New Films in Production

Discuss film culture and criticism
Locked
Message
Author
User avatar
James Mills
Joined: Mon Dec 06, 2010 11:12 pm
Location: el ciudad del angeles

Re: New Films in Production

#1476 Post by James Mills »

I'm not sure it's worth a recapitulation seeing that you're surely already aware of this, but there happens to be a huge difference between LotR and Twilight. The differences in Jacob/Jason's role or whatever and Aragorn's is substantial too.
User avatar
domino harvey
Dot Com Dom
Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 6:42 pm

Re: New Films in Production

#1477 Post by domino harvey »

To be fair though, how many of those bellyaching have actually seen one of the movies he's acted in?
User avatar
swo17
Bloodthirsty Butcher
Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2008 2:25 pm
Location: SLC, UT

Re: New Films in Production

#1478 Post by swo17 »

James Mills wrote:I'm not sure it's worth a recapitulation seeing that you're surely already aware of this, but there happens to be a huge difference between LotR and Twilight. The differences in Jacob/Jason's role or whatever and Aragorn's is substantial too.
Other than the fact that the films have different titles and were fashionable in different halves of the last decade, I fail to see much of a difference. I would, however, expect to see a marked difference between Twilight and a Cronenberg film.
User avatar
mfunk9786
Under Chris' Protection
Joined: Fri May 16, 2008 8:43 pm
Location: Miami, FL

Re: New Films in Production

#1479 Post by mfunk9786 »

I've never seen the guy act, but Croenenberg tends to get the most out of his actors. This is a Punch-Drunk Love situation all over again.
User avatar
Murdoch
Joined: Mon Apr 21, 2008 3:59 am
Location: Upstate NY

Re: New Films in Production

#1480 Post by Murdoch »

Markson wrote:Robert Pattinson has been selected to star in Cronenberg's adaptation of DeLillo's Cosmopolis.
I look forward to the future Pattinson vs. Giamatti tween debate.
User avatar
flyonthewall2983
Joined: Mon Jun 27, 2005 7:31 pm
Location: Indiana
Contact:

Re: New Films in Production

#1481 Post by flyonthewall2983 »

swo17 wrote:
All of you guys six years ago wrote:I can't believe Cronenberg's going to make his next three films starring some guy from Lord of the Rings.
Almost funny if it weren't for the fact Viggo had a more solid body of work behind him before he ever did LOTR.
User avatar
willoneill
Joined: Wed Mar 18, 2009 2:10 pm
Location: Ottawa, Ontario, Canada

Re: New Films in Production

#1482 Post by willoneill »

Personally I thought Pattinson was decent enough in that one Harry Potter flick, and of the brief few minutes of one of the Twilight movies I saw on cable, he was better than most of the other cast. I'm going to stick up for my fellow Canadian Cronenberg and say that he doesn't cast actors for their box office draw, so I'm guessing Pattinson has impressed him in some way. Plus, on a more general level, I don't think it's fair to judge an actor based on their most franchisable film roles, especially early in their career. For all we know, Pattinson might be the next Olivier. He had a shot at some easy money when he was young, and now he can go out and pick and choose whom he works with, like say, David Cronenberg. Good for him.

If it turns out he sucks, than I'll stand corrected, but until then, I put my faith in Cronenberg.
User avatar
knives
Joined: Sat Sep 06, 2008 10:49 pm

Re: New Films in Production

#1483 Post by knives »

Pattinson may be know for shit movies, but he has a lot of talent. You can't judge a guy when he is sleepwalking(he hates those movies more than anyone here). I thought he made a really good Dali in the otherwise okay Little Ashes for example. At the very least this is keeping within the talent of his original choice.
User avatar
matrixschmatrix
Joined: Wed May 26, 2010 3:26 am

Re: New Films in Production

#1484 Post by matrixschmatrix »

Honestly, as long as it's not Kristen Stewart, I don't think anyone in the Twilight movies is automatically disbarred from ever being good in anything.
User avatar
James Mills
Joined: Mon Dec 06, 2010 11:12 pm
Location: el ciudad del angeles

Re: New Films in Production

#1485 Post by James Mills »

matrixschmatrix wrote:Honestly, as long as it's not Kristen Stewart, I don't think anyone in the Twilight movies is automatically disbarred from ever being good in anything.
Agreed. That girl just ruins anything she shows her face in, straight up. She's like Keira Knightly times 5.
User avatar
matrixschmatrix
Joined: Wed May 26, 2010 3:26 am

Re: New Films in Production

#1486 Post by matrixschmatrix »

She was memorably referred to (in a review of The Runaways in the AVClub) as a "Dead-eyed talent vacuum", which is such an admirable summary of her talent that I can't think of anything else when watching her.

Which actually makes me worry she's secretly good and I'm just distracted by a great insult. Ah, well.
User avatar
Mr Sausage
Has Risen from the Grave
Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 1:02 am
Location: Canada

Re: New Films in Production

#1487 Post by Mr Sausage »

knives wrote: You can't judge a guy when he is sleepwalking(he hates those movies more than anyone here).
Did he mention this in an interview?
User avatar
knives
Joined: Sat Sep 06, 2008 10:49 pm

Re: New Films in Production

#1488 Post by knives »

Yes, I forget which interview but he said something along the lines of the books are poorly written and creep him out a bit because they read like someone's wet dream. He also made fun of his character as a creepy 100 year old virgin stalker.
User avatar
James Mills
Joined: Mon Dec 06, 2010 11:12 pm
Location: el ciudad del angeles

Re: New Films in Production

#1489 Post by James Mills »

If everyone hated me for contributing to the stupidest media craze since the Backstreet Boys, I'd tell people "I hate it!" too. Hell, I assume even the Backstreet Boys did that after they cashed in.
stwrt
Joined: Wed Mar 12, 2008 12:24 am

Re: New Films in Production

#1490 Post by stwrt »

Thought she was quite good in Panic Room - haven't followed her career since that movie.
Mr. Ned
Joined: Sun Apr 05, 2009 10:58 pm

Re: New Films in Production

#1491 Post by Mr. Ned »

I think Pattinson in Cosmopolis is a genius move by Cronenberg. I read the novel for a lit. class years ago and I think the casting is dead-on for the character; for those who've read the thing, agree/disagree?
User avatar
matrixschmatrix
Joined: Wed May 26, 2010 3:26 am

Re: New Films in Production

#1492 Post by matrixschmatrix »

stwrt wrote:Thought she was quite good in Panic Room - haven't followed her career since that movie.
Wow, I had no idea that was her. Well, now there's at least one thing I've liked her in.

It's funny, all I remember people mentioning about her in that movie was her character's androgyny.
User avatar
Brian C
I hate to be That Pedantic Guy but...
Joined: Wed Sep 16, 2009 3:58 pm
Location: Northwest US

Re: New Films in Production

#1493 Post by Brian C »

I don't think Stewart is terrible as much as she's one-note. She has the sullen teen thing down, and in a small role that doesn't demand more than that - like Sean Penn's Into the Wild - she's fine. But when called on to show more than that, as in The Runaways, she tends to fall back on her one note. This was also a problem in Adventureland, I thought. Her characters come across as single-minded and dull.

I remain agnostic on the Twilight films, as I haven't seen them, but I would imagine that she delivers exactly what the primary audience wants from her.
User avatar
ambrose
Joined: Wed Sep 08, 2010 6:16 pm
Location: Durham United-kingdom

Re: New Films in Production

#1494 Post by ambrose »

ianungstad
Joined: Thu Mar 17, 2005 1:20 am

Re: New Films in Production

#1495 Post by ianungstad »

We Need to Talk About Kevin is one of the films debuting in 2011 that I'm really looking forward to. The film doesn't have a US distributor yet and with the recent shooting spree in Arizona, I think it's pretty safe to say that all the majors will pass on the project. Hopefully a smaller label like IFC or Magnolia will pick the film up. I'm a little concerned it will either be shelved or delayed in the United States. It's too bad that the film will almost certainly not get the release it deserves due to recent events. You have to feel bad for Lynne Ramsay.
User avatar
Duncan Hopper
Joined: Mon Dec 21, 2009 9:16 am
Location: http://www.eldiabolik.com
Contact:

Re: New Films in Production

#1496 Post by Duncan Hopper »

ianungstad wrote:We Need to Talk About Kevin is one of the films debuting in 2011 that I'm really looking forward to. The film doesn't have a US distributor yet and with the recent shooting spree in Arizona, I think it's pretty safe to say that all the majors will pass on the project. Hopefully a smaller label like IFC or Magnolia will pick the film up. I'm a little concerned it will either be shelved or delayed in the United States. It's too bad that the film will almost certainly not get the release it deserves due to recent events. You have to feel bad for Lynne Ramsay.
Especially after she got shafted by Peter Jackson over the Lovely Bones. She really doesn't seem to be having much luck.
James
Joined: Wed Jun 04, 2008 8:11 pm

Re: New Films in Production

#1497 Post by James »

Written by the guys who did Valkyrie with Tom Cruise and likely to be a movie with Italians speaking English... I'll pass.
User avatar
ambrose
Joined: Wed Sep 08, 2010 6:16 pm
Location: Durham United-kingdom

Re: New Films in Production

#1498 Post by ambrose »

James wrote:
Written by the guys who did Valkyrie with Tom Cruise and likely to be a movie with Italians speaking English... I'll pass.
You don't honestly think that I have any desire let-alone intention of seeing that film either do you? When I posted that production information I did so in an entirely neutral fashion!
User avatar
mfunk9786
Under Chris' Protection
Joined: Fri May 16, 2008 8:43 pm
Location: Miami, FL

Re: New Films in Production

#1499 Post by mfunk9786 »

Wait... he didn't accuse you of wanting to see it.
User avatar
ambrose
Joined: Wed Sep 08, 2010 6:16 pm
Location: Durham United-kingdom

Re: New Films in Production

#1500 Post by ambrose »

mfunk9786 wrote:Wait... he didn't accuse you of wanting to see it.
Your right of course! But he did seem quite hostile towards the mere presence of the production details, that by-itself might have lead to my overreaction.
Last edited by ambrose on Thu Jan 20, 2011 9:57 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Locked