
Moderators: MichaelB, yoloswegmaster


Honestly, I wouldn't be against slim Amarays even if it's only for 3 cases. Every shelf space saved is good to me.What A Disgrace wrote:I doubt they're slim cases, as this is a dual format release. Fassbinder is one of the few boxed sets that have Blu-rays only, which I expect is a bigreason they chose it for their first slim case box.
I doubt they're slim cases too - not because it's a dual format release, but because it's a three film set. If it was a bigger set like the Fassbinder one, I'm sure they'd consider slimmer cases. They could do 2-disc slim cases if they wanted, similar to what MoC did with their Imamura set last year, but I'm not sure it's necessary here.tenia wrote:Honestly, I wouldn't be against slim Amarays even if it's only for 3 cases. Every shelf space saved is good to me.What A Disgrace wrote:I doubt they're slim cases, as this is a dual format release. Fassbinder is one of the few boxed sets that have Blu-rays only, which I expect is a bigreason they chose it for their first slim case box.
I believe slim Amarays are available for 2 discs. I remember Carlotta using slim 2-disc Amarays for their Douglas Sirk DVD boxsets, and Viva are making some 6mm 2-BD cases.
It's because the mock-ups were done in double-quick time by a designer who (unsurprisingly) hadn't seen the film. And who (reasonably) wasn't expecting people to devote rather more time to discussing the spines than he did in creating them in the first place.tenia wrote:I guess it's because they chose the male character for the spine rather than the female one.
You mean how Criterion's doing it?MichaelB wrote:five episodes across two discs is obviously ridiculous
I wasn't, actually.Ribs wrote:I expect Michael was fully aware of what Criterion has done when writing that statement.