David Ehrenstein wrote:Andre's fealty to the Oscars (and their alleged power) is . . .amusing.
You make the mistake (shocking!) of thinking that I agree resoundingly with the decisions the Academy makes. In fact I have as much respect for the Academy as I have for the Bush administration - little to none. However, I do have a grip on the reality of the society we live in, which means that as much as I despise the decisions made by the Bush administration, I must acknowledge that they have a great deal of power and influence and just may be the most powerful government administration on the globe (though China and Saudi Arabia are giving them a run for the money). That is a
reality, David, not some decision or opinion on my part.
The same goes for the Academy and their most recognized symbol, the Oscar. I have no allegiance to the Oscars or the Academy, but the
reality (that is out of my hands) is that they are powerful and have influence over the mainstream, especially within the 2-3 months where the Oscar hype-machine gets started and the topic is discussed in dozens of media outlets in various forms. Admittedly, that power is probably not as forceful as it once may have been given the recent Red/Blue split over media.
Even if you deny that the Academy has influence and simply shut it out to concentrate on your own view of the world, the results of their influence are obvious. The winner (film and individual actors/actresses) usually obtains financial success and then influences the types of projects that are made in future years. Thus, they determine what types of films are distributed to mainstream America. You could make hundreds of films in the spirit of
Mala Noche,
Love is the Devil,
Edward II,
Happy Together, and
Son Frere, (and I would probably watch them) but if very few people see them then these films lack the ability to change the collective mainstream conscience, which is required for most political and social change to occur. That's a reality. It's much like the reality that the
Harry Potter films/books have more influence on the mainstream than your blog does, because they reach a greater audience.
This is not something I am alleging to be true, it's a reality based on basic evidence within the last 15 years of Hollywood filmmaking. I might not like it, but I do have to deal with it.
David Ehrenstein wrote:According to Andre once Bareback Molehill sweeps the Oscars everything will be perfect.
Yeah, that's exactly what I'm saying. Is this the part where I tell you to go back and read what I wrote... slowly? Your efforts to twist, warp, and exaggerate my words to suit your own perceptions are concerning, especially since your profession as a film critic relies on your ability to interpret messages.
Annie Mall wrote:dvdane, move over - your nemesis has arrived.
He certainly could be Henrik's nemesis, considering Henrik bases himself in reality, while...