Non-Marvel and DC Comic Books on Film

Discuss specific films and franchises
Post Reply
Message
Author
User avatar
SpiderBaby
Joined: Wed Dec 15, 2010 10:34 pm

Re: Comic Books on Film

#176 Post by SpiderBaby »

Nicolas Winding Refn should make a Punisher movie, only if under Marvel.
User avatar
flyonthewall2983
Joined: Mon Jun 27, 2005 7:31 pm
Location: Indiana
Contact:

Re: Comic Books on Film

#177 Post by flyonthewall2983 »

It would probably never happen, but David Fincher would be a good choice as well. On one of the special features on the Blu-ray for Girl With The Dragon Tattoo, he talked about how he feels about portraying vengeance on screen. He used Alex Murphy's death in RoboCop as an example of how he believes it should be done. That it's important to feel the pain as it were, so that later when the hero gets their comeuppance it's that much more cathartic for the audience.

Since you brought up Marvel, it kind of depresses me now that I remembered Disney has their deal with them. Which means the movie I pitched would likely never get made.
User avatar
SpiderBaby
Joined: Wed Dec 15, 2010 10:34 pm

Re: Comic Books on Film

#178 Post by SpiderBaby »

Yeah, a PG-13 Punisher film doesn't sound right (assuming that is what a Marvel/Disney production would do). But Fincher would be another good choice.
User avatar
flyonthewall2983
Joined: Mon Jun 27, 2005 7:31 pm
Location: Indiana
Contact:

Re: Comic Books on Film

#179 Post by flyonthewall2983 »

An R wouldn't be out of the realm of possibility, but I'd imagine it would be a tame R at best. The idea for it we've been kind of drooling over would certainly be a much harsher R if that makes any sense.
User avatar
SpiderBaby
Joined: Wed Dec 15, 2010 10:34 pm

Re: Comic Books on Film

#180 Post by SpiderBaby »

Makes sense.
User avatar
dx23
Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 12:52 am
Location: Puerto Rico

Re: Comic Books on Film

#181 Post by dx23 »

Does Disney allow R rated films? They used to have Miramax for that but now that they are gone I don't remember Disney releasing R films through any of their sister companies. Punisher would have to a hard R to truly work.
User avatar
cdnchris
Site Admin
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 6:45 pm
Location: Washington
Contact:

Re: Comic Books on Film

#182 Post by cdnchris »

They released plenty through Touchstone and Hollywood Pictures (Shoot to Kill, The Rock, Stakeout, Down and Out in Beverly Hills, Color of Money, Miracle at St. Anna, etc.)
User avatar
dx23
Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 12:52 am
Location: Puerto Rico

Re: Comic Books on Film

#183 Post by dx23 »

Had completely forgotten about that. So an R Punisher from Marvel wouldn't be out of the question. I like the 70's story idea but Marvel wouldn't probably do it just because they want to keep their characters in the same era.
User avatar
Cold Bishop
Joined: Wed May 31, 2006 1:45 am
Location: Portland, OR

Re: Comic Books on Film

#184 Post by Cold Bishop »

I thought it was pretty well known that, after the original film was such a disappointment (not just financially, but to Jane, artistically), he approached Walter Hill with the specific purpose of doing a Hard-R Taxi Driver influenced take on the material. They went even as far as giving a presentation to the studio, but Lionsgate kiboshed it.

Too bad Jane and Hill likely had a falling out over the Headshot screwjob; it's right up both their alleys. Wayne Kramer, perhaps (if he can keep the technological gimmickry in check)?
ianungstad
Joined: Thu Mar 17, 2005 1:20 am

Re: Comic Books on Film

#185 Post by ianungstad »

Unless plans have changed, there are plans to launch Punisher as a basic cable series.
User avatar
Mr Sausage
Has Risen from the Grave
Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 1:02 am
Location: Canada

Re: Comic Books on Film

#186 Post by Mr Sausage »

Cold Bishop wrote:I thought it was pretty well known that, after the original film was such a disappointment (not just financially, but to Jane, artistically), he approached Walter Hill with the specific purpose of doing a Hard-R Taxi Driver influenced take on the material. They went even as far as giving a presentation to the studio, but Lionsgate kiboshed it.
Yet for some reason Lionsgate gave the go-ahead for a very hard-R sequel, Punisher: Warzone.
User avatar
Cold Bishop
Joined: Wed May 31, 2006 1:45 am
Location: Portland, OR

Re: Comic Books on Film

#187 Post by Cold Bishop »

It's must understanding that Lexi Alexander had a hell of a time getting that film made, and there were many compromises before it made it (barely) to the screen. I know the soundtrack alone was the source of much controversy: Anderson wanted a full orchestral soundtrack; Lionsgate wanted wall-to-wall Modern Rock, something they could market as a CD. That pretty much sums up the different headspaces between creative talent and brass on the project.

I'm guessing there were fine with the over-the-top non-stop action. It's the nuance, ambiguity and focus on character drama (if you believe Jane) that probably gave them cold feet.
Last edited by Cold Bishop on Wed Jul 18, 2012 6:08 am, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
SpiderBaby
Joined: Wed Dec 15, 2010 10:34 pm

Re: Comic Books on Film

#188 Post by SpiderBaby »

I must say, there are a few things I love with P:WZ. I always disliked the trench coat look, and always saw the character Frank Castle like he was ready for war (to the point of obsession with weaponry), so the mercenary look I loved so much from that film (and hope any future film/T.V. version follows that). I already praised the art direction of the film and the comic book neon colors. The casting of Ray Stevenson, who looked like the perfect Castle. The problem is, you have to love Jane's passion for the character and only hope he returns.
User avatar
dx23
Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 12:52 am
Location: Puerto Rico

Re: Comic Books on Film

#189 Post by dx23 »

ianungstad wrote:Unless plans have changed, there are plans to launch Punisher as a basic cable series.
Plans have changed as the Punisher was not picked up by Fox. The rumor mill about the TV show started again because of the Jane short film above, but so far no network has picked the series. I'm glad Fox didn't pick up the series because it would not work unless it is shown on AMC, HBO, Showtime or FX.
User avatar
Cold Bishop
Joined: Wed May 31, 2006 1:45 am
Location: Portland, OR

Re: Comic Books on Film

#190 Post by Cold Bishop »

SpiderBaby wrote:I must say, there are a few things I love with P:WZ.
It definitely doesn't quash my theory that more masculine genres could use female filmmakers.
User avatar
flyonthewall2983
Joined: Mon Jun 27, 2005 7:31 pm
Location: Indiana
Contact:

Re: Comic Books on Film

#191 Post by flyonthewall2983 »

Cold Bishop wrote:I know the soundtrack alone was the source of much controversy: Anderson wanted a full orchestral soundtrack; Lionsgate wanted wall-to-wall Modern Rock, something they could market as a CD.
Considering this is like 4-5 years ago and well after the Pandora's box of downloading music free online, this is almost comical to think that a studio still sees as a marketing tool.
User avatar
Mr Sausage
Has Risen from the Grave
Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 1:02 am
Location: Canada

Re: Comic Books on Film

#192 Post by Mr Sausage »

Cold Bishop wrote:
SpiderBaby wrote:I must say, there are a few things I love with P:WZ.
It definitely doesn't quash my theory that more masculine genres could use female filmmakers.
From what I understand, director Lexi Alexander is a karate champion and former stunt woman, so it seems she has the sensibility for it.
User avatar
flyonthewall2983
Joined: Mon Jun 27, 2005 7:31 pm
Location: Indiana
Contact:

Re: Comic Books on Film

#193 Post by flyonthewall2983 »

dx23 wrote:I'm glad Fox didn't pick up the series because it would not work unless it is shown on AMC, HBO, Showtime or FX.
AMC would probably fumble the ball with it, HBO would just pass it on to Cinemax, and Showtime would let it run too long. FX would be a better fit if you consider the kind of areas they went with The Shield and more recently American Horror Story. Plus they kind of have a niche for the kind of macho material The Punisher represents.
User avatar
dx23
Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 12:52 am
Location: Puerto Rico

Re: Comic Books on Film

#194 Post by dx23 »

flyonthewall2983 wrote:
dx23 wrote:I'm glad Fox didn't pick up the series because it would not work unless it is shown on AMC, HBO, Showtime or FX.
AMC would probably fumble the ball with it, HBO would just pass it on to Cinemax, and Showtime would let it run too long. FX would be a better fit if you consider the kind of areas they went with The Shield and more recently American Horror Story. Plus they kind of have a niche for the kind of macho material The Punisher represents.
Starz could also do it since they have a relationship with Disney and like doing violent series.
User avatar
dx23
Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 12:52 am
Location: Puerto Rico

Marvel's The Avengers 2 (Joss Whedon, 2015)

#195 Post by dx23 »

Marvel confirmed on Monday that Joss Whedon is returning to direct Avengers 2and will do some Marvel related TV show. I'm glad he is returning but I fear that film will be completely overcrowded with characters. This will also be the end of what Marvel calls Phase 2. As for the TV show, I wouldn't be surprised to see a minor character on a series that will be tied with the Marvel films.
User avatar
feihong
Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 4:20 pm

Re: Marvel's The Avengers 2 (Joss Whedon, 2015)

#196 Post by feihong »

They should Peter Jackson this stuff up. Just make 6 hours of movie and cut it into two 3-hour features, and have Avengers 2 and 3 tell two halves of the same story. Then they can manage the large cast and some excitement, to boot.

With Thanos as the implied villain, I imagine the Guardians of the Galaxy will travel from their movie and appear in the Avengers sequel.
User avatar
mfunk9786
Under Chris' Protection
Joined: Fri May 16, 2008 8:43 pm
Location: Miami, FL

Re: Marvel's The Avengers 2 (Joss Whedon, 2015)

#197 Post by mfunk9786 »

I wonder if there'll ever be an end to the popularity of these superhero films. You can only make the same fucking movie over and over again so many times, right?
User avatar
Jean-Luc Garbo
Joined: Thu Dec 09, 2004 5:55 am
Contact:

Re: Comic Books on Film

#198 Post by Jean-Luc Garbo »

It depends because you could say the same about the comic books, right? Batman has been around for seventy-three years and there's been no end to the comics. If it makes money, after all. The stories aren't always the same story and the movies don't have to be the same movie. Not that too many executives in charge seem to care. A better question is why people in your estimation seem to want to watch the same movie?
User avatar
Siddon
Joined: Sun May 08, 2011 11:44 am

Re: Comic Books on Film

#199 Post by Siddon »

I don't see comic book films coming to an end anytime soon. I think the critical and commercial success of Amazing Spider-man and X-men First Class demonstrated that you can reset these films and the audiences will come back which tells me that the sub-genre has a versatility that other popular sub-genres don't have. I also don't understand why people would be upset about these films, they are lets face it a level ahead of the typical summer blockbusters.
User avatar
flyonthewall2983
Joined: Mon Jun 27, 2005 7:31 pm
Location: Indiana
Contact:

Re: Comic Books on Film

#200 Post by flyonthewall2983 »

It's definitely a better wealth of source material, as opposed to a board game or amusement park ride.

This bit from an interview with David Cronenberg and Robert Pattinson talking about Cosmopolis has been getting some attention. I respect Cronenberg, and he has a fair point at the end, which I think is directed at the uber-fanboys but I don't think he's seeing the forest from the trees on this subject.
David, you've done drama and horror. Some fairly formidable directors have branched out into superhero movies pretty beautifully —is that something you would consider doing?

DC: I don't think they are making them an elevated art form. I think it's still Batman running around in a stupid cape. I just don't think it's elevated. Christopher Nolan's best movie is "Memento," and that is an interesting movie. I don't think his Batman movies are half as interesting though they're 20 million times the expense. What he is doing is some very interesting technical stuff, which, you know, he's shooting IMAX and in 3-D. That's really tricky and difficult to do. I read about it in "American Cinematography Magazine," and technically, that's all very interesting. The movie, to me, they're mostly boring.

Do you think the subject matter prohibits the elevated art form?

DC: Absolutely. Anybody who works in the studio system has got 20 studio people sitting on his head at every moment, and they have no respect, and there's no…it doesn't matter how successful you've been. And obviously Nolan has been very successful. He's got a lot of power, relatively speaking. But he doesn't really have power.

So that's a no.

DC: I would say that's a no, you know. And the problem is you gotta… as I say, you can do some interesting, maybe unexpected things. And certainly, I've made the horror films and people say, "Can you make a horror film also an art film?" And I would say, "Yeah, I think you can."

But a superhero movie, by definition, you know, it's comic book. It's for kids. It's adolescent in its core. That has always been its appeal, and I think people who are saying, you know, "Dark Knight Rises" is, you know, supreme cinema art," I don't think they know what the f**k they're talking about.
Post Reply