Warner Brothers Archive Collection (DVDs only)

Discuss North American DVDs, Blu-rays, UHDs, and related topics
Post Reply
Message
Author
User avatar
domino harvey
Dot Com Dom
Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 6:42 pm

Re: Warner Brothers Archive Collection

#1476 Post by domino harvey »

Got my copy today and can confirm it's a pressed disc. Only did a cursory scan to take these caps but man does it look gorgeous:

Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
User avatar
domino harvey
Dot Com Dom
Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 6:42 pm

Re: Warner Brothers Archive Collection

#1477 Post by domino harvey »

domino harvey wrote:Image
To give a sense of the upgrade, here's the TCM rip that's been the only circulating copy in the interim:

Image
User avatar
Ashirg
Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 1:10 pm
Location: Atlanta

Re: Warner Brothers Archive Collection

#1478 Post by Ashirg »

Previously lost Hello Pop short is now released by Warner Archive with 4 additional MGM Ted Healy and His Stooges shorts and Roast Beef and Movies (with lone Stooge Curly Howard) as Classic Shorts From The Dream Factory: Volume 3.
felipe
Joined: Thu May 06, 2010 3:06 am

Re: Warner Brothers Archive Collection

#1479 Post by felipe »

domino harvey wrote:
domino harvey wrote:Image
To give a sense of the upgrade, here's the TCM rip that's been the only circulating copy in the interim:

Image
The difference really is astonishing!
kristophers
Joined: Fri Sep 05, 2014 2:50 pm

Re: Warner Brothers Archive Collection

#1480 Post by kristophers »

ianthemovie wrote:I don't know if this was ever mentioned, but the Warner Archive Crash is not pan and scan as was originally stated on their website. I received a copy in the mail yesterday and can confirm that it is in 1.78, includes both the NC-17 and R-rated versions, and looks generally good. It's no Criterion but is certainly a workable DVD edition.
Any reason to get this if I already have the New line release? I've always been missing cover art for this one, so I might pick it up anyway.Looks like a blu-ray release is a ways away.
User avatar
swo17
Bloodthirsty Butcher
Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2008 2:25 pm
Location: SLC, UT

Re: Warner Brothers Archive Collection

#1481 Post by swo17 »

Best Foot Forward is the latest title to be demoted from pressed DVD to a DVD-R.
User avatar
domino harvey
Dot Com Dom
Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 6:42 pm

Re: Warner Brothers Archive Collection

#1482 Post by domino harvey »

That's a good one worth tracking down on eBay as a pressed disc for sure, though it's been OOP for a while
User avatar
swo17
Bloodthirsty Butcher
Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2008 2:25 pm
Location: SLC, UT

Re: Warner Brothers Archive Collection

#1483 Post by swo17 »

And now Waiting for Guffman gets a DVD-R. ](*,)
User avatar
domino harvey
Dot Com Dom
Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 6:42 pm

Re: Warner Brothers Archive Collection

#1484 Post by domino harvey »

I wouldn't have been surprised if it got a Blu-ray. But that would imply Warners understands any audience beyond some weirdos on their floor of the office building
User avatar
captveg
Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 11:28 pm

Re: Warner Brothers Archive Collection

#1485 Post by captveg »

I wonder if this means they were underwhelmed by the Blu-ray sales of Best in Show
User avatar
Gregory
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 8:07 pm

Re: Warner Brothers Archive Collection

#1486 Post by Gregory »

I can't recall just how funny I found this film but I just ordered a used copy, so thanks for the tip. It'll be a shame if they strip off the special features for the DVD-R. How often do they do that in cases where WAC releases a title that had been a special edition DVD?
I know that in many cases of downgrades to DVD-R the earlier DVDs had no special features in the first place (e.g., Akira Kurosawa's Dreams, KITH Brain Candy), or had only the slightest bits of filler (e.g. Gummo). Too bad in the case of something like Brain Candy, as it would be nice to see the alternate ending and deleted scenes.
User avatar
domino harvey
Dot Com Dom
Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 6:42 pm

Re: Warner Brothers Archive Collection

#1487 Post by domino harvey »

I'm pretty sure all of the rereleases have maintained the original disc's contents and only adjust the main menus (and sometimes not even that)
User avatar
captveg
Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 11:28 pm

Re: Warner Brothers Archive Collection

#1488 Post by captveg »

For the most part Warner only drops special features when rights issues come up (expiration, music issues, etc.)
User avatar
rockysds
Joined: Wed May 19, 2010 3:25 pm
Location: Denmark

Re: Warner Brothers Archive Collection

#1489 Post by rockysds »

Image

Ugh.
User avatar
warren oates
Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2012 4:16 pm

Re: Warner Brothers Archive Collection

#1490 Post by warren oates »

I just can't imagine Criterion not coveting Blow-Up and Warners not being willing to give it to them. I wouldn't necessarily despair about all those other titles either.
User avatar
domino harvey
Dot Com Dom
Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 6:42 pm

Re: Warner Brothers Archive Collection

#1491 Post by domino harvey »

Hitchcock on MOD, you gotta be kiddin me here Warners
felipe
Joined: Thu May 06, 2010 3:06 am

Re: Warner Brothers Archive Collection

#1492 Post by felipe »

Sometimes it seems people prefer having a title as OOP than having it released through MOD.
User avatar
swo17
Bloodthirsty Butcher
Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2008 2:25 pm
Location: SLC, UT

Re: Warner Brothers Archive Collection

#1493 Post by swo17 »

I mean, yeah, I prefer keeping this picture of my mom and dad on my nightstand as opposed to their rotting corpses, but that doesn't change the fact that Warner Brothers murdered my parents.
User avatar
Gregory
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 8:07 pm

Re: Warner Brothers Archive Collection

#1494 Post by Gregory »

felipe wrote:Sometimes it seems people prefer having a title as OOP than having it released through MOD.
I'd prefer to see more titles reissued on Blu-ray, to try and keep that format alive, especially since next year is touted as the year that will show that Warner is serious about their back catalog. Keeping a film like Blow-Up out of print for years the way they've done doesn't make any sense.
User avatar
Ashirg
Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 1:10 pm
Location: Atlanta

Re: Warner Brothers Archive Collection

#1495 Post by Ashirg »

At least Warner's releases indicate when they are being replaced with DVD-R with a new cover. Sony just replaced a bunch of titles as DVD-R keeping the same artwork (including original Pennies from Heaven)...
Noiradelic
Joined: Sun Jul 19, 2009 4:45 am

Re: Warner Brothers Archive Collection

#1496 Post by Noiradelic »

warren oates wrote:I just can't imagine Criterion not coveting Blow-Up and Warners not being willing to give it to them. I wouldn't necessarily despair about all those other titles either.
That they wouldn't either release it as a WAC Blu themselves or let Criterion or another boutique label have a crack at it is pretty shocking. Not many foreign art films of the era penetrated popular culture as much as it did. It's almost as if MGM had demoted Persona or Last Tango in Paris to MOD (I realize neither of these films is a perfect analogy, but Blow-Up, being English language but without a star of Brando's magnitude falls somewhere in-between those two in my mind in terms of contemporaneous pop cultural impact).
Last edited by Noiradelic on Wed Oct 22, 2014 8:39 am, edited 1 time in total.
Noiradelic
Joined: Sun Jul 19, 2009 4:45 am

Re: Warner Brothers Archive Collection

#1497 Post by Noiradelic »

felipe wrote:Sometimes it seems people prefer having a title as OOP than having it released through MOD.
As long as Blow Up was OOP, there was still hope, especially in light of Badlands and last week's Wexner chat, that Criterion would land it.
User avatar
rockysds
Joined: Wed May 19, 2010 3:25 pm
Location: Denmark

Re: Warner Brothers Archive Collection

#1498 Post by rockysds »

Blow-Up could potentially be following the sorta odd release pattern of Get Carter where the WAC MOD was followed by a WB blu-ray later (50th anniversary in 2016 for example), if folks wanna keep hoping. Both Love in the Afternoon and Mr. and Mrs. Smith are available pressed in TCM sets, so they weren't hard/expensive to get, but this would seem to squash blu-rays. I thought the Wilder would have been close to a shoo-in for blu mostly due to the Audrey Hepburn factor.
User avatar
domino harvey
Dot Com Dom
Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 6:42 pm

Re: Warner Brothers Archive Collection

#1499 Post by domino harvey »

Murder, My Sweet, Kings Row, and Clash By Night are now MOD only. I could understand the last two since the current market may not be too big for the pleasures they offer, but Warners once more clearly shows they don't understand their noir holdings (no news there) with Murder My Sweet getting DVD-R'd and freaking Possessed getting a Blu-ray

Also Wicked Wicked, which they've been teasing since the Archives began, is finally out, and it's not even getting a pressed Archives release. All that work and buildup for a DVD-R. Well, as Flicker Alley has proved, consumers are fucking idiots and still support this format so oh well
User avatar
Ashirg
Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 1:10 pm
Location: Atlanta

Re: Warner Brothers Archive Collection

#1500 Post by Ashirg »

As Get Carter proved, having a DVD-R doesn't mean the blu-ray won't get released. They just released a bunch of musicals that were released on blu-ray by Warner Archive on DVD-R - Billy Rose's Jumbo, Hit the Deck and Kismet. Blu-ray release requires extra restoration as Out of the Past showed, but DVD-R can use the same masters from DVD, so it's much easier to do.
Post Reply