Awards Season 2011

Discuss film culture and criticism
Message
Author
User avatar
rohmerin
Joined: Mon Aug 07, 2006 2:36 pm
Location: Spain

Re: Awards Season 2011

#526 Post by rohmerin »

Come on !!!! Prince Alberto is Grace Kelly's son. Come on ! He and his wife should have given Best picture Oscar and not the crazy film -bad actor- star
User avatar
mfunk9786
Under Chris' Protection
Joined: Fri May 16, 2008 8:43 pm
Location: Miami, FL

Re: Awards Season 2011

#527 Post by mfunk9786 »

Silent movie! You know... it was silent!
User avatar
Professor Wagstaff
Joined: Wed Aug 25, 2010 3:27 am

Re: Awards Season 2011

#528 Post by Professor Wagstaff »

Moneyball's terrific score couldn't get a nomination, yet the Academy found it appropriate enough to be the theme for the entire show.
User avatar
mfunk9786
Under Chris' Protection
Joined: Fri May 16, 2008 8:43 pm
Location: Miami, FL

Re: Awards Season 2011

#529 Post by mfunk9786 »

rohmerin wrote:Come on !!!! Prince Alberto is Grace Kelly's son. Come on ! He and his wife should have given Best picture Oscar and not the crazy film -bad actor- star
I don't understand most of that
User avatar
Murdoch
Joined: Mon Apr 21, 2008 3:59 am
Location: Upstate NY

Re: Awards Season 2011

#530 Post by Murdoch »

Guess I have to watch a silent movie now IN THE 21ST CENTURY
User avatar
knives
Joined: Sat Sep 06, 2008 10:49 pm

Re: Awards Season 2011

#531 Post by knives »

Given what a shit fit they threw over Hamlet winning all those years ago I wonder what they're thinking with two foreign best pictures in a row?
User avatar
domino harvey
Dot Com Dom
Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 6:42 pm

Re: Awards Season 2011

#532 Post by domino harvey »

Murdoch wrote:Guess I have to watch a silent movie now IN THE 21ST CENTURY
Don't listen to the sourpusses on this forum, the Artist is a fantastic film
User avatar
matrixschmatrix
Joined: Wed May 26, 2010 3:26 am

Re: Awards Season 2011

#533 Post by matrixschmatrix »

It's like half an hour of fun stuff and an hour and a half long wallow in a dude feeling bad about himself for reasons that don't seem particularly compelling
User avatar
Murdoch
Joined: Mon Apr 21, 2008 3:59 am
Location: Upstate NY

Re: Awards Season 2011

#534 Post by Murdoch »

I think Bérénice Bejo is cute so I'd watch it even on mute, oh wait
User avatar
mfunk9786
Under Chris' Protection
Joined: Fri May 16, 2008 8:43 pm
Location: Miami, FL

Re: Awards Season 2011

#535 Post by mfunk9786 »

Does the fact that it's an above average silent film really warrant a Best Picture Oscar, though? I will never understand that.
User avatar
domino harvey
Dot Com Dom
Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 6:42 pm

Re: Awards Season 2011

#536 Post by domino harvey »

"Fact"
User avatar
mfunk9786
Under Chris' Protection
Joined: Fri May 16, 2008 8:43 pm
Location: Miami, FL

Re: Awards Season 2011

#537 Post by mfunk9786 »

Okay, one of the best silent films ever made, gotcha
User avatar
matrixschmatrix
Joined: Wed May 26, 2010 3:26 am

Re: Awards Season 2011

#538 Post by matrixschmatrix »

It's one of the best three silent movies ever to win best picture
User avatar
mfunk9786
Under Chris' Protection
Joined: Fri May 16, 2008 8:43 pm
Location: Miami, FL

Re: Awards Season 2011

#539 Post by mfunk9786 »

I'll keep thinking about 2007 and just hope something similar happens again. You know, good films being nominated and whatnot
User avatar
domino harvey
Dot Com Dom
Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 6:42 pm

Re: Awards Season 2011

#540 Post by domino harvey »

ANYWAYS, Kimmel's Movie: the Movie was roughly a million times better than any "comedy" on the actual Oscars. Gary Oldman's diagnosis, Clooney facing off against Black Hitler, and "Daniel Day Lewis as you've never seen him before--" all killed it
User avatar
mfunk9786
Under Chris' Protection
Joined: Fri May 16, 2008 8:43 pm
Location: Miami, FL

Re: Awards Season 2011

#541 Post by mfunk9786 »

All of this has me wondering... what do the Oscars accomplish at this point? They don't reflect arthouse or populist tastes... they've got an incredibly dull ceremony full of shockingly dull nominees and winners... realistically, how far are we from this just being the Grammys II?
User avatar
knives
Joined: Sat Sep 06, 2008 10:49 pm

Re: Awards Season 2011

#542 Post by knives »

They boost sells. That's all they ever have do and all they have ever done (aside from some union busting of course).
User avatar
Jeff
Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 1:49 am
Location: Denver, CO

Re: Awards Season 2011

#543 Post by Jeff »

Completely ridiculous year-in-advance predictions:

Best Picture
Anna Karenina
Cloud Atlas
The Great Gatsby
The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey
Life of Pi
Lincoln
The Master
Les Miserables
Skyfall

Director
Paul Thomas Anderson
Peter Jackson
Ang Lee
Steven Spielberg
Joe Wright

Actor
Daniel Day-Lewis (Lincoln)
Phillip Seymour Hoffman (The Master)
Leonardo DiCaprio (The Great Gatsby)
Bill Murray (Hyde Park on Hudson)
Brad Pitt (Cogan's Trade)

Actress
Sandra Bullock (Gravity)
Anne Hathaway (Les Miserables)
Scarlett Johansson (Under the Skin)
Keira Knightly (Anna Karenina)
Carey Mulligan (The Great Gatsby)

Original Screenplay
Woody Allen (Nero Fiddled)
Paul Thomas Anderson (The Master)
Wes Anderson (Moonrise Kingdom)
Judd Apatow (This is Forty)
Quentin Tarantino (Django Unchained)

Adapted Screenplay
Tony Kushner, John Logan (Lincoln)
Baz Luhrmann, Craig Pearce (The Great Gatsby)
David Magee (Life of Pi)
Tom Stoppard (Anna Karenina)
Fran Walsh, Philippa Boyens, Peter Jackson, Guillermo del Toro (The Hobbit)
User avatar
tarpilot
Joined: Thu Jan 20, 2011 2:48 pm

Re: Awards Season 2011

#544 Post by tarpilot »

Jeff wrote:Life of Pi
Up until now I have managed to remain blissfully unaware that this piece of shit finally emerged from development hell. Thanks, Jeff
gfxtwin
Joined: Fri Oct 28, 2011 3:22 am
Location: Austin

Re: Awards Season 2011

#545 Post by gfxtwin »

Seems like the politics and desire for viewership that sometimes inform the Academy's decisions were in full force tonight. I don't see the logic in awarding a movie solely based on it being likeable and up to industry standards, technically (but not raising any bars whatsoever). I know shows like these shouldn't be taken to heart, but why not award a filmmaker because of his/her ability to add something to the industry, offer new experiences, ambitious concepts, and dazzling technical wizardry? The Tree of Life did all of these things but couldn't even manage a much-deserved cinematography award. Drive was one of the most stylish and thoughtful pop movies of the year, and it was totally shut-out (oh, I forgot the sound mixing nomination. Because that's what everyone remembers about Drive). Why? The TOL was too "weird" and Drive was too violent I imagine. Unfortunate.

Usually the academy are conscious about awarding movies that strike a balance between critic-pleaser and crowd-pleaser. They did that this year to some degree, but it's too bad their criteria for best picture apparently leaned far more in the latter direction than the former. More so than any year in recent memory.
User avatar
domino harvey
Dot Com Dom
Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 6:42 pm

Re: Awards Season 2011

#546 Post by domino harvey »

mfunk9786 wrote:All of this has me wondering... what do the Oscars accomplish at this point?
Everyone has their reasons and justifications, but as far back as I can remember, the Oscars were An Event in my household. My mother and I would fill out the ballots and watch and the winner would get to pick where we'd go out to eat to celebrate (eating out being a rare treat). I don't know that I ever considered it a correct matrix of taste so much as a fascinating omnipresent construct: The Oscars. But I was a strange little boy, perhaps-- When I was nine or ten I would go to the library sales and snatch up all the old Entertainment Weekly issues I could find and read them cover to cover. Immersed in that self-aggrandizing world of industry importance that feeds itself, the Oscars always made sense. They still do. The Oscars are the Oscars, and they're for the Academy-- and those curious few still on the outside looking in. I don't blame anyone who doesn't think the Oscars reflect their personal taste, but I could do without the annual bellyaching about their irrelevancy-- when were the Oscars ever about relevancy?!

All that said, the Artist still remains a great film
User avatar
Jeff
Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 1:49 am
Location: Denver, CO

Re: Awards Season 2011

#547 Post by Jeff »

That's a great post, Domino. My tastes haven't really aligned with the Academy's since I was a kid, but they have an appeal of their own. I also filled out Oscar ballots (torn out of TV Guide pre-internet) as a young kid, and collected issues of Entertainment Weekly as a teen.
User avatar
Noiretirc
Joined: Tue Dec 09, 2008 10:04 pm
Location: VanIsle
Contact:

Re: Awards Season 2011

#548 Post by Noiretirc »

Yeah, great post Domino, and you have convinced me to watch The Artist. (In honor of Oscar night, I watched Santa Sangre. Did I miss much? Any love for Tree Of Life?)
User avatar
thirtyframesasecond
Joined: Mon Apr 02, 2007 5:48 pm

Re: Awards Season 2011

#549 Post by thirtyframesasecond »

Nothing controversial but I'm happy with the winners from the noms at least. I always thought Dujardin's English was dodgy, must've had some serious lessons in prep for the Oscars and subsequent Hollywood work. Expect him to be the next Bond villain or something.
User avatar
eerik
Joined: Sun Mar 22, 2009 8:53 pm
Location: Estonia

Re: Awards Season 2011

#550 Post by eerik »

mfunk9786 wrote:Does the fact that it's an above average silent film really warrant a Best Picture Oscar, though? I will never understand that.
One word: Weinstein.
Post Reply