540 The Darjeeling Limited

Discuss releases by Criterion and the films on them. Threads may contain spoilers!
Post Reply
Message
Author
User avatar
kinjitsu
Joined: Sat Feb 12, 2005 5:39 pm
Location: Uffa!

#276 Post by kinjitsu »

Louise Brooks would have been inclined to disagree with you.
User avatar
Antoine Doinel
Joined: Sat Mar 04, 2006 5:22 pm
Location: Montreal, Quebec
Contact:

#277 Post by Antoine Doinel »

So would Woody Allen.
User avatar
Steven H
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 7:30 pm
Location: NC

#278 Post by Steven H »

bearcuborg wrote:I haven't seen the film, nor am I fan of Anderson but applaud Domino for this post. Barmys review was quite clever but I never got the feeling he was passing himself off as cool. Perhaps if Slave questioned Barmy on his review instead of being threatend there could have been a meaningful discussion.
Actually, in spite of what some people might say (and I'm sincerely sure he/she has their heart in the right place) these kinds of comments do *not* lead to meaningful discussion. Its a dead end. Why is it racist? What makes it more twee/fey/nostalghic than, say, Garrel's Regular Lovers? I'm no Truffaut fan (I only like his Roche adaptations, maybe more for the source material) but his little Truffaut references just make me smile like its a joke, not some godawful crime against humanity wos wrong wit dat?, etc.

Then again, the film's not even out yet. I bet it will immediately become everyone's favorite movie, and they might even name a child after it. From what I'm hearing it could be one of his best. (and for what its worth a friend told me he thought Portman reminded him of Seberg in Breathlesss.)
User avatar
Polybius
Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 2:57 am
Location: Rollin' down Highway 41

#279 Post by Polybius »

Antoine Doinel wrote:So would Woody Allen.
"There you go, knockin' my hobbies again..." - Mickey Sachs
David Ehrenstein
Joined: Wed Oct 12, 2005 12:30 am

#280 Post by David Ehrenstein »

What makes it more twee/fey/nostalghic than, say, Garrel's Regular Lovers?
Regular Lovers is an overwhelmingly serious film about May 68 and its immediate aftermath by Someone Who Was Fucking THERE!!!!!

The Darjeeling Limited is a film about luggage.

Obsessive Compulsive Disorder does not constitute mise en scene.
User avatar
Barmy
Joined: Mon May 16, 2005 7:59 pm

#281 Post by Barmy »

But isn't all the luggage a clever metaphor for "baggage"?
David Ehrenstein
Joined: Wed Oct 12, 2005 12:30 am

#282 Post by David Ehrenstein »

No.
User avatar
Barmy
Joined: Mon May 16, 2005 7:59 pm

#283 Post by Barmy »

Can we let the following opinion piece posted on imdb be the last word?
I don't like Wes because his movies are very depressing. I only watch them because Anjelica is in them, but when I'm done watching the movie I feel so drained. Like....I've lost some brain cells LOL! He is a good director, but horrible as well. Great mind, but gaaah too depressing for films. I only own Life Aquatic, but not Royal Ten. my mom won't let me have it haha and I don't want it! Although I don't understand why Anjelica likes Wes Anderson....she confuses me a lot.....Also a love crush on Bill Murray? How funny is that XD

one who knows Anjelica is seeing the light to God
User avatar
tavernier
Joined: Sat Apr 02, 2005 11:18 pm

#284 Post by tavernier »

Amen.
David Ehrenstein
Joined: Wed Oct 12, 2005 12:30 am

#285 Post by David Ehrenstein »

Sounds like a stalker to me.
User avatar
Donald Brown
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 7:21 pm
Location: a long the riverrun

#286 Post by Donald Brown »

I bet Anjeclica reminds him of his mother, the mother who won't allow him to own a copy of Royal Ten. (WTF? Maybe she's disturbed at the thought of him rubbing one out to images of her likeness. No oedipus complex porn for you, sonny.)
User avatar
Jeff
Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 1:49 am
Location: Denver, CO

#287 Post by Jeff »

Philippe Garrel discussion moved here.
User avatar
The Elegant Dandy Fop
Joined: Thu Dec 09, 2004 7:25 am
Location: Los Angeles, CA

#288 Post by The Elegant Dandy Fop »

Wes Anderson will be having a discussion on Wednesday at the American Cinematheque theatre, Aero, in Santa Monica.

I would love to go, but it's sold out. Anyone going? Anyone going to harass him with "Is Darjeeling going to be Criterion?"
User avatar
Barmy
Joined: Mon May 16, 2005 7:59 pm

#289 Post by Barmy »

Will Anjelica be there?
User avatar
Jeff
Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 1:49 am
Location: Denver, CO

#290 Post by Jeff »

The Elegant Dandy Fop wrote:Anyone going to harass him with "Is Darjeeling going to be Criterion?"
I would imagine that the sub-Zissou reception the film is receiving would have squelched any enthusiasm the Criterion brass may have had in regards to acquiring it.
User avatar
souvenir
Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 4:20 pm

#291 Post by souvenir »

Jeff wrote:
The Elegant Dandy Fop wrote:Anyone going to harass him with "Is Darjeeling going to be Criterion?"
I would imagine that the sub-Zissou reception the film is receiving would have squelched any enthusiasm the Criterion brass may have had in regards to acquiring it.
Are you being serious Jeff? Almost every review I've read prefers it to Zissou. It did outstanding box office this weekend, making $140,000 total at 2 theaters in 2 days, and is frequently being called "a return to form." In the podcast interview with Susan Arosteguy I posted in the Two-Lane Blacktop thread, she cautiously says she doesn't know whether Criterion will release it, but she also mentions how Anderson has made sure to have the studio(s) let Criterion put out his DVDs. Readers of the recent New York magazine article posted above might have noticed how Anderson obviously does things his own way and is adept at talking studios into accommodating him (like editing Darjeeling at a specific Manhattan hotel with the bill footed by Fox).

Contrary to the gospel in this thread, I thought the film was outstanding and I want to see Eric Anderson do the DVD cover art, hopefully for a Criterion release.
User avatar
Jeff
Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 1:49 am
Location: Denver, CO

#292 Post by Jeff »

souvenir wrote:Are you being serious Jeff? Almost every review I've read prefers it to Zissou.
I guess the negative reviews are standing out to me more than the positive ones, but that could very well just be my pessimistic nature. I won't get a chance to see it for another week or so. As a certified Anderson fanboy and accused Zissou apologist, I hope it's wonderful. I know that it had a record-breaking weekend in it's very limited release, so at least people are going to see it. The early reception struck me as tepid-at-best, with cries of "twee!" coming from all quarters (especially here). I'm still quite anxious to see it, hope to love it, and would certainly be pleased to see Criterion release it. Perhaps the critical vibe I'm getting is completely off base or will turn around, and Criterion will enthusiastically pursue it.
User avatar
chaddoli
Joined: Fri Nov 05, 2004 3:41 am
Location: New York City
Contact:

#293 Post by chaddoli »

I feel Anderson followed up his best film with his worst one. I didn't hate it, but it was for the most part unfunny and unmoving and, though only 90 minutes, too long. It felt somewhat lazy. Anderson, after the wild experimentation of The Life Aquatic - a bold furthering of previous themes and styles - is here playing it safe.
Spoiler
The dramatic scene in this film was interesting to me, though - the boy's accident. It was entirely contrived, not plot or character motivated, but once it got going, Anderson's talent as a filmmaker and the actors' talents showed through. A lot of very powerful moments, including my favorite line in the film: "I didn't save mine."
I don't think I'll be buying the Criterion.
User avatar
Barmy
Joined: Mon May 16, 2005 7:59 pm

#294 Post by Barmy »

You didn't seem to notice that "I didn't save mine" is one of the most narcissistic and racist lines in cinema history. But entirely in keeping with Anderson's overall approach.
User avatar
chaddoli
Joined: Fri Nov 05, 2004 3:41 am
Location: New York City
Contact:

#295 Post by chaddoli »

Barmy wrote:You didn't seem to notice that "I didn't save mine" is one of the most narcissistic and racist lines in cinema history. But entirely in keeping with Anderson's overall approach.
Yeah, I guess I didn't. Thank you.
User avatar
toiletduck!
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 9:43 pm
Location: The 'Go
Contact:

#296 Post by toiletduck! »

Barmy, that's the sort of uber-sensitive culture-killing PC reading between lines that aren't there that I expected least of all from you.

-Toilet Dcuk
User avatar
domino harvey
Dot Com Dom
Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 6:42 pm

#297 Post by domino harvey »

User avatar
kaujot
Joined: Mon May 08, 2006 10:28 pm
Location: Austin
Contact:

#298 Post by kaujot »

I guess I have to hate it.
User avatar
The Elegant Dandy Fop
Joined: Thu Dec 09, 2004 7:25 am
Location: Los Angeles, CA

#299 Post by The Elegant Dandy Fop »

Saw this yesterday. Can't see why people keep calling it a comedy. It's too serious to be funny. Or course there are chuckles here and there, but nothing like Caddyshack or The Jerk. Those are comedies. This is very different.

Critics are having a field day with it saying Anderson hasn't matured, but you really feel by the characters and the story that he doesn't want to, and we should thank him for that. In a time where directors are too focused on telling stories about bullshit or making comedies with people I don't care about, this comes along with it's great cast of characters.

Zissou is a funnier, but then again, it's a sillier movie. He really has grown up when you think about it, but it's things from when he was younger that makes him happy. Or so it seems.

The slight open ended-ness of the film added a lot as well. They go to India trying to find home in the form of their mother, but then at the end, they realize they had themselves and people waiting for them outside of India.

I was so worried this movie was goin to be awful after seeing Hotel Chevalier, which was, honestly, a lot of nothing, but it ceases to be nothing when it's watched with the film. Damn shame it isn't, it doesn't work on it's own.

On a final note, anyone catch the cameo by Barbet Schroeder? I doubt the people in the theatre knew who he was, but it got me excited.
mikebowes
Joined: Fri Nov 19, 2004 9:19 pm
Location: Cambridge, MA

#300 Post by mikebowes »

Wes Anderson and Jason Schwartzman are going to be at the Brattle Theatre in Cambridge, MA (www.brattlefilm.org) for a special screening on Thursday at 7:00pm. Not sure if they're doing a national tour with it right now or not, but I'll certainly check this out!
Post Reply