Criterion & Eclipse Cover Art & Packaging Babble-on Vol.3

News on Criterion and Janus Films
Locked
Message
Author
User avatar
jbeall
Joined: Sat Aug 12, 2006 1:22 pm
Location: Atlanta-ish

#476 Post by jbeall »

J M Powell wrote:The accent's on the wrong "e" in "Misérables"! Here's hoping somebody catches that goof . . .
Report a problem directly to criterion.

I did this awhile back when I noticed they'd misspelled 'Michael Powell' as 'Micheal Powell' on the cover art of A Canterbury Tale, back when it was still a forthcoming release. They fixed it a day or two later.
User avatar
arsonfilms
Joined: Wed Nov 02, 2005 4:53 pm
Location: Philadelphia, PA

#477 Post by arsonfilms »

I just finally got my copy of the Louis Malle docs, and was a little surprised to see the standard sized double keep case used for Phantom India. Don't get me wrong, I'm glad they went that way and I don't know how else it would have been packaged, but it makes me wonder how Raymond Bernard is going to work. A double keep case and four thinpaks are one thing, but a double keep case and ONE thinpak might be awkward, especially in that sleeve. Maybe we'll see something similar to Yojimbo/Sanjuro and I Am Curious?
User avatar
godardslave
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 8:44 pm
Location: Confusing and open ended = high art.

#478 Post by godardslave »

so they still are keeping the ridiculous sleeve for eclipse?
Maybe by late Ozu it might be changed, one would hope!
User avatar
arsonfilms
Joined: Wed Nov 02, 2005 4:53 pm
Location: Philadelphia, PA

#479 Post by arsonfilms »

godardslave wrote:so they still are keeping the ridiculous sleeve for eclipse?
Maybe by late Ozu it might be changed, one would hope!
Ozu will likely (and sadly) wind up the same as what we've seen so far, but I have a hard time believing they'd stay consistent with a 3 disc release, which might hopefully open up the possibility of experimenting with different packaging concepts in their 5 and 6 disc releases.

But thats really just speculation on my part.
User avatar
justeleblanc
Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 10:05 pm
Location: Connecticut

#480 Post by justeleblanc »

I'd be curious how many people would be willing to pay 10 dollars more for a more stable Eclipse packaging. How hard would it be to set up another poll on this forum.
User avatar
Matt
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 4:58 pm

#481 Post by Matt »

justeleblanc wrote:I'd be curious how many people would be willing to pay 10 dollars more for a more stable Eclipse packaging. How hard would it be to set up another poll on this forum.
For this? Extremely difficult, I'm afraid.
ranaing83
Joined: Fri Nov 10, 2006 3:40 pm
Location: http://directcinema.blogspot.com
Contact:

#482 Post by ranaing83 »

10 bucks is a lot for a simply cardboard case, but i'd be willing to shell out a buck or two more.
User avatar
justeleblanc
Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 10:05 pm
Location: Connecticut

#483 Post by justeleblanc »

This was something sent to me today that I figured most here would appreciate, at least in terms of the new packaging designs.
User avatar
godardslave
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 8:44 pm
Location: Confusing and open ended = high art.

#484 Post by godardslave »

justeleblanc wrote:I'd be curious how many people would be willing to pay 10 dollars more for a more stable Eclipse packaging. How hard would it be to set up another poll on this forum.
I would pay $5.00 more.
User avatar
fdm
Joined: Fri Apr 21, 2006 5:25 pm

#485 Post by fdm »

godardslave wrote:
justeleblanc wrote:I'd be curious how many people would be willing to pay 10 dollars more for a more stable Eclipse packaging. How hard would it be to set up another poll on this forum.
I would pay $5.00 more.
I'd be willing to pay $5 more if they'd stop using the flimsy cardboard on their regular box sets (Rohmer, Robeson etc) and go with sturdier boxes (e.g., Almodovar from Sony, Bond boxes off the top of my head)... I'd just as soon not pay it for the Eclipses; kinda like the low-rent-ness of them. My vote fwiw.
Bajaja
Joined: Wed Aug 09, 2006 6:39 pm
Location: Baltimore, MD

#486 Post by Bajaja »

Oops! Weren't the flimsy Eclipse box covers meant to be DISPOSABLE?
User avatar
Matt
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 4:58 pm

#487 Post by Matt »

Bajaja wrote:Oops! Weren't the flimsy Eclipse box covers meant to be DISPOSABLE?
I should think so, but you know we're all packaging tarts here.
User avatar
toiletduck!
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 9:43 pm
Location: The 'Go
Contact:

#488 Post by toiletduck! »

Packaging strumpet, if you please.

-Toilet Dcuk
User avatar
thethirdman
Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 8:26 pm

#489 Post by thethirdman »

Image
Dante Vescio
Joined: Thu Feb 22, 2007 3:51 pm

#490 Post by Dante Vescio »

Looking good. Does the movie "If....", coming in June, already have some photos of the packaging from the inside?
User avatar
TheGodfather
Joined: Sun Sep 17, 2006 8:39 pm
Location: The Netherlands

#491 Post by TheGodfather »

That packaging for The Third Man looks really good. Bring it on!
Andreas
Joined: Tue Nov 28, 2006 1:11 pm

#492 Post by Andreas »

was is it in here people used to post their home made cc covers? I can't find any of them...
User avatar
hammock
Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 5:52 pm
Location: www.criteriondungeon.com
Contact:

#493 Post by hammock »

Andreas wrote:was is it in here people used to post their home made cc covers?
I can't find any of them...
That would be here! They also have a large section at the .com forum.
User avatar
Derek Estes
Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 12:00 am
Location: Portland Oregon

#494 Post by Derek Estes »

Has the font on IF.... always been green? I thought it was white with the orange dot. I couldn't find an older picture. Maybe I just wasn't paying attention.
User avatar
domino harvey
Dot Com Dom
Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 6:42 pm

#495 Post by domino harvey »

No, it used to be white... ugh, at the risk of breaking the forum decorum, I must proclaim barf-o-rama on that new color choice
User avatar
souvenir
Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 4:20 pm

#496 Post by souvenir »

Here's the original version and the new one:

ImageImage

Maybe it's a digipak and both covers will be used somehow? I noticed the year has been changed also. The new one has 1969, even though the Criterion page still lists 1968.
Last edited by souvenir on Wed May 09, 2007 4:44 am, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Mr Pixies
Joined: Sun Nov 07, 2004 2:03 am
Location: Fla

#497 Post by Mr Pixies »

Hopefully, the white is great, the green is yucky.
Narshty
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 6:27 pm
Location: London, UK

#498 Post by Narshty »

Packaging for the UK "If...."

That totally rinses the Criterion packaging, especially since it appears to be coming with all the same extras plus a trivia subtitle track. I don't know if the UK version will actually come with a load of postcards and a copy of the script (which it seems to, judging from the picture), but if it does it'll be no contest.
User avatar
thechallenger
Joined: Mon Apr 23, 2007 4:56 pm
Location: New York

#499 Post by thechallenger »

Wow. You're right. It seems like the ultimate package (assuming it includes everything shown). I wonder how it will measure-up against Criterion's image-wise.
iceberg58
Joined: Fri Feb 16, 2007 5:04 am
Location: Virginia Beach

#500 Post by iceberg58 »

O __ Man! if.... only it was not split pea soup green.
Locked