Criterion and Sony

News on Criterion and Janus Films
Post Reply
Message
Author
AfterTheRain
Joined: Thu Apr 10, 2008 1:42 am

Re: Criterion and Sony

#101 Post by AfterTheRain »

I'm wondering if Criterion would put out Terry Gilliam's The Fisher King in an all new director approved special edition. The current DVD is basically barebones, but the OOP Criterion laserdisc does have commentary by Gilliam.
beamish13
Joined: Sun Oct 14, 2007 9:31 am

Re: Criterion and Sony

#102 Post by beamish13 »

Maybe the time is right to finally release the original, musical cut of James L. Brooks' "I'll Do Anything".
Perkins Cobb
Joined: Tue Apr 29, 2008 4:49 pm

Re: Criterion and Sony

#103 Post by Perkins Cobb »

LightBulbFilm wrote:What about Henry Jaglom's A Safe Place, it's owned by Columbia and a great extra would be the documentary "Who Is Henry Jaglom?" I could see it happening as Criterion has an affinity for Z Channel favorites and director's first features.
I'd love to see this, but does Sony have it free and clear? Jaglom gave copies of the movie on VHS to a couple of L.A. video stores years ago, and I vaguely remember it was because of a rights issue, but Jaglom may have just meant that he didn't have the rights.
jaredsap
Joined: Tue Jun 05, 2007 5:24 am
Location: Los Angeles

Re: Criterion and Sony

#104 Post by jaredsap »

Perkins Cobb wrote:
LightBulbFilm wrote:What about Henry Jaglom's A Safe Place, it's owned by Columbia and a great extra would be the documentary "Who Is Henry Jaglom?" I could see it happening as Criterion has an affinity for Z Channel favorites and director's first features.
I'd love to see this, but does Sony have it free and clear?
Yes.
Arthur House
Joined: Tue Feb 24, 2009 7:20 pm

Re: Criterion and Sony

#105 Post by Arthur House »

Could Truffaut's Such A Gorgeous Kid Like Me be in the running? I saw somewhere that Sony Pictures Classics currently holds the rights.
jaredsap
Joined: Tue Jun 05, 2007 5:24 am
Location: Los Angeles

Re: Criterion and Sony

#106 Post by jaredsap »

Arthur House wrote:Could Truffaut's Such A Gorgeous Kid Like Me be in the running? I saw somewhere that Sony Pictures Classics currently holds the rights.
Columbia owns the USA rights in perpetuity, not Sony Pictures Classics. And yes, it could be in the running.
Arthur House
Joined: Tue Feb 24, 2009 7:20 pm

Re: Criterion and Sony

#107 Post by Arthur House »

Thanks for the news. The thought of more Bernadette Lafont (in the collection or otherwise) is always a good thing!
beamish13
Joined: Sun Oct 14, 2007 9:31 am

Re: Criterion and Sony

#108 Post by beamish13 »

"Five Finger Exercise" (1962) seems like a likely contender.
jaredsap
Joined: Tue Jun 05, 2007 5:24 am
Location: Los Angeles

Re: Criterion and Sony

#109 Post by jaredsap »

beamish13 wrote:"Five Finger Exercise" (1962) seems like a likely contender.
What makes it likely? The fact that it was made by a marginal director and almost no one on the planet has heard of -- let alone cares about -- the film? You can expect to see it from Criterion around the same time they release their SE of Columbia's SHE'S OUT OF CONTROL.
User avatar
Jeff
Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 1:49 am
Location: Denver, CO

Re: Criterion and Sony

#110 Post by Jeff »

ianungstad wrote:Wouldn't a licensing deal with Criterion be limited to either Columbia or Sony Classics and not a mix of the two?
Jared, is Ian's assumption correct?
jaredsap
Joined: Tue Jun 05, 2007 5:24 am
Location: Los Angeles

Re: Criterion and Sony

#111 Post by jaredsap »

Jeff wrote:
ianungstad wrote:Wouldn't a licensing deal with Criterion be limited to either Columbia or Sony Classics and not a mix of the two?
Jared, is Ian's assumption correct?
There's no reason to make that assumption. It's true that the theatrical distribution and production/acquisition arms of Columbia and Sony Pictures Classics are kept quite separate. But Sony Pictures Home Entertainment is responsible for releasing titles from both entities. (This was decidedly not the case with New Line/WB before they merged; remember that New Line used to have their own Home Entertainment division.) That said, I don't want to reveal whether Criterion has currently licensed only Columbia titles, only Sony Pictures Classics titles, or a combination thereof.
ianungstad
Joined: Thu Mar 17, 2005 1:20 am

Re: Criterion and Sony

#112 Post by ianungstad »

Hardcore (Paul Schrader) could be another possibility. The current DVD has no extras and I'm sure we'll see more films from Schrader in Criterion's future.
User avatar
Person
Joined: Sat May 19, 2007 7:00 pm

Re: Criterion and Sony

#113 Post by Person »

ianungstad wrote:Hardcore (Paul Schrader) could be another possibility. The current DVD has no extras and I'm sure we'll see more films from Schrader in Criterion's future.
I feel that Hardcore is an awful film - one of Schrader's worst, certainly least interesting stories. Maybe in the late 70s, this was a risque movie, but it just looks silly today and George C. Scott hardly has anyone worth while to act with aside from Peter Boyle; such a weird role for him to have chosen to play.
User avatar
justeleblanc
Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 10:05 pm
Location: Connecticut

Re: Criterion and Sony

#114 Post by justeleblanc »

Person wrote:
ianungstad wrote:Hardcore (Paul Schrader) could be another possibility. The current DVD has no extras and I'm sure we'll see more films from Schrader in Criterion's future.
I feel that Hardcore is an awful film - one of Schrader's worst, certainly least interesting stories. Maybe in the late 70s, this was a risque movie, but it just looks silly today and George C. Scott hardly has anyone worth while to act with aside from Peter Boyle; such a weird role for him to have chosen to play.
I agree, I was less impressed with that. The film I did truly love of his was Light Sleeper, but I'm guessing Criterion wouldn't be interested since it's Warner/New Line.
User avatar
kaujot
Joined: Mon May 08, 2006 10:28 pm
Location: Austin
Contact:

Re: Criterion and Sony

#115 Post by kaujot »

Hardcore was the first movie I ever saw on IFC. I was hoping for more tits and sex. I mean, sure, I got George C. Scott, which was great, but not nearly enough tits and sex for a horny little fifteen year old watching a movie with a relatively suggestive title.
User avatar
The Elegant Dandy Fop
Joined: Thu Dec 09, 2004 7:25 am
Location: Los Angeles, CA

Re: Criterion and Sony

#116 Post by The Elegant Dandy Fop »

kaujot wrote:Hardcore was the first movie I ever saw on IFC. I was hoping for more tits and sex. I mean, sure, I got George C. Scott, which was great, but not nearly enough tits and sex for a horny little fifteen year old watching a movie with a relatively suggestive title.
Jeez Louise! You'd figure the naked girl getting her throat slashed would be enough!

Hardcore is good, not great, but it wouldn't hurt to hear Mr. Schrader talk about this film. Besides, it has a great seventies era soundtrack by Jack Nitzsche.

There's no denying it's a disturbing film. The bits of black comedy with Peter Boyle are great and add to the overall uncomfortable feeling. I wouldn't mind a Criterion by any means (though it isn't a priority).
User avatar
kaujot
Joined: Mon May 08, 2006 10:28 pm
Location: Austin
Contact:

Re: Criterion and Sony

#117 Post by kaujot »

I actually asked about Hardcore several months ago. Got a "No."

I want Blue Collar more, anyway.
ianungstad
Joined: Thu Mar 17, 2005 1:20 am

Re: Criterion and Sony

#118 Post by ianungstad »

According to the March 15th DVD Talk forum posting, the Viva Pedro set is now out of print at Sony. I'm sure Criterion would love to handle some of these titles. (I've always wanted a special edition of Law of Desire)

I think this might increase the chances that some Predro titles might be part of the deal?
User avatar
Matt
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 4:58 pm

Re: Criterion and Sony

#119 Post by Matt »

ianungstad wrote:I think this might increase the chances that some Predro titles might be part of the deal?
I don't think so. They're either going to re-release it, including Volver, when Broken Embraces comes out, or they're going to go back to individual DVD releases. Almodovar is Sony's only guaranteed arthouse moneymaker; they wouldn't give him up to Criterion.
User avatar
domino harvey
Dot Com Dom
Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 6:42 pm

Re: Criterion and Sony

#120 Post by domino harvey »

All the same, I'm sure the Viva Pedro set will start going for absurd prices very soon. Now I wish I'd bought more than one when they were going for $29
User avatar
Jeff
Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 1:49 am
Location: Denver, CO

Re: Criterion and Sony

#121 Post by Jeff »

I wouldn't be terribly surprised to see a paired release of Matador and Law of Desire. They've never been released in R1 outside of the box, and aren't as well-known to the casual arthouse moviegoer as his post-Breakdown stuff. Sony would, of course, re-issue the previously available individual titles.

Sony no longer distributes MGM product, which includes Women on the Verge of a Nervous Breakdown and Live Flesh. Could be the reason for the OOPness.
beamish13
Joined: Sun Oct 14, 2007 9:31 am

Re: Criterion and Sony

#122 Post by beamish13 »

Is "To Sleep With Anger" a possibility? I'd love to see it finally get an R1 release.
jaredsap
Joined: Tue Jun 05, 2007 5:24 am
Location: Los Angeles

Re: Criterion and Sony

#123 Post by jaredsap »

beamish13 wrote:Is "To Sleep With Anger" a possibility? I'd love to see it finally get an R1 release.
Yes, possible.
User avatar
domino harvey
Dot Com Dom
Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 6:42 pm

Re: Criterion and Sony

#124 Post by domino harvey »

Unless the rights reverted in last few months, it's a Milestone title
jaredsap
Joined: Tue Jun 05, 2007 5:24 am
Location: Los Angeles

Re: Criterion and Sony

#125 Post by jaredsap »

domino harvey wrote:Unless the rights reverted in last few months, it's a Milestone title
Nope. Sony has sublicensed this film to a few companies over the years (Samuel Goldwyn is the US, Cinephile in Canada and Capitol in International territories), but those deals have now all expired and we own the rights. You can see the VHS was from Sony.
Post Reply