Warner Random Speculation

Discuss North American DVDs, Blu-rays, UHDs, and related topics
Message
Author
User avatar
Jeff
Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 1:49 am
Location: Denver, CO

Re: Warner Random Speculation

#326 Post by Jeff »

Fiery Angel wrote:Jeff Baker, WHV’s Executive VP and General Manager, Theatrical Catalog
Wasn't this Feltenstein's title? Has he been kicked to the curb? That might explain Warner's recent decision to start sucking at everything.
User avatar
souvenir
Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 4:20 pm

Re: Warner Random Speculation

#327 Post by souvenir »

Jeff wrote:
Fiery Angel wrote:Jeff Baker, WHV’s Executive VP and General Manager, Theatrical Catalog
Wasn't this Feltenstein's title? Has he been kicked to the curb? That might explain Warner's recent decision to start sucking at everything.
This Wall Street Journal article has Feltenstein as the "senior vice president for theatrical catalog marketing" which sounds pretty close.
User avatar
Matt
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 4:58 pm

Re: Warner Random Speculation

#328 Post by Matt »

Corporate hierarchy is, to me, about as arcane as royal succession lines, but I believe a Senior Vice President is under an Executive Vice President.

Here's a new Macleans story on why the release of classics on DVD has slowed to a trickle, with some sobering statements by Feltenstein.
User avatar
brendanjc
Joined: Mon Jul 07, 2008 6:29 am
Location: Seattle, WA

Re: Warner Random Speculation

#329 Post by brendanjc »

I wonder if The Exorcist moratorium is for all versions of the film since the latest I'd heard on the forthcoming Blu-ray release was that it would be the Version-That-You-Don't-Want-To-See-Again only.
User avatar
Tom Hagen
Joined: Mon Apr 14, 2008 4:35 pm
Location: Salt Lake City, Utah

Re: Warner Random Speculation

#330 Post by Tom Hagen »

domino harvey wrote:Warners is taking cues from fucking Walt Disney? Jesus Christ, how the mighty have fallen. And keep falling
No, a true Walt Disney move would be taking, say, Casablanca, Singin' in the Rain and Citizen Kane off of the market for nine years. Six months -- with an annoucement that new titles are forthcoming -- is more pointless than it is irritating.
User avatar
fiddlesticks
Joined: Fri Sep 21, 2007 12:19 am
Location: Borderlands

Re: Warner Random Speculation

#331 Post by fiddlesticks »

Matt wrote:Corporate hierarchy is, to me, about as arcane as royal succession lines, but I believe a Senior Vice President is under an Executive Vice President.
Titles aside, the Grand Poobah of "theatrical catalog marketing" certainly reports to the General Grand Poobah of "theatrical catalog", just as the Poobahs of theatrical catalog sales, theatrical catalog distribution, and theatrical catalog entombment do.
User avatar
Matt
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 4:58 pm

Re: Warner Random Speculation

#332 Post by Matt »

fiddlesticks wrote:theatrical catalog entombment
The Poobah of this department appears to be a rising star at Warner Home Video.
User avatar
Jeff
Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 1:49 am
Location: Denver, CO

Re: Warner Random Speculation

#333 Post by Jeff »

Matt wrote:Here's a new Macleans story on why the release of classics on DVD has slowed to a trickle, with some sobering statements by Feltenstein.]
That's fucking depressing. It's not really news, but it sucks to see it all laid out in print like that. The writing has certainly been on the wall, for Criterion and Warner especially.

I think the bit about stores closing has had more impact than we think. Just because the people who post here buy the vast majority of our discs online, doesn't mean everybody does. Virgin and Tower have closed up shop, and Borders has drastically reduced or eliminated DVD inventory at most stores. Criterion counted on impulse buys at full MSRP from those retailers, all three of which set aside special sections just for Criterion product. I buy almost all my stuff online, but the closing of the Denver Tower and Virgin branches was painful. I liked spending hours browsing the racks for esoteric stuff I wasn't familiar with. You know the closings have got to be killing Kino, et al too.

There's only one national brick and mortar retailer that still stocks the full Criterion catalog and usually markets it in its own section. Guess where Criterion just trained customers to look for Criterion discs via a major 50% off sale. They are desperate to get some of that business back.
User avatar
domino harvey
Dot Com Dom
Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 6:42 pm

Re: Warner Random Speculation

#334 Post by domino harvey »

Jeff wrote:Criterion counted on impulse buys at full MSRP from those retailers, all three of which set aside special sections just for Criterion product.
Actually, it doesn't matter for Criterion whether the disc was bought at full retail price or not, as the retailer pays the distributor (Here, Image) a fixed (though perhaps negligibly negotiable from retailer to retailer depending) price far below the MSRP. Now, granted, if a lot of people bought copies from B+Ms, that would mean the B+Ms would order more titles from the distributor, but it's no different from Amazon, &c.
User avatar
Jeff
Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 1:49 am
Location: Denver, CO

Re: Warner Random Speculation

#335 Post by Jeff »

domino harvey wrote:Actually, it doesn't matter for Criterion whether the disc was bought at full retail price or not, as the retailer pays the distributor (Here, Image) a fixed (though perhaps negligibly negotiable from retailer to retailer depending) price
I thought about that when I wrote it, but I'm betting that places like Amazon, who may have large standing orders for thousands of copies of all different titles, get a significant price break from distributors. Of course I could just be talking out my ass.
User avatar
domino harvey
Dot Com Dom
Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 6:42 pm

Re: Warner Random Speculation

#336 Post by domino harvey »

Actually, the other way around. Amazon charges distros that don't move a sufficient amount of product a rental fee for the space they take up-- but any label approaching Criterion's volume would never have to worry about that. When Amazon cuts a price way down on a title, they're the ones taking a bath. However, last I checked, they operated on a 45/55, meaning you must be right unless Amazon really believes in loss leaders!
User avatar
GringoTex
Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 9:57 am

Re: Warner Random Speculation

#337 Post by GringoTex »

Matt wrote:Corporate hierarchy is, to me, about as arcane as royal succession lines, but I believe a Senior Vice President is under an Executive Vice President.

Here's a new Macleans story on why the release of classics on DVD has slowed to a trickle, with some sobering statements by Feltenstein.
That's the most depressing thing I've read in a long time.
User avatar
HerrSchreck
Joined: Sun Sep 04, 2005 3:46 pm

Re: Warner Random Speculation

#338 Post by HerrSchreck »

Re: ^^

Wow.. this all seemed to happen so quickly, too: CC and WB virtually shutting down their line of pre-1950's films within a couple of quarters, replacing them with a semi-monthly slow dribble.
Jeff wrote:
Matt wrote:Here's a new Macleans story on why the release of classics on DVD has slowed to a trickle, with some sobering statements by Feltenstein.]
That's fucking depressing. It's not really news, but it sucks to see it all laid out in print like that. The writing has certainly been on the wall, for Criterion and Warner especially.

I think the bit about stores closing has had more impact than we think. Just because the people who post here buy the vast majority of our discs online, doesn't mean everybody does. Virgin and Tower have closed up shop, and Borders has drastically reduced or eliminated DVD inventory at most stores. Criterion counted on impulse buys at full MSRP from those retailers, all three of which set aside special sections just for Criterion product. I buy almost all my stuff online, but the closing of the Denver Tower and Virgin branches was painful. I liked spending hours browsing the racks for esoteric stuff I wasn't familiar with. You know the closings have got to be killing Kino, et al too.

There's only one national brick and mortar retailer that still stocks the full Criterion catalog and usually markets it in its own section. Guess where Criterion just trained customers to look for Criterion discs via a major 50% off sale. They are desperate to get some of that business back.
Barnes and Noble-- that who you mean?
User avatar
Hopscotch
Joined: Sat Apr 05, 2008 12:30 am

Re: Warner Random Speculation

#339 Post by Hopscotch »

HerrSchreck wrote:Barnes and Noble-- that who you mean?
I'm pretty sure that's who he means, yes.
User avatar
Jeff
Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 1:49 am
Location: Denver, CO

Re: Warner Random Speculation

#340 Post by Jeff »

Yeah, Barnes and Noble is the only major national brick and mortar outlet for Criterion product now -- the only one I can think of anyway.

It's hard to muster up much sympathy for the faceless corporate monolith that is Time Warner, but I really feel for Peter, Jon, and the rest of the great crew at Criterion. They've got to be struggling right now. When you've got to make payroll for 50 people, an economy which finds consumers without money for luxury DVDs is a scary prospect. If releasing Monsoon Wedding on a loaded Blu-ray and dumping Le Jour se lève on an Essential Arthouse disc isn't a desperate cry for help, I don't know what is.
User avatar
Highway 61
Joined: Mon Nov 08, 2004 8:40 pm

Re: Warner Random Speculation

#341 Post by Highway 61 »

Macleans wrote:Warner released a few popular titles in the format (including Casablanca) and found that, according to Feltenstein, “classics are having a tough time on Blu-Ray. New films do great, but people don’t know how great old movies can look in this format.” Warner will try again later this year with Blu-Rays of titles like Gone With the Wind and North By Northwest, but for now, Blu-Ray is another thing to squeeze old movies off the limited shelf space in stores.
It has to be said that Warner would undoubtedly have more luck with these titles if they didn't jack up the MSRP to $60 or $80 by including a bunch of novelty crap with the disc. Talk about "irresponsible releases." :roll:

That said, this article as a whole makes me feel guilty for my "No Blu-ray, no purchase" stance with Criterion. Maybe I'll be a little less demanding from now on.
User avatar
swo17
Bloodthirsty Butcher
Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2008 2:25 pm
Location: SLC, UT

Re: Warner Random Speculation

#342 Post by swo17 »

Jeff wrote:Yeah, Barnes and Noble is the only major national brick and mortar outlet for Criterion product now -- the only one I can think of anyway.
FYE?

Also, for what it's worth, I know that just this past month, I singlehandedly financed the payroll for at least one low-level Criterion intern.
User avatar
knives
Joined: Sat Sep 06, 2008 10:49 pm

Re: Warner Random Speculation

#343 Post by knives »

swo17 wrote:
Jeff wrote:Yeah, Barnes and Noble is the only major national brick and mortar outlet for Criterion product now -- the only one I can think of anyway.
FYE?

Also, for what it's worth, I know that just this past month, I singlehandedly financed the payroll for at least one low-level Criterion intern.
Ditto for the intern.
Also I buy most of my Crit from the local Frys and my Borders has a huge section. Still a depressingly true article.
User avatar
Antoine Doinel
Joined: Sat Mar 04, 2006 5:22 pm
Location: Montreal, Quebec
Contact:

Re: Warner Random Speculation

#344 Post by Antoine Doinel »

Matt wrote:Corporate hierarchy is, to me, about as arcane as royal succession lines, but I believe a Senior Vice President is under an Executive Vice President.

Here's a new Macleans story on why the release of classics on DVD has slowed to a trickle, with some sobering statements by Feltenstein.
My chat with Jonathan Turrell that uses the Maclean's article as the launching point.
HarryLong
Joined: Tue Nov 25, 2008 4:39 pm
Location: Lebanon, PA

Re: Warner Random Speculation

#345 Post by HarryLong »

and my Borders has a huge section
The DVDs haven't been cleared out to make room for toys as they have at many other Borders stores?
Frankinho007
Joined: Tue May 26, 2009 10:45 pm
Location: Berlin, Germany

Re: Warner Random Speculation

#346 Post by Frankinho007 »

From the newest Classic Coming Attractions column at The Bits:
Classic fans will be pleased to know that Warners has just recently been able to complete clearing the rights to two titles long in demand by fans. No Time for Sergeants (1958, with Andy Griffith) and The Breaking Point (1950, with John Garfield) are both now planned for pressed DVD release sometime in 2010. The studio hopes that No Time for Sergeants will have Andy Griffith's participation in appropriate supplementary material. The Breaking Point might get slotted into Warners' Film Noir Collection: Volume 5 (which is a definite go for 2010), but will more likely see a separate release.

Warner Bros. also continues to work actively on The Hanging Tree (1959, with Gary Cooper). There is much more work to do on the photochemical restoration for the original elements, but the results should be worth the wait. A pressed DVD release is currently planned, but no release timing has yet been set.
User avatar
Matt
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 4:58 pm

Re: Warner Random Speculation

#347 Post by Matt »

pressed DVD release sometime in 2010
Say that phrase out loud. That, ladies and gentlemen, is the sound of expectations that can go no lower.
User avatar
swo17
Bloodthirsty Butcher
Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2008 2:25 pm
Location: SLC, UT

Re: Warner Random Speculation

#348 Post by swo17 »

Oh, it can still get worse. I give them three more years before they're distributing films via mass email messages* saying:
Come rummage through the trash in the alley behind our offices. We threw a bunch of old film canisters out there. Maybe one of you will be smart enough to make DVDs out of them.
*I'm kidding of course. This would take some actual effort.
User avatar
Matt
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 4:58 pm

Re: Warner Random Speculation

#349 Post by Matt »

Future news story:

Out-of-control wildfires in California took a toll on America's cultural heritage as the Warner Bros. vaults where thousands of classic films were archived burned to the ground this morning. Quick-thinking archivists managed to save only four films made before 1997: Gone With the Wind, Casablanca, The Wizard of Oz, and Blade Runner. When reached for comment, the head of Warner Home Video shrugged and said, "Eh."
ianungstad
Joined: Thu Mar 17, 2005 1:20 am

Re: Warner Random Speculation

#350 Post by ianungstad »

http://forum.dvdtalk.com/dvd-talk/52944 ... ad-13.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Between New Line Cinema, Turner and Warner Brother's, it looks like the company discontinued 332 dvds in the last week, many of which are classic titles.

Someone, Criterion or otherwise needs to license a good chunk of Warner's classic library. With all the other bad news about Warner's in the last few months...the future is looking pretty awful.
Post Reply