Eclipse Discussion and Random Speculation

News on Criterion and Janus Films
Post Reply
Message
Author
User avatar
HerrSchreck
Joined: Sun Sep 04, 2005 3:46 pm

#501 Post by HerrSchreck »

I'll let the liner notes from the Bernard box speak for itself, and for what I and the few other genuine fans of Bernard have known for years:
It's hard to think of an artist who better exemplifies the ebb and flow of film history better than R. Bernard. Once a director equally admired by critics, fellow artists, audiences, and studio heads, Bernard is now, even among film scholars, and French cinema junkies, nearly forgotten.
His work should have always been considered "standard studio classic" in reportoire, but it absolutely has not. The postwar French public was not even able to properly see LES MIS until beyond the late 70's, when the director, frail and nearly sightless, got his chance to replace all that excised footage before he died (I'd make that my mission too if I made that film and was near the grave).

Standard studio classic means just that-- an unquestioned classic that gets hauled out each year in all markets because of its global fanbase and it's reliability in generating revenue on the circuit. That doesn't mean "made by a studio, prints do get struck, screenings do get held, even if only after a restoration or a new print struck,". (almost every title that's played in arthouse qualifies in that category.

As mentioned, standard studio classics would be, say, the films in the JANUS AT 50 box if on the eclectic route, or AMC/TCM golden oldies from WB/MGM.
ByMarkClark.com
Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2005 7:59 pm
Location: Columbus, OH
Contact:

#502 Post by ByMarkClark.com »

souvenir wrote:These were the four specifically cited for the Kurosawa set:

Scandal
Idiot
Records of a Living Being
No Regrets for Our Youth
Cited by who? Not that I doubt it, but I find it puzzling. An EARLY KUROSAWA set would seem to make much more sense, and would make a far more coherent viewing experience. What would they even call this set? KUROSAWA GRAB BAG?

Don't get me wrong -- I'd buy it. RECORD OF A LIVING BEING is my most-wanted Kurosawa disc. But both it and NO REGRETS deserve the full Criterion SE treatment (barring issues with source materials). To say nothing of the annoying MoC overlap factor.

Still, I'm willing to bet we see an Eclipse Kurosawa set of some type in 2008, along with a Criterion TIGER'S TAIL and a remastered HIGH AND LOW.
User avatar
souvenir
Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 4:20 pm

#503 Post by souvenir »

ByMarkClark.com wrote:Cited by who?
On the .com board, by the person who seems to have an inside source.
User avatar
justeleblanc
Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 10:05 pm
Location: Connecticut

#504 Post by justeleblanc »

ByMarkClark.com wrote:What would they even call this set? KUROSAWA GRAB BAG?
I think it's pretty clear the set will be called KUROSAWA: SWORDS, SUICIDES, CUDDLY WOMEN
User avatar
domino harvey
Dot Com Dom
Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 6:42 pm

#505 Post by domino harvey »

Eclipse Series 7: U Guys Luv Kurosawa Rite
User avatar
Cinephrenic
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 6:58 pm
Location: Paris, Texas

#506 Post by Cinephrenic »

These were the four specifically cited for the Kurosawa set:

Scandal
Idiot
Records of a Living Being
No Regrets for Our Youth
Doesn't make sense. I don't even think Criterion has the rights to Idiot . I mean, as pointed out, wouldn't "Early Kurosawa" make sense and release these films out from their catalog:

The Quiet Duel
One Wonderful Sunday
No Regrets for My Youth
Most Beautiful
Scandal

Maybe even Those Who Make Tomorrow
Andreas
Joined: Tue Nov 28, 2006 1:11 pm

#507 Post by Andreas »

before they started to discuss the OJ Simpson case, .com's source was giving some hints about Kurosawa's post-war films...
User avatar
Ashirg
Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 1:10 pm
Location: Atlanta

#508 Post by Ashirg »

I don't think The Quiet Duel is in their catalog.
User avatar
barnyard078
Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 9:37 pm

#509 Post by barnyard078 »

The Quiet Duel has already received a R1 release a couple of months ago. Ronin Entertainment, a subdivision of BCI Eclipse (no relation), released it. Above average release, surprisingly.

My ideal Early Kurosawa set would be:

1. Sanshiro Sugata 1 & 2
2. The Most Beautiful
3. One Wonderful Sunday
4. No Regrets For Our Youth

That would include all pre-Mifune Kurosawa films, except for Tiger's Tail, obviously.
ByMarkClark.com
Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2005 7:59 pm
Location: Columbus, OH
Contact:

#510 Post by ByMarkClark.com »

barnyard078 wrote:My ideal Early Kurosawa set would be:

1. Sanshiro Sugata 1 & 2
2. The Most Beautiful
3. One Wonderful Sunday
4. No Regrets For Our Youth
I'd really like to see UMA included, if source materials can be found.

NO REGRETS would be the gem of the set if included. But, as I posted before, it deserves the full SE treatment. So does SANSHIRO SUGATA, but presumably it would be "Eclipsed" due to source material limitations. The same fate may befall NO REGRETS.
User avatar
tryavna
Joined: Wed Mar 30, 2005 8:38 pm
Location: North Carolina

#511 Post by tryavna »

barnyard078 wrote:The Quiet Duel has already received a R1 release a couple of months ago. Ronin Entertainment, a subdivision of BCI Eclipse (no relation), released it. Above average release, surprisingly.
Ronin is actually a branch of Adness, which merely distributes through BCI. That probably explains why it's a decent release. Adness do good work, though their total number of releases is quite small.
User avatar
kinjitsu
Joined: Sat Feb 12, 2005 5:39 pm
Location: Uffa!

#512 Post by kinjitsu »

User avatar
HerrSchreck
Joined: Sun Sep 04, 2005 3:46 pm

#513 Post by HerrSchreck »

Anybody know what's happening with E? No new announced titles since mid JULY?

They re-evaluating the biz model or something? Did the series fail to generate the revenue expected?

Hey David, Steven, and Andy-- imagine they closed up shop on Eclipse before releasing the half-ass-announced Gremillion? That would sure pop a lotta dingleberries around here.
User avatar
Steven H
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 7:30 pm
Location: NC

#514 Post by Steven H »

Maybe they put Bernard ahead of Gremillon, thinking they filled their quota for relatively obscure early french films this year (I still can't imagine La petite Lise being included, that one will take an MoC or Kino). Their much debated mission statement with its "once a month" declaration of releases is definitely getting thrown out the window. Even if they do close up shop its been a good year, but yeah, dingleberries popped and torn if its over.

edit: also, schreck, aren't you a fan of Kobayashi's Black River (I think I remember this). I posted some screencaps of the new French DVD of this, it looks gorgeous, and again I call for an "Early Kobayashi" Eclipse set.
User avatar
Tommaso
Joined: Fri May 19, 2006 2:09 pm

#515 Post by Tommaso »

HerrSchreck wrote:They re-evaluating the biz model or something? Did the series fail to generate the revenue expected?
This is precisely what I fear, too. In a way, it would be understandable. Excepting the Bergman and the Ozu sets for sheer size and diversity, each of the Eclipse releases would surely have been bought as full-blown CCs by those (few) who bought them. If something is as 'obscure' as Bernard, you won't be able to generate interest just via the cheapo price, perhaps even on the contrary: imagine the Bernard with audio commentaries, a background docu on French film in the early 30s, interviews, the whole usual stuff: this might titillate those who still hesitate. And practically everything released under the Eclipse moniker would have been a jewel in the CC output this year. "Monsters and Madmen" is probably the only one that would have fitted Eclipse better than the main Collection.

So instead of putting Saura in the Eclipse line, they better really continue with box sets of early films by well-known directors: Kurosawa, Kobayashi, early or late Powell(with or without Pressburger) for instance. I dream of an Eclipse set containing "Honeymoon", "They're a weird mob", "Age of Consent", "Duke Bluebeard's Castle" and "The boy who turned yellow" , and another one containing the missing P&P films.
User avatar
What A Disgrace
Joined: Mon Nov 08, 2004 2:34 am
Contact:

#516 Post by What A Disgrace »

HerrSchreck wrote:Anybody know what's happening with E? No new announced titles since mid JULY?
I don't think there's anything to worry about...anyone who expected Criterion to continuously unload 2-6 extra feature films every month with this line was fooling themselves, and the lack of new announcements for November and December doesn't seem unusual... November has a *huge* selection as it is, and December is historically a lesser month for releases. I could be wrong, though...others seem more educated on the matters of business than I am. But the lack of new releases after the Saura box isn't any cause for alarm; its just two months so far.
User avatar
Awesome Welles
Joined: Fri Apr 27, 2007 10:02 am
Location: London

#517 Post by Awesome Welles »

I think it would be a little early to presume that Criterion are having difficulty with the Eclipse line. After all the sets haven't been out a year yet, I'm sure they're banking on people purchasing the sets as time goes by rather than going on first week/month sales. I think Criterion's product is surely a slow burner rather than a fast seller, isn't it? We're not talking Pirates of the Caribbean here are we? I only hope that the Eclipse line is something that Criterion will continue with. And hopefully we will see some of the rumoured (Mizoguchi, Naruse, Imamura etc.) and some of the wished (Kobayashi, Gremillon, P&P etc.) soon.
ByMarkClark.com
Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2005 7:59 pm
Location: Columbus, OH
Contact:

#518 Post by ByMarkClark.com »

I'd be surprised if the CC was re-evaluating Eclipse. The new imprint has been enthusiastically embraced by fans and critics. I would be shocked to learn the Bergman, Ozu and Fuller sets DIDN'T sell well.

I suspect that they may have simply underestimated the logistical impact of putting out a boxed set every month. Either that, or they ARE reconsidering the financial implications of doing 12 releases per year. Maybe we will actually see more like 6 or 8, so Eclipse doesn't wind up competing with itself.
User avatar
arsonfilms
Joined: Wed Nov 02, 2005 4:53 pm
Location: Philadelphia, PA

#519 Post by arsonfilms »

December is traditionally a light month for everyone. Not too many people are buying anything for themselves in the holiday season, and few put anything on their holiday wishlists that isn't availble by November. The UK division of my old company would skip December releases altogether, and US releases were minimal. Even Criterion is only putting out one new release that month.

I would suspect that there was something in the works for November and they missed their deadline. Then when the time came for December announcements, it made more sense to hold onto whatever was in the works than to dump it in December. Although I'm sure the Eclipse line is a success, I can't imagine it's doing so well that they can afford to take chances on unpopular release dates.
User avatar
kinjitsu
Joined: Sat Feb 12, 2005 5:39 pm
Location: Uffa!

#520 Post by kinjitsu »

Kim Hendrickson wrote:There won't be another Eclipse release until January 2008. We'll be announcing the content soon.
User avatar
justeleblanc
Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 10:05 pm
Location: Connecticut

#521 Post by justeleblanc »

I hope it's the Lubitsch!
User avatar
HerrSchreck
Joined: Sun Sep 04, 2005 3:46 pm

#522 Post by HerrSchreck »

So I wonder what this means as far as the monthly release schedule, prev announced. Maybe dipping their toes in that rougher, far less glossy Kino/Moc/Arte/Milestone zone of films means that something is going to have to give... either the tempo of the release schedule, or the quality of the packaging & meticulous encoding, if they're going to see profit on the line.

Yes, waiting for a subbed version of BLACK RIVER, Steve, definitely!

And to whoever said it, the Gremillion release was already mentioned/confirmed by CC for Eclipse when the line itself was confirmed/announced about a year ago... it's not a "wished" release based only on personal taste and a prayer. It's one of the very few nonreleased Eclipses I can think of as already officially confirmed.
User avatar
Awesome Welles
Joined: Fri Apr 27, 2007 10:02 am
Location: London

#523 Post by Awesome Welles »

Postwar Kurosawa announced

I Live in Fear
The Idiot
No Regrets For Our Youth
One Wonderful Sunday
Scandal


A possible triple double dip for Kurosawa fans (me included). I wonder what sort of state the films will be in (Youth and Sunday that is)?. I feel underwhelmed.
User avatar
HerrSchreck
Joined: Sun Sep 04, 2005 3:46 pm

#524 Post by HerrSchreck »

Normally would be in the "why dont they release what I want" dept, but I feel free to say owing to the general mood: I'm a bit underwhelmed by the line in general. Hopefully it will pick up, but this huge pause in the line and the generally midline interest of the material (who has been really pulling their hair out screaming for years for the Malle docs, the Saura melodramas, the midline Ozu's-- which I'd probably rank #2 after the Bernard?) has made it a generally tepid intro to the whole idea.. whereas I expected month after month of hardcore bernard-type shit.
User avatar
jbeall
Joined: Sat Aug 12, 2006 1:22 pm
Location: Atlanta-ish

#525 Post by jbeall »

Perhaps Criterion is catering to the completists among us. If you really, really really REALLY want every Ozu, Malle, Bergman, and Kurosawa title, then Eclipse is for you. Personally, I don't even want all of their films that have been put out on the Criterion line--Louis Malle, for example, is not such a great director that I have any desire to own more than a handful of his films. This isn't to knock any of these directors (sorry, Louis!). However, like Schreck (I think), I see the real potential of Eclipse as being the unknown/unreleased masterpieces that Criterion wants to make available in the first place, albeit not restored to CC's high standards and fitted out with beaucoup extras.
Post Reply