Late Night Television

Discuss TV shows old and new
Post Reply
Message
Author
Robert de la Cheyniest
Joined: Wed Nov 22, 2006 1:06 am

Re: Late Night Television

#26 Post by Robert de la Cheyniest »

A very classy response from Conan. As a die hard Letterman watcher during my high school years I've always hated Jay Leno with a passion (also he's not funny) and this definitely doesn't help that opinion. But more importantly, who the hell is running NBC right now? Jesus!
User avatar
Matt
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 4:58 pm

Re: Late Night Television

#27 Post by Matt »

Moving Leno to 10 was that idiot Ben Silverman's idea. If he hadn't already left NBC, I'm sure he'd be fired over this debacle. The best thing NBC could do is to cut Leno loose and give him a development deal. Or stick him on Sunday nights.

For me, messing with The Tonight Show, one of the greatest continuing institutions in TV history, is not an option (and I probably watched Leno's version maybe 10 times and never all the way through). You might as well cancel TV altogether.

I don't think jumping to Fox would be a good move for Conan. They have no established late-night presence and a terrible history of previous late-night endeavors (Chevy Chase Show, anyone?). Furthermore, any late-night show on Fox would probably come on at 11:00 (Eastern), after the 10:00 local news and a half-hour of, what, TMZ (that's what's on my Fox affiliate)? They think people are going to stick around? And not be watching the better local news at 11? Or a rerun of Seinfeld?
User avatar
Highway 61
Joined: Mon Nov 08, 2004 8:40 pm

Re: Late Night Television

#28 Post by Highway 61 »

Matt wrote:I don't think jumping to Fox would be a good move for Conan. They have no established late-night presence and a terrible history of previous late-night endeavors (Chevy Chase Show, anyone?). Furthermore, any late-night show on Fox would probably come on at 11:00 (Eastern), after the 10:00 local news and a half-hour of, what, TMZ (that's what's on my Fox affiliate)? They think people are going to stick around? And not be watching the better local news at 11? Or a rerun of Seinfeld?
You know where I'd like to see Conan go? HBO. Not just for the lack of censorship, but I have to think pay cable would allow him to do longer interviews with more interesting guests.

Still, I'm more optimistic about Fox than you are. They're a far bigger network today than when they did the Chevy Chase and Joan Rivers shows. And I imagine they won't be harping on Conan to water down his act.
User avatar
flyonthewall2983
Joined: Mon Jun 27, 2005 7:31 pm
Location: Indiana
Contact:

Re: Late Night Television

#29 Post by flyonthewall2983 »

God, that would be great if Conan went to HBO.
User avatar
tavernier
Joined: Sat Apr 02, 2005 11:18 pm

Re: Late Night Television

#30 Post by tavernier »

Highway 61 wrote:You know where I'd like to see Conan go? HBO. Not just for the lack of censorship, but I have to think pay cable would allow him to do longer interviews with more interesting guests.
You're not serious...Conan is a worse interviewer than Leno.
User avatar
Napier
Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 1:48 pm
Location: The Shire

Re: Late Night Television

#31 Post by Napier »

Conan has told NBC to go fuck itself. Apparently they have already inked Leno to a new deal. This next week or so of The Tonight Show should be great, to say the least. Here's hoping for some good old fashioned Network style TV.
User avatar
Fiery Angel
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 5:59 pm

Re: Late Night Television

#32 Post by Fiery Angel »

Dave was good and snarky last night, especially when he was imitating Leno's whiny voice.
User avatar
Highway 61
Joined: Mon Nov 08, 2004 8:40 pm

Re: Late Night Television

#33 Post by Highway 61 »

tavernier wrote:
Highway 61 wrote:You know where I'd like to see Conan go? HBO. Not just for the lack of censorship, but I have to think pay cable would allow him to do longer interviews with more interesting guests.
You're not serious...Conan is a worse interviewer than Leno.
Call me crazy, but I am serious. My intuition could easily be off on this, but I think Conan's lame interviews are more a symptom of A) Consistently B-list guests at 12:30 and later when NBC screwed him over in favor of Leno and B) A concious effort to play nice so as to prove to NBC that he was mainstream. Again it's mere intuition, but I think wherever Conan goes next he'll be edgier and more intelligent.
User avatar
Cold Bishop
Joined: Wed May 31, 2006 1:45 am
Location: Portland, OR

Re: Late Night Television

#34 Post by Cold Bishop »

Conan's interview has always followed a basic pattern.

1) The first guest is usually you're average bland pr-run celebrity. The difference between A and B-listers isn't all that important, since its obvious there's not much to talk about other than the basic play-nice approach that is symptomatic of every talk show. Occasionally, he'll nab someone he really would like to talk to (he did seem to genuinely enjoy interviewing Gary Oldman the other night), but there's not much you can do here.

2) Second guest usually tends to be the less famous, but much more interesting person, more often the person which it is obvious Conan invited, and as such, the subject of the better interview. This is where most of the comics end up, and Conan's best interviews (with Norm McDonald, Dave Chappelle, Patton Oswalt and such) usually fall in this category.

3) Stand-up or musical guest: this is where the transistion to the Tonight Show really did damage, as he hasn't been able to bring in the more edgy acts the way he use to.

Anyways, the best thing about Conan has always been the stuff around the regular talk-show schtick than the schtick itself (not only interviews, but his monologues have never been amazing, and most of the humor comes from how self-deprecating they are), the jump to an edgier network could perhaps allow him to break and subvert the traditional format a little more.

Sure, he's not a Charlie Rose or Dick Cavett, but that's because guests go on there to hawk their wears, not face serious questions. If anything, Conan's "poor interviewing" skills (a common complaint) is his attempt to make dead-weight interviews more interesting.
User avatar
Murdoch
Joined: Mon Apr 21, 2008 3:59 am
Location: Upstate NY

Re: Late Night Television

#35 Post by Murdoch »

I've always thought Craig Ferguson's great at interviews if only because he comes off as the guest's half-drunk uncle.
User avatar
Highway 61
Joined: Mon Nov 08, 2004 8:40 pm

Re: Late Night Television

#36 Post by Highway 61 »

I normally have no time for Jimmy Kimmel, but his hour long Jay Leno evisceration last night was the funniest thing I've seen on network late night TV in years.
User avatar
tavernier
Joined: Sat Apr 02, 2005 11:18 pm

Re: Late Night Television

#37 Post by tavernier »

Dave's "promo" for Law and Order: Leno Victims Unit was pretty good....
User avatar
Jeff
Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 1:49 am
Location: Denver, CO

Re: Late Night Television

#38 Post by Jeff »

tavernier wrote:Dave's "promo" for Law and Order: Leno Victims Unit was pretty good....
Here
User avatar
Polybius
Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 2:57 am
Location: Rollin' down Highway 41

Re: Late Night Television

#39 Post by Polybius »

Fiery Angel wrote:Dave was good and snarky last night, especially when he was imitating Leno's whiny voice.
"Don't kid yourselves...these guys wouldn't have their jobs if they didn't know what they were doing." :lol:
Robert de la Cheyniest
Joined: Wed Nov 22, 2006 1:06 am

Re: Late Night Television

#40 Post by Robert de la Cheyniest »

And here is the Dave Letterman we all know and love

And here too
User avatar
Highway 61
Joined: Mon Nov 08, 2004 8:40 pm

Re: Late Night Television

#41 Post by Highway 61 »

Once again, I'm surprised to learn that Kimmel isn't a hack. Here he is telling Leno to fuck off right to his face.
Last edited by Highway 61 on Fri Jan 15, 2010 5:50 am, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
flyonthewall2983
Joined: Mon Jun 27, 2005 7:31 pm
Location: Indiana
Contact:

Re: Late Night Television

#42 Post by flyonthewall2983 »

Kimmel isn't a hack, really. He just looks (and acts a bit) like an asshole. You'd swear if he wasn't intentionally funny he'd be a shoe-in for Fox News.
User avatar
mfunk9786
Under Chris' Protection
Joined: Fri May 16, 2008 8:43 pm
Location: Miami, FL

Re: Late Night Television

#43 Post by mfunk9786 »

That Kimmel clip is absolutely amazing. Unfortunately, I suppose, this is all for naught: it's not like Leno has a soul or anything.
User avatar
flyonthewall2983
Joined: Mon Jun 27, 2005 7:31 pm
Location: Indiana
Contact:

Re: Late Night Television

#44 Post by flyonthewall2983 »

http://losangeles.craigslist.org/sfv/cl ... 43187.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
User avatar
Murdoch
Joined: Mon Apr 21, 2008 3:59 am
Location: Upstate NY

Re: Late Night Television

#45 Post by Murdoch »

User avatar
domino harvey
Dot Com Dom
Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 6:42 pm

Re: Late Night Television

#46 Post by domino harvey »

User avatar
tavernier
Joined: Sat Apr 02, 2005 11:18 pm

Re: Late Night Television

#47 Post by tavernier »

So were all 3 together or was it CGI?
User avatar
Jeff
Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 1:49 am
Location: Denver, CO

Re: Late Night Television

#48 Post by Jeff »

tavernier wrote:So were all 3 together or was it CGI?
It was legit.
User avatar
flyonthewall2983
Joined: Mon Jun 27, 2005 7:31 pm
Location: Indiana
Contact:

Re: Late Night Television

#49 Post by flyonthewall2983 »

Conan's going to TBS.
User avatar
mfunk9786
Under Chris' Protection
Joined: Fri May 16, 2008 8:43 pm
Location: Miami, FL

Re: Late Night Television

#50 Post by mfunk9786 »

What could the allure of TBS possibly be? This is downright embarassing... no one watches TBS for anything but Seinfeld reruns.
Post Reply