Lincoln (Steven Spielberg, 2012)

Discuss specific films and franchises
Post Reply
Message
Author
User avatar
mfunk9786
Under Chris' Protection
Joined: Fri May 16, 2008 8:43 pm
Location: Miami, FL

Re: Lincoln (Steven Spielberg, 2012)

#76 Post by mfunk9786 »

Bill Murray picked a terrible year to try to snag his Oscar - he'll be third in the running at best.
User avatar
rohmerin
Joined: Mon Aug 07, 2006 2:36 pm
Location: Spain

Re: Lincoln (Steven Spielberg, 2012)

#77 Post by rohmerin »

Day Lewis in that VF picture is so bloody ... hot !
User avatar
Highway 61
Joined: Mon Nov 08, 2004 8:40 pm

Re: Lincoln (Steven Spielberg, 2012)

#78 Post by Highway 61 »

mfunk9786 wrote:Bill Murray picked a terrible year to try to snag his Oscar - he'll be third in the running at best.
Naturally he doesn't stand a chance. I just anticipate lots of media coverage of DDL and Murray's respective performances.

Anyhow, if DDL wins, would that make him the only actor to win three times? I know Nicholson has three, but one is for supporting.
User avatar
mfunk9786
Under Chris' Protection
Joined: Fri May 16, 2008 8:43 pm
Location: Miami, FL

Re: Lincoln (Steven Spielberg, 2012)

#79 Post by mfunk9786 »

You're right - he'd be the first of this class to emerge with a third Best Actor award:

Spencer Tracy
Fredric March
Gary Cooper
Marlon Brando
Dustin Hoffman
Tom Hanks
Jack Nicholson
Daniel Day-Lewis
Sean Penn

He'll have a tremendous percentage going too, as it'll be his 5th nomination and 3rd win. By comparison, for example, Spencer Tracy had 9 nominations that yielded his wins.
User avatar
knives
Joined: Sat Sep 06, 2008 10:49 pm

Re: Lincoln (Steven Spielberg, 2012)

#80 Post by knives »

Of course in Tracey's case he pissed off the academy so bad they'd never give him an other one after the Edison fiasco.
stroszeck
Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2005 2:42 am

Re: Lincoln (Steven Spielberg, 2012)

#81 Post by stroszeck »

knives wrote:Of course in Tracey's case he pissed off the academy so bad they'd never give him an other one after the Edison fiasco.
What fiasco do you speak of?
User avatar
knives
Joined: Sat Sep 06, 2008 10:49 pm

Re: Lincoln (Steven Spielberg, 2012)

#82 Post by knives »

Basically Tracy thought it was a moral imperative for Edison, The Man to be rewarded in some way and when it wasn't even nominated for BP he did a George C. Scott which prevented him from winning anything after.
User avatar
mfunk9786
Under Chris' Protection
Joined: Fri May 16, 2008 8:43 pm
Location: Miami, FL

Re: Lincoln (Steven Spielberg, 2012)

#83 Post by mfunk9786 »

I like how someone asking for clarification on Oscar shorthand was given another riddle to solve
User avatar
knives
Joined: Sat Sep 06, 2008 10:49 pm

Re: Lincoln (Steven Spielberg, 2012)

#84 Post by knives »

Are you suggesting not everyone here is an oscarologist?
User avatar
mfunk9786
Under Chris' Protection
Joined: Fri May 16, 2008 8:43 pm
Location: Miami, FL

Re: Lincoln (Steven Spielberg, 2012)

#85 Post by mfunk9786 »

I'm as surprised as you are ;)
stroszeck
Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2005 2:42 am

Re: Lincoln (Steven Spielberg, 2012)

#86 Post by stroszeck »

Yea actually I'm in the dark about the Scott story as well but I'm assuming it was something unforgivable (?)....
User avatar
willoneill
Joined: Wed Mar 18, 2009 2:10 pm
Location: Ottawa, Ontario, Canada

Re: Lincoln (Steven Spielberg, 2012)

#87 Post by willoneill »

Instead of attending the Oscars, Scott stayed home and watched a hockey game. That's always forgiveable in my book.
User avatar
triodelover
Joined: Sat Jan 27, 2007 6:11 pm
Location: The hills of East Tennessee

Re: Lincoln (Steven Spielberg, 2012)

#88 Post by triodelover »

willoneill wrote:Instead of attending the Oscars, Scott stayed home and watched a hockey game. That's always forgiveable in my book.
Well, It's a tad more than that. He refused his first Oscar nomination in 1962 for The Hustler. When he was nominated for Best Actor for Patton, he refused again, calling the Oscars "a goddamned meat parade". He didn't accept the Oscar nor was he at the presentation. He directed that the Oscar should be donated to the Patton Museum, but those instructions were never put in writing to the Academy. The Oscar is currently on display at VMI. ( Scott was a native Virginian.)
User avatar
mfunk9786
Under Chris' Protection
Joined: Fri May 16, 2008 8:43 pm
Location: Miami, FL

Re: Lincoln (Steven Spielberg, 2012)

#89 Post by mfunk9786 »

Even though I'm an Oscar nerd, I totally appreciate him exercising his right to give that institution the middle finger.
User avatar
Sloper
Joined: Wed May 30, 2007 2:06 am

Re: Lincoln (Steven Spielberg, 2012)

#90 Post by Sloper »

Of course, that didn't stop the Academy from nominating him again the following year for The Hospital.
User avatar
oldsheperd
Joined: Thu Nov 11, 2004 9:18 pm
Location: Rio Rancho/Albuquerque

Re: Lincoln (Steven Spielberg, 2012)

#91 Post by oldsheperd »

The Academy also has a stalker ex-girlfriend obsession with Woody Allen.
User avatar
willoneill
Joined: Wed Mar 18, 2009 2:10 pm
Location: Ottawa, Ontario, Canada

Re: Lincoln (Steven Spielberg, 2012)

#92 Post by willoneill »

triodelover wrote:
willoneill wrote:Instead of attending the Oscars, Scott stayed home and watched a hockey game. That's always forgiveable in my book.
Well, It's a tad more than that.
Oh yeah, I'm sure the hockey game remark was a joke on Scott's part ... though he was married to a Canadian at the time.
User avatar
flyonthewall2983
Joined: Mon Jun 27, 2005 7:31 pm
Location: Indiana
Contact:

Re: Lincoln (Steven Spielberg, 2012)

#93 Post by flyonthewall2983 »

Image
User avatar
Markson
Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2010 9:50 am

Re: Lincoln (Steven Spielberg, 2012)

#94 Post by Markson »

First footage appears in a trailer for the trailer.
User avatar
Roger Ryan
Joined: Wed Apr 28, 2010 4:04 pm
Location: A Midland town spread and darkened into a city

Re: Lincoln (Steven Spielberg, 2012)

#95 Post by Roger Ryan »

Markson wrote:First footage appears in a trailer for the trailer.
Only a few years ago I would not have believed that the words "Lincoln", "Spielberg" and "Live Google Hangout" could coexist in the same trailer.
Brianruns10
Joined: Sun Jul 02, 2006 2:48 pm

Re: Lincoln (Steven Spielberg, 2012)

#96 Post by Brianruns10 »

God I hope the trailer suggests the film has more to it than this, another bullshit Great Man history that reduces a marvelously complex, mysterious, misunderstood, flawed, intelligent, cunning, creative individual in American history to a living waxwork or Christ figure spouting plattitudes and reciting one damn speech of his everyone seems to remember.
User avatar
knives
Joined: Sat Sep 06, 2008 10:49 pm

Re: Lincoln (Steven Spielberg, 2012)

#97 Post by knives »

This is Spielberg we are talking about. If you expected anything other than a hagiography you were looking the wrong way.
Brianruns10
Joined: Sun Jul 02, 2006 2:48 pm

Re: Lincoln (Steven Spielberg, 2012)

#98 Post by Brianruns10 »

Yeah, I know, you're right. It's still a damn shame, because when he does something, it can't be done again, because invariably some producer will say, "Why bother, Spielberg did it?"

Lincoln would be such a marvelous person to make a movie about, if only the filmmaker would bother to really learn about him, and try to discover the man's humanity. That's what made him so great.

John Ford came closest, with Young Mr. Lincoln.
User avatar
Matt
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 4:58 pm

Re: Lincoln (Steven Spielberg, 2012)

#99 Post by Matt »

I would hope that the combination of Doris Kearns-Goodwin and Tony Kushner might be a bulwark against Spielbergian oversimplification. Let's also remember that we are watching that new manner of beast, the trailer for a trailer, and that it's designed to make a tiny impact on a big number of people.

I'm more worried by all that teal lighting and fog I see. Tony Scott est mort! Vive Tony Scott!
User avatar
Drucker
Your Future our Drucker
Joined: Wed May 18, 2011 1:37 pm

Re: Lincoln (Steven Spielberg, 2012)

#100 Post by Drucker »

Brianruns10 wrote:Yeah, I know, you're right. It's still a damn shame, because when he does something, it can't be done again, because invariably some producer will say, "Why bother, Spielberg did it?"

Lincoln would be such a marvelous person to make a movie about, if only the filmmaker would bother to really learn about him, and try to discover the man's humanity. That's what made him so great.

John Ford came closest, with Young Mr. Lincoln.
Spielberg's no slouch. He's always made movies for everyone (kids included). Maybe he's hit and miss these days, but this film need not be some dark, moody, brooding affair for it to be great.
Post Reply