Awards Season 2010

Discuss film culture and criticism
Post Reply
Message
Author
User avatar
aox
Joined: Fri Jun 20, 2008 4:02 pm
Location: nYc

Re: Awards Season 2010

#626 Post by aox »

After seeing excerpts from his latest interview, I am hoping that they ask Charlie Sheen to host next year.
User avatar
mfunk9786
Under Chris' Protection
Joined: Fri May 16, 2008 8:43 pm
Location: Miami, FL

Re: Awards Season 2010

#627 Post by mfunk9786 »

oldsheperd wrote:I swear, Randy Newman farts out anything and he wins an Oscar. "Right foot, Left foot, Right foot, Left foot."
To be fair, this was only his second Oscar.
User avatar
Tom Hagen
Joined: Mon Apr 14, 2008 4:35 pm
Location: Salt Lake City, Utah

Re: Awards Season 2010

#628 Post by Tom Hagen »

I pretty certain that Bergman never made it from Faro. He did, however, send Liv to accept the Thalberg on his behalf.
Last edited by Tom Hagen on Mon Feb 28, 2011 4:15 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Jean-Luc Garbo
Joined: Thu Dec 09, 2004 5:55 am
Contact:

Re: Awards Season 2010

#629 Post by Jean-Luc Garbo »

Highway 61 wrote:Indeed, I'm always curious how the nominees who are obvious losers and clearly above the whole pageant feel about attending. What moves a David Lynch or a Julian Schnabel to even bother to show up and sit through hours of self-absorption?
I'm pretty sure that Lynch goes to see his peers and socialize.
User avatar
mfunk9786
Under Chris' Protection
Joined: Fri May 16, 2008 8:43 pm
Location: Miami, FL

Re: Awards Season 2010

#630 Post by mfunk9786 »

Not sure where else to post this, but Kris Tapley has done his yearly list of his top 10 shots of 2010. Part two is here.
User avatar
Finch
Joined: Mon Jul 07, 2008 9:09 pm
Location: United States

Re: Awards Season 2010

#631 Post by Finch »

Not that I really begrudge Pfister his award for Inception but I do feel for Roger Deakins who must be wondering what he has to do to actually win the damn thing. Perhaps the Academy is saving it for a Lifetime Achievement prize?

True Grit in general has to be considered one of the losers of the night: a whopping 10 nominations and won absolutely nothing. Can anyone remember the last time a film garnered so many noms and went home empty-handed?

The two shockers of the night were Hooper claiming the Best Director award (this should have been Fincher's, no question) and Bier winning Best Foreign Picture (but that they are a bit clueless when it comes to that category should be no surprise after last year's utterly dreadful winner).
User avatar
Michael
Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 4:09 pm

Re: Awards Season 2010

#632 Post by Michael »

Finch wrote:True Grit in general has to be considered one of the losers of the night: a whopping 10 nominations and won absolutely nothing. Can anyone remember the last time a film garnered so many noms and went home empty-handed? .
The Color Purple did not receive any Oscars. The film currently holds the record along with The Turning Point with 11 Oscar nominations but no wins.
User avatar
Jean-Luc Garbo
Joined: Thu Dec 09, 2004 5:55 am
Contact:

Re: Awards Season 2010

#633 Post by Jean-Luc Garbo »

Finch wrote:Not that I really begrudge Pfister his award for Inception but I do feel for Roger Deakins who must be wondering what he has to do to actually win the damn thing. Perhaps the Academy is saving it for a Lifetime Achievement prize?
I was thrilled for Pfister, but Deakins certainly deserves the recognition. The Academy isn't holding some anti-Coen grudge, is it?
User avatar
aox
Joined: Fri Jun 20, 2008 4:02 pm
Location: nYc

Re: Awards Season 2010

#634 Post by aox »

Finch wrote: True Grit in general has to be considered one of the losers of the night: a whopping 10 nominations and won absolutely nothing. Can anyone remember the last time a film garnered so many noms and went home empty-handed?
Gangs of New York?
User avatar
Professor Wagstaff
Joined: Wed Aug 25, 2010 3:27 am

Re: Awards Season 2010

#635 Post by Professor Wagstaff »

aox wrote:
Finch wrote: True Grit in general has to be considered one of the losers of the night: a whopping 10 nominations and won absolutely nothing. Can anyone remember the last time a film garnered so many noms and went home empty-handed?
Gangs of New York?
Yes, Gangs was the last big shutout.
User avatar
James Mills
Joined: Mon Dec 06, 2010 11:12 pm
Location: el ciudad del angeles

Re: Awards Season 2010

#636 Post by James Mills »

Finch wrote:Not that I really begrudge Pfister his award for Inception but I do feel for Roger Deakins who must be wondering what he has to do to actually win the damn thing. Perhaps the Academy is saving it for a Lifetime Achievement prize?

True Grit in general has to be considered one of the losers of the night: a whopping 10 nominations and won absolutely nothing. Can anyone remember the last time a film garnered so many noms and went home empty-handed?
I thought True Grit was Deakins' most mundane effort with the Coens' to date. The entire production design of that film seemed rushed and bland to me, personally.
The two shockers of the night were Hooper claiming the Best Director award (this should have been Fincher's, no question) and Bier winning Best Foreign Picture (but that they are a bit clueless when it comes to that category should be no surprise after last year's utterly dreadful winner).
Absolutely.
User avatar
mfunk9786
Under Chris' Protection
Joined: Fri May 16, 2008 8:43 pm
Location: Miami, FL

Re: Awards Season 2010

#637 Post by mfunk9786 »

Yeah, totally rushed and bland:

Image

He deserved the Oscar for the tracking shot with the horse towards the end of the film alone, quite frankly.
User avatar
knives
Joined: Sat Sep 06, 2008 10:49 pm

Re: Awards Season 2010

#638 Post by knives »

I was going to bring up the opening shot too. That is easily the best I've seen from Deakins. Plus the story didn't call for the sort of flash that he showed in No Country or Jesse James.
User avatar
flyonthewall2983
Joined: Mon Jun 27, 2005 7:31 pm
Location: Indiana
Contact:

Re: Awards Season 2010

#639 Post by flyonthewall2983 »

Inception was my favorite movie of 2010, but even I have to say that Roger was robbed. At least Wally made his speech worthwhile by mentioning the news out of Wisconsin and the importance of unions.
User avatar
HistoryProf
Joined: Mon Mar 13, 2006 7:48 am
Location: KCK

Re: Awards Season 2010

#640 Post by HistoryProf »

aox wrote:
mfunk9786 wrote:I'm not disappointed, but I'm just sad that more people didn't realize just how great Black Swan and 127 Hours were.
Black Swan was one of the worst films I have seen in years that gets any acclaim.

FUN FACT: It wasn't a comedy. So all of those people laughing in the theater was unintentional. That should be red flag number 1.
word.
User avatar
MichaelB
Joined: Fri Aug 11, 2006 10:20 pm
Location: Worthing
Contact:

Re: Awards Season 2010

#641 Post by MichaelB »

aox wrote:
mfunk9786 wrote:I'm not disappointed, but I'm just sad that more people didn't realize just how great Black Swan and 127 Hours were.
Black Swan was one of the worst films I have seen in years that gets any acclaim.

FUN FACT: It wasn't a comedy. So all of those people laughing in the theater was unintentional. That should be red flag number 1.
In the case of the audience I saw it with, it was mild tittering building up to full-scale belly laughs - the tipping point being Winona Ryder's final appearance.

Which made a pleasant change from Requiem for a Dream, when my girlfriend and I were the only ones laughing. Clearly, more people are beginning to recognise Darren Aronofsky's considerable comedic gifts.
User avatar
colinr0380
Joined: Mon Nov 08, 2004 8:30 pm
Location: Chapel-en-le-Frith, Derbyshire, UK

Re: Awards Season 2010

#642 Post by colinr0380 »

Not only that but with Mila Kunis in Black Swan he appears to have a mini-trend going on of giving excellent (and often the most moving) roles to actors better known for their comedy performances. Marlon Wayans in Requiem is another example - who'd have thought the guy later responsible for appearing in many of those awful Scary Movie films, Dungeons and Dragons, Norbit and *shudder* White Chicks could give such a great performance?
Peter-H
Joined: Fri Jun 04, 2010 9:02 pm

Re: Awards Season 2010

#643 Post by Peter-H »

flyonthewall2983 wrote:Inception was my favorite movie of 2010, but even I have to say that Roger was robbed. At least Wally made his speech worthwhile by mentioning the news out of Wisconsin and the importance of unions.
I hope your being sarcastic. "While i'm up here accepting this award why don't I go on a completely unrelated note by sermonizing people with my clueless political ideals. I am always astounded when people in Hollywood think anyone cares about their opinions.
User avatar
Kirkinson
Joined: Wed Dec 15, 2004 9:34 am
Location: Portland, OR

Re: Awards Season 2010

#644 Post by Kirkinson »

Yeah, who do those stupid Hollywood celebrities like Wally Pfister think they are?
User avatar
jbeall
Joined: Sat Aug 12, 2006 1:22 pm
Location: Atlanta-ish

Re: Awards Season 2010

#645 Post by jbeall »

User avatar
Professor Wagstaff
Joined: Wed Aug 25, 2010 3:27 am

Re: Awards Season 2010

#646 Post by Professor Wagstaff »

I've never liked Andrew O'Hehir and I can't make much sense of his article. This piece seems like a desperate attempt to join those hating "The King's Speech" and somehow tie it in to his affection for "Uncle Boonmee". He even says in the second paragraph that these films have nothing in common except they both won major awards.

Plus the article's mention that "The Pianist" was the last film to win the Palm D'or and best picture Oscar strikes me as a pretty egregious error. Even if he doesn't know his facts are wrong (as I'm sure everyone on this site can tell him it is), he must be able to get an intern to fact check that. At least then someone would be putting a little work into this article.
User avatar
Mr Sausage
Has Risen from the Grave
Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 1:02 am
Location: Canada

Re: Awards Season 2010

#647 Post by Mr Sausage »

Moved the Royals/ideology/aesthetics discussion here.
User avatar
colinr0380
Joined: Mon Nov 08, 2004 8:30 pm
Location: Chapel-en-le-Frith, Derbyshire, UK

Re: Awards Season 2010

#648 Post by colinr0380 »

Looking back on the discussion I would like to add my vote to thinking of 2007 as one of the better Best Picture years of the Oscars. I know there was some sniffing about Atonement, but I really think that was one of the few 'heritage pictures' that fully deserved its nomination, especially since it undermined its heritage aspects at almost every point by emphasising their superficiality/fictionality.

I do think Social Network was robbed this year, particularly for Best Director - though I am really glad Social Network got Best Score as it is truly fantastic. Strangely the over-frantic version of In The Hall Of The Mountain King is my least favourite of all of the pieces. It seems a shame it seemed to get played during the winner's walkup (at least during Social Network's wins at the BAFTAs) - something like the Pieces Form The Whole track would have made for a much jauntier accompaniment to the action of someone going up on stage to collect an award! Two of my particular favourite tracks would have to be the plodding, yet strangely upbeat, On We March (it's my current favourite listening at the moment for the occasions when I'm stuck in cramped, darkened rooms doing Harvey Pekar-esque medical record filing) and the slightly Japanese-sounding Soft Trees Break The Fall.

As for The King's Speech, as much as I liked Tom Hooper's Longford a couple of years ago, I just found Speech too calculated in order to tick all of the boxes for heritage cinema. I know it is also just something that you say when you win an award but all of the comments from the cast and crew when interviewed about how they "never believed this small film would be a success" etc seem rather disingenuous given the built in appeal of the subject matter to large swathes of Royal lovers combined with a triumph over adversity subplot.

It might be interesting to describe the way that the BBC responded to The King's Speech wins. They began on the first day by getting extremely overexcited interviewing anyone vaguely connected with the film (an interview with Helena Bonham Carter on the Breakfast news bulletin that morning was priceless. Not far anything that the actress said but because going to her live interview cut short the sports reporters football roundup. Probably the first time that film has ever won out over sporting news! And the sports reporter sulked quite a bit when they returned to him a couple of minutes later!), and any familiar location (When the BBC's 'arts reporter' Ed Gompertz trailed his upcoming segment live from that location where the speech therapy sessions took place with the line "And this is the room where it all happened...", I assumed at first that he was going to talk about that porno that was filmed there!)

On the day after the elation there were the predicatable stories about "What next for the British Film Industry?", "What will be King's Speech 2?" etc, as the media cottoned onto the way that the film had been funded by the defunct UK Film Council. Which meant a few of the BBC news reports ended with a somewhat disdainful sidelong glance at the BFI now being in charge of funding and whether it could 'fulfil expectations' due to apparently being more intellectually rather than commercially interested in film.
Post Reply