Of course I do, I have it. But wouldn't Modine want to hawk said book during his commentary? It's not as if it was a huge bestseller.kinjitsu wrote:Didn't you know, he wrote a book.tavernier wrote:Where the hell is Modine?
Stanley Kubrick Collection
- denti alligator
- Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 1:36 am
- Location: "born in heaven, raised in hell"
- Jeff
- Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 1:49 am
- Location: Denver, CO
Bringing Up Baby and Rio Bravo both have The Men Who Made the Movies: Howard Hawks on their second discs. It allows Warner to pad out what might otherwise be a skimpy second disc and raise the MSRP by seven bucks.THX1378 wrote:So were getting O Lucky Malcolm! as an extra on both the Clockwork disc and O Lucky Man? That just doesn't seem like Warners to have the same extra on two different releases. Must be a typo.
-
patrick
- Joined: Sun Mar 11, 2007 4:15 pm
- Location: Philadelphia
Pretty lame that they're duplicating a feature-length documentary on both, although I guess it does let people avoid double dipping on A Clockwork Orange if they're absolutely repulsed by buying two copies of a movie.
Generally most extra features on HD formats are in SD, but occasionally you'll get thrown some HD extra features on high-profile releases.General HD basic question here. Are the special features in HD too on BR or HD-DVD? Someone told it is not the case, is it true?
- Jeff
- Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 1:49 am
- Location: Denver, CO
Although it is kind of silly to have that doc on both sets, the Clockwork set can more than justify its second disc without it. The Channel 4 doc is 55 minutes long and the "Great Bolshy Yarblockos" featurette is 28 minutes. The McDowell profile is really just icing on the cake. Throw in that commentary track, and the Clockwork upgrade is really a no-brainer.patrick wrote:Pretty lame that they're duplicating a feature-length documentary on both, although I guess it does let people avoid double dipping on A Clockwork Orange if they're absolutely repulsed by buying two copies of a movie.
- tryavna
- Joined: Wed Mar 30, 2005 8:38 pm
- Location: North Carolina
Am I the only one who's actually more excited to learn that Warner is launching a whole new series than about the extras on this one? This opens a range of possibilities and opportunities for Warner to get to some more of their back catalogue. Who knows? Maybe this will be the excuse to finally get to some of their languishing silents (via a Vidor or Seastrom set).jaredsap wrote:Warner Home Video will launch the first in their new series featuring influential films from some of history's greatest directors. Warner Home Video Director's Series: Stanley Kubrick
-
jaredsap
- Joined: Tue Jun 05, 2007 5:24 am
- Location: Los Angeles
That was my favorite part of the press release too.tryavna wrote:Am I the only one who's actually more excited to learn that Warner is launching a whole new series than about the extras on this one? This opens a range of possibilities and opportunities for Warner to get to some more of their back catalogue. Who knows? Maybe this will be the excuse to finally get to some of their languishing silents (via a Vidor or Seastrom set).
- justeleblanc
- Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 10:05 pm
- Location: Connecticut
This isn't new, is it? They already released two Ford boxes, a Scorsese, and a Hitchcock, right?jaredsap wrote:That was my favorite part of the press release too.tryavna wrote:Am I the only one who's actually more excited to learn that Warner is launching a whole new series than about the extras on this one?
- tryavna
- Joined: Wed Mar 30, 2005 8:38 pm
- Location: North Carolina
Yes, but they've been surreptitiously entered under Warner's "Signature" line because they're big enough names to carry a boxset on their own. (And of course one of the Ford boxes was also simultaneously a John Wayne box.) This press release makes it sound like Warner will be inaugurating a whole series devoted to directors. Perhaps they'll be devoting boxsets to directors who might not be as familiar to the average filmgoer -- i.e., there may be a sort of "educational" aspect to this new series.justeleblanc wrote:This isn't new, is it? They already released two Ford boxes, a Scorsese, and a Hitchcock, right?jaredsap wrote:That was my favorite part of the press release too.tryavna wrote:Am I the only one who's actually more excited to learn that Warner is launching a whole new series than about the extras on this one?
-
Narshty
- Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 6:27 pm
- Location: London, UK
I know I've seen an interview where Christiane dismisses Baxter's book as by far the most inaccurate and ludicrous of all the Kubrick biographies, so his inclusion here is indeed very strange.Jeff wrote:I'm sure Jan Harlan and Christiane Kubrick approved of Baxter since Harlan is producing these DVDs, but I'm surprised they would do so if Baxter's book is inaccurate or unflattering.Highway 61 wrote:Sucks to see hack biographer Baxter on the commentary. Was LoBrutto not available?
I've seen the Clockwork Orange (I'm sure this is on YouTube) and the Eyes Wide Shut Channel 4 documentaries and they're not especially good - they're not exactly making-of's, just long-winded appreciations. Maybe the 2001 one will be worthwhile though.
- jedgeco
- Joined: Tue Nov 23, 2004 3:28 pm
The Digital Bits is reporting that the HD versions of Blade Runner will have standard def extras. If Blade Runner (which seems to be WB's marque title for the year) isn't getting HD supplements, that would seem to lower the odds that the Kubricks will.patrick wrote:Generally most extra features on HD formats are in SD, but occasionally you'll get thrown some HD extra features on high-profile releases.General HD basic question here. Are the special features in HD too on BR or HD-DVD? Someone told it is not the case, is it true?
- jorencain
- Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 5:45 am
Baxter's Woody Allen biography is awful as well; mostly comprised of gossip and devoid of any intelligent discussion of his work.Narshty wrote:I know I've seen an interview where Christiane dismisses Baxter's book as by far the most inaccurate and ludicrous of all the Kubrick biographies, so his inclusion here is indeed very strange.
- Person
- Joined: Sat May 19, 2007 7:00 pm
Excellent extras. Bravo, Warners.
The 2001 doc is hosted by James Cameron and is a bit silly in places. Camille Paglia is interviewed and yes, you guessed it - she talks about sexual symbolism and uses the word 'penis'. Fuck off, woman! But I am glad that the original 1968 behind-the-scenes piece, Making the Future is included. I submitted that doc to the IMDb as simply, Making 2001, as I was sure that was what it was called! Shit! That Keir Dullea and Gary Lockwood will be very boring, though hopefully, I am totally wrong. I would have prefered a commentary by a scholar.
It's a pity that, Stanley Kubrick: The Invisible Man was not included, as it is very good. Thankfully, I have a DVD-R of it.
The 2001 doc is hosted by James Cameron and is a bit silly in places. Camille Paglia is interviewed and yes, you guessed it - she talks about sexual symbolism and uses the word 'penis'. Fuck off, woman! But I am glad that the original 1968 behind-the-scenes piece, Making the Future is included. I submitted that doc to the IMDb as simply, Making 2001, as I was sure that was what it was called! Shit! That Keir Dullea and Gary Lockwood will be very boring, though hopefully, I am totally wrong. I would have prefered a commentary by a scholar.
It's a pity that, Stanley Kubrick: The Invisible Man was not included, as it is very good. Thankfully, I have a DVD-R of it.
-
hot_locket
- Joined: Mon Jul 30, 2007 11:39 am
- kinjitsu
- Joined: Sat Feb 12, 2005 5:39 pm
- Location: Uffa!
- Luke M
- Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 1:21 am
Interesting, but I disagree with him about it being made. I mean didn't this guy see how A.I. turned out?kinjitsu wrote:Stanley Kubrick's Napoleon - His Greatest Film Never Made...
- Cold Bishop
- Joined: Wed May 31, 2006 1:45 am
- Location: Portland, OR
Ahem... Easily Spielberg's best. The only problem with a Napoleon adaption would be finding a director who's talented enough to bring to life Kubrick's vision, while not totally making a Kubrick imitation or betraying one's own personal vision (which I feel AI succeeds at).Luke M wrote:Interesting, but I disagree with him about it being made. I mean didn't this guy see how A.I. turned out?
But a subject not for the DVD thread.
- Grand Wazoo
- Joined: Thu Jun 21, 2007 6:23 pm
- justeleblanc
- Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 10:05 pm
- Location: Connecticut