Blu-ray, in General

Discuss North American DVDs, Blu-rays, UHDs, and related topics
Post Reply
Message
Author
User avatar
Cinephrenic
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 6:58 pm
Location: Paris, Texas

Re: Blu-ray, in General

#1626 Post by Cinephrenic »

Heartbreaking news. I thought Criterion would release some of these because of their relationship with Image. Perhaps Image needed the money after all.
User avatar
tojoed
Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2008 3:47 pm
Location: Cambridge, England

Re: Blu-ray, in General

#1627 Post by tojoed »

You find the news of Blurays of these films heartbreaking? How strange.
User avatar
fdm
Joined: Fri Apr 21, 2006 5:25 pm

Re: Blu-ray, in General

#1628 Post by fdm »

tojoed wrote:You find the news of Blurays of these films heartbreaking? How strange.
E1 is an offspring of Fox Lorber or Koch Lorber or something... You know the ones that made all those stellar DVDs.
Flike
Joined: Sun Jun 08, 2008 11:47 pm

Re: Blu-ray, in General

#1629 Post by Flike »

I'm inclined to give them the benefit of the doubt (crosses fingers). This year is looking promising for new format (non-Criterion) canon: La dolce vita, Taxi Driver, Metropolis, Battleship Potemkin...
User avatar
perkizitore
Joined: Thu Jul 10, 2008 7:29 pm
Location: OOP is the only answer

Re: Blu-ray, in General

#1630 Post by perkizitore »

User avatar
Cinephrenic
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 6:58 pm
Location: Paris, Texas

Re: Blu-ray, in General

#1631 Post by Cinephrenic »

This should piss a bunch of retailers off.
User avatar
Magic Hate Ball
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 10:15 pm
Location: Seattle, WA

Re: Blu-ray, in General

#1632 Post by Magic Hate Ball »

DVDBeaver reviews the Lionsgate Ran Blu-Ray and oh look it sucks. A similar disappointment with the Ladykillers Blu-Ray, which is so bright and washed out that if it were not so sharp it could be mistaken for a VHS image.
User avatar
tojoed
Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2008 3:47 pm
Location: Cambridge, England

Re: Blu-ray, in General

#1633 Post by tojoed »

There's no disappointment for me at all with The Ladykillers BluRay, it looks as it should and once did. It's the SD DVD that looks terrible and green tinged.
User avatar
Magic Hate Ball
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 10:15 pm
Location: Seattle, WA

Re: Blu-ray, in General

#1634 Post by Magic Hate Ball »

I think it's the last screencap that's really bugging me. The other ones are okay, but she looks like a ghost there.
User avatar
bkimball
Joined: Sat Apr 15, 2006 4:10 am
Location: SLC, UT

Re: Blu-ray, in General

#1635 Post by bkimball »

Seriously, reading these reviews and comparing them to the general tone of the forum, it seems that everyone has a bias against StudioCanal simply because they took their collection back from Criterion. Let's have some perspective on the release individually without coming in with a grudge against them for their licensing practices.

Personally, I'm quite excited about Ladykillers and still stoked about Ran. Contempt is my most anticipated release though.
User avatar
Peacock
Joined: Mon Dec 22, 2008 11:47 pm
Location: Scotland

Re: Blu-ray, in General

#1636 Post by Peacock »

bkimball wrote:Personally, I'm quite excited about Ladykillers and still stoked about Ran. Contempt is my most anticipated release though.
But all 3 are poor. Ran - extremely noisy with dull colors; Contempt - soft with quite muted colors from a 2k; Ladykillers overly noisy and overly bright.

I don't think any feelings of regret are unwarranted. It'll be interesting to see how the Studio Canal compares to the Crit Pierrot le Fou
User avatar
TMDaines
Joined: Wed Nov 11, 2009 5:01 pm
Location: Greater Manchester

Re: Blu-ray, in General

#1637 Post by TMDaines »

bkimball wrote:Seriously, reading these reviews and comparing them to the general tone of the forum, it seems that everyone has a bias against StudioCanal simply because they took their collection back from Criterion. Let's have some perspective on the release individually without coming in with a grudge against them for their licensing practices.
Indeed. It's 2010 and Criterion still can't do releases in the 1.33:1 format properly - they are far from perfect too.
User avatar
bkimball
Joined: Sat Apr 15, 2006 4:10 am
Location: SLC, UT

Re: Blu-ray, in General

#1638 Post by bkimball »

Peacock wrote:
bkimball wrote:Personally, I'm quite excited about Ladykillers and still stoked about Ran. Contempt is my most anticipated release though.
But all 3 are poor. Ran - extremely noisy with dull colors; Contempt - soft with quite muted colors from a 2k; Ladykillers overly noisy and overly bright.

I don't think any feelings of regret are unwarranted. It'll be interesting to see how the Studio Canal compares to the Crit Pierrot le Fou
Fair enough, and how I do covet my copy of the Pierrot Le Fou BD. How gorgeous. How sublime!
User avatar
nsps
Joined: Tue Aug 05, 2008 8:25 am
Contact:

Re: Blu-ray, in General

#1639 Post by nsps »

So is this Ran BD as bad as the notorious HD DVD edition?
User avatar
tojoed
Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2008 3:47 pm
Location: Cambridge, England

Re: Blu-ray, in General

#1640 Post by tojoed »

Peacock wrote: But all 3 are poor...Ladykillers overly noisy and overly bright.
You're entitled to your view, of course, but if you are basing it on the SD DVD, that was always far too dark. My experience of Ladykillers theatrically, albeit a long time ago, chimes with the BluRay.
jbaart
Joined: Fri Jan 01, 2010 11:16 pm
Location: Germany

Re: Blu-ray, in General

#1641 Post by jbaart »

If you look at the Beaver caps of Ladykillers you can clearly see details being lost due to the brightness. Also, skin colors don't look natural in any way and I don't see a good artistic reason to make them look artificially white in this movie. I can't believe this is how the film's supposed to look.
User avatar
Person
Joined: Sat May 19, 2007 7:00 pm

Re: Blu-ray, in General

#1642 Post by Person »

The Blu-ray of Ladykillers look blown out, to me. The sky is fucking bleach white! The black tones look milky. I always loved the dark look of the previous DVD, VHS and TV presentations. Also, isn't the end of the movie shot day for night? Christ knows how that scene looks now.
Flike
Joined: Sun Jun 08, 2008 11:47 pm

Re: Blu-ray, in General

#1643 Post by Flike »

Glenn Kenny's post about the new Gangs of New York Blu-ray. We're finally beginning to see decent re-releases, and that's very exciting. Now for The Searchers, Do the Right Thing, Pan's Labyrinth, A History of Violence, pretty much all the Kubricks except 2001, GoodFellas...
User avatar
mfunk9786
Under Chris' Protection
Joined: Fri May 16, 2008 8:43 pm
Location: Miami, FL

Re: Blu-ray, in General

#1644 Post by mfunk9786 »

Don't hold your breath for Kubrick re-releases. Just don't.
User avatar
aox
Joined: Fri Jun 20, 2008 4:02 pm
Location: nYc

Re: Blu-ray, in General

#1645 Post by aox »

mfunk9786 wrote:Don't hold your breath for Kubrick re-releases. Just don't.
Besides 2001 and The Shining, that's a real shame.
User avatar
Highway 61
Joined: Mon Nov 08, 2004 8:40 pm

Re: Blu-ray, in General

#1646 Post by Highway 61 »

mfunk9786 wrote:Don't hold your breath for Kubrick re-releases. Just don't.
What makes you say that? Studios love the double dip, and A Clockwork Orange's 40th anniversary is right around the corner.
User avatar
swo17
Bloodthirsty Butcher
Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2008 2:25 pm
Location: SLC, UT

Re: Blu-ray, in General

#1647 Post by swo17 »

Well, they love to rerelease things, but not necessarily to give them the release they deserve. Case in point: Someone mentioned Goodfellas up above. That's getting rereleased next week to coincide with the 20th anniversary, but supposedly with no improvement in image quality.
User avatar
aox
Joined: Fri Jun 20, 2008 4:02 pm
Location: nYc

Re: Blu-ray, in General

#1648 Post by aox »

swo17 wrote:Well, they love to rerelease things, but not necessarily to give them the release they deserve. Case in point: Someone mentioned Goodfellas up above. That's getting rereleased next week to coincide with the 20th anniversary, but supposedly with no improvement in image quality.
Yeah, it's very disappointing. But at least GANGS OF NY is getting the treatment it deserves with its rerelease! Priorities.
Last edited by aox on Mon Feb 08, 2010 7:14 pm, edited 2 times in total.
User avatar
eerik
Joined: Sun Mar 22, 2009 8:53 pm
Location: Estonia

Re: Blu-ray, in General

#1649 Post by eerik »

swo17 wrote:Case in point: Someone mentioned Goodfellas up above. That's getting rereleased next week to coincide with the 20th anniversary, but supposedly with no improvement in image quality.
In fact, it is exactly the same disc from 2007, just new packaging and a bonus DVD.

I can even say that I hate Warner Brothers. They have a huge library of films but all their Blu-ray releases are somewhat filtered, low bitrate encodes. Many of those come from old low quality masters, many of them don't have lossless audio, etc.
User avatar
Cinephrenic
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 6:58 pm
Location: Paris, Texas

Re: Blu-ray, in General

#1650 Post by Cinephrenic »

Classic studio double-dipping, regarding Goodfellas.
Post Reply