Isabella (Pang Ho-Cheung, 2006)

Discuss specific films and franchises
Message
Author
Grimfarrow
Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 11:35 am
Location: Hong Kong

#26 Post by Grimfarrow »

yoshimori wrote: Was just about to write the same thing!

Mr Grimfarrow: Is the Jia the doc on mutes? Have you seen it? Is it my favorite film of all time? Are the Tsai and Miike films finished? Have you seen them? Brief remarks? Maybe you should start a thread called "Why you all hate me, Mr Grimfarrow" which consists solely of a list of all the great films you've seen but which will never make it to LA or Boston! :)
No, the Jia doc is going to be unveiled very soon, but STILL LIFE is a real Jia film, albeit a much smaller film than THE WORLD. Dunno about the progress of Tsai and Miike, but I'd guess they'll be out by end of year latest. No, I haven't seen anything, but someone did see HANA and said it's "the best Japanese film this year". Take that with a grain of salt...

I'll be going to Toronto Film Fest later this year, so I'm sure I'll see a few there too :) Don't be jealous - you saw more films than me during HKIFF! (haha).
artfilmfan
Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 1:11 am

#27 Post by artfilmfan »

It's been fun reading the above exchanges :)

And I thought "Isabella" was the name of the daughter! :)

MEK, I think you chose "the wrong" WKW films to watch :) I think you might like "Days of Being Wild" and "In the Mood for Love" (and maybe "2046", too). These are the only WKW films I've seen and the first two, IMO, are very good.
User avatar
Michael Kerpan
Spelling Bee Champeen
Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 5:20 pm
Location: New England
Contact:

#28 Post by Michael Kerpan »

Isabella spoilers below
Spoiler
Isabella = original name of the heroine's mother (which the mother dropped after she got dumped by the "hero") = name given to the girl's dog (bought after the mother had been diagnosed with cancer) = name of the actress playing the heroine.
I'll try more WKW one of these days -- it's not like I'm allergic to his films (unlike Tsai).
User avatar
Skritek
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 1:59 pm
Location: Switzerland

#29 Post by Skritek »

I'm wondering if Kerpan still thinks this is a masterpiece. While I find it a nice film, with all the strengths and some of the pitfalls of Hong Kong films, I don't see what Kerpan saw in it (religious underpinnings, et al.).

Thank you very much for the reply. :)
User avatar
Michael Kerpan
Spelling Bee Champeen
Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 5:20 pm
Location: New England
Contact:

#30 Post by Michael Kerpan »

I haven't re-watched this yet. Though I've been thinking it was about time.
User avatar
sidehacker
Joined: Sat Mar 17, 2007 6:49 am
Location: Bowling Green, Ohio
Contact:

#31 Post by sidehacker »

I think it is a masterpiece too. It looks lovely enough to negate any possible shortcomings. Pang's follow-up Exodus has a similar visual brilliance but is brought down by being a bit too silly.
User avatar
Michael Kerpan
Spelling Bee Champeen
Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 5:20 pm
Location: New England
Contact:

#32 Post by Michael Kerpan »

It would be interesting as part of a double bill with XU Jinglei's debut film My Father and I -- which has some thematic similarities. Xu's film is less flashy -- but just as good overall.
User avatar
Skritek
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 1:59 pm
Location: Switzerland

#33 Post by Skritek »

Michael Kerpan wrote:I haven't re-watched this yet. Though I've been thinking it was about time.
Thanks anyways. I've been thinking of rewatching it also, that's why I wrote.
Post Reply