52-59 / BD 36-37, 71-72 Late Mizoguchi: Eight Films, 1951-56

Discuss releases by Eureka and Masters of Cinema and the films on them
Message
Author
User avatar
swo17
Bloodthirsty Butcher
Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2008 2:25 pm
Location: SLC, UT

Re: 52-59 / BD 36-37, 71-72 Late Mizoguchi: Eight Films, 195

#426 Post by swo17 »

Florinaldo wrote:Is MoC sending the numbered box sets in strict numerical order according to when the order was placed or is it random?...I find it surprising that they would already have sold nearly 500 copies.
I ordered within 5 minutes of them going on sale and ended up with #51. (There, you got it out of me.) Also, they've not only sold 500 copies, but supposedly almost the entire run of 2,000.
Ishmael
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 6:56 pm

Re: 52-59 / BD 36-37, 71-72 Late Mizoguchi: Eight Films, 195

#427 Post by Ishmael »

A. For what earthly reason would they bother shipping these out in numerical sequence?
B. For those of you who are serious about these numbers, why do you think that a lower number of a limited edition is more significant than any other number?
User avatar
zedz
Joined: Sun Nov 07, 2004 11:24 pm

Re: 52-59 / BD 36-37, 71-72 Late Mizoguchi: Eight Films, 195

#428 Post by zedz »

Ishmael wrote:B. For those of you who are serious about these numbers, why do you think that a lower number of a limited edition is more significant than any other number?
Because collectors be collectors and people be insanely optimistic.

And I confess: I'm Ringo.
Ishmael
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 6:56 pm

Re: 52-59 / BD 36-37, 71-72 Late Mizoguchi: Eight Films, 195

#429 Post by Ishmael »

I clicked on that link. My head exploded.
Arrow
Joined: Wed Sep 16, 2009 5:02 pm

Re: 52-59 / BD 36-37, 71-72 Late Mizoguchi: Eight Films, 195

#430 Post by Arrow »

At this point, an unnumbered set might be the true collector's item (I forgot to check which number I got and the box set it at home at present).
Don't the numbers just peel off anyway?
User avatar
jindianajonz
Jindiana Jonz Abrams
Joined: Thu Oct 13, 2011 12:11 am

Re: 52-59 / BD 36-37, 71-72 Late Mizoguchi: Eight Films, 195

#431 Post by jindianajonz »

REAL collectors would try to obtain a full set of all 2000 numbers!
User avatar
Ozu Teapot
Joined: Fri Jul 16, 2010 3:33 pm
Location: UK
Contact:

Re: 52-59 / BD 36-37, 71-72 Late Mizoguchi: Eight Films, 195

#432 Post by Ozu Teapot »

I seem to remember Kevin from Eureka saying *somewhere* that they'd received their allocation -all lowest numbers - on a pallet but with no order to the numbering and that they'd sent them out just in the order they came off the pallet. (Bet they looked out for number 1 though! )
remy
Joined: Fri May 11, 2012 3:24 pm

Re: 52-59 / BD 36-37, 71-72 Late Mizoguchi: Eight Films, 195

#433 Post by remy »

I received mine yesterday (US East coast) and got #0003. I placed my direct order to Eureka mid-October, so it definitely does not correspond to order placement.
User avatar
effigy105
Joined: Wed Sep 16, 2009 5:30 pm
Location: Chicago, IL

Re: 52-59 / BD 36-37, 71-72 Late Mizoguchi: Eight Films, 195

#434 Post by effigy105 »

Arrived in perfect nick here in Kentucky. Number 19[/peerpressure]
User avatar
RodneyOz
Joined: Tue Dec 09, 2008 10:54 am

Re: 52-59 / BD 36-37, 71-72 Late Mizoguchi: Eight Films, 195

#435 Post by RodneyOz »

effigy105 wrote:Arrived in perfect nick here in Kentucky. Number 19[/peerpressure]
Well that confirms something about how randomly the numbers were assigned. Picked up mine today, in Australia, and it's number 20!
(oh, and I didn't get the corrugated cardboard - I got a box inside a box, with enough masking tape over every join and corner that it took a good five minutes to finally get it out) And I preordered a couple of days AFTER the 'we're going to sell out' tweet.
User avatar
jindianajonz
Jindiana Jonz Abrams
Joined: Thu Oct 13, 2011 12:11 am

Re: 52-59 / BD 36-37, 71-72 Late Mizoguchi: Eight Films, 195

#436 Post by jindianajonz »

It's odd that so many people here are getting numbers in the double digits
User avatar
fdm
Joined: Fri Apr 21, 2006 5:25 pm

Re: 52-59 / BD 36-37, 71-72 Late Mizoguchi: Eight Films, 195

#437 Post by fdm »

The set I'm returning to amazon was in the 700s.
User avatar
antnield
Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2005 5:59 pm
Location: Cheltenham, England

Re: 52-59 / BD 36-37, 71-72 Late Mizoguchi: Eight Films, 195

#438 Post by antnield »

User avatar
Oedipax
Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 12:48 pm
Location: Atlanta

Re: 52-59 / BD 36-37, 71-72 Late Mizoguchi: Eight Films, 195

#439 Post by Oedipax »

rwaits wrote:Arrived in Atlanta. I am floored by how gorgeous this set looks. Very well done MoC.
Damn, that's not encouraging. Still nothing here as of Saturday's delivery and I'm in Atlanta as well (ordered October 15).
David Locke
Joined: Thu Oct 18, 2007 2:24 pm
Location: Paris, France

Re: 52-59 / BD 36-37, 71-72 Late Mizoguchi: Eight Films, 195

#440 Post by David Locke »

I received my copy from Base.com today.
I am pleased to announce it is #1902.
Naturally, the only reason why we all post the number of our beloved set is that we don't want to end up with a fake.
Imagine someone claiming to have a set boasting the exact same number as yours ! What a nightmare, what a tragedy !
User avatar
tenia
Ask Me About My Bassoon
Joined: Wed Apr 29, 2009 3:13 pm

Re: 52-59 / BD 36-37, 71-72 Late Mizoguchi: Eight Films, 195

#441 Post by tenia »

David Locke wrote:I received my copy from Base.com today.
I am pleased to announce it is #1902.
Naturally, the only reason why we all post the number of our beloved set is that we don't want to end up with a fake.
Imagine someone claiming to have a set boasting the exact same number as yours ! What a nightmare, what a tragedy !
Actually, I've read someone saying his set had no number at all. So, you know...
User avatar
domino harvey
Dot Com Dom
Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 6:42 pm

Re: 52-59 / BD 36-37, 71-72 Late Mizoguchi: Eight Films, 195

#442 Post by domino harvey »

In further proof that life isn't fair, I was one of the last people to order before they actually started shipping out and my package arrived today in Baltimore with the low low number #0014
User avatar
Gregory
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 8:07 pm

Re: 52-59 / BD 36-37, 71-72 Late Mizoguchi: Eight Films, 195

#443 Post by Gregory »

Contrary to popular belief, the higher numbers are really better than the low ones. (It's no more self-evident one way than the other.)
User avatar
domino harvey
Dot Com Dom
Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 6:42 pm

Re: 52-59 / BD 36-37, 71-72 Late Mizoguchi: Eight Films, 195

#444 Post by domino harvey »

Numbers divisible by seven are luckiest, though, that much is certain
User avatar
swo17
Bloodthirsty Butcher
Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2008 2:25 pm
Location: SLC, UT

Re: 52-59 / BD 36-37, 71-72 Late Mizoguchi: Eight Films, 195

#445 Post by swo17 »

I'm mostly just jealous that domino somehow got mail today.
User avatar
domino harvey
Dot Com Dom
Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 6:42 pm

Re: 52-59 / BD 36-37, 71-72 Late Mizoguchi: Eight Films, 195

#446 Post by domino harvey »

It was delivered by a veteran who thanked me for my service
Zot!
Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2010 4:09 am

Re: 52-59 / BD 36-37, 71-72 Late Mizoguchi: Eight Films, 195

#447 Post by Zot! »

#664 from Amazon in a crap packing job. Only two away from the only one I was secretly hoping for.
User avatar
Michael Kerpan
Spelling Bee Champeen
Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 5:20 pm
Location: New England
Contact:

Re: 52-59 / BD 36-37, 71-72 Late Mizoguchi: Eight Films, 195

#448 Post by Michael Kerpan »

Prime numbers are best.
User avatar
knives
Joined: Sat Sep 06, 2008 10:49 pm

Re: 52-59 / BD 36-37, 71-72 Late Mizoguchi: Eight Films, 195

#449 Post by knives »

I thought irrational ones were.
User avatar
Michael Kerpan
Spelling Bee Champeen
Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 5:20 pm
Location: New England
Contact:

Re: 52-59 / BD 36-37, 71-72 Late Mizoguchi: Eight Films, 195

#450 Post by Michael Kerpan »

knives wrote:I thought irrational ones were.
But MOC didn't hand out any with such numbers. They leave irrationality to us. ;~}
Post Reply