692 It's a Mad Mad Mad Mad World

Discuss releases by Criterion and the films on them. Threads may contain spoilers!
Post Reply
Message
Author
User avatar
swo17
Bloodthirsty Butcher
Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2008 2:25 pm
Location: SLC, UT

Re: Business Models: Twilight Time vs. Olive Films

#226 Post by swo17 »

My point was that no one would ever think to like the movie in the first place without having first spent sufficient time in a criticism-free vacuum.
User avatar
Moe Dickstein
Joined: Sat Aug 25, 2012 3:19 am

Re: Business Models: Twilight Time vs. Olive Films

#227 Post by Moe Dickstein »

I bought the movie sight unseen on laserdisc when I was 15 and I liked it, no Internet forum to tell me if it was worthy of my attention. I still enjoy it to this day. You can say that something is lacking in complexity or subtext perhaps, but what is an enjoyable film is a totally subjective metric, and you can't just say that something is or isn't good by that yardstick.

There is plenty of criticism at HTF, but there is less of an attitude of a monolithic "correct" viewpoint.
User avatar
domino harvey
Dot Com Dom
Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 6:42 pm

Re: Business Models: Twilight Time vs. Olive Films

#228 Post by domino harvey »

Image
User avatar
swo17
Bloodthirsty Butcher
Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2008 2:25 pm
Location: SLC, UT

Re: Business Models: Twilight Time vs. Olive Films

#229 Post by swo17 »

Moe Dickstein wrote:You can say that something is lacking in complexity or subtext perhaps, but what is an enjoyable film is a totally subjective metric, and you can't just say that something is or isn't good by that yardstick.
If it were any other film I would completely agree with you, but as we've all been trying to explain, this one is the exception that proves the rule. Note that Kramer himself removed subjectivity from the conversation when he rather brazenly chose to title the film as he did as opposed to, say, IMHO the World Might Be a Little Mad Though Admittedly Not All of the Facts Are In Yet.
User avatar
FrauBlucher
Joined: Tue Jul 16, 2013 12:28 am
Location: Greenwich Village

Re: Business Models: Twilight Time vs. Olive Films

#230 Post by FrauBlucher »

Actually, Kramer shortened the title from the original, which was "It's a Mad, Mad, Mad, Mad World for Washed Up and Over the Hill Comics Trying to Earn a Buck"
User avatar
Moe Dickstein
Joined: Sat Aug 25, 2012 3:19 am

Re: Business Models: Twilight Time vs. Olive Films

#231 Post by Moe Dickstein »

I actually prefer the second working title "One Damn Thing After Another"
User avatar
Gregory
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 8:07 pm

Re: Business Models: Twilight Time vs. Olive Films

#232 Post by Gregory »

"It's a Mad, Mad, Mad, Mad World"
Okay, so the world's mad. I heard you twice already the first time. What better epitomizes the bloated excesses of the early '60s studio system?
User avatar
domino harvey
Dot Com Dom
Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 6:42 pm

Re: Forthcoming: It's a Mad Mad Mad Mad World

#233 Post by domino harvey »

I prefer Kramer's third working title, Millions Now Living Will Never Die
User avatar
kingofthejungle
Joined: Wed Feb 29, 2012 3:25 pm

Re: Business Models: Twilight Time vs. Olive Films

#234 Post by kingofthejungle »

swo17 wrote: IMHO the World Might Be a Little Mad Though Admittedly Not All of the Facts Are In Yet.
That's the title of Woody Allen's answer film.
User avatar
salad
Joined: Tue Jul 18, 2006 1:20 am

Re: Forthcoming: It's a Mad Mad Mad Mad World

#235 Post by salad »

EddieLarkin wrote:
colinr0380 wrote:I don't think I have seen the film in years so cannot comment on its quality (though it would also be nice to see some of the other madcap 1960s action movies such as The Great Race, Those Magnificent Men In Their Flying Machines or Monte Carlo Or Bust! that can out in the wake of It's A Mad, Mad, Mad, Mad World get Blu upgrades)
Twilight Time already put it out. I personally found it quite a bit more enjoyable than Mad World.
Hey! 'Monte Carlo or Bust! is paired with 'Houdini' in a Tony Curtis double feature blu-ray!
User avatar
Moe Dickstein
Joined: Sat Aug 25, 2012 3:19 am

Re: When does Criterion announce new titles?

#236 Post by Moe Dickstein »

The title I want is coming tomorrow anyway. The rest is gravy.
User avatar
matrixschmatrix
Joined: Wed May 26, 2010 3:26 am

Re: When does Criterion announce new titles?

#237 Post by matrixschmatrix »

I think what I'm most excited about is never having another discussion about It's A Mad, Mad, Mad, Mad World again
User avatar
The Narrator Returns
Joined: Tue Nov 15, 2011 10:35 pm

Re: When does Criterion announce new titles?

#238 Post by The Narrator Returns »

Moe Dickstein wrote:The title I want is coming tomorrow anyway. The rest is gravy.
But does gravy on a shit sandwich really add anything?
User avatar
domino harvey
Dot Com Dom
Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 6:42 pm

Re: When does Criterion announce new titles?

#239 Post by domino harvey »

matrixschmatrix wrote:I think what I'm most excited about is never having another discussion about It's A Mad, Mad, Mad, Mad World again
I look forward to that (soon to be this) thread receiving no posts ever again once its release date is safely behind us all
User avatar
zedz
Joined: Sun Nov 07, 2004 11:24 pm

Re: Forthcoming: It's a Mad Mad Mad Mad World

#240 Post by zedz »

Well, I'm definitely going to be posting about how awful this film is when I finally get around to seeing it.
User avatar
domino harvey
Dot Com Dom
Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 6:42 pm

Re: Forthcoming: It's a Mad Mad Mad Mad World

#241 Post by domino harvey »

Maybe it will show up in a future Film Club theme poll, Films No One Wants To Actually Watch
User avatar
Moe Dickstein
Joined: Sat Aug 25, 2012 3:19 am

Re: Forthcoming: It's a Mad Mad Mad Mad World

#242 Post by Moe Dickstein »

Yeah theoretically the discussion can move to a thread dedicated to the film so that people who dislike it and don't care can avoid it...

Wait a moment!

That's already happened....
User avatar
knives
Joined: Sat Sep 06, 2008 10:49 pm

Re: Forthcoming: It's a Mad Mad Mad Mad World

#243 Post by knives »

If that were to happen though only you'd be posting in here and then the thread would only be five pages long.
User avatar
captveg
Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 11:28 pm

Re: Forthcoming: It's a Mad Mad Mad Mad World

#244 Post by captveg »

Frankly, as a member of both forums, the extreme love/hate expressed over this film on one side or the other seems like overkill. I get that people are passionate pro or con, but good grief there's been a lot of virtual ink spilled over this one release. :P

(Posting the exact same thing in both forums. I have equal :roll: across the boards).
User avatar
domino harvey
Dot Com Dom
Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 6:42 pm

Re: Forthcoming: It's a Mad Mad Mad Mad World

#245 Post by domino harvey »

We'll always win because in ten years most of us will still be alive
User avatar
captveg
Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 11:28 pm

Re: Forthcoming: It's a Mad Mad Mad Mad World

#246 Post by captveg »

Unless you all murder each other, which seems just as probable these days.
User avatar
Michael Kerpan
Spelling Bee Champeen
Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 5:20 pm
Location: New England
Contact:

Re: Twilight Time

#247 Post by Michael Kerpan »

Moe Dickstein wrote:Right, people are allowed to have opinions that others disagree with without being mocked. Not a downslide IMO.
If one isn't ready and willing to be mocked for his (or, purely hypethetically and for purposes of equity and balance, her) stated opinions, one is not yet ready to for full membership in THIS forum. ;~}
User avatar
Moe Dickstein
Joined: Sat Aug 25, 2012 3:19 am

Re: Forthcoming: It's a Mad Mad Mad Mad World

#248 Post by Moe Dickstein »

I believe I've shown my fortitude in regards to being mocked...
User avatar
Michael Kerpan
Spelling Bee Champeen
Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 5:20 pm
Location: New England
Contact:

Re: Forthcoming: It's a Mad Mad Mad Mad World

#249 Post by Michael Kerpan »

;~}
User avatar
Moe Dickstein
Joined: Sat Aug 25, 2012 3:19 am

Re: Forthcoming: It's a Mad Mad Mad Mad World

#250 Post by Moe Dickstein »

In all seriousness, I think outside of the merits of the film itself, there are going to be aspects of this release that are interesting to those who follow film restoration and methodology. I'm looking forward to being able to discuss that aspect of it with anyone who's interested.
Post Reply