Miracle at St. Anna (Spike Lee, 2008)

Discuss specific films and franchises
Message
Author
User avatar
kaujot
Joined: Mon May 08, 2006 10:28 pm
Location: Austin
Contact:

#26 Post by kaujot »

Spike is coming off a little Kanye West-ish.
User avatar
fiddlesticks
Joined: Fri Sep 21, 2007 12:19 am
Location: Borderlands

#27 Post by fiddlesticks »

I don't know about anyone else, but I'd stand in line to see "Motherfucking Driving Miss Daisy."
User avatar
domino harvey
Dot Com Dom
Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 6:42 pm

#28 Post by domino harvey »

You know what I like about Spike Lee? He's not bitter.
User avatar
knives
Joined: Sat Sep 06, 2008 10:49 pm

#29 Post by knives »

Oh I'm sure he feels his life is a privliged one and appreciates what success and fame he can come by.
avner
Joined: Mon May 12, 2008 9:25 pm

#30 Post by avner »

This movie looks amazing judging from the trailer. Looking foward to it, regardless of what american critics have to say. But that's coz' I think She Hate Me is a great movie, for example.

Spike's comments however are becoming incresingly predictable and tired in their aim to stir up controversy. Never liked him as a public figure and what he has to say.

Always loved in as a filmmaker, so as long as he makes good pictures, no problemo.
User avatar
Jeff
Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 1:49 am
Location: Denver, CO

#31 Post by Jeff »

User avatar
tavernier
Joined: Sat Apr 02, 2005 11:18 pm

#32 Post by tavernier »

Spike: "You white reviewers just don't get it."

Wait until Armond finishes him off.
User avatar
domino harvey
Dot Com Dom
Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 6:42 pm

#33 Post by domino harvey »

Isn't it more likely that Armond White will decide he likes Spike Lee now that he's finally made a masterpiece
User avatar
tavernier
Joined: Sat Apr 02, 2005 11:18 pm

#34 Post by tavernier »

with AW, you never know.
User avatar
lacritfan
Life is one big kevyip
Joined: Wed Dec 05, 2007 10:39 pm
Location: Los Angeles

#35 Post by lacritfan »

Here's what I'm hoping come Oscar time :
  • 1. Milk gets a bunch of nominations, including one for Sean Penn. M@StA gets one for sound.
    2. Spike - Hollywood honors a movie about gay people but not the African American soldiers who fought for the freedom gay people have.
    3. Sean Penn - Spike should just shut his mouth. Also his criticism of Eastwood was as stupid as when Chris Rock didn't know who Jude Law was.
    4. Chris Rock - It was a joke you dumb muthafucka!
    5. Spike - Sean Penn is a racist.
    6. Mickey Rourke shows up with his now fiance Evan Rachel Wood - Hey everybody, what's going on?
    7. Entertainment Weekly puts out an issue about WTF couples and has a graph where Billy Bob Thornton and Angelina Jolie only rate a 4 but Mickey and ERW are a 9.
Grand Illusion
Joined: Wed Sep 26, 2007 11:56 am

#36 Post by Grand Illusion »

lacritfan wrote:Here's what I'm hoping come Oscar time :
  • 1. Milk gets a bunch of nominations, including one for Sean Penn. M@StA gets one for sound.
Your acronym spells "Masta." Fantastic.
User avatar
domino harvey
Dot Com Dom
Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 6:42 pm

#37 Post by domino harvey »

Grand Illusion wrote:
lacritfan wrote:Here's what I'm hoping come Oscar time :
  • 1. Milk gets a bunch of nominations, including one for Sean Penn. M@StA gets one for sound.
Your acronym spells "Masta." Fantastic.
Oh my God =D>
User avatar
kaujot
Joined: Mon May 08, 2006 10:28 pm
Location: Austin
Contact:

#38 Post by kaujot »

Post of the year.
User avatar
AWA
Joined: Mon Mar 17, 2008 12:32 am
Location: Windsor, Ontario, Canada
Contact:

#39 Post by AWA »

He adds, "Nobody is watching motherfucking Driving Miss Daisy today. Do The Right Thing is being taught in classes at major universities and high schools all over the world. That's how you're supposed to test art. Does the work stand up?"
Man, if he didn't just make the case of why he shouldn't care if he wins an Oscar or not. I wonder if he realized that after saying it, that he made Do The Right Thing and people are still considering it a serious, important piece of filmmaking is far more valuable than some effing Oscar.
User avatar
Svevan
Joined: Mon Nov 22, 2004 11:49 pm
Location: Portland, OR

#40 Post by Svevan »

Seriously. What does Spike Lee not have now that an Oscar would give him? What would mainstream acceptance afford him that his "angry black artist" image has not?
User avatar
John Cope
Joined: Thu Dec 15, 2005 9:40 pm
Location: where the simulacrum is true

#41 Post by John Cope »

Wasn't someone asking about this?
User avatar
tavernier
Joined: Sat Apr 02, 2005 11:18 pm

#42 Post by tavernier »

Even I didn't think he'd mention fucking Spielberg in the opening paragraph.
User avatar
swo17
Bloodthirsty Butcher
Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2008 2:25 pm
Location: SLC, UT

#43 Post by swo17 »

And the title. And at least once in each of five out of nine paragraphs.
User avatar
domino harvey
Dot Com Dom
Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 6:42 pm

#44 Post by domino harvey »

That was a smokescreen for Lee’s ongoing Spielberg rivalry (as in his Malcolm X scene disparaging E.T.)
This is just a new level of Armondance
User avatar
Orphic Lycidas
Joined: Fri Jun 02, 2006 11:25 pm
Location: NY/NJ, USA

#45 Post by Orphic Lycidas »

That was a smokescreen for Lee’s ongoing Spielberg rivalry (as in his Malcolm X scene disparaging E.T.)
The film Malcolm X has a scene disparaging E.T.? I've seen the former film a number of times and I haven't the foggiest idea what that can possibly mean.
User avatar
swo17
Bloodthirsty Butcher
Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2008 2:25 pm
Location: SLC, UT

#46 Post by swo17 »

You must have forgotten to watch the film with a giant E.T. poster on the wall behind your TV.
User avatar
domino harvey
Dot Com Dom
Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 6:42 pm

#47 Post by domino harvey »

I had a chuckle at White putting an exclamation point after "WTF" in the middle of the sentence-- he just got one-upped by teenage girls
User avatar
Morbii
Joined: Sat Nov 27, 2004 7:38 am

#48 Post by Morbii »

tavernier wrote:Even I didn't think he'd mention fucking Spielberg in the opening paragraph.
Much less the actual title and headline :o
User avatar
tavernier
Joined: Sat Apr 02, 2005 11:18 pm

#49 Post by tavernier »

I usually skip the titles of AW's reviews so I can get to the meat of his argument that much quicker.
User avatar
exte
Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 8:27 pm
Location: NJ

#50 Post by exte »

Ebert gave it three stars, albeit begrudgingly:
In a sense, the scenes I complain about are evidence of Lee's stature as an artist. In a time of studios and many filmmakers who play it safe and right down the middle, Lee has a vision and sticks to it. The scenes I object to are not evidence of any special perception I have. They're the kind of scenes many studio chiefs from the dawn of film might have singled out, in the interest of making the film shorter and faster. But they're important to Lee, who must have defended them. And it's important to me that he did. When you see one of his films, you're seeing one of his films. And "Miracle at St. Anna" contains richness, anger, history, sentiment, fantasy, reality, violence and life. Maybe too much. Better than too little.
Post Reply