Studio Canal titles newly out of print
- Jeff
- Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 1:49 am
- Location: Denver, CO
- LightBulbFilm
- Joined: Wed Nov 16, 2005 9:11 pm
- Location: Florida
- Contact:
- Cronenfly
- Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2007 4:04 pm
Indeed: as well, the sudden nature, unlikelihood of CC reissues, and lack of backtsock on sale from Criterion of the 4 titles that went OOP makes me think that LG might be in the mix...or that the licensing renewals were too expensive and the titles are OOP for good in R1.Jeff wrote:And there have been plenty that went out of print and never came back at all, which is apparently the case here.Steven H wrote:M Hulot's Holiday and Mon Oncle.Shrew wrote:Has there ever been a Criterion title that went out of print and didn't get a new improved release when it came back?
EDIT- I guess we'll just have to wait and see, given that Criterion titles seem to go OOP for many different reasons, and come back into print for just as many more (though I guess $/licenses are the biggest factor on releases like the 4 SC titles).
- otis
- Joined: Mon Aug 08, 2005 3:43 pm
- Matt
- Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 4:58 pm
Perhaps you might find the answer in a more appropriate thread?otis wrote:Which ones have fixed subs? I rented the wonderful Marseillaise recently, and the subs were certainly optional. Can you give details of the others?ellipsis7 wrote:There actually isn't consistency - the Optimum JEAN RENOIR boxset has 2 films with fixed subs, 5 with optional subs...
- domino harvey
- Dot Com Dom
- Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 6:42 pm
- HerrSchreck
- Joined: Sun Sep 04, 2005 3:46 pm
- thethirdman
- Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 8:26 pm
- bunuelian
- Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 3:49 pm
- Location: San Diego
For those interested in the legal side, having read a lot of DVD license agreements for a job I had last year, I suspect CC couldn't give warning about this because their contract with Studio Canal includes a strict confidentiality clause that prevents them from announcing terms of the deal. Even if that didn't apply here, it could also be that they were trying to negotiate an extension, and didn't want to announce that these might go OOP and spark a rush on the titles, only to announce weeks later that they'd stay in production.
Ultimately, I would think that if they could have, CC would have announced that these were going OOP well ahead of time to clean out their (now apparently unsellable) backlogs.
Ultimately, I would think that if they could have, CC would have announced that these were going OOP well ahead of time to clean out their (now apparently unsellable) backlogs.
- Cinephrenic
- Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 6:58 pm
- Location: Paris, Texas
-
neal
- Joined: Sat Dec 03, 2005 3:44 am
- Location: NY, USA
Well, they're losing distribution rights, so I imagine not. Though I'm no expert on the matter...Cinephrenic wrote:Isn't losing rights meaning they cannot produce the item any longer, which would mean they could sell the remaining stock on hand?time to clean out their (now apparently unsellable) backlogs.
- HerrSchreck
- Joined: Sun Sep 04, 2005 3:46 pm
I seriously doubt they'd be forced to eat the discs. This has to have come up a bazillion times when rights transit from one party to another, or expire, and language must exist in contracts to correspond to it. There's usually enough of a lag time between a new licensee in the region to get their product out onto the street whereby thru sales and other promotional incentives inventory can be liquidated fast enough without anyone acting like a paperwaving dick.
And anyhow, they can always just wholesale them to online & bm shops, and let them deal with it... I'm sure they'd be delighted to jack up the prices and make a killing.
And anyhow, they can always just wholesale them to online & bm shops, and let them deal with it... I'm sure they'd be delighted to jack up the prices and make a killing.
- HistoryProf
- Joined: Mon Mar 13, 2006 7:48 am
- Location: KCK
wow...I can't really believe this! I have Le Corbeau, but Quai des Orfevres has been on my wishlist since it was announced and i've just never gotten around to it. I also don't care about Variety Lights...but went ahead and ordered Port of Shadows too from Amazon. Both are still available there for the very reasonable $22 - and free shipping of course.
But damn, now I have to put off the Malle Documentaries Eclipse box i had in my cart in the DD 20% off sale
ETA: Well maybe they aren't available at Amazon anymore after all...they just updated the shipping time to the dreaded 1-3 weeks. Crap!
But damn, now I have to put off the Malle Documentaries Eclipse box i had in my cart in the DD 20% off sale
ETA: Well maybe they aren't available at Amazon anymore after all...they just updated the shipping time to the dreaded 1-3 weeks. Crap!
-
ByMarkClark.com
- Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2005 7:59 pm
- Location: Columbus, OH
- Contact:
-
Chull
- Joined: Thu Sep 13, 2007 3:17 am
Amazon.ca has them, but at $39.99 CAN, it's probably less attractive than Ebay.rwaits wrote:I just got the email from Amazon about Quai des Orfevres as well. Like you, I'd been meaning to pick this one up forever but never got around to it. Now I'm kicking myself. Any ideas where I might find a copy before its too late (besides ebay)?
- dadaistnun
- Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 12:31 pm
A few Amazon Marketplace sellers have copies in the $22-$25 range at the moment. They might be worth a shot.rwaits wrote:I just got the email from Amazon about Quai des Orfevres as well. Like you, I'd been meaning to pick this one up forever but never got around to it. Now I'm kicking myself. Any ideas where I might find a copy before its too late (besides ebay)?
- colinr0380
- Joined: Mon Nov 08, 2004 8:30 pm
- Location: Chapel-en-le-Frith, Derbyshire, UK
- arsonfilms
- Joined: Wed Nov 02, 2005 4:53 pm
- Location: Philadelphia, PA
Licenses usually have timeframes written into the contracts. First party licenses seem to be around seven years, but I wouldn't know much about third party contracts. This could either effect individual titles or batches, but it would never effect a licensee accross the board unless the licensee's rights are being questioned. I'm sure that Variety Lights wasn't part of the same deal that the more recent releases were on, but rather someone noticed the rights happened to be up at or around the same time.
Anyway, I wouldn't worry too much about other Studio Canal titles, at least not until we have reason. Its pretty unlikely that titles as big as Ran or Contempt would have been included under the same deal(s) as the newly out of print titles here. Pure speculation of course, but thats what my intermediate experience with film licenses would indicate to me.
Anyway, I wouldn't worry too much about other Studio Canal titles, at least not until we have reason. Its pretty unlikely that titles as big as Ran or Contempt would have been included under the same deal(s) as the newly out of print titles here. Pure speculation of course, but thats what my intermediate experience with film licenses would indicate to me.
- Antoine Doinel
- Joined: Sat Mar 04, 2006 5:22 pm
- Location: Montreal, Quebec
- Contact:
- HistoryProf
- Joined: Mon Mar 13, 2006 7:48 am
- Location: KCK