Criterion Discussion and Random Speculation Volume 7

News on Criterion and Janus Films
Post Reply
Message
Author
felipe
Joined: Thu May 06, 2010 3:06 am

Re: Forthcoming: Discussion and Random Speculation Volume 7

#1726 Post by felipe »

mindlabcreative wrote: And as far as November being a light month? I don't think I'd be complaining with 54 films coming in December + a few others probably.
Am I the only one who would happily take 54 other films instead of the Olympics set? :-#
User avatar
Morbii
Joined: Sat Nov 27, 2004 7:38 am

Re: Forthcoming: Discussion and Random Speculation Volume 7

#1727 Post by Morbii »

felipe wrote: Am I the only one who would happily take 54 other films instead of the Olympics set? :-#
Nope. I just haven't said anything so as to not incite a riot.
User avatar
swo17
Bloodthirsty Butcher
Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2008 2:25 pm
Location: SLC, UT

Re: Forthcoming: Discussion and Random Speculation Volume 7

#1728 Post by swo17 »

felipe wrote:
mindlabcreative wrote: And as far as November being a light month? I don't think I'd be complaining with 54 films coming in December + a few others probably.
Am I the only one who would happily take 54 other films instead of the Olympics set? :-#
Then you have everything else Criterion released during 2017. They release as much as they have the capacity to. I gather much of this work on the Olympics set was performed by the IOC, with Criterion mostly offering branding.
User avatar
domino harvey
Dot Com Dom
Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 6:42 pm

Re: Forthcoming: Discussion and Random Speculation Volume 7

#1729 Post by domino harvey »

I honestly wouldn't be surprised if the release, including labor, was fully subsidized by the committee in exchange for a sweetheart royalty deal
User avatar
bjboyer
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2010 8:59 pm
Location: Swansea, MA
Contact:

Re: Forthcoming: Discussion and Random Speculation Volume 7

#1730 Post by bjboyer »

swo17 wrote:
felipe wrote:
mindlabcreative wrote: And as far as November being a light month? I don't think I'd be complaining with 54 films coming in December + a few others probably.
Am I the only one who would happily take 54 other films instead of the Olympics set? :-#
Then you have everything else Criterion released during 2017. They release as much as they have the capacity to. I gather much of this work on the Olympics set was performed by the IOC, with Criterion mostly offering branding.
What branding, though? There's nothing in the packaging photos that would advertise this as being from Criterion. Not even a 900 on the spine. (And they seemed to make such a big deal about that fact, too.) Has there been word that the packaging design will evolve before the release?

Also, I'm with felipe, just I'd take it further... I would happily take 10 other films instead of the Olympics set.
User avatar
Ribs
Joined: Fri Jun 13, 2014 5:14 pm

Re: Forthcoming: Discussion and Random Speculation Volume 7

#1731 Post by Ribs »

We don't see the other side of the case, which is presumably where there'll be a tiny #900 and some kind of Wacky C (possibly in sticker form).
User avatar
movielocke
Joined: Fri Jan 18, 2008 4:44 am

Re: Forthcoming: Discussion and Random Speculation Volume 7

#1732 Post by movielocke »

domino harvey wrote:I honestly wouldn't be surprised if the release, including labor, was fully subsidized by the committee in exchange for a sweetheart royalty deal
i imagine so, but this also basically a full time two year long project for whatever producer (Jason Altman I'd guess?) was in charge, this set, along with Koresky leaving, might actually be why haven't any eclipse sets, nor because the line was dead but because their hands were full with this set and nobody could be spared for eclipse projects.
felipe
Joined: Thu May 06, 2010 3:06 am

Re: Forthcoming: Discussion and Random Speculation Volume 7

#1733 Post by felipe »

swo17 wrote:
felipe wrote:
mindlabcreative wrote: And as far as November being a light month? I don't think I'd be complaining with 54 films coming in December + a few others probably.
Am I the only one who would happily take 54 other films instead of the Olympics set? :-#
Then you have everything else Criterion released during 2017. They release as much as they have the capacity to. I gather much of this work on the Olympics set was performed by the IOC, with Criterion mostly offering branding.
I know they release as much as they can, that's why I mentioned a time-consuming 54-film boxset if that's what got them busy to the point of only announcing 4 titles for November.
User avatar
movielocke
Joined: Fri Jan 18, 2008 4:44 am

Re: Forthcoming: Discussion and Random Speculation Volume 7

#1734 Post by movielocke »

felipe wrote:
swo17 wrote:
felipe wrote: Am I the only one who would happily take 54 other films instead of the Olympics set? :-#
Then you have everything else Criterion released during 2017. They release as much as they have the capacity to. I gather much of this work on the Olympics set was performed by the IOC, with Criterion mostly offering branding.
I know they release as much as they can, that's why I mentioned a time-consuming 54-film boxset if that's what got them busy to the point of only announcing 4 titles for November.
don't let one datum fool you, even without the olympics set, criterion is having a peak year (or near peak) in terms of volume of new releases for 2017.

Which must necessarily mean that the olympics box set hasn't impinged their output.
User avatar
flyonthewall2983
Joined: Mon Jun 27, 2005 7:31 pm
Location: Indiana
Contact:

Re: Forthcoming: Discussion and Random Speculation Volume 7

#1736 Post by flyonthewall2983 »

Which is a shame because it's basically the same disc as before.
User avatar
cdnchris
Site Admin
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 6:45 pm
Location: Washington
Contact:

Re: Forthcoming: Discussion and Random Speculation Volume 7

#1737 Post by cdnchris »

Jesus, what the hell is with the Christmas-y motif of the cover?
felipe
Joined: Thu May 06, 2010 3:06 am

Re: Forthcoming: Discussion and Random Speculation Volume 7

#1738 Post by felipe »

Do we know what films are expected to be in that box?
User avatar
Ribs
Joined: Fri Jun 13, 2014 5:14 pm

Re: Forthcoming: Discussion and Random Speculation Volume 7

#1739 Post by Ribs »

It will almost definitely be Sixteen Candles / Breakfast Club / Weird Science. There's no evidence at all it'll be anything more than those Universal titles.
John Shade
Joined: Sat Jan 14, 2017 7:04 pm

Re: Forthcoming: Discussion and Random Speculation Volume 7

#1740 Post by John Shade »

I'm surprised it'll be the same movies as a box Universal already released which I saw at Best Buy like a week ago. I guess they're banking on the fans who already bought that to understand that the next iteration is worth spending more money.
User avatar
CSM126
Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 12:22 pm
Location: The Room
Contact:

Re: Forthcoming: Discussion and Random Speculation Volume 7

#1741 Post by CSM126 »

John Shade wrote:I'm surprised it'll be the same movies as a box Universal already released which I saw at Best Buy like a week ago. I guess they're banking on the fans who already bought that to understand that the next iteration is worth spending more money.
Let's be honest: if Criterion does proper 4K masters of those films, that alone will make it worth tossing the Universal Blu rays.
User avatar
Malickite
Joined: Wed Dec 28, 2016 9:47 pm
Location: United States

Re: Forthcoming: Discussion and Random Speculation Volume 7

#1742 Post by Malickite »

What evidence is there that there will be either a John Hughes or a Wong Kar-wai box set? Other than Criterion teased two (2) Hughes titles and now have the rights to Wong's older works?

Why wouldn't they put out the two Hughes films as separate, consecutive releases like they do almost all the time. And why not bide their time with dolling out the Kar-wais like they do almost all of the time?

Put away your box set boners.
User avatar
Ribs
Joined: Fri Jun 13, 2014 5:14 pm

Re: Forthcoming: Discussion and Random Speculation Volume 7

#1743 Post by Ribs »

The evidence that they've not done the sequential spine thing much at all in recent memory, the last example (going off memory, forgive if wrong) being Chimes at Midnight and Immortal Story and before that State of Siege and The Confession, none of which are popular American films that will be breaking the bank flying off the shelves. It could just be the two titles, but considering they've been bundled in the past it seems more than reasonable Weird Science would be included in this package.

I didn't mention the Wong Kar-wai thing but it was just speculation based on that they'd need to incorporate a rerelease of Chungking Express, which given we now know they're probably doing for Monterey Pop might just happen on its own.
Robespierre
Joined: Mon Apr 17, 2017 9:31 pm

Re: Forthcoming: Discussion and Random Speculation Volume 7

#1744 Post by Robespierre »

Criterion should just remaster everything that Universal has ever released on blu ray, starting with Jurassic Park and The Big Lebowski. Maybe throw in A Beautiful Mind which has shockingly poor A/V quality.
User avatar
Never Cursed
Such is life on board the Redoutable
Joined: Sun Aug 14, 2016 4:22 am

Re: Forthcoming: Discussion and Random Speculation Volume 7

#1745 Post by Never Cursed »

Robespierre wrote:Maybe throw in A Beautiful Mind
No, don't
User avatar
Ribs
Joined: Fri Jun 13, 2014 5:14 pm

Re: Forthcoming: Discussion and Random Speculation Volume 7

#1746 Post by Ribs »

I've got a bunch of numbers swirling around my head trying to figure out any good reason for Criterion to release A Beautiful Mind
User avatar
domino harvey
Dot Com Dom
Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 6:42 pm

Re: Forthcoming: Discussion and Random Speculation Volume 7

#1747 Post by domino harvey »

Opportunity for some intern to get to speak to Jennifer Connelly
User avatar
Big Ben
Joined: Mon Feb 08, 2016 4:54 pm
Location: Great Falls, Montana

Re: Forthcoming: Discussion and Random Speculation Volume 7

#1748 Post by Big Ben »

domino harvey wrote:Opportunity for some intern to get to speak to Jennifer Connelly
It better be :: kogonada OR I WILL FUCKING RIOT.
User avatar
domino harvey
Dot Com Dom
Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 6:42 pm

Re: Forthcoming: Discussion and Random Speculation Volume 7

#1749 Post by domino harvey »

Beautiful Ugliness (9 mins) ::hoochiemama explores how Howard's film depicts actors talking to one another in shot/reverse-shots
Noiradelic
Joined: Sun Jul 19, 2009 4:45 am

Re: Forthcoming: Discussion and Random Speculation Volume 7

#1750 Post by Noiradelic »

Robespierre wrote:throw in A Beautiful Mind which has shockingly poor A/V quality.
Fitting.
Post Reply