Criterion Newsletter (Part 2)

News on Criterion and Janus Films
Locked
Message
Author
User avatar
zedz
Joined: Sun Nov 07, 2004 11:24 pm

Re: Criterion Newsletter (Part 2)

#1401 Post by zedz »

I had no idea Kes was so unknown / hard to get in the US. It's practically a national treasure in Britain. I wonder if they've thought of hitting up Jarvis Cocker for supplements?
User avatar
Alphonse Doinel
Joined: Sun Dec 06, 2009 4:42 pm

Re: Criterion Newsletter (Part 2)

#1402 Post by Alphonse Doinel »

Loach had this and plenty of his other films in full on YouTube, so I wonder if we'll be seeing a few more in the future?
User avatar
swo17
Bloodthirsty Butcher
Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2008 2:25 pm
Location: SLC, UT

Re: Criterion Newsletter (Part 2)

#1403 Post by swo17 »

Tom Hagen wrote:It's cool that we were actually given a clue about a title that hadn't been unofficially confirmed already. I don't think that's happened since Che.
Image
SheriffAmbrose
Joined: Sat Feb 03, 2007 4:08 pm

Re: Criterion Newsletter (Part 2)

#1404 Post by SheriffAmbrose »

zedz wrote:I wonder if they've thought of hitting up Jarvis Cocker for supplements?
Wait, why Cocker?

(This has aired occasionally on TCM in the States and I've seen it and love it, so great news!)
User avatar
FilmFanSea
Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 5:37 pm
Location: Portland, OR

Re: Criterion Newsletter (Part 2)

#1405 Post by FilmFanSea »

Regarding Kes. I bought the U.K. DVD from MGM back in 2003. The film itself is excellent. I believe it's 16mm blown up to 35mm. It has a grainy, verité quality. The MGM disc is barebones as I recall, so it will be nice to upgrade this one.

Edit: U.K. version is also non-anamorphic (1.66:1 letterboxed), so Criterion should be able to improve on the picture quality.
User avatar
HistoryProf
Joined: Mon Mar 13, 2006 7:48 am
Location: KCK

Re: Criterion Newsletter (Part 2)

#1406 Post by HistoryProf »

swo17 wrote:
Tom Hagen wrote:It's cool that we were actually given a clue about a title that hadn't been unofficially confirmed already. I don't think that's happened since Che.
Image
broadcast gnus? can't believe i don't remember that one :lol:
User avatar
NABOB OF NOWHERE
Joined: Thu Sep 01, 2005 4:30 pm
Location: Brandywine River

Re: Criterion Newsletter (Part 2)

#1407 Post by NABOB OF NOWHERE »

SheriffAmbrose wrote:
zedz wrote:I wonder if they've thought of hitting up Jarvis Cocker for supplements?
Wait, why Cocker?
South Yorkshire's own on the soundtrack...
Music by John Cameron. Limited vinyl and CD. This is the first ever issue of this original music. It is short and beautiful. I'll leave it to a pop star to explain:

"The sound of a long-lost childhood...The smell of a damp school cloakroom, from an age when comics were still printed on newsprint...But this is more than just another product of the nostalgia industry - put on this album & immediately you'll be soaring through the air, free of your earthly shackles: for this is the sound of a human soul in flight. A beautiful daydream antidote to an all too real South Yorkshire nightmare. "Tha' won't get me down t'pit." "Pig, Pig, Sow,Sow." "Tha' dun't like being called a bastard does tha'?" This is the real thing. This is beauty so fragile it hurts. This is music with the Jesses well & truly off." Jarvis Cocker
User avatar
Cold Bishop
Joined: Wed May 31, 2006 1:45 am
Location: Portland, OR

Re: Criterion Newsletter (Part 2)

#1408 Post by Cold Bishop »

Intriguing. I wasn't expecting Kes so soon... :-k :wink:
User avatar
Sloper
Joined: Wed May 30, 2007 2:06 am

Re: Criterion Newsletter (Part 2)

#1409 Post by Sloper »

I love Kes - those who haven't seen it yet are in for a treat. And am I right in thinking that Cathy Come Home and Family Life have also not been released in America? It would be nice to see Criterion do justice to those soul-crushing little beauties. All three films should be required viewing for anybody thinking of starting a family!
Prickly
Joined: Wed Sep 01, 2010 10:20 pm
Location: London

Re: Criterion Newsletter (Part 2)

#1410 Post by Prickly »

Long-time lurker jumping in...
I'm fairly sure that the film was dubbed for the American market and even in some London / southern cinemas as the Barnsley accent is fairly impenetrable at times. Wonder if they'd release it with two soundtracks.
User avatar
colinr0380
Joined: Mon Nov 08, 2004 8:30 pm
Location: Chapel-en-le-Frith, Derbyshire, UK

Re: Criterion Newsletter (Part 2)

#1411 Post by colinr0380 »

If they were going to release a Ken Loach film it is only fitting that they did this one. A fantastic, moving film that still manages to effortlessly put recent fluffier and more heartwarming attempts at similar 'it's grim up north' material (I'm thinking Billy Elliot or The Full Monty) to shame.

And it's Brian Glover's debut and his finest hour as the brutal P.E. teacher!

The next question is (and apologies for posting about cover art outside of the dedicated thread): will they use similar cover art to the UK DVD, or be more hawkish about their imagery?

Image
User avatar
charulata
Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 4:19 pm
Location: Blighty
Contact:

Re: Criterion Newsletter (Part 2)

#1412 Post by charulata »

That two finger gesture doesn't translate very well outside the UK (Wikipedia - the V sign).
Growing up in the North, I was always lead to believe that the most straightforward translation of it was "f*@& off". "Victory" or "Peace" - or "two" - it is not!
It's pretty much become the iconic image of the film.
User avatar
Tribe
The Bastard Spawn of Hank Williams
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 11:59 pm
Location: Toledo, Ohio
Contact:

Re: Criterion Newsletter (Part 2)

#1413 Post by Tribe »

Prickly wrote:Long-time lurker jumping in...
I'm fairly sure that the film was dubbed for the American market and even in some London / southern cinemas as the Barnsley accent is fairly impenetrable at times. Wonder if they'd release it with two soundtracks.
I doubt they'd release a dubbed version...I still can't understand a word they are saying in Ratcatcher (aside from "wee mouse") without subtitles.
User avatar
StevenJ0001
Joined: Mon May 05, 2008 4:02 pm
Location: Los Angeles

Re: Criterion Newsletter (Part 2)

#1414 Post by StevenJ0001 »

I almost fell over when I saw that clue!! I am completely bowled over and ectsatic with this news!! One of the most painful yet beautiful films about childhood ever made.

Yesterday (literally), I was considering when to order the UK disc as I really felt like watching this film again, and suddenly today I don't have to make that decision--I just have to be patient and wait for the CC! Happy days. :D :D :D

I love that image on the UK cover.
User avatar
zedz
Joined: Sun Nov 07, 2004 11:24 pm

Re: Criterion Newsletter (Part 2)

#1415 Post by zedz »

NABOB OF NOWHERE wrote:
SheriffAmbrose wrote:
zedz wrote:I wonder if they've thought of hitting up Jarvis Cocker for supplements?
Wait, why Cocker?
South Yorkshire's own on the soundtrack...
Music by John Cameron. Limited vinyl and CD. This is the first ever issue of this original music. It is short and beautiful. I'll leave it to a pop star to explain:

"The sound of a long-lost childhood...The smell of a damp school cloakroom, from an age when comics were still printed on newsprint...But this is more than just another product of the nostalgia industry - put on this album & immediately you'll be soaring through the air, free of your earthly shackles: for this is the sound of a human soul in flight. A beautiful daydream antidote to an all too real South Yorkshire nightmare. "Tha' won't get me down t'pit." "Pig, Pig, Sow,Sow." "Tha' dun't like being called a bastard does tha'?" This is the real thing. This is beauty so fragile it hurts. This is music with the Jesses well & truly off." Jarvis Cocker
I believe he's quite fanatical about the soundtrack, the film, and the source novel, and has presented public screenings of it from time to time, so presumably what he has to say about it is worth hearing.

And reinforcing everyone else, this is a fantastic film, even if you're not a fan of latter day Loach. Family Life is incredible too, but it would be an even harder sell to American audiences, I'd think.
User avatar
colinr0380
Joined: Mon Nov 08, 2004 8:30 pm
Location: Chapel-en-le-Frith, Derbyshire, UK

Re: Criterion Newsletter (Part 2)

#1416 Post by colinr0380 »

I'm not really a huge fan of recent Loach films (though I think Ladybird, Ladybird, seemingly often overshadowed by coming between the more comfortably confrontational Raining Stones and Land and Freedom, is a masterpiece!), but Kes is a truly great film. Family Life is as well - sort of a rawer, semi-documentary teenage version of something like A Woman Under The Influence, with all that stifling family love and miscommunication aggravating the situation rather than helping!

I guess I just prefer the Loach films where the norms of the family are pitted against the norms of the state (police, teachers, doctors, social services, politicians etc). I think Loach in recent years expanded that to cover extended families (political groups, groups of friends in gangs, workmates, broken families) but in films like Family Life, Ladybird Ladybird and Raining Stones (even Kes in the most heartbreaking way) blood relatives are shown to be able to hurt each other far more deeply and with more of a casual callousness than anyone else can - even the state.
Last edited by colinr0380 on Thu Sep 02, 2010 4:58 pm, edited 2 times in total.
User avatar
NABOB OF NOWHERE
Joined: Thu Sep 01, 2005 4:30 pm
Location: Brandywine River

Re: Criterion Newsletter (Part 2)

#1417 Post by NABOB OF NOWHERE »

colinr0380 wrote:I'm not really a huge fan of recent Loach films (though I think Ladybird, Ladybird, seemingly often overshadowed by coming between the more comfortably confrontational Raining Stones and Land and Freedom, is a masterpiece!), but Kes is a truly great film. Family Life is as well - sort of a rawer, semi-documentary teenage version of A Woman Under The Influence, with all that stifling family love aggravating the situation rather than helping!
I'm glad you brought up Ladybird Ladybird Colin as I think it rates up there with the rawest of Pialat and les freres Dardennes. Probably one of Loach's most abrasive characters yet the compassion that claws its way through never becomes cloying or lubricative in a way that the later/latest films seem to suffer from.
If my house had a flagpole I'd be flying a banner for Kes as it's one of those films that seen at the right moment in your life will stay forever.
Incidentally, not long ago I had a meeting with a 'Head of development' about one of my scripts dealing with a problematic young lad. Summing up the meeting with a curt regret that they couldn't take it further because of the problems of selling a film with a young protagonist I asked how they would consider marketing Kes nowadays. Unfortunately there was no answer forthcoming as she had never heard of it. There encapsulated in a moment is the malaise of the British Film Industry. Perhaps a Criterion edition might redress the balance but I'm not betting the farm on it.
User avatar
Tom Hagen
Joined: Mon Apr 14, 2008 4:35 pm
Location: Salt Lake City, Utah

Re: Criterion Newsletter (Part 2)

#1418 Post by Tom Hagen »

swo17 wrote:Image
Between this and forgetting about Melville's aviators in Breathless, I'm batting 1.000 for the month.
User avatar
colinr0380
Joined: Mon Nov 08, 2004 8:30 pm
Location: Chapel-en-le-Frith, Derbyshire, UK

Re: Criterion Newsletter (Part 2)

#1419 Post by colinr0380 »

Agreed Nabob! The woman at the heart of the film is never sympathetic in an easy way (quite a feat to make a mother figure such a divisive character!), and it is one of the very few films where I've found myself watching a character make stupid, self-destructive decisions that hurt everyone around her, and yet still am able to feel for her, trapped in an utterly hopeless cycle of repetitive actions. But I love the way that the central relationship depicted might be a tempestuous one, but feels like it contains a genuine love there - albeit cruelly stretched to breaking point by internal factors that then get picked up and magnified by external ones.

Possibly naively, I think if more people were 'forced' to watch this film perhaps then Britain could at least start to have a healthier attitude to so many important issues that the media and politicians casually bandy about and that are still 'hot topics', if not hotter topics, now: 'unfit' mothers; taking children into care; the British 'underclass'; immigration and the labour market. So many of these issues are shown to be far more complex than anything portrayed in the latest kneejerk headline or point scoring political speech. The 'human element' that makes this film so moving is powerful, as you say, not for tugging the heartstrings in an easily manipulative manner but to show that even the 'worst', or most neglected, people in our society are in their particular situations for a reason and still deserve a sensitivity in treatment that is all too often denied to them.

But perhaps the above is why the film is so rarely shown (in addition to the raw brutality of the material, I guess). Some films can be too powerfully revealing of a society.

Please Criterion, if you are reading this, consider Ladybird, Ladybird for release!
Last edited by colinr0380 on Sun Sep 05, 2010 10:23 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
zedz
Joined: Sun Nov 07, 2004 11:24 pm

Re: Criterion Newsletter (Part 2)

#1420 Post by zedz »

Haven't got much to add except that Ladybird, Ladybird is far and away my favourite latter day Loach, and I think it's largely down to Chrissie Rock. As Colin says, she manages to make the character-who-makes-self-destructive-decisions (a stock figure of many recent Loach films) compelling and plausible, whereas in many Loach films that figure's actions seem motivated by plot necessity rather than coherent psychology. Even her too-good-to-be-true love interest works in the film's hard-earned context.
User avatar
tavernier
Joined: Sat Apr 02, 2005 11:18 pm

Re: Criterion Newsletter (Part 2)

#1421 Post by tavernier »

Wacky Lizardman in the October newsletter:

Image
Last edited by tavernier on Wed Oct 06, 2010 8:25 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
mteller
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 7:23 pm

Re: Criterion Newsletter (Part 2)

#1422 Post by mteller »

Wall Street on Blu-Ray? That's all I've got.
trixster

Re: Criterion Newsletter (Part 2)

#1423 Post by trixster »

My first thought was Fear and Loathing.
Flike
Joined: Sun Jun 08, 2008 11:47 pm

Re: Criterion Newsletter (Part 2)

#1424 Post by Flike »

That's all I could think of also... unfortunately.
onedimension
Joined: Sat Nov 29, 2008 8:35 pm

Re: Criterion Newsletter (Part 2)

#1425 Post by onedimension »

Night of the Iguana on blu?
Locked