Excerpts from Ed Gonzalez's more positive review at
Slant Magazine:
Now, in terms of image and sound quality, this is a solid presentation. Colors are accurate and robust and contrast is profound, but sound is a little underwhelming and could have benefited from a 5.1 surround treatment.
Though the disc is anamorphic 1.78:1, Gonzalez notes that it may be improperly flagged as 1.33:1 (his DVD player transmitted a full-frame image). If you have a player which automatically detects the AR and you notice a vertically stretched picture, you may have to manually change the setting.
The commentary track by Apichatpong Weerasethakul and critic Chuck Stephens isn't so much a joint commentary as much as a two-hour question-and-answer jam session. In his answers, Weerasethakul reveals himself to be as playful, innocent, and unpretentious as Tong from the film, a fact that I'm not sure if Stephens is perturbed or mesmerized by.
I feel much better about ordering this now. I especially want to hear the commentary.
Thinking about the DVD Talk review noted earlier in this thread:
IMDb lists the runtime of the film as 118 mins.
Strand lists the runtime of the R1 DVD at 118 mins (as does Slant).
DVD Beaver lists the timing of the R3 PAL Thai disc at 114:20 (not quite 4% shorter).
If these timings are correct, this would lead me to conclude that the R1 DVD is based on an NTSC master.
Svet Atanasov, who wrote the review at DVD Talk recently joined this forum as "pro-bassoonist," perhaps he (she?) can comment on the actual timing of the R1 disc, or what led him (her?) to believe it is a PAL-to-NTSC transfer.
Svet Atanasov's reply:
Let me address your questions regarding the
R1 release of Strand's Tropical Malady. First of all the total timing for this print of the film clocks in exactly at 1.53.12. I don't know what IMDB lists and can not attest whether or not their timing is correct as they often tend to provide false information especially when it comes down to foreign releases. With this said the time above reflects the length of the film from the opening credits all the way to the final logo of the company producer.
Furthermore, this is clearly a flawed print. There is a substantial amount of “ghostingâ€