The Passenger

Discuss North American DVDs, Blu-rays, UHDs, and related topics
Message
Author
User avatar
tavernier
Joined: Sat Apr 02, 2005 11:18 pm

#51 Post by tavernier »

Kinjitsu wrote:Who the hell is Irvine and why is she associated with this film?
Maybe she's a friend of Peploe who interviews him for the commentary, kind of like Soderbergh and Nichols on CATCH-22. :shock:
rwaits
Joined: Tue Dec 21, 2004 4:24 pm

#52 Post by rwaits »

Hey, just be happy it's finally coming out!
Man, I'm extremely happy its coming out. Its just that, at time of its initial announcement, this thing was on my short list for DVD of the decade!
User avatar
Gigi M.
Joined: Wed Jul 06, 2005 9:09 pm
Location: Santo Domingo, Dominican Rep

#53 Post by Gigi M. »

What's happening with this release. Some say no commentary by Nicholson and Wenders, then DVDACTIVE says:
Sony Pictures Home Entertainment has announced a new release of The Passenger which stars Jack Nicholson and Maria Schneider. Originally released in 1975, the film is a suspenseful and haunting portrait of a drained journalist whose deliverance is an identity exchange with a dead man. The disc will be available to own from the 25th April, priced at around $24.96. Extras on this one will include an audio commentary with Jack Nicholson, a second commentary with Wim Wenders (director of Paris, Texas & Wings of Desire), An Evening at the Academy Featurette, and an interview with writer Mark Peploe and actress Maria Schneide.
rwaits
Joined: Tue Dec 21, 2004 4:24 pm

#54 Post by rwaits »

I believe that was the original press release from a couple months ago. I'm still hoping though...
User avatar
cdnchris
Site Admin
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 6:45 pm
Location: Washington
Contact:

#55 Post by cdnchris »

I'd be shocked if Jack didn't do a commentary. Everytime he talks about it (including a gushing bit in Entertainment Weekly) he obviously considers it the best damn thing he's ever done, or at least his favourite film to work on. (Number 2 almost seems to be Batman.) I'd love to hear him talk about it for the length of the film and something tells me he's love to as well.
rwaits
Joined: Tue Dec 21, 2004 4:24 pm

#56 Post by rwaits »

Really? I was never aware of this. In fact, for some reason I always imagined that his feelings for the film were just the opposite. Why, in the past, has he worked so hard to hinder this film from being shown, and ultimately released?
User avatar
zedz
Joined: Sun Nov 07, 2004 11:24 pm

#57 Post by zedz »

rwaits wrote:Really? I was never aware of this. In fact, for some reason I always imagined that his feelings for the film were just the opposite. Why, in the past, has he worked so hard to hinder this film from being shown, and ultimately released?
The last bit's a mystery to me too, but Nicholson's contributions to Criterion's L'Avventura disc support cdnchris's claim.
rwaits
Joined: Tue Dec 21, 2004 4:24 pm

#58 Post by rwaits »

I have only rented that disc. What exactly were his contributions?
User avatar
kinjitsu
Joined: Sat Feb 12, 2005 5:39 pm
Location: Uffa!

#59 Post by kinjitsu »

rwaits wrote:I have only rented that disc. What exactly were his contributions?
Writings by Antonioni, read by Jack Nicholson--plus Nicholson's personal recollections of the director
User avatar
Andre Jurieu
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 7:38 pm
Location: Back in Milan (Ind.)

#60 Post by Andre Jurieu »

rwaits wrote: Why, in the past, has he worked so hard to hinder this film from being shown, and ultimately released?
zedz wrote:The last bit's a mystery to me too...
Isn't the most widely accepted reason behind Jack's behavior regarding the film due to the fact that the film was very personal to him, so he bought the US rights. Perhaps he felt the film might be exploited or butchered if it was acquired by another party that didn't appreciate Antonioni's work.
User avatar
cdnchris
Site Admin
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 6:45 pm
Location: Washington
Contact:

#61 Post by cdnchris »

rwaits wrote:Really? I was never aware of this. In fact, for some reason I always imagined that his feelings for the film were just the opposite. Why, in the past, has he worked so hard to hinder this film from being shown, and ultimately released?

I've read a couple interviews with him where he just gushes about the film and the director, the most recent being one in Entertainment Weekly during the theatrical re-release of the film. He speaks nothing but high praises of Antonioni and The Passenger (and how shitty movies are today--yet never mentions Anger Management), but he doesn't mention why he withheld it (or at least I don't remember him mentioning why.) And I think it was that one where he went on about the final shot of the film. He also speaks fondly of working with him during one supplement on the L'Avventura DVD.

I'm figuring if he did talk about The Passenger during a commentary it would be an awesome commentary, and incredibly informative. He was pumped during the supplements of the Batman DVD, I'd think he'd be only more enthusiastic about The Passenger and probably wouldn't shut up about it (at least I'd hope so). If he doesn't do one I'll be incredibly disappointed.
User avatar
ellipsis7
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 5:56 pm
Location: Dublin

#62 Post by ellipsis7 »

Image
User avatar
Fletch F. Fletch
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 7:54 pm
Location: Provo, Utah

#63 Post by Fletch F. Fletch »

cdnchris wrote:I'm figuring if he did talk about The Passenger during a commentary it would be an awesome commentary, and incredibly informative. He was pumped during the supplements of the Batman DVD, I'd think he'd be only more enthusiastic about The Passenger and probably wouldn't shut up about it (at least I'd hope so). If he doesn't do one I'll be incredibly disappointed.
For what it's worth, he contributed some excellent scene-specific commentary bits on the Blood and Wine DVD, which seems like a film he was also personally passionate about.
User avatar
justeleblanc
Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 10:05 pm
Location: Connecticut

#64 Post by justeleblanc »

Fletch F. Fletch wrote:
cdnchris wrote:I'm figuring if he did talk about The Passenger during a commentary it would be an awesome commentary, and incredibly informative. He was pumped during the supplements of the Batman DVD, I'd think he'd be only more enthusiastic about The Passenger and probably wouldn't shut up about it (at least I'd hope so). If he doesn't do one I'll be incredibly disappointed.
For what it's worth, he contributed some excellent scene-specific commentary bits on the Blood and Wine DVD, which seems like a film he was also personally passionate about.
That would make sense. He and Raphaelson are very close.
User avatar
Barmy
Joined: Mon May 16, 2005 7:59 pm

#65 Post by Barmy »

It STILL isn't up for a 4/25 release on the Sony website.

What a botch to not get the Nicholson commentary and the Schneider interview. EW did a short interview with Maria and (of course) she indicated that this was her fave performance/film. And it's sad that Nicholson doesn't care enough about film history to sit down for a couple hours and jabber while he's watching the film.
User avatar
Gigi M.
Joined: Wed Jul 06, 2005 9:09 pm
Location: Santo Domingo, Dominican Rep

#66 Post by Gigi M. »

DVDTOWN confirms the Nicholson and Wenders commentary. I really don't know what to believe anymore.
User avatar
FilmFanSea
Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 5:37 pm
Location: Portland, OR

#67 Post by FilmFanSea »

gigimonagas wrote:DVDTOWN confirms the Nicholson and Wenders commentary. I really don't know what to believe anymore.
I think you gotta trust the press release at this point. No PR person in his/her right mind would neglect to mention a Jack Nicholson commentary if one were present. Its inclusion could certainly raise the curiosity among many of the Jack fanboys who've never even heard of Antonioni.
User avatar
Barmy
Joined: Mon May 16, 2005 7:59 pm

#68 Post by Barmy »

Aurora Irvine=Jack Nicholson
User avatar
FilmFanSea
Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 5:37 pm
Location: Portland, OR

#69 Post by FilmFanSea »

Barmy wrote:Aurora Irvine=Jack Nicholson
I guess that's a joke, but it would sure explain why Googling "Aurora Irvine" (professione: giornalista???) comes up empty.
User avatar
solaris72
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 7:03 pm
Location: Baltimore, MD

#70 Post by solaris72 »

AICN's Moriarty has a review of the new DVD in his blog, and it confirms both the Peploe/Irvine commentary and the Nicholson commentary.
User avatar
Gordon
Joined: Thu Nov 11, 2004 12:03 pm

#71 Post by Gordon »

Ah, well spotted, solaris! Great news. I still can't believe that this one is being released on DVD! :D
User avatar
ellipsis7
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 5:56 pm
Location: Dublin

#72 Post by ellipsis7 »

Time to throw away that Imagica disc with all that wow and flutter on reel 1...
rwaits
Joined: Tue Dec 21, 2004 4:24 pm

#73 Post by rwaits »

That IS great news! What happened to Wenders, though???
User avatar
carax09
Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 6:22 am
Location: This almost empty gin palace

#74 Post by carax09 »

It's really strange, but if someone were to ask me to describe my favorite moment in all of modern cinema, the scene that moved me the most was the one in which Nicholson tells the girl to turn her back on the front seat. It's been years since I've had a chance to see it. I selfishly thought no-one else noticed it when they watched The Passenger, and that it was a private connection between myself and Antonioni (if there could ever be such a thing). Obviously, since the reviewer mentions the scene, I was mistaken, but I don't feel sad about it. That is the scene that lit the fuse of my movie-love, and now that The Passenger is getting a proper home video release, perhaps the same will be true for others.
User avatar
Barmy
Joined: Mon May 16, 2005 7:59 pm

#75 Post by Barmy »

That's certainly my fave scene in The Passenger. It is not overemphasized, which is one reason why I like it so much.
Post Reply