Seinfeld

Discuss TV shows old and new
Message
Author
User avatar
Black Hat
Joined: Thu Nov 24, 2011 9:34 pm
Location: NYC

Re: Seinfeld

#26 Post by Black Hat »

I thought it was terrible, almost painful to watch and felt like I could sense their discomfort with one another through the screen.
User avatar
bearcuborg
Joined: Fri Sep 14, 2007 6:30 am
Location: Philadelphia via Chicago

Re: Seinfeld

#27 Post by bearcuborg »

Black Hat wrote:I thought it was terrible, almost painful to watch and felt like I could sense their discomfort with one another through the screen.
It was terrible, but at least Wayne Knight ate up his screen time.
OnOnt
Joined: Thu Aug 23, 2012 2:07 am

Re: Seinfeld

#28 Post by OnOnt »

User avatar
domino harvey
Dot Com Dom
Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 6:42 pm

Re: Seinfeld

#29 Post by domino harvey »

Gotta hand it to 80sTees, they've really dug deep for their shirt inspirations:

Image
User avatar
jindianajonz
Jindiana Jonz Abrams
Joined: Thu Oct 13, 2011 12:11 am

Re: Seinfeld

#30 Post by jindianajonz »

My first thought was they were referencing Tomb Raider 2, but wikipedia has shown how wrong I was...
User avatar
Murdoch
Joined: Mon Apr 21, 2008 3:59 am
Location: Upstate NY

Re: Seinfeld

#31 Post by Murdoch »

"No, no, it's a joke! Don't you remember that Seinfeld episode, the one where George tries to get the apartment... No? Oh, c'mon, you remember!"
User avatar
swo17
Bloodthirsty Butcher
Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2008 2:25 pm
Location: SLC, UT

Re: Seinfeld

#33 Post by swo17 »

Interesting. Re: guns in comedy, for what it's worth, "The Cartridge Family" is one of my favorite Simpsons episodes.
User avatar
cdnchris
Site Admin
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 6:45 pm
Location: Washington
Contact:

Re: Seinfeld

#34 Post by cdnchris »

Salesman: Sorry, the law requires a five day waiting period. We've got to run a background check.
Homer: Five days? But I'm mad now! I'd kill you if I had my gun.
Salesman: Yeah, well, you don't.
User avatar
flyonthewall2983
Joined: Mon Jun 27, 2005 7:31 pm
Location: Indiana
Contact:

Re: Seinfeld

#35 Post by flyonthewall2983 »

There's also the forgotten Robin Williams/Walter Matthau film The Survivors which loosely dealt with guns
Zot!
Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2010 4:09 am

Re: Seinfeld

#36 Post by Zot! »

Try Elmer Fudd and Yosemite Sam for early gun nut social commentary.
User avatar
flyonthewall2983
Joined: Mon Jun 27, 2005 7:31 pm
Location: Indiana
Contact:

Re: Seinfeld

#37 Post by flyonthewall2983 »

I'm with Larry Charles in that it might have been something that would have worked later when the show was running full-steam rather than when it was just beginning. I think you can make nearly any topic funny, it just depends on a lot of things the trickier the subject is.
User avatar
manicsounds
Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 2:58 am
Location: Tokyo, Japan

Re: Seinfeld

#38 Post by manicsounds »

Wasn't this part of one of the special features on the Seinfeld DVDs? I can't remember which one. Could have been an easter egg.
User avatar
domino harvey
Dot Com Dom
Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 6:42 pm

Re: Seinfeld

#39 Post by domino harvey »

When the series was ending, Entertainment Weekly had a special all-Seinfeld issue and they had a sidebar feature with storylines from the writers that were eventually rejected. It may have come up there, I don't recall. The two I remember were: Kramer rehabilitates a skeleton for medical display and George gets in trouble for saying, "I've never seen a black person eat a salad."
User avatar
mfunk9786
Under Chris' Protection
Joined: Fri May 16, 2008 8:43 pm
Location: Miami, FL

Re: Seinfeld

#40 Post by mfunk9786 »

Also, Jason Alexander got quite angry at The Pen, an all-time great episode, but one with literally no lines or appearances from George. They never repeated that by having an episode lacking any of the big 4 again. It managed to get filmed, but I'd imagine it was pretty confrontational around the set at the time.
User avatar
domino harvey
Dot Com Dom
Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 6:42 pm

Re: Seinfeld

#41 Post by domino harvey »

TBS allegedly speeds up its broadcasts by 7.5% to fit in more commercials. Video evidence
User avatar
swo17
Bloodthirsty Butcher
Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2008 2:25 pm
Location: SLC, UT

Re: Seinfeld

#42 Post by swo17 »

7.5% of nothing is still nothing.
User avatar
domino harvey
Dot Com Dom
Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 6:42 pm

Re: Seinfeld

#43 Post by domino harvey »

User avatar
hearthesilence
Joined: Fri Mar 04, 2005 8:22 am
Location: NYC

Re: Seinfeld

#44 Post by hearthesilence »

I saw Billy Wilder's Kiss Me, Stupid today, and while diving into its convoluted history of casting hopes/changes, I found out for the first time that Mariska Hargitay is Jayne Mansfield's daughter. Absolutely had no idea - then I remembered she has a small but key role in "The Pilot", and another bit of trivia is how two episodes that season (including "The Pilot") both make the same joke while referencing her mother the first time then Kim Novak in "The Pilot." When Marilyn Monroe died, Mansfield was given the role in Kiss Me, Stupid only to be replaced by Novak when she became pregnant with Mariska Hargitay. Too inconsequential and complicated to be anything more than a coincidence, but one that I found amusing.

Also, I want to say Jack Lemmon (who had scheduling conflicts) and Marilyn Monroe would've been the ideal Orville and Polly in Kiss Me, Stupid, but Walston and especially Novak still do a fine job in those roles.
User avatar
therewillbeblus
Joined: Tue Dec 22, 2015 7:40 pm

Re: Seinfeld

#45 Post by therewillbeblus »

Walston is the MVP, which is saying a lot since everyone is so good. I like Lemmon, but Walston's role is very difficult to pull off in the way it needs to (the entire film hinges on his ability to resiliently cope with his own insanity, his paranoia becoming a reality of circumstances) and Lemmon's screen presence would likely overshadow a lot of the nuance with a blubbering naive nice-guy shade. The part is more complex than it lets on, and I can't conceive of anything matching a fraction of Walston's darker, demented take
User avatar
hearthesilence
Joined: Fri Mar 04, 2005 8:22 am
Location: NYC

Re: Seinfeld

#46 Post by hearthesilence »

What was weird was seeing stills of Peter Sellers in that role. Normally I'd take Sellers over Walston in an instant, but it's hard to imagine what magic he could've done with the role under Wilder's direction, especially when they clashed over the approach Sellers should take. (Supposedly Wilder didn't talk much about the film afterwards, but I wonder if he took Sellers's leave of absence as an opportunity to recast rather than a necessity?)
Post Reply