Watchmen (Zack Snyder, 2009)

Discuss specific films and franchises
Post Reply
Message
Author
User avatar
GoldenPilgrim
Joined: Fri Sep 21, 2007 7:43 pm
Location: California
Contact:

Re: Watchmen (Zack Snyder, 2009)

#401 Post by GoldenPilgrim »

Wait...so...
Is that seriously a finished scene, like, as it is going to appear on the big screen, sound and all?

Is he adapting Watchmen or Streets of Rage?
User avatar
domino harvey
Dot Com Dom
Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 6:42 pm

Re: Watchmen (Zack Snyder, 2009)

#402 Post by domino harvey »

Armond White is going to give himself an ulcer worrying about whether he should pretend to like this movie
User avatar
cdnchris
Site Admin
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 6:45 pm
Location: Washington
Contact:

Re: Watchmen (Zack Snyder, 2009)

#403 Post by cdnchris »

Is that music really appearing in the film?

Jesus.

I don't know what's more offensive, the scene or the fact it looks like aint-it-cool is jizzing their pants over it.
User avatar
jbeall
Joined: Sat Aug 12, 2006 1:22 pm
Location: Atlanta-ish

Re: Watchmen (Zack Snyder, 2009)

#404 Post by jbeall »

It's time to give Harry Knowles another wedgie.
User avatar
domino harvey
Dot Com Dom
Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 6:42 pm

Re: Watchmen (Zack Snyder, 2009)

#405 Post by domino harvey »

I can understand the appeal for a lot of films that I have no interest in, but I simply cannot compute how anyone who watched that clip could think, "Hey, give me nearly three hours of that, please!"
User avatar
Murdoch
Joined: Mon Apr 21, 2008 3:59 am
Location: Upstate NY

Re: Watchmen (Zack Snyder, 2009)

#406 Post by Murdoch »

Good lord, it's like an Uwe Boll movie.
User avatar
jbeall
Joined: Sat Aug 12, 2006 1:22 pm
Location: Atlanta-ish

Re: Watchmen (Zack Snyder, 2009)

#407 Post by jbeall »

Not even. It's just another formulaic fight scene where keystone cops (okay, rioting inmates) get hip-tossed, somehow getting knocked out cold in the process. (Do they ever get back up and fight? Pussies.) I don't think this clip is anything we haven't seen before in a thousand other movies; what I don't get is Harry Knowles' ecstatic blogpost. I know he's a psycho fanboy and all, but even by his lamentable standards, that's really over the top.
User avatar
knives
Joined: Sat Sep 06, 2008 10:49 pm

Re: Watchmen (Zack Snyder, 2009)

#408 Post by knives »

Moore: 0 Hollywood's big prick: 6

Honestly I just want some one to adapt his work perfectly so that Moore can have an stroke over such a paradox for himself.
User avatar
cdnchris
Site Admin
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 6:45 pm
Location: Washington
Contact:

Re: Watchmen (Zack Snyder, 2009)

#409 Post by cdnchris »

What exactly was the moment that was so amazing we should save it for the big screen? ](*,)
Cde.
Joined: Sun Dec 02, 2007 10:56 am
Location: Sydney, Australia

Re: Watchmen (Zack Snyder, 2009)

#410 Post by Cde. »

i think it was Night Owl's totally awesome Batman move from the Owl Ship.
JonathanM
Joined: Fri Feb 13, 2009 3:18 pm
Location: London, UK
Contact:

Re: Watchmen (Zack Snyder, 2009)

#411 Post by JonathanM »

Why can't people get that excited about good films?

"Click here for the bit in The New World when Smith returns back to the English camp. Warning : This scene is so AWESOME and TOTALLY SWEET that you want to save it for the big screen. AWESOME... AWESOME... AWESOME..."

I'm sure that out there somewhere is a parallel universe in which art house cinema gets received with endless hype whilst mainstream blockbusters are treated with complete contempt.

"Dude... it's in English! Why would I want to go and see a film in English? I speak it all the time!"
Cde.
Joined: Sun Dec 02, 2007 10:56 am
Location: Sydney, Australia

Re: Watchmen (Zack Snyder, 2009)

#412 Post by Cde. »

JonathanM wrote:"Click here for the bit in The New World when Smith returns back to the English camp. Warning : This scene is so AWESOME and TOTALLY SWEET that you want to save it for the big screen. AWESOME... AWESOME... AWESOME..."
Oh man, I wish.

In all seriousness though, I'll probably be saying things like that when The Tree of Life nears release.
User avatar
knives
Joined: Sat Sep 06, 2008 10:49 pm

Re: Watchmen (Zack Snyder, 2009)

#413 Post by knives »

Image
JonathanM
Joined: Fri Feb 13, 2009 3:18 pm
Location: London, UK
Contact:

Re: Watchmen (Zack Snyder, 2009)

#414 Post by JonathanM »

Nice.

That's a very slender version of Moore. Doubtless he has the same personal trainer as Night Owl.
User avatar
nsps
Joined: Tue Aug 05, 2008 8:25 am
Contact:

Re: Watchmen (Zack Snyder, 2009)

#415 Post by nsps »

JonathanM wrote:
knives wrote:Just because I don't feel like talking Moore I'll go with this as I think it is entirely possible. Verhoeven has been doing it for years (Starship Troopers) He just needed to have the suits look stupid and have the only violence shown be absolutely disgusting. As for 300, I think it was accidental subversion, but I still enjoy Spartan Slo-mo Storybook Time nevertheless.
Hmmm. I think you're right about Starship Troopers but I think Starship Troopers is a much more limited critique than Watchmen. ST never, for even one second, suggests that the humans shouldn't be fighting or that their sacrifices are for nothing, instead it takes potshots at the suits and makes it clear that there's not much glamour to be had in the actual waging of war.
I've grown a bit tired of hearing about the political satire of ST. The film has a few satirical vignettes, to be sure, but it mostly just feels like a video game. Kill a bunch of smaller giant insects, then take on the big one. Repeat.

And while the macho posturing of "300"—coupled with its combination of homophobia and homoeroticism—is laughable, I am fairly certain that that isn't the intent.
Nothing
Joined: Fri Oct 20, 2006 8:04 am

Re: Watchmen (Zack Snyder, 2009)

#416 Post by Nothing »

Are you two joking? Starship Troopers quite clearly implies that the humans started the war with the bugs and all of the leads (not only the 'suits') are repulsive aryan stereotypes. Every Verhoeven film from this period (Robocop through to Starship Troopers) is a satirical masterpiece, as subversive as Hollywood cinema can get. Showgirls being the coup de grace.
User avatar
nsps
Joined: Tue Aug 05, 2008 8:25 am
Contact:

Re: Watchmen (Zack Snyder, 2009)

#417 Post by nsps »

It's been years since I watched the movie—like when I was in high school—but the action sequences were so redundant and boring that no amount of subversion could have saved it for me.
knives wrote:Image
This is awesome. Who did it?
User avatar
luridedith
Joined: Fri Feb 01, 2008 11:34 pm

Re: Watchmen (Zack Snyder, 2009)

#418 Post by luridedith »

Orphic Lycidas wrote:First look at a completed scene from "Watchmen". I have to admit I laughed throughout. It's even worse than we thought.
Oh my god, its like a parody of every vapid superhero blockbuster of the past couple of years. Its completely distilled all the elements that make the fanboys wet (obnoxious "badass" macho posturing, lame RAWK music, swooooshing sound effects and tacky slow motion where every mundane movement is ridiculously underlined) and just made the entire movie simply out of the elements. Are we sure Zack Snyder is for real and this isn't some kind of colossal joke? (I LOVE Showgirls and Verhoeven by the way - he has a snide, vulgar sense of humour that dull, humourless Snyder lacks)

I'm so sick of every single major release basically being empty, aggressively juvenile 12 year old geek fantasies. Do high school outsider geeks even exist anymore considering the jocks/preps/masses have the exact same taste and interests now?
User avatar
Binker
Joined: Thu Jun 19, 2008 8:53 am
Location: Tucson

Re: Watchmen (Zack Snyder, 2009)

#419 Post by Binker »

High School geeks read Sartre now
User avatar
knives
Joined: Sat Sep 06, 2008 10:49 pm

Re: Watchmen (Zack Snyder, 2009)

#420 Post by knives »

Nsps, I don't know who made that :(
Luridedith, I really hope that he actually got it and is doing the subtlest parody ever. If so he got it right. That's the last string of hope I have. If my friend who saw the prison scene on teevee is any indication though, people won't get it.
Jarpie
Joined: Mon Feb 04, 2008 10:10 pm
Location: Finland

Re: Watchmen (Zack Snyder, 2009)

#421 Post by Jarpie »

That "complete" scene looks just so god-awful, like many here have already said so. I hated 300, and I was very sucpicious about Snyder "directing" Watchmen the movie from the beginning, and my suspicions were apparently proven right. And what the hell were those stupid grins before and after the lousy fight?

I'm sure many in here agree, that Terry Gilliam should've directed Watchmen, visually and thematically probably only director who could've made it as it should have been made.
User avatar
jbeall
Joined: Sat Aug 12, 2006 1:22 pm
Location: Atlanta-ish

Re: Watchmen (Zack Snyder, 2009)

#422 Post by jbeall »

The grins aren't so bad, as they're at least consistent with the characters' newly-rediscovered happiness at being in costume again after a long hiatus.

And re: Gilliam directing, I think he'd have too much respect for the source material to even take the project on. I'm coming around to the view that The Watchmen shouldn't even be filmed in the first place. <sigh> when does Blade IV come out?
User avatar
nsps
Joined: Tue Aug 05, 2008 8:25 am
Contact:

Re: Watchmen (Zack Snyder, 2009)

#423 Post by nsps »

jbeall wrote:And re: Gilliam directing, I think he'd have too much respect for the source material to even take the project on. I'm coming around to the view that The Watchmen shouldn't even be filmed in the first place. <sigh> when does Blade IV come out?
Isn't that what happened? I think Gilliam twice tackled the adaptation and twice deemed it unfilmable, at least as a single film. (I think he suggested a miniseries.)
User avatar
starmanof51
Joined: Fri Nov 05, 2004 7:28 am
Location: Seattleish
Contact:

Re: Watchmen (Zack Snyder, 2009)

#424 Post by starmanof51 »

nsps wrote:
jbeall wrote:And re: Gilliam directing, I think he'd have too much respect for the source material to even take the project on. I'm coming around to the view that The Watchmen shouldn't even be filmed in the first place. <sigh> when does Blade IV come out?
Isn't that what happened? I think Gilliam twice tackled the adaptation and twice deemed it unfilmable, at least as a single film. (I think he suggested a miniseries.)
A 12 episode HBO series was what I was hoping for.
User avatar
somnambulating
Joined: Wed Nov 12, 2008 5:10 am

Re: Watchmen (Zack Snyder, 2009)

#425 Post by somnambulating »

I'm thinking, the extended Rorschach's Journal scenes tell you about as much as you need to know concerning the adaptation.

Watchmen the film will tend to excel in these inhuman moments where Snyder can lift directly from the already cinematic bits of Rorschach's Journal. This is why directors are usually steered away from using extensive Voice-over and score throughout a film; you have to be an absolute ape to botch the use of these tools in a scene. However, there are incredibly crucial human moments in the original story that call for more than narrated phantasmaghoria. If Snyder has the wrong philosophy of film, which plenty of evidence is pointing toward, the misdirection of the later type of scene ultimately presents us with an unbalanced storytelling, poor exposition of necessary information, and an over all lower cinematic experience.

Watchmen will do about as much as V For Vendetta.
Post Reply