Blu-ray, in General
- Brian C
- I hate to be That Pedantic Guy but...
- Joined: Wed Sep 16, 2009 3:58 pm
- Location: Northwest US
Re: Blu-ray, in General
I have Clockwork, EWS, Shining, and 2001, and I think they all look great. It's true that Clockwork is somewhat soft, but it looks very film-like in my opinion. I'd say the same for EWS - whatever flaws it may have (and I wouldn't pretend to be definitive on the subject since I'm watching on a 720p TV), it looks as much like a 35mm print as I can imagine on my TV.
- fdm
- Joined: Fri Apr 21, 2006 5:25 pm
Re: Blu-ray, in General
Sorry but I didn't say it was mediocre/bad. I said it looked pretty much just like it did in the cinema. I THINK IT LOOKS GREAT. It's only aox who has problems.nsps wrote:Sorry—was actually referring to posts above yours (fdm, aox, other combinations of three letters (OK, just those two) saying it was mediocre-to-bad.Fierias wrote:I'm saying that I don't see any problems.nsps wrote: What are the problems with Eyes Wide Shut? All the complaints I've seen about EWS seemed more geared at the film's visual design than the look of the transfer, but maybe I missed some valid concerns…
- nsps
- Joined: Tue Aug 05, 2008 8:25 am
- Contact:
Re: Blu-ray, in General
Thanks for correcting my misinterpretation. I thought you were implying it had been grain-reduced or something with your "ummmm no" post, but I just read your meaning wrong. Sorry about that.fdm wrote:Sorry but I didn't say it was mediocre/bad. I said it looked pretty much just like it did in the cinema. I THINK IT LOOKS GREAT. It's only aox who has problems.
- fdm
- Joined: Fri Apr 21, 2006 5:25 pm
Re: Blu-ray, in General
ummmm no was aox being cute, not me.nsps wrote:Thanks for correcting my misinterpretation. I thought you were implying it had been grain-reduced or something with your "ummmm no" post, but I just read your meaning wrong. Sorry about that.fdm wrote:Sorry but I didn't say it was mediocre/bad. I said it looked pretty much just like it did in the cinema. I THINK IT LOOKS GREAT. It's only aox who has problems.
-
stwrt
- Joined: Wed Mar 12, 2008 12:24 am
Re: Blu-ray, in General
The Blu-Ray for Boogie Nights looks fresh, sharp and pleasing. A lot of these movies had early DVD transfers which look poor nowadays but were re-mastered for special edition DVDs in the later 2000s, so the improvement when they appear on HD is not always immediately apparent (though the Blu-Ray is virtually always better than its DVD version). But afaik Boogie Nights on home video hasn't been revisited since 2000 so the new Blu-Ray is up against late 1990s DVD standards - the Blu-Ray looks night and day better, has far more close detail and more accurate color levels and in some scenes makes the DVD look like a VHS image. Good stuff indeed.
- fdm
- Joined: Fri Apr 21, 2006 5:25 pm
Re: Blu-ray, in General
If you're sitting on the fence about going to blu-ray, and your TV only has component video inputs (no hdmi), might be a good idea to get a player by the end of this year... Link
- nsps
- Joined: Tue Aug 05, 2008 8:25 am
- Contact:
Re: Blu-ray, in General
Amazon shows a Boogie Nights DVD from 2007, but I'm pretty sure you're right and it's the same as the 2000 two-disc edition. I can see why they hadn't updated it, as it was a pretty impressive undertaking with the second cast-and-crew commentary along with all the other special features, even if the transfer doesn't hold up as well to today's standards. I just watched PTA's Magnolia (my favorite of his) on Blu last week, and it also looks very good.stwrt wrote:The Blu-Ray for Boogie Nights looks fresh, sharp and pleasing. A lot of these movies had early DVD transfers which look poor nowadays but were re-mastered for special edition DVDs in the later 2000s, so the improvement when they appear on HD is not always immediately apparent (though the Blu-Ray is virtually always better than its DVD version). But afaik Boogie Nights on home video hasn't been revisited since 2000 so the new Blu-Ray is up against late 1990s DVD standards - the Blu-Ray looks night and day better, has far more close detail and more accurate color levels and in some scenes makes the DVD look like a VHS image. Good stuff indeed.
Wow—apparently I've just gone batty and can't tell who posted what…I must've got mixed up over who was quoted versus who was posting…I do have a nasty virus that I caught at Sundance and has been dogging me ever since. Chalk it up to it eating away my brain.fdm wrote:ummmm no was aox being cute, not me.
- swo17
- Bloodthirsty Butcher
- Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2008 2:25 pm
- Location: SLC, UT
Re: Blu-ray, in General
They did reissue Boogie Nights on DVD in 2007, but I believe it was just a repackaging of the earlier edition into a two-disc keepcase. I never compared the two editions side by side but the image quality on the reissue left a lot to be desired, so I'm assuming it was just a port of the original. As soon as the price is right, the Blu-ray will be mine...
- ZizouJuve
- Joined: Wed Feb 21, 2007 3:07 am
- Location: Pittsburgh, PA
- Contact:
Re: Blu-ray, in General
That was one of my most anticipated Blu's of this year and its well worth it. Hell I even ventured into the devil's lair (Best Buy) to pick it up.swo17 wrote:They did reissue Boogie Nights on DVD in 2007, but I believe it was just a repackaging of the earlier edition into a two-disc keepcase. I never compared the two editions side by side but the image quality on the reissue left a lot to be desired, so I'm assuming it was just a port of the original. As soon as the price is right, the Blu-ray will be mine...
- dx23
- Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 12:52 am
- Location: Puerto Rico
Re: Blu-ray, in General
I heard that the Blu-ray left out some extras or easter eggs. Does anyone know anything?
- nsps
- Joined: Tue Aug 05, 2008 8:25 am
- Contact:
Re: Blu-ray, in General
I know the color bars with JCR's ass were removed from Magnolia, but I haven't checked Boogie Nights.
- Noiretirc
- Joined: Tue Dec 09, 2008 10:04 pm
- Location: VanIsle
- Contact:
Re: Blu-ray, in General
Sigh, I wish I could understand what that all meant. I think I'm rather like John Lennon in this department; "Mr Martin, make this song sound like an orange."fdm wrote:If you're sitting on the fence about going to blu-ray, and your TV only has component video inputs (no hdmi), might be a good idea to get a player by the end of this year... Link
- fdm
- Joined: Fri Apr 21, 2006 5:25 pm
Re: Blu-ray, in General
Basically it means that if you got a widescreen TV (or projector) prior to a few years ago when the best connection on it might have been through those three red blue and green connectors (component video), once next year's new blu-ray player models start to appear, and you end up hooking one of them up using those connectors, you will only be allowed to see DVD quality picture (standard definition), even when playing blu-ray discs.Noiretirc wrote:Sigh, I wish I could understand what that all meant. I think I'm rather like John Lennon in this department; "Mr Martin, make this song sound like an orange."fdm wrote:If you're sitting on the fence about going to blu-ray, and your TV only has component video inputs (no hdmi), might be a good idea to get a player by the end of this year... Link
If you get one of this year's (or earlier) model blu-ray players, you'll still be able to see full HD quality picture (high definition) from blu-rays when you use those very same connectors between your blu-ray player and your TV.
If you currently (or in the future) use an HDMI connection instead, you can basically ignore that article.
(That's from the hardware perspective. What wasn't mentioned in the article is that from a software (blu-ray disc) perspective, film companies could theoretically at any time also start "locking" (flagging is the term I think they use) the discs in such a way that even if you have a this year or earlier player, those flagged discs would only allow standard def video to come out of players that are using component video outputs to connect to their TVs.)
So, component video is basically being phased out as a high definition option for blu-ray players, those available now should be fine, unless film companies decide to also start flagging their discs so even that is not permitted (when blu-ray was first introduced, they agreed up front to not flag the discs for several years because most TVs only had component video connections, dunno if/when that moratorium on flagging will end).
More verbose than I anticipated when I started typing, but maybe that'll help a bit. (If too much, the first paragraph or so should give you the gist of the this year's players vs next year's players disadvantage coming up.)
- mteller
- Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 7:23 pm
Re: Blu-ray, in General
The color bars and the associated easter egg are gone. Everything else is there.dx23 wrote:I heard that the Blu-ray left out some extras or easter eggs. Does anyone know anything?
- Noiretirc
- Joined: Tue Dec 09, 2008 10:04 pm
- Location: VanIsle
- Contact:
Re: Blu-ray, in General
Thank you fdm, that was quite helpful.
- manicsounds
- Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 2:58 am
- Location: Tokyo, Japan
Re: Blu-ray, in General
Weinstein Company titles will be distributed by Sony now and I'm guessing DVD too.
- aox
- Joined: Fri Jun 20, 2008 4:02 pm
- Location: nYc
Re: Blu-ray, in General
Sony? is that a good thing?
- domino harvey
- Dot Com Dom
- Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 6:42 pm
Re: Blu-ray, in General
Well, it's a good thing for fans of the Worst DVD Covers Ever thread
- Brian C
- I hate to be That Pedantic Guy but...
- Joined: Wed Sep 16, 2009 3:58 pm
- Location: Northwest US
Re: Blu-ray, in General
Will Sony have anything to do with them other than basically stamping a logo on the back and collecting a cut?
In general terms though, Sony good, yes?
In general terms though, Sony good, yes?
- willoneill
- Joined: Wed Mar 18, 2009 2:10 pm
- Location: Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
Re: Blu-ray, in General
From the article I read, it seems that Sony will be handling all of the marketing on these, and it will be Weinstein that will simply be getting a cut.
- Brian C
- I hate to be That Pedantic Guy but...
- Joined: Wed Sep 16, 2009 3:58 pm
- Location: Northwest US
Re: Blu-ray, in General
I guess the relevant question is who's going to be in charge of the actual content. Are Sony simply going to be releasing transfers that the Weinsteins have already made? Or doing their own heavy lifting?
- fdm
- Joined: Fri Apr 21, 2006 5:25 pm
Re: Blu-ray, in General
Sure, no problem. About the only "if" that I thought about later, is possibly they could retro-actively downgrade component video via a firmware update, but that's probably just me being paranoid. (But just in case, might be a good idea to hold off on firmware updates after the end of this year if you're hooked up via component video until someone (else) makes sureNoiretirc wrote:Thank you fdm, that was quite helpful.
- nsps
- Joined: Tue Aug 05, 2008 8:25 am
- Contact:
Re: Blu-ray, in General
Given the consortium's consumer-as-enemy worldview, I don't think you're being paranoid at all.fdm wrote:Sure, no problem. About the only "if" that I thought about later, is possibly they could retro-actively downgrade component video via a firmware update, but that's probably just me being paranoid. (But just in case, might be a good idea to hold off on firmware updates after the end of this year if you're hooked up via component video until someone (else) makes sureNoiretirc wrote:Thank you fdm, that was quite helpful.)
- fdm
- Joined: Fri Apr 21, 2006 5:25 pm
Re: Blu-ray, in General
Yeah, I just re-skimmed the article a little while ago, and my skimming led me to believe that if a current component video fully enabled blu-ray player is still being sold next year, this could end up not being paranoia based at all. One of the few reasons I'm glad my component video only HDTV died after a few years. (Replaced with a Sony notorious for its bad optical blocks... but at least it has HDMInsps wrote:Given the consortium's consumer-as-enemy worldview, I don't think you're being paranoid at all.fdm wrote:Sure, no problem. About the only "if" that I thought about later, is possibly they could retro-actively downgrade component video via a firmware update, but that's probably just me being paranoid. (But just in case, might be a good idea to hold off on firmware updates after the end of this year if you're hooked up via component video until someone (else) makes sureNoiretirc wrote:Thank you fdm, that was quite helpful.)
-
AfterTheRain
- Joined: Thu Apr 10, 2008 1:42 am
Re: Blu-ray, in General
I just got a Blu-ray player today for my birthday. Does anyone know about any DVD-for-Blu-ray exchange programs that are going on? It's because I have a couple of titles that are out on the format and I would really like to know.