The Lovely Bones (Peter Jackson, 2009)

Discuss specific films and franchises
Message
Author
User avatar
Mr Sausage
Has Risen from the Grave
Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 1:02 am
Location: Canada

#26 Post by Mr Sausage »

Matt wrote:
Mr_sausage wrote:
tavernier wrote:The review in the NY Times Book Review was more enjoyable.
Well that's the first time I've ever heard anyone apply the word "tedious" to any part of Lolita.
It's very fashionable these days to dismiss Nabokov (and Roth and Updike and Mailer most other major mid-century male writers).
I would have thought Lolita was firmly canonical enough to avoid such fashionable dismissal. It was a shitty review anyway; if mentioning Sophocles (whose plays are apparently over-earnest) and Dostoevsky did anything besides foster the illusion that the reviewer was smart, I could not see it.
User avatar
Antoine Doinel
Joined: Sat Mar 04, 2006 5:22 pm
Location: Montreal, Quebec
Contact:

#27 Post by Antoine Doinel »

It turns out the "creative differences" were actually "intense dislike".
User avatar
Cold Bishop
Joined: Wed May 31, 2006 1:45 am
Location: Portland, OR

#28 Post by Cold Bishop »

Cutting his hair and fighting with wardrobe??? God forbid he be allowed to create his own character.

Dissapointing, since intense dislikes like these involving great actors and great (if the LOTR-Kong run hasn't completely ruined the guy capable of Heavenly Creatures) directors have a tendency to produce the best results.
User avatar
Antoine Doinel
Joined: Sat Mar 04, 2006 5:22 pm
Location: Montreal, Quebec
Contact:

#29 Post by Antoine Doinel »

eez28
Joined: Wed Mar 14, 2007 3:51 pm
Location: Houston

#30 Post by eez28 »

So this article which is about The Hobbit, mentions that this wont be out till '09. Why would this movie take that long to come out? It's not like some effects ridden 3+hr fantasy flick.
User avatar
Antoine Doinel
Joined: Sat Mar 04, 2006 5:22 pm
Location: Montreal, Quebec
Contact:

#31 Post by Antoine Doinel »

Ryan Gosling puts to rest the rumors around his departure from the film:
Last year, he signed up for The Lovely Bones, Peter Jackson's adaptation of Alice Sebold's bestselling novel. Gosling was due to play the grieving father of a murdered 14-year-old girl, only to be dismissed two days before production started. The first time I met him, in Toronto in early September, he was weeks away from heading off to Philadelphia for The Lovely Bones shoot. As much effort as he'd put into ageing himself for the role, with added bulk and a thick, well-tended beard, he was still surprised at having been cast.

"They called me, and I just couldn't see myself as the father of this girl, you know?" says Gosling, who was just 26 when Jackson hired him. "I called Peter and said, 'You must be nuts. I love the story, but me as the dad? You're crazy.' And they were like, 'That's the way that we see it.' So who was I to argue because they want the parents to be young?"

When he reported for duty, it didn't take long for him and Jackson to realise he wasn't a good fit (Mark Wahlberg replaced him). "It was always an issue for me. I always felt too young for the role. It's psychological, I guess, but for me that just felt impossible. We did everything we could to get it to that point, but at the end of the day, I couldn't accept it. Within myself, I just didn't feel right."

Does that mean it was his decision to leave? "No, it was mutual. I mean, it wasn't dramatic, it just became clear that it would be better with someone else. I feel like it's a better movie with Mark Wahlberg in it. You have to know what you can't do, too. The problem is, when you're just starting out, you're trying to convince everybody that you can do anything, because you need a job. You train yourself to think that way. And then when you get to a point where you don't have to hustle for jobs any more, you have to sort of reprogram yourself and think, 'Well, what can't I do?' Because the truth is that they'll catch you. They'll put you in anything."

Will the experience make him reassess how he approaches offers? "Yeah, I think so. It was nice to be believed in that much, but it was also an important realisation for me: not to let your ego get involved. It's OK to be too young for a role."
User avatar
Antoine Doinel
Joined: Sat Mar 04, 2006 5:22 pm
Location: Montreal, Quebec
Contact:

#32 Post by Antoine Doinel »

The film has been delayed from early 2009 to fall 2009. Perhaps for awards consideration?
User avatar
Jeff
Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 1:49 am
Location: Denver, CO

#33 Post by Jeff »

Antoine Doinel wrote:The film has been delayed from early 2009 to fall 2009. Perhaps for awards consideration?
I think that it's probably because of this.
User avatar
Antoine Doinel
Joined: Sat Mar 04, 2006 5:22 pm
Location: Montreal, Quebec
Contact:

Re: The Lovely Bones (Peter Jackson, 2009)

#34 Post by Antoine Doinel »

Brian Eno is scoring the film.
User avatar
flyonthewall2983
Joined: Mon Jun 27, 2005 7:31 pm
Location: Indiana
Contact:

Re: The Lovely Bones (Peter Jackson, 2009)

#35 Post by flyonthewall2983 »

That alone has upped my interest in this.
User avatar
Antoine Doinel
Joined: Sat Mar 04, 2006 5:22 pm
Location: Montreal, Quebec
Contact:

Re: The Lovely Bones (Peter Jackson, 2009)

#36 Post by Antoine Doinel »

Two stills have been released. The film opens December 11.
User avatar
Antoine Doinel
Joined: Sat Mar 04, 2006 5:22 pm
Location: Montreal, Quebec
Contact:

Re: The Lovely Bones (Peter Jackson, 2009)

#38 Post by Antoine Doinel »

Paramount's big Oscar hopeful gets the most boring teaser poster ever.
User avatar
flyonthewall2983
Joined: Mon Jun 27, 2005 7:31 pm
Location: Indiana
Contact:

Re: The Lovely Bones (Peter Jackson, 2009)

#39 Post by flyonthewall2983 »

Isn't DreamWorks independent of Paramount now?
User avatar
Jeff
Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 1:49 am
Location: Denver, CO

Re: The Lovely Bones (Peter Jackson, 2009)

#40 Post by Jeff »

flyonthewall2983 wrote:Isn't DreamWorks independent of Paramount now?
Yes, but Paramount got custody of The Lovely Bones in the divorce.
User avatar
puxzkkx
Joined: Fri Jul 17, 2009 4:33 am

Re: The Lovely Bones (Peter Jackson, 2010)

#41 Post by puxzkkx »

I'm most interested in seeing how the Ruth role turns out
User avatar
flyonthewall2983
Joined: Mon Jun 27, 2005 7:31 pm
Location: Indiana
Contact:

Re: The Lovely Bones (Peter Jackson, 2010)

#42 Post by flyonthewall2983 »

User avatar
Antoine Doinel
Joined: Sat Mar 04, 2006 5:22 pm
Location: Montreal, Quebec
Contact:

Re: The Lovely Bones (Peter Jackson, 2010)

#43 Post by Antoine Doinel »

What a dull trailer. The special effects in particular look sorta corny, and it's too bad the studio decided to use the most generic drama film trailer music for the second half. I would've been nice to hear some of Brian Eno's score instead.
User avatar
Jeff
Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 1:49 am
Location: Denver, CO

Re: The Lovely Bones (Peter Jackson, 2010)

#44 Post by Jeff »

I certainly hope all that CGI is in service of something. Obviously, Ramsay would have gone a very different route.

Hard to tell from the trailer what the net effect of placing Marky Mark in a central role will be. The cinematography looks great, and here's an early prediction for an unrecognizable Stanley Tucci showing up in the Best Supporting Actor race.
Gator
Joined: Thu May 01, 2008 1:40 pm
Location: UK

Re: The Lovely Bones (Peter Jackson, 2010)

#45 Post by Gator »

Pretty unremarkable trailer, glossy & bombastic as most of these usually are. So she's dead & there's a killer that needs catching. *yawn* I can hardly contain my enthusiasm.
Charlie Rane
Joined: Wed Aug 05, 2009 9:56 am

Re: The Lovely Bones (Peter Jackson, 2010)

#46 Post by Charlie Rane »

Antoine Doinel wrote:What a dull trailer. The special effects in particular look sorta corny, and it's too bad the studio decided to use the most generic drama film trailer music for the second half. I would've been nice to hear some of Brian Eno's score instead.
It kinda looks like the 4th dimension from Heavenly Creatures on crack. I'm sure Jackson will use the surreal imagery for strong emotional storytelling like he did in the past.

Also did that little green planet thing reminded anyone of Super Mario Galaxy? I'm wonder if Jackson played it, being the video game fan that he is.
User avatar
Magic Hate Ball
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 10:15 pm
Location: Seattle, WA

Re: The Lovely Bones (Peter Jackson, 2009)

#47 Post by Magic Hate Ball »

Antoine Doinel wrote:Paramount's big Oscar hopeful gets the most boring teaser poster ever.
It's like they saw the opening credits and said "Now there's an idea!".
User avatar
puxzkkx
Joined: Fri Jul 17, 2009 4:33 am

Re: The Lovely Bones (Peter Jackson, 2009)

#48 Post by puxzkkx »

The trailer looks blah. Hopefully Jackson can tap into Heavenly Creatures territory, though - because of course most trailers are misleading. I'll see this anyway cause I read the book and I really liked Ronan in Atonement. I'm really interested in seeing the performances of the new NZ actresses Rose McIver and Carolyn Dando (esp. the latter who has the most interesting role in the book) as well.
User avatar
Finch
Joined: Mon Jul 07, 2008 9:09 pm
Location: United States

Re: The Lovely Bones (Peter Jackson, 2009)

#49 Post by Finch »

Awful score and too many spoilers; with the preview for The Road, this is a joint contender for the year's worst trailer. Either PJ has no say in the marketing of the film (which, with his clout I find hard to believe) or he doesn't care that Dreamworks are doing a bang up job of making this look as unappealing as possible.
rs98762001
Joined: Mon Jul 25, 2005 10:04 pm

Re: The Lovely Bones (Peter Jackson, 2009)

#50 Post by rs98762001 »

Mr Finch wrote:Awful score and too many spoilers; with the preview for The Road, this is a joint contender for the year's worst trailer. Either PJ has no say in the marketing of the film (which, with his clout I find hard to believe) or he doesn't care that Dreamworks are doing a bang up job of making this look as unappealing as possible.
Considering he's sitting there smugly introducing the trailer I would say he's pretty supportive of it. Anyway, there is a direct correlation between Jackson's weight and his work. Fat PJ = awesome. Skinny PJ = sucks. So The Lovely Bones is clearly doomed.
Post Reply