Criterion & Eclipse Cover Art & Packaging Babble-on Vol.5

News on Criterion and Janus Films
Locked
Message
Author
User avatar
mfunk9786
Under Chris' Protection
Joined: Fri May 16, 2008 8:43 pm
Location: Miami, FL

Re: Criterion & Eclipse Cover Art & Packaging Babble-on Vol.

#201 Post by mfunk9786 »

Holding out until Christmas for this will be really, really difficult.
User avatar
swo17
Bloodthirsty Butcher
Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2008 2:25 pm
Location: SLC, UT

Re: Criterion & Eclipse Cover Art & Packaging Babble-on Vol.

#202 Post by swo17 »

That's actually precisely where I intend to put my copy of Easy Rider immediately after cracking open the set.
User avatar
Napier
Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 1:48 pm
Location: The Shire

Re: Criterion & Eclipse Cover Art & Packaging Babble-on Vol.

#203 Post by Napier »

swo17 wrote:That's actually precisely where I intend to put my copy of Easy Rider immediately after cracking open the set.
Don't do that swo17! Just send it to me. I'll even pay the postage.
felipe
Joined: Thu May 06, 2010 3:06 am

Re: Criterion & Eclipse Cover Art & Packaging Babble-on Vol.

#204 Post by felipe »

Judging by that picture, is Easy Rider going to be a digipack?
User avatar
aox
Joined: Fri Jun 20, 2008 4:02 pm
Location: nYc

Re: Criterion & Eclipse Cover Art & Packaging Babble-on Vol.

#205 Post by aox »

Since it is part of a box set, I assume it will be, but maybe not in the sense of Breathless or Seven Samurai. Probably more like cardboard slip covers. Could be like an eclipse case too.

When these are eventually released individually, I would see them being in the standard plastic BD case.
User avatar
zedz
Joined: Sun Nov 07, 2004 11:24 pm

Re: Criterion & Eclipse Cover Art & Packaging Babble-on Vol.

#206 Post by zedz »

aox wrote:When these are eventually released individually, I would see them being in the standard plastic BD case.
What makes you think this is going to happen? As far as I can recall, the only Criterion box set to ever be subsequently broken up was Cassavetes, and that's a completely different licensing situation, with some of the titles in this set already available individually from the licensor. In fact, I would have expected that 'box only' (and corresponding price barrier) was a condition of the licence.
User avatar
kaujot
Joined: Mon May 08, 2006 10:28 pm
Location: Austin
Contact:

Re: Criterion & Eclipse Cover Art & Packaging Babble-on Vol.

#207 Post by kaujot »

And the Malle set, but it came together and separate at the same time.
User avatar
mfunk9786
Under Chris' Protection
Joined: Fri May 16, 2008 8:43 pm
Location: Miami, FL

Re: Criterion & Eclipse Cover Art & Packaging Babble-on Vol.

#208 Post by mfunk9786 »

Not sure why people seem to have such difficulty with photographs. That's obviously a slim digi, much like the ones in the Varda and Doniel sets. There is no plastic on or around the case pictured, hence...
User avatar
Highway 61
Joined: Mon Nov 08, 2004 8:40 pm

Re: Criterion & Eclipse Cover Art & Packaging Babble-on Vol.

#209 Post by Highway 61 »

zedz wrote:
aox wrote:When these are eventually released individually, I would see them being in the standard plastic BD case.
What makes you think this is going to happen? As far as I can recall, the only Criterion box set to ever be subsequently broken up was Cassavetes, and that's a completely different licensing situation, with some of the titles in this set already available individually from the licensor. In fact, I would have expected that 'box only' (and corresponding price barrier) was a condition of the licence.
The Monterey Pop set was also broken up, and of course The 400 Blows was eventually available separately. But they milked the box sets for years before they broke them up, and since the America Lost and Found set will undoubtedly be a much bigger cash cow, I doubt we'll see individual years for a long, long time, if ever. And as you say, there's the licensing situation to consider.
User avatar
Brian C
I hate to be That Pedantic Guy but...
Joined: Wed Sep 16, 2009 3:58 pm
Location: Northwest US

Re: Criterion & Eclipse Cover Art & Packaging Babble-on Vol.

#210 Post by Brian C »

The one thing that's really odd - and maybe this has been brought up elsewhere - is that the box itself has no spine number. As far as I can tell, it'll be the only box in the mainline collection that has no spine number in which the discs aren't available separately.
User avatar
aox
Joined: Fri Jun 20, 2008 4:02 pm
Location: nYc

Re: Criterion & Eclipse Cover Art & Packaging Babble-on Vol.

#211 Post by aox »

Brian C wrote:The one thing that's really odd - and maybe this has been brought up elsewhere - is that the box itself has no spine number. As far as I can tell, it'll be the only box in the mainline collection that has no spine number in which the discs aren't available separately.
This was one of the main reasons I think this box will be split up. But I get Zedz's point.

For me personally, The Last Picture Show is the only film in the box I would care to revisit throughout my life with any regularity until the end. So, maybe wishful thinking makes up another side of my post in the hopes that this will be a single spine.
User avatar
zedz
Joined: Sun Nov 07, 2004 11:24 pm

Re: Criterion & Eclipse Cover Art & Packaging Babble-on Vol.

#212 Post by zedz »

Brian C wrote:The one thing that's really odd - and maybe this has been brought up elsewhere - is that the box itself has no spine number. As far as I can tell, it'll be the only box in the mainline collection that has no spine number in which the discs aren't available separately.
Maybe the studio execs had as hard a time understanding the rationale for numbering the box as the rest of us do, and when they were told about it said: "No. . . What?"

As for the other exceptions, I'll give you Monterey Pop, but the Malles were simultaneous releases and The 400 Blows was a previous release (as were two of the Vardas, for that matter).
User avatar
swo17
Bloodthirsty Butcher
Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2008 2:25 pm
Location: SLC, UT

Re: Criterion & Eclipse Cover Art & Packaging Babble-on Vol.

#213 Post by swo17 »

What was the story with the Hitchcock set, Wrong Men & Notorious Women? Was that a boxset that got broken up?
User avatar
Tom Hagen
Joined: Mon Apr 14, 2008 4:35 pm
Location: Salt Lake City, Utah

Re: Criterion & Eclipse Cover Art & Packaging Babble-on Vol.

#214 Post by Tom Hagen »

Didn't the two Ozu films get a box spine number this year? That was a strange call.
User avatar
oldsheperd
Joined: Thu Nov 11, 2004 9:18 pm
Location: Rio Rancho/Albuquerque

Re: Criterion & Eclipse Cover Art & Packaging Babble-on Vol.

#215 Post by oldsheperd »

Hitchcock Box:I believe it was boxed up after the individual releases like the Olivier stuff
User avatar
zedz
Joined: Sun Nov 07, 2004 11:24 pm

Re: Criterion & Eclipse Cover Art & Packaging Babble-on Vol.

#216 Post by zedz »

Hitchcock was a 'collector's set' of previously issued discs like the many Samurai ones, the Bergman and 'Great Adaptations'.

The Ozu double feature follows Criterion numbering protocol to a T (see also I Am Curious), though the Rossellini set was non-standard in numbering the box after the discs.

Slow news week, huh?
User avatar
ccfixx
Joined: Sun Nov 30, 2008 12:37 am
Location: Rhode Island, USA

Re: Criterion & Eclipse Cover Art & Packaging Babble-on Vol.

#217 Post by ccfixx »

Has no one posted this, yet? I didn't see it anywhere. Maybe, we'll get one new image per day from Criterion.

Image

CC
User avatar
domino harvey
Dot Com Dom
Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 6:42 pm

Re: Criterion & Eclipse Cover Art & Packaging Babble-on Vol.

#218 Post by domino harvey »

BBS set is confirmed digipak -- looks like a thick box too, like the Oceans set?
zitherstrings
Joined: Wed Mar 03, 2010 4:35 am

Re: Criterion & Eclipse Cover Art & Packaging Babble-on Vol.

#219 Post by zitherstrings »

Haven't all these Facebook pics already confirmed digi?
User avatar
mfunk9786
Under Chris' Protection
Joined: Fri May 16, 2008 8:43 pm
Location: Miami, FL

Re: Criterion & Eclipse Cover Art & Packaging Babble-on Vol.

#220 Post by mfunk9786 »

Apparently not to the people in this thread, which I believe was the impetus for domino's tongue-in-cheek post. They could post a photo with the caption "DIGIPACK" and people here would still post "Looks great - hope it isn't one of those plastic cases!"
User avatar
CSM126
Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 12:22 pm
Location: The Room
Contact:

Re: Criterion & Eclipse Cover Art & Packaging Babble-on Vol.

#221 Post by CSM126 »

mfunk9786 wrote:Apparently not to the people in this thread, which I believe was the impetus for domino's tongue-in-cheek post. They could post a photo with the caption "DIGIPACK" and people here would still post "Looks great - hope it isn't one of those plastic cases!"
It's better on the rare occasion that we get a picture of a plastic keepcase and someone says it looks like we're getting a digi.
User avatar
Finch
Joined: Mon Jul 07, 2008 9:09 pm
Location: United States

Re: Criterion & Eclipse Cover Art & Packaging Babble-on Vol.

#222 Post by Finch »

Image Image

Image Image

Image Image

Love Still Walking and Sweet Smell of Success is growing on me. LOL at Senso and Fish Tank.
User avatar
Murdoch
Joined: Mon Apr 21, 2008 3:59 am
Location: Upstate NY

Re: Criterion & Eclipse Cover Art & Packaging Babble-on Vol.

#223 Post by Murdoch »

I actually really like the Fish Tank cover, haven't seen the film though.
User avatar
movielocke
Joined: Fri Jan 18, 2008 4:44 am

Re: Criterion & Eclipse Cover Art & Packaging Babble-on Vol.

#224 Post by movielocke »

it's been nearly ten minutes since these covers were posted, I expected at least thirty posts bitching about Still Walking and Fish Tank's covers by now, terribly disappointed in the forum, I can't believe how we're slacking off. ;)
User avatar
Brian C
I hate to be That Pedantic Guy but...
Joined: Wed Sep 16, 2009 3:58 pm
Location: Northwest US

Re: Criterion & Eclipse Cover Art & Packaging Babble-on Vol.

#225 Post by Brian C »

I think Fish Tank is fine, also. And agreed that Still Walking is beautiful. I'm not sure what to make of Senso.
Locked