Inglourious Basterds

Discuss releases from Arrow and the films on them

Moderators: MichaelB, yoloswegmaster

Post Reply
Message
Author
User avatar
Antoine Doinel
Joined: Sat Mar 04, 2006 5:22 pm
Location: Montreal, Quebec
Contact:

Re: Inglourious Basterds (Quentin Tarantino, 2009)

#326 Post by Antoine Doinel »

The film was announced today as the surprise closing feature of the Fantasia Film Festival here in Montreal, and will be presented by Eli Roth. If you're in the area, and have any interest in the film (or want to heckle Eli Roth), this is probably the most ideal audience to see the film with.
User avatar
Napier
Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 1:48 pm
Location: The Shire

Re: Inglourious Basterds (Quentin Tarantino, 2009)

#327 Post by Napier »

Antoine, I trust you'll be attending. Will you please let us know your thoughts on the film. I may be alone here, but I am anticipating this release.
User avatar
Antoine Doinel
Joined: Sat Mar 04, 2006 5:22 pm
Location: Montreal, Quebec
Contact:

Re: Inglourious Basterds (Quentin Tarantino, 2009)

#328 Post by Antoine Doinel »

The trailer for Nation's Pride, the film within the film, has arrived.
User avatar
somnambulating
Joined: Wed Nov 12, 2008 5:10 am

Re: Inglourious Basterds (Quentin Tarantino, 2009)

#329 Post by somnambulating »

Nation's Pride was a great opportunity to do something both modern and period. why squander that entirely?
User avatar
knives
Joined: Sat Sep 06, 2008 10:49 pm

Re: Inglourious Basterds (Quentin Tarantino, 2009)

#330 Post by knives »

I just wish they had played up the old trailer aspect. That was what it would look like today, not in the 30s or 40s. There was still a laugh though.
User avatar
RodneyOz
Joined: Tue Dec 09, 2008 10:54 am

Re: Inglourious Basterds (Quentin Tarantino, 2009)

#331 Post by RodneyOz »

Having seen the movie in Sydney on Monday, the extracts from 'Nation's Pride' were the worst part of the film. So many ways the footage could have been staged, but it's just a boring repetitive series of BLAM! soldier falls BLAM! soldier falls (extend to infinity). Even that could have been worthwhile if it was done with absurdity or a sense of excess, but no - it's just dead space. There's no sense of how being a specifically NAZI propaganda film (rather than a standard war-time exercise) would have affected the imagery or staging. My understanding though is that Eli Roth shot the 'Nation's Pride' footage, so that kind of explains the missed opportunity aspect.
User avatar
colinr0380
Joined: Mon Nov 08, 2004 8:30 pm
Location: Chapel-en-le-Frith, Derbyshire, UK

Re: Inglourious Basterds (Quentin Tarantino, 2009)

#332 Post by colinr0380 »

My thought on seeing it was that it was the Nazi version of Saving Private Ryan - didn't that have a sniper glorification sequence too?
User avatar
RodneyOz
Joined: Tue Dec 09, 2008 10:54 am

Re: Inglourious Basterds (Quentin Tarantino, 2009)

#333 Post by RodneyOz »

Oh fuck, of course. Gaah, I didn't even make that connection until I read that. It still could have done more with the possibilities though.
Charlie Rane
Joined: Wed Aug 05, 2009 9:56 am

Re: Inglourious Basterds (Quentin Tarantino, 2009)

#334 Post by Charlie Rane »

I really can't believe this wasn't shot on black and white film in an effort to actually imitate the pictures that would have existed from the era. Eli Roth. . . :roll:

The stroller was handled terribliy [-( Why even evoke Battleship Potemkin? It was from 1925. Why not Triumph of the Will or other Nazi Propaganda films?
User avatar
R0lf
Joined: Tue May 19, 2009 11:25 am

Re: Inglourious Basterds (Quentin Tarantino, 2009)

#335 Post by R0lf »

The strange thing about Nation's Pride is that in the movie it basically serves as the movie Inglourious Basterds is advertised as being. i.e.
Tom Hagen wrote:I get that this is Tarantino and everything, but Jesus Christ the average kid watching this trailer is going to come away thinking that war crimes are a fun and funny - if not morally justifiable - response to unconscionable evil.
With Hitler's reaction more or less being representative of the audience for Inglourious Basterds. Though I wonder if this was intentional.

I just flipped through the script to try and place where Maggie Cheung's character fits in. It did make sense cutting those scenes out - the story elements were summed up in a ten second montage. I hope they include the scenes on the DVD though.
Bloody Benten
Joined: Wed Nov 26, 2008 6:52 am

Re: Inglourious Basterds (Quentin Tarantino, 2009)

#336 Post by Bloody Benten »

To those who have seen the film I'm confused about one thing:

Is that trailer for 'Stolz Der Nation' that's online right now appear exactly like in the movie or is that trailer for 'Stolz Der Nation' specifically made to advetise the trailer in the movie? if anyone can understand that. I'm saying that if the trailer that's online is exactly the one that's in the movie it looks horribly out of place even given the recreating history aspect of the movie. The editing and CGI.... I thought it was way too cheesy in a very bad way.
User avatar
Finch
Joined: Mon Jul 07, 2008 9:09 pm
Location: United States

Re: Inglourious Basterds (Quentin Tarantino, 2009)

#337 Post by Finch »

planetjake

Re: Inglourious Basterds (Quentin Tarantino, 2009)

#338 Post by planetjake »

Burn.

His remark about making old man films reminded me of that article he wrote a little bit ago. I forget the title or even where to look for it, but it's basically his argument against any film made by men after the age of 60... Does anyone happen to have a link to this article? Was this even an article? Am I cobbling together comments he's made over the last decade?
User avatar
Highway 61
Joined: Mon Nov 08, 2004 8:40 pm

Re: Inglourious Basterds (Quentin Tarantino, 2009)

#339 Post by Highway 61 »

planetjake wrote:Am I cobbling together comments he's made over the last decade?
Well, he's been saying this same line ever since he returned to the public eye around the time of Kill Bill. The first time I remember hearing it was in his New Yorker profile. The pathetic irony is that he's self-aware enough to acknowledge the reality of artistic decline, but too self-absorbed to realize he's been in the throws of it for the entire decade.
Vic Pardo
Joined: Fri May 01, 2009 10:24 am

Re: Inglourious Basterds (Quentin Tarantino, 2009)

#340 Post by Vic Pardo »

Read about actual Jewish commandos connected to the British army during WWII--and their reaction to Tarantino's film.
User avatar
kaujot
Joined: Mon May 08, 2006 10:28 pm
Location: Austin
Contact:

Re: Inglourious Basterds (Quentin Tarantino, 2009)

#341 Post by kaujot »

Interesting article and interview with Tarantino by Jeffrey Goldberg in The Atlantic (a magazine I highly recommend you subscribe to).
rs98762001
Joined: Mon Jul 25, 2005 10:04 pm

Re: Inglourious Basterds (Quentin Tarantino, 2009)

#342 Post by rs98762001 »

“I hate that hand-wringing shit,” he said. He had a revelation in his early 20s, he recalled, when he saw Red Dawn, a Cold War revenge fantasy in which a group of American high-school students, the “Wolverines,” battle Soviet and Central American soldiers who invade Colorado. “The Wolverines capture a soldier, and there’s a little bit of back-and-forth—should we kill him or not—and C. Thomas Howell just blows him away with his shotgun,” Tarantino recalled. “Those are the kind of things you say, ‘That’s exactly what I would do.’ It’s what I want to see, and when I don’t see it, I become frustrated, and then it feels like a movie as opposed to real life.”
Is Tarantino really claiming that the "real life" version of people (high schoolers, even) dealing with captive prisoners is to blow them away rather than to think things through? Isn't it the other way around? Idealogically, this man gets more and more frightening - he seems somewhere between Paul Kersey and George W. Bush.
He went on, “When you watch all the different Nazi movies, all the TV movies, it’s sad, but isn’t it also frustrating? Did everybody walk into the boxcar? Didn’t somebody do something?”
It would be interesting to see exactly what Quentin would "do" if it was 1943 and he was being herded into a boxcar while surrounded by Nazis with machine guns. Having had the misfortune to see and hear the idiot in action over the last 15 years, I would say the most likely scenario is that he would simply shit his pants.
User avatar
FerdinandGriffon
Joined: Wed Nov 26, 2008 3:16 pm

Re: Inglourious Basterds (Quentin Tarantino, 2009)

#343 Post by FerdinandGriffon »

I feel physically ill reading this stuff, and I say this as someone who spent the morning hacking through book four of Maldoror. The guy is a complete psychotic, as is Roth, and that he remains such a power player in film (and culture in general) is downright horrifying.
User avatar
domino harvey
Dot Com Dom
Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 6:42 pm

Re: Inglourious Basterds (Quentin Tarantino, 2009)

#344 Post by domino harvey »

Quentin Tarantino wrote:Let’s not have everything build up to a big misery, let’s actually take the fun of action-movie cinema and apply it to this situation.
I know eternity is still young, but it's hard to imagine a more vile statement ever being made by a respected filmmaker, re: the Holocaust
HarryLong
Joined: Tue Nov 25, 2008 4:39 pm
Location: Lebanon, PA

Re: Inglourious Basterds (Quentin Tarantino, 2009)

#345 Post by HarryLong »

Short of denying it, no.
“Those are the kind of things you say, ‘That’s exactly what I would do.’
Is anyone else having trouble envisioning Couch Potarantino as a man of action?
User avatar
tavernier
Joined: Sat Apr 02, 2005 11:18 pm

Re: Inglourious Basterds (Quentin Tarantino, 2009)

#346 Post by tavernier »

If the equally talented Benigni can turn the Holocaust into Life Is Beautiful, surely QT can transform Hitler into something "fun"!
HarryLong
Joined: Tue Nov 25, 2008 4:39 pm
Location: Lebanon, PA

Re: Inglourious Basterds (Quentin Tarantino, 2009)

#347 Post by HarryLong »

"The Hitler you knew ... the Hitler you loved ... the Hitler with a song in heart ..."
User avatar
knives
Joined: Sat Sep 06, 2008 10:49 pm

Re: Inglourious Basterds (Quentin Tarantino, 2009)

#348 Post by knives »

Any respect I had for the guy just got flushed down the toilet. What a madman.
Cde.
Joined: Sun Dec 02, 2007 10:56 am
Location: Sydney, Australia

Re: Inglourious Basterds (Quentin Tarantino, 2009)

#349 Post by Cde. »

Jeff Wells from Hollywood Elsewhere has seen the film twice and seems to concur with the consensus on Tarantino over the past page.
User avatar
R0lf
Joined: Tue May 19, 2009 11:25 am

Re: Inglourious Basterds (Quentin Tarantino, 2009)

#350 Post by R0lf »

Cde. wrote:Jeff Wells from Hollywood Elsewhere has seen the film twice and seems to concur with the consensus on Tarantino over the past page.
Really that review is almost the same as saying that Pulp Fiction is pro butt rape.
Post Reply