mother! (Darren Aronofsky, 2017)

Discuss specific films and franchises
Post Reply
Message
Author
User avatar
Luke M
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 1:21 am

Re: mother! (Darren Aronofsky, 2017)

#26 Post by Luke M »

I thought The Wrestler was his best work.
User avatar
domino harvey
Dot Com Dom
Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 6:42 pm

Re: mother! (Darren Aronofsky, 2017)

#27 Post by domino harvey »

Image
User avatar
Luke M
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 1:21 am

Re: mother! (Darren Aronofsky, 2017)

#28 Post by Luke M »

It's a great take on the "this is fine" meme.
User avatar
Big Ben
Joined: Mon Feb 08, 2016 4:54 pm
Location: Great Falls, Montana

Re: mother! (Darren Aronofsky, 2017)

#30 Post by Big Ben »

I'll be seeing this if it comes here. Looks like it the film will sink or swim on whatever is really "going on" here. Not that I doubt Aronofsky but we all know what happens with a bad reveal.
User avatar
mfunk9786
Under Chris' Protection
Joined: Fri May 16, 2008 8:43 pm
Location: Miami, FL

Re: mother! (Darren Aronofsky, 2017)

#31 Post by mfunk9786 »

I’m going to Montana to see that.
User avatar
The Narrator Returns
Joined: Tue Nov 15, 2011 10:35 pm

Re: mother! (Darren Aronofsky, 2017)

#32 Post by The Narrator Returns »

Image
User avatar
Big Ben
Joined: Mon Feb 08, 2016 4:54 pm
Location: Great Falls, Montana

Re: mother! (Darren Aronofsky, 2017)

#33 Post by Big Ben »

Not as...upfront as the first one we saw (Although a drawing of JLaw with her removed heart is rather hard to top). But I don't think
mfunk9786 wrote:I’m going to Montana to see that.
You're more than welcome to come but I'm sure it would be comical downgrade from wherever you reside. I'm hoping that Aronofsky's name is enough to get it here.

Aside however there's been some debate on just why Lawrence's character is married to the much older Bardem. Perhaps it's just me catching wind of some very cranky internet people but I thought I'd bring it up. It doesn't bother me but I thought I'd pass the message along that that this fact may come up in future comments/reviews.
User avatar
willoneill
Joined: Wed Mar 18, 2009 2:10 pm
Location: Ottawa, Ontario, Canada

Re: mother! (Darren Aronofsky, 2017)

#34 Post by willoneill »

Big Ben wrote:Aside however there's been some debate on just why Lawrence's character is married to the much older Bardem.
Javier Bardem is the exact same age as Aronofsky (they're no more than 3 or 4 weeks apart), and Lawrence is dating Aronofsky ... so there's something. I also think there must be something about Lawrence that makes some directors put her in roles that she's somewhat young for (like all three of her roles for David O. Russell, for instance).
User avatar
Roger Ryan
Joined: Wed Apr 28, 2010 4:04 pm
Location: A Midland town spread and darkened into a city

Re: mother! (Darren Aronofsky, 2017)

#35 Post by Roger Ryan »

She's the Lauren Bacall of the 21st century.
User avatar
colinr0380
Joined: Mon Nov 08, 2004 8:30 pm
Location: Chapel-en-le-Frith, Derbyshire, UK

Re: mother! (Darren Aronofsky, 2017)

#36 Post by colinr0380 »

I hadn't realised until seeing the trailer (though should have guessed from the title) that it seems to be going into Rosemary's Baby territory! But I am amusing myself by wondering whether this might mean that Michelle Pfeiffer and Ed Harris are this film's equivalent of the Ruth Gordon and Sidney Blackmer nefarious older couple! And could Javier Bardem be the John Cassavetes of this film?
User avatar
mfunk9786
Under Chris' Protection
Joined: Fri May 16, 2008 8:43 pm
Location: Miami, FL

Re: mother! (Darren Aronofsky, 2017)

#37 Post by mfunk9786 »

From David Ehrlich on Twitter - this has to be in the studio swag pantheon:

Image
User avatar
domino harvey
Dot Com Dom
Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 6:42 pm

Re: mother! (Darren Aronofsky, 2017)

#38 Post by domino harvey »

All the way from Baltimore!
User avatar
mfunk9786
Under Chris' Protection
Joined: Fri May 16, 2008 8:43 pm
Location: Miami, FL

Re: mother! (Darren Aronofsky, 2017)

#39 Post by mfunk9786 »

How can they possibly either ship or hand deliver something like that and have it arrive looking that good? Witchcraft.
User avatar
domino harvey
Dot Com Dom
Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 6:42 pm

Re: mother! (Darren Aronofsky, 2017)

#40 Post by domino harvey »

I'm certain it was couriered, and probably driven three hours directly to do so. Hell, I'd do it for $100 and expenses, not much for the publicity of him sharing it on his social media, which is the point
User avatar
The Narrator Returns
Joined: Tue Nov 15, 2011 10:35 pm

Re: mother! (Darren Aronofsky, 2017)

#41 Post by The Narrator Returns »

Image
User avatar
swo17
Bloodthirsty Butcher
Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2008 2:25 pm
Location: SLC, UT

Re: mother! (Darren Aronofsky, 2017)

#42 Post by swo17 »

Ha!
User avatar
domino harvey
Dot Com Dom
Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 6:42 pm

Re: mother! (Darren Aronofsky, 2017)

#43 Post by domino harvey »

That's hilarious, love it
User avatar
djproject
Joined: Sat Oct 09, 2010 7:41 pm
Location: Framingham, MA
Contact:

Re: mother! (Darren Aronofsky, 2017)

#44 Post by djproject »

To add to the hilarity, an online colleague - through the Facebook group "The Criterion Gyre" - works at one of the theatres in [strike]NY[/strike]. Apparently, Darren rented out one of them just so he could have a private screening with Jennifer Lawrence.

Get your barf bags, er I mean, popcorn bags ready!

Correction: It's in LA.
Last edited by djproject on Tue Aug 22, 2017 6:38 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
The Narrator Returns
Joined: Tue Nov 15, 2011 10:35 pm

Re: mother! (Darren Aronofsky, 2017)

#45 Post by The Narrator Returns »

And Aronofsky literally just tweeted this.

Image
User avatar
domino harvey
Dot Com Dom
Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 6:42 pm

Re: mother! (Darren Aronofsky, 2017)

#46 Post by domino harvey »

It's not as funny when they don't use the same color as the Rosemary's Baby poster
User avatar
domino harvey
Dot Com Dom
Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 6:42 pm

Re: mother! (Darren Aronofsky, 2017)

#47 Post by domino harvey »

People have now seen this and word on the street is the third act is wildly, massively divisive. Like, Lars Von Trier-levels
User avatar
Randall Maysin
Joined: Tue Apr 02, 2013 4:26 pm

Re: mother! (Darren Aronofsky, 2017)

#48 Post by Randall Maysin »

What are the odds it involves vaginal mutilation? It always does
User avatar
Big Ben
Joined: Mon Feb 08, 2016 4:54 pm
Location: Great Falls, Montana

Re: mother! (Darren Aronofsky, 2017)

#49 Post by Big Ben »

It received an "18" certificate from the BBFC for violence so I imagine it'll be rather upsetting. This is the same ratings board that gave Hacksaw Ridge a "15" so take that as you will. I don't think Aronofsky has the gall that von Trier has though. That isn't a slight against him either it's just very few people are as ridiculous as von Trier.
User avatar
TraverseTown
Joined: Tue Nov 18, 2014 8:38 am

Re: mother! (Darren Aronofsky, 2017)

#50 Post by TraverseTown »

Now I want to see that poster with the End of Evangelion color-scheme.
Spoiler
Image
Post Reply