Criterion & Eclipse in the Press

News on Criterion and Janus Films
Post Reply
Message
Author
User avatar
HistoryProf
Joined: Mon Mar 13, 2006 7:48 am
Location: KCK

Re: Criterion & Eclipse in the Press

#101 Post by HistoryProf »

I had no idea the origins of the company were so, well, simple and haphazard. crazy. Thanks for posting that.
User avatar
Tribe
The Bastard Spawn of Hank Williams
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 11:59 pm
Location: Toledo, Ohio
Contact:

Re: Criterion & Eclipse in the Press

#102 Post by Tribe »

It was painfully obvious that the Criterion Collection on DVD was going to make millions and millions of dollars.
'Nuff said.
User avatar
Tom Hagen
Joined: Mon Apr 14, 2008 4:35 pm
Location: Salt Lake City, Utah

Re: Bob Stein Interview

#103 Post by Tom Hagen »

Jeff wrote:Am I correct in understanding that Ron Haver's commentary for King Kong, the first commentary track ever, was done in exchange for weed?
"Have you really seen King Kong? I mean, really seen it?"
User avatar
Jeff
Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 1:49 am
Location: Denver, CO

Re: 'Forthcoming' Lists Discussion and Random Speculation Vo

#104 Post by Jeff »

Don't know where else to put this (not that it deserves to be put anywhere), but Jeffrey Wells has revealed that the reason he posts such ridiculous, baseless criticisms of Criterion all the time is because he holds a 25-year-old grudge and "vowed that [he] would somehow pay Criterion back." Fantastic.
Jeffrey Wells wrote:Okay, let's get really honest. This is going to sound like it's right out of the Lee J. Cobb in Twelve Angry Men playbook, but I have it in for Criterion because I was once humiliated by a guy in their West Coast office when I set up an interview for some kind of in-house publicity position.

It was either the mid '80s or the early '90s...I forget which. Their office was on PCH in Santa Monica, right in front of the bluff and not far from the pier -- I remember that much. A Criterion marketing (or senior publicity) woman and I had hit it off pretty well, and she suggested that I drop by the office for an interview later that day or the following morning. That was a very quick response, which told me I was doing pretty well. Anyway, I got down there and something had obviously "happened" (i.e., someone had pushed a bad button and/or sullied my rep with a negative reference) because all of a sudden the woman who'd said "come on down!" had done a total flip-flop and couldn't see me.

Instead she sent out this malevolent yuppie creep to run interference and say that something really important had come up in her schedule...bullshit. His task was to conduct a "show" interview and and then make me go away so she didn't have to interview me. This guy she sent to pre-interview me in the Criterion lobby -- the lobby! -- was a brusque, hard-eyed yuppie weasel. I loathed him and his dismissive manner instantly. On top of which I was appalled that I'd been asked to come down only to be told, "Oh, uhm...changed our mind!" At the very least I was entitled to a courtesy chat in that woman's office.

So after I was blown off & sent packing and basically treated like I was some kind of South Central gang-banger who had somehow impersonated an eligible candidate for the job, I vowed that I would somehow pay Criterion back, even if it took 10 or 15 or 20 years. I've never been treated so shabbily by any prospective employer in my life. Criterion was in no way obliged to hire me, obviously, but I felt it was my due to be treated with respect. And I've never forgotten that horrible interception in the lobby or the eyes and the manner of that loathsome Criterion serpent. And being treated like (and feeling like) dogshit when the humiliation was over.

So that was the beginning. I've had similar reactions to other Criterion people since. Their basic thing is "Oh...uhm, yeah....well, we'd like to make time to speak to you or even be semi-candid with you, but we're so cool, you see...we're so VERY COOL and you're only you, so can we help you with anything else?" And as unfair and unrelated as this may sound, I've wanted to stick it to Criterion ever since that incident in their Santa Monica office. Like I said, I'm basically Lee J. Cobb who wants to find the kid guilty because he's angry at his own son, etc. It's irrational. Maybe by admitting this I'll get rid of the bad blood. I don't know. I only know that I fundamentally loathe the Criterion Co. elitist mindset.

This as nothing to do with their DVD/Blurays or their superb transfers or any of that quality-based stuff, mind. They're the best DVD and Bluray company in the world.
His latest diatribe is that the Criterion website doesn't tell who designs the covers and he can't ask them because "the Criterion Collection [is] such an elitist, foo-foo, too-cool-to-schmooze-with-the-little-people outfit." Among the other previous gems have been that Stagecoach was the "worst-looking, worst-sounding Bluray of a classic black-and-white film in history" and that after purchasing it he felt "used and abused by Criterion. Snookered, ass-fucked, film-flammed, hoodwinked, boondoggled...a tin can tied to my tail." They also "hid" the fact that Che was coming. He was also "burned" by their disc of The Third Man. There's more, but it's not worth digging for. I don't think anyone takes the guy seriously anyway. The appeal of his site is the crazy old man vibe. If anyone did though, they're surely done with him now, after an admission of a complete lack of journalistic ethics.
User avatar
domino harvey
Dot Com Dom
Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 6:42 pm

Re: 'Forthcoming' Lists Discussion and Random Speculation Vo

#105 Post by domino harvey »

Isn't this the creepy guy who asked a director for nude pix of Vinessa Shaw?
Thomas Dukenfield
Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2010 10:42 pm

Re: 'Forthcoming' Lists Discussion and Random Speculation Vo

#106 Post by Thomas Dukenfield »

Looks like not hiring Wells was yet another smart move by the best home video outfit in the business. If that's elitism, so be it.
User avatar
domino harvey
Dot Com Dom
Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 6:42 pm

Re: 'Forthcoming' Lists Discussion and Random Speculation Vo

#107 Post by domino harvey »

What are the odds that even the above story is just a cover for how Criterion refused to forward Wells JPEGs of Tamara?
User avatar
matrixschmatrix
Joined: Wed May 26, 2010 3:26 am

Re: 'Forthcoming' Lists Discussion and Random Speculation Vo

#108 Post by matrixschmatrix »

Jesus, he sounds like fucking Rupert Pupkin.
User avatar
aox
Joined: Fri Jun 20, 2008 4:02 pm
Location: nYc

Re: 'Forthcoming' Lists Discussion and Random Speculation Vo

#109 Post by aox »

Image
User avatar
Drucker
Your Future our Drucker
Joined: Wed May 18, 2011 1:37 pm

Re: 'Forthcoming' Lists Discussion and Random Speculation Vo

#110 Post by Drucker »

I went on a job interview. Then I didn't get to interview with the person I wanted to interview with. I hated who I interviewed with immediately and at first sight. HOW COULD I NOT HAVE GOTTEN THIS JOB?
User avatar
gcgiles1dollarbin
Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2010 7:38 am

Re: 'Forthcoming' Lists Discussion and Random Speculation Vo

#111 Post by gcgiles1dollarbin »

Jeffrey Wells wrote:A Criterion marketing (or senior publicity) woman and I had hit it off pretty well, and she suggested that I drop by the office for an interview later that day or the following morning.

If this unnamed woman still works at Criterion and reads this, she'll probably feel like Ann Rule when the latter discovered that she worked a suicide hotline with Ted Bundy.

EDIT: Which is to say, they dodged a bullet. My simile is a little extreme.
Last edited by gcgiles1dollarbin on Tue Aug 30, 2011 7:32 am, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
The Elegant Dandy Fop
Joined: Thu Dec 09, 2004 7:25 am
Location: Los Angeles, CA

Re: 'Forthcoming' Lists Discussion and Random Speculation Vo

#112 Post by The Elegant Dandy Fop »

So when are him and Ray Carney going to make the Criterion Conspiracy Club (CCC)?
Perkins Cobb
Joined: Tue Apr 29, 2008 4:49 pm

Re: Criterion & Eclipse in the Press

#113 Post by Perkins Cobb »

Vinessa Shaw is hot, though. I mean....
User avatar
Murdoch
Joined: Mon Apr 21, 2008 3:59 am
Location: Upstate NY

Re: Criterion & Eclipse in the Press

#115 Post by Murdoch »

Criterion's Kim Hendrickson interviewed by Jezebel as part of a piece on challenging the accepted film canon.
User avatar
Boosmahn
Joined: Tue Sep 05, 2017 2:08 am

Re: Criterion & Eclipse in the Press

#116 Post by Boosmahn »

Is that article suggesting that film "canon" upholds white supremacy simply because the majority of (regarded) classics were directed by white people? :?
User avatar
knives
Joined: Sat Sep 06, 2008 10:49 pm

Re: Criterion & Eclipse in the Press

#117 Post by knives »

One could argue truth to such an argument if phrased well. While a lot of this is dependent on historical factors outside the US it is probably no wonder the focus of film studies has been with the occupation most filled by the American hegemony with roles filled by minorities (religious and ethnic) and women ignored and even demonized with the producers. For a minority to be talked about outside of a specific study they have to be a unique titan such as James Wong Howe.

After all this isn't far from Spike Lee's argument about teaching Griffith in a bubble of technique.
User avatar
movielocke
Joined: Fri Jan 18, 2008 4:44 am

Re: Criterion & Eclipse in the Press

#118 Post by movielocke »

shoot, everything that article attributes to Griffith and to BoaN is a well-constructed myth (that he certainly had a part in creating) if not an outright lie. And let us not forget, Birth of a Nation's availability pre home video was incredibly widespread and was heavily subsidized thanks to the KKK, so schools and professors could access or own a good quality print of BoaN for free or practically nothing relative to what accessing film prints usually cost them. And if the only silent film available to your school for free is BoaN, chances were that text was going to be used to teach from whilst credulously treating it as a holy text. Making schools complicit in spreading KKK propaganda and finding compelling ways to dress it up in palatable academic forms was certainly one of their finest achievements.
User avatar
domino harvey
Dot Com Dom
Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 6:42 pm

Re: Criterion & Eclipse in the Press

#119 Post by domino harvey »

It's not a myth that it was highly influential and represented the most popular initial utilization of many elements we now associate with what a feature film looks like. Calling academics who have taught the film "complicit in spreading KKK propaganda" does, however, quality you to write for Jezebel, so I hope you're sending in your CV
User avatar
Brian C
I hate to be That Pedantic Guy but...
Joined: Wed Sep 16, 2009 3:58 pm
Location: Northwest US

Re: Criterion & Eclipse in the Press

#120 Post by Brian C »

I remember being shown BoaN in my junior high social studies class by a teacher who once literally brought herself to tears while telling us how FDR and the New Deal nearly destroyed this country. I’m not sure she would have objected to being charged with spreading KKK propaganda!
User avatar
knives
Joined: Sat Sep 06, 2008 10:49 pm

Re: Criterion & Eclipse in the Press

#121 Post by knives »

Man, OK sounds so weird.
User avatar
domino harvey
Dot Com Dom
Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 6:42 pm

Re: Criterion & Eclipse in the Press

#122 Post by domino harvey »

I’m pretty sure Brian wasn’t in OK, he didn’t mention that his history teacher was just the basketball coach
User avatar
knives
Joined: Sat Sep 06, 2008 10:49 pm

Re: Criterion & Eclipse in the Press

#123 Post by knives »

Weird. I thought him and Michael had gone to elementary school together.
User avatar
knives
Joined: Sat Sep 06, 2008 10:49 pm

Re: Criterion & Eclipse in the Press

#125 Post by knives »

Yes.
Post Reply