Bela Tarr in R1

Discuss North American DVDs, Blu-rays, UHDs, and related topics
Message
Author
User avatar
godardslave
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 8:44 pm
Location: Confusing and open ended = high art.

#51 Post by godardslave »

$80 RRP for 1 film, that must be a record.
and the cover sucks.
User avatar
John Cope
Joined: Thu Dec 15, 2005 9:40 pm
Location: where the simulacrum is true

#52 Post by John Cope »

I like the cover.

:o

$80 is perverse though. For that it should include a Jonathan Rosenbaum commentary, some Mihaly Vig music videos and a bonus Easter Egg of Tarr's version of The Aristocrats. We know he can be funny.
User avatar
Lemmy Caution
Joined: Wed Mar 29, 2006 7:26 am
Location: East of Shanghai

#53 Post by Lemmy Caution »

godardslave wrote:$80 RRP for 1 film, that must be a record.
and the cover sucks.
I like it too. And certainly a better cover than the Clavis edition.
User avatar
mbalson
Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 3:26 am
Location: Toronto,Canada
Contact:

#54 Post by mbalson »

I certainly hope no one is going to be buying the Facets Sátántangó.
It's will almost certainly be inferior to the Artificial Eye edition and it costs way more.
marty

#55 Post by marty »

mbalson wrote:I certainly hope no one is going to be buying the Facets Sátántangó.

It's will almost certainly be inferior to the Artificial Eye edition and it costs way more.
I agree. I have the Artificial Eye edition and it's as good as the film is likely to get. A must-buy.
User avatar
Lemmy Caution
Joined: Wed Mar 29, 2006 7:26 am
Location: East of Shanghai

#56 Post by Lemmy Caution »

Has anyone seen Facets edition?
I watched the Clavis edition. Pretty good, but some subtitle errors along with a large black splotch in the upper right of the frame which recurred roughly every 10 minutes.

Does anyone know if the AE edition is better than the Clavis?
User avatar
denti alligator
Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 1:36 am
Location: "born in heaven, raised in hell"

#57 Post by denti alligator »

Lemmy Caution wrote: a large black splotch in the upper right of the frame which recurred roughly every 10 minutes.
Reel change markers. Not really a flaw. You'd certainly see these if you saw the film in the theater. Which brings up an interesting issue: should these markers be left in on DVD transfers or removed?
User avatar
Lemmy Caution
Joined: Wed Mar 29, 2006 7:26 am
Location: East of Shanghai

#58 Post by Lemmy Caution »

denti alligator wrote:
Lemmy Caution wrote: a large black splotch in the upper right of the frame which recurred roughly every 10 minutes.
Reel change markers. Not really a flaw. You'd certainly see these if you saw the film in the theater. Which brings up an interesting issue: should these markers be left in on DVD transfers or removed?
Removed. They were distracting, unnecessary and not part of the intended visuals of the film. I wouldn't imagine it would be too hard to remove as they are brief. Does the AE version contain reel markers as well? And is the AE version of ST better than CLavis (or Facets)?
User avatar
denti alligator
Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 1:36 am
Location: "born in heaven, raised in hell"

#59 Post by denti alligator »

Lemmy Caution wrote:
denti alligator wrote:
Lemmy Caution wrote: a large black splotch in the upper right of the frame which recurred roughly every 10 minutes.
Reel change markers. Not really a flaw. You'd certainly see these if you saw the film in the theater. Which brings up an interesting issue: should these markers be left in on DVD transfers or removed?
Removed. They were distracting, unnecessary and not part of the intended visuals of the film. I wouldn't imagine it would be too hard to remove as they are brief. Does the AE version contain reel markers as well? And is the AE version of ST better than CLavis (or Facets)?
I only suggest they should remain because if we want to preserve the look of an original theatrical projection, they would stay. You can't go to the theater to see any classic film without these.
User avatar
MichaelB
Joined: Fri Aug 11, 2006 10:20 pm
Location: Worthing
Contact:

#60 Post by MichaelB »

I vote for "removed" - they're not necessary for anything other than theatrical projection, and I really can't believe directors and cinematographers would vote for their retention across all media unless it was a Guy Maddin type of film where deliberate surface abuse is part of the overall texture.

In any case, if you want to retain the theatrical experience, how about sticking silhouetted heads at the bottom of the frame, and not especially sotto voce whispering and rustling coming out of one of the speakers? In fact, you could make good use of a 5.1 setup to have mobile phones going off at various parts of the virtual auditorium.
User avatar
Lemmy Caution
Joined: Wed Mar 29, 2006 7:26 am
Location: East of Shanghai

#61 Post by Lemmy Caution »

MichaelB wrote:In any case, if you want to retain the theatrical experience, how about sticking silhouetted heads at the bottom of the frame, and not especially sotto voce whispering and rustling coming out of one of the speakers? In fact, you could make good use of a 5.1 setup to have mobile phones going off at various parts of the virtual auditorium.
The Chinese pirates are way ahead of you, camcording first-run theatrical releases. I haven't picked up any of those in a few years, but I do remember heads, coughs, audience laughter, a coat pulled over the camcorder when an usher passes by, etc. I also remember friends telling me stories of the camcorder operator loudly munching popcorn for a flick or two, and another where the guy had audible gas. Everything but your feet sticking to the floor.
User avatar
MichaelB
Joined: Fri Aug 11, 2006 10:20 pm
Location: Worthing
Contact:

#62 Post by MichaelB »

I've just picked up the Hungarian (Mokep) DVD of Family Nest - the physical blemishes are identical to the Facets, and the running times are only seconds out, suggesting that both were sourced from the same PAL Digibeta master.

However, the Mokep disc has a much higher bitrate (average 9.0!), optional subtitles, a progressive encode, is native PAL (region 2), and probably looks about as good as this film is ever likely to (given that the ultra-grainy cinematography and evidence of poorly-maintained camera gates are presumably inherent in the original materials).

God knows where you'd order it from online, though - I bought it in a Budapest bookshop.
User avatar
tavernier
Joined: Sat Apr 02, 2005 11:18 pm

#63 Post by tavernier »

MichaelB wrote:God knows where you'd order it from online, though - I bought it in a Budapest bookshop.
Of course, what you should have done was let all of us know you were going to a Budapest bookshop and taken our orders! 8-)
User avatar
MichaelB
Joined: Fri Aug 11, 2006 10:20 pm
Location: Worthing
Contact:

#64 Post by MichaelB »

tavernier wrote:Of course, what you should have done was let all of us know you were going to a Budapest bookshop and taken our orders! 8-)
No chance of that, I'm afraid - firstly, I didn't know I'd get a chance to visit any bookshops until the final morning (I was only there for 48 hours, as a short wedding anniversary break), and secondly, my wife practically divorced me on the spot when she caught me trying to cram 14 DVDs plus several books into one of our suitcases...
User avatar
tavernier
Joined: Sat Apr 02, 2005 11:18 pm

#65 Post by tavernier »

MichaelB wrote:
tavernier wrote:Of course, what you should have done was let all of us know you were going to a Budapest bookshop and taken our orders! 8-)
No chance of that, I'm afraid - firstly, I didn't know I'd get a chance to visit any bookshops until the final morning (I was only there for 48 hours, as a short wedding anniversary break), and secondly, my wife practically divorced me on the spot when she caught me trying to cram 14 DVDs plus several books into one of our suitcases...
That sounds familiar.
User avatar
feckless boy
Joined: Wed Jan 03, 2007 8:38 pm
Location: Stockholm

#66 Post by feckless boy »

God knows where you'd order it from online, though - I bought it in a Budapest bookshop.
NetPiac has the MOKÉP-disk for around 26 US dollar.
User avatar
skuhn8
Joined: Tue Dec 14, 2004 8:46 pm
Location: Chico, CA

#67 Post by skuhn8 »

tavernier wrote:
MichaelB wrote:God knows where you'd order it from online, though - I bought it in a Budapest bookshop.
Of course, what you should have done was let all of us know you were going to a Budapest bookshop and taken our orders! 8-)
:roll: or...
Post Reply