Tom Cruise

Discuss film culture and criticism
Post Reply
Message
Author
User avatar
Jean-Luc Garbo
Joined: Thu Dec 09, 2004 5:55 am
Contact:

#126 Post by Jean-Luc Garbo »

Gawker's reply is on the money. This really says a lot that CSI is giving them grief. I mean, how paranoid can you be? Do they have people monitoring the internet just so they can harass websites that make them look silly? :roll:
David Ehrenstein
Joined: Wed Oct 12, 2005 12:30 am

#127 Post by David Ehrenstein »

Yes they do.
Narshty
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 6:27 pm
Location: London, UK

#128 Post by Narshty »

As if to somehow validate this entire thread, Tom Cruise's new website is now up. The opening video left me speechless.
User avatar
flyonthewall2983
Joined: Mon Jun 27, 2005 7:31 pm
Location: Indiana
Contact:

#129 Post by flyonthewall2983 »

Hasn't it been up for awhile, the ad's have been running here for months.
hot_locket
Joined: Mon Jul 30, 2007 11:39 am

#130 Post by hot_locket »

Narshty wrote:The opening video left me speechless.
Sympathy for the Devil is not an inappropriate musical choice.
User avatar
Person
Joined: Sat May 19, 2007 7:00 pm

#131 Post by Person »

Ah, the old "movies are escapism" route. That's not what aesthetics are about, Tom. Read Schopenhauer and Nietzsche, for a start, dude. I don't sit on bubblegum for "entertainment" for $15. I'd rather have a midget suck me off, you $cientologist, con-theory encourager. People found in hotel bath tubs after not paying Hubbard dues motherfucker. Sympathy for the Devil? Let Zeus boil you in the bag of your own bodily fluids, you Kidman-divorcing pseudo-Greek, shameless crock of poop! =D>
User avatar
flyonthewall2983
Joined: Mon Jun 27, 2005 7:31 pm
Location: Indiana
Contact:

#132 Post by flyonthewall2983 »

Come on, tell us how you really feel.
User avatar
Antoine Doinel
Joined: Sat Mar 04, 2006 5:22 pm
Location: Montreal, Quebec
Contact:

#133 Post by Antoine Doinel »

User avatar
Matt
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 4:58 pm

#135 Post by Matt »

Pardon me, but Lauren Bacall has no business throwing stones at a 40-something major movie star who left his actress wife for a hot younger actress.
User avatar
flyonthewall2983
Joined: Mon Jun 27, 2005 7:31 pm
Location: Indiana
Contact:

#136 Post by flyonthewall2983 »

Plus, didn't she take a potshot at Nicole a few years back?
User avatar
Fletch F. Fletch
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 7:54 pm
Location: Provo, Utah

#137 Post by Fletch F. Fletch »

flyonthewall2983 wrote:Plus, didn't she take a potshot at Nicole a few years back?
Yep
User avatar
Antoine Doinel
Joined: Sat Mar 04, 2006 5:22 pm
Location: Montreal, Quebec
Contact:

#138 Post by Antoine Doinel »

I actually agree with Bacall on the "pot shot" at Kidman. As much as I have a borderline David Thomson-esque obsession with her, she's not a legend. And I agree that no actress at Kidman's age should be really be referred to as one.
User avatar
flyonthewall2983
Joined: Mon Jun 27, 2005 7:31 pm
Location: Indiana
Contact:

#139 Post by flyonthewall2983 »

That much is true, but it all has a kind of "waving her hands, still wanting attention" kind of vibe to it.
User avatar
Antoine Doinel
Joined: Sat Mar 04, 2006 5:22 pm
Location: Montreal, Quebec
Contact:

#140 Post by Antoine Doinel »

Not really, IMO. She was asked a question, she responded and then the media reported she was bashing Nicole.
moviscop
Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2008 7:51 pm
Location: California

#141 Post by moviscop »

Quick question, i am tossing it in here because it is important to me, but not worth making a thread about.

What does Cameron Crowe's crew do with the sound mixing in Vanilla Sky and some of his other films.

I don't think I'm the only one who found the dialogue levels off in many areas. Also, dialogue with no mouth movement by the characters. Was the dialogue recorded in a studio after shooting? It sounds very bright and loud even in discussions taking place across a room.

Please dawn some light on this for me.
User avatar
Person
Joined: Sat May 19, 2007 7:00 pm

#142 Post by Person »

Next friday, I shall BE Michael Jackson. Got the Thriller outfit, mask, monkey. All that's missing in the Negro child. Oh yeah. :D Love Halloween.
User avatar
Antoine Doinel
Joined: Sat Mar 04, 2006 5:22 pm
Location: Montreal, Quebec
Contact:

#143 Post by Antoine Doinel »

Tom Cruise roasts Matt Lauer.
User avatar
Matt
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 4:58 pm

Re: Tom Cruise the new Michael Jackson?

#144 Post by Matt »

I have no plans to read the accompanying articles, but these "Old Hollywood" photographs of Tom and Katie by Solve Sundsbo are gorgeous.
User avatar
HerrSchreck
Joined: Sun Sep 04, 2005 3:46 pm

Re: Tom Cruise the new Michael Jackson?

#145 Post by HerrSchreck »

They sure are. That's the first time I've seen Cruise look like "a man".

No matter how old he gets, he still always looks like a boy to me.
User avatar
anvilscepe
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 10:12 pm
Location: Los Angeles

Re: Tom Cruise the new Michael Jackson?

#146 Post by anvilscepe »

I always thought Joey Potter had potential. WOOZA!
User avatar
Antoine Doinel
Joined: Sat Mar 04, 2006 5:22 pm
Location: Montreal, Quebec
Contact:

Re: Tom Cruise the new Michael Jackson?

#147 Post by Antoine Doinel »

Tom Cruise is keeping script doctors in Hollywood employed. Even David Cronenberg's script for The Matarese Circle is getting a once over.
stroszeck
Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2005 2:42 am

Re: Tom Cruise the new Michael Jackson?

#148 Post by stroszeck »

Yea, ten bucks says Cronenberg walks away....
User avatar
exte
Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 8:27 pm
Location: NJ

Re: Tom Cruise the new Michael Jackson?

#149 Post by exte »

I doubt he'll walk. I'm sure everyone there wants to work with him. Perhaps even he felt he didn't nail it. If another writer does a better job, what's wrong with that?
User avatar
Antoine Doinel
Joined: Sat Mar 04, 2006 5:22 pm
Location: Montreal, Quebec
Contact:

Re: Tom Cruise the new Michael Jackson?

#150 Post by Antoine Doinel »

It will probably depend on how many of Cronenberg's edges Cruise's script guy rounds off. If he still thinks it will represent what he wants to do with the film, he'll do it. If not, Cronenberg is attached to a number of other projects that he'd probably feel more invested in.
Post Reply