Prince (1958-2016)

Discuss film culture and criticism
Post Reply
Message
Author
User avatar
FrauBlucher
Joined: Tue Jul 16, 2013 12:28 am
Location: Greenwich Village

Re: Prince (1958-2016)

#176 Post by FrauBlucher »

User avatar
hearthesilence
Joined: Fri Mar 04, 2005 8:22 am
Location: NYC

Re: Prince (1958-2016)

#177 Post by hearthesilence »

What happened to the second live DVD? (Allegedly to be the famous 1983 First Avenue show.) F-ing hell man, I was looking forward to that one.
User avatar
flyonthewall2983
Joined: Mon Jun 27, 2005 7:31 pm
Location: Indiana
Contact:

Re: Prince (1958-2016)

#178 Post by flyonthewall2983 »

Too bad there's no surround mix.
User avatar
hearthesilence
Joined: Fri Mar 04, 2005 8:22 am
Location: NYC

Re: Prince (1958-2016)

#179 Post by hearthesilence »

I got the BD Sign 'O' the Times - it is indeed the REAL deal, an HD transfer off of good film elements, not an up convert etc. The one exception is the "U Got the Look" chapter, which is basically the original music video - they apparently copied the video master onto film and spliced it into the film negative, so unless that music video was shot on film and they saved the OCN AND they were willing to go back and re-do the edit for this film, I doubt it will ever be improved. Regardless, buy with confidence!
User avatar
ando
Bringing Out El Duende
Joined: Mon Dec 06, 2004 10:53 pm
Location: New York City

Re: Prince (1958-2016)

#180 Post by ando »

That's cool. Here's a nice raw version of the album. Fun.
Image
Part 2
User avatar
hearthesilence
Joined: Fri Mar 04, 2005 8:22 am
Location: NYC

Re: Prince (1958-2016)

#181 Post by hearthesilence »

Ah, just noticed something about that crappy looking "U Got the Look" sequence - as mentioned before, they basically dropped the music video into the film, but I noticed another reason why it looks so bad - it's blown up. The music video is academy ratio (which makes sense - music videos were meant for television broadcast, and this was when MTV et al were still academy ratio), but the feature is 16:9, so they blew up the image, thus cropping out the top and bottom portions of the frame of the music video.
User avatar
zedz
Joined: Sun Nov 07, 2004 11:24 pm

Re: Prince (1958-2016)

#182 Post by zedz »

hearthesilence wrote:Ah, just noticed something about that crappy looking "U Got the Look" sequence - as mentioned before, they basically dropped the music video into the film, but I noticed another reason why it looks so bad - it's blown up. The music video is academy ratio (which makes sense - music videos were meant for television broadcast, and this was when MTV et al were still academy ratio), but the feature is 16:9, so they blew up the image, thus cropping out the top and bottom portions of the frame of the music video.
I don't think that's the fault of the digital transfer, though. As I recall, it was cropped to fit in the theatrical prints.
User avatar
hearthesilence
Joined: Fri Mar 04, 2005 8:22 am
Location: NYC

Re: Prince (1958-2016)

#183 Post by hearthesilence »

I know, that's what I was implying.
User avatar
ando
Bringing Out El Duende
Joined: Mon Dec 06, 2004 10:53 pm
Location: New York City

Re: Prince (1958-2016)

#184 Post by ando »

Image

Hey Guys. The Paisley Park label material has just had a wide release with music services. Discogs has compiled an extensive list.
User avatar
zedz
Joined: Sun Nov 07, 2004 11:24 pm

Re: Prince (1958-2016)

#185 Post by zedz »

That's fantastic. I heartily recommend the self-titled albums by The Family and Jill Jones: Prince at the height of his powers, but with different vocalists subbed in. The second Mavis Staples Paisley Park album (The Voice) is very good as well, though Prince was less involved in the production of that one (he still wrote most of the album).
User avatar
ando
Bringing Out El Duende
Joined: Mon Dec 06, 2004 10:53 pm
Location: New York City

Re: Prince (1958-2016)

#186 Post by ando »

Sadly, no Mavis Staples or George Clinton material were included with the streaming release. :(
User avatar
The Fanciful Norwegian
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 6:24 pm
Location: Teegeeack

Re: Prince (1958-2016)

#187 Post by The Fanciful Norwegian »

Showtime to air Sign o' the Times in September 16th. No indication of whether they have any non-TV rights (e.g. DVD/Blu).
User avatar
Jean-Luc Garbo
Joined: Thu Dec 09, 2004 5:55 am
Contact:

Re: Prince (1958-2016)

#188 Post by Jean-Luc Garbo »

Will this appear on the Showtime subscription thru Hulu?
User avatar
flyonthewall2983
Joined: Mon Jun 27, 2005 7:31 pm
Location: Indiana
Contact:

Re: Prince (1958-2016)

#189 Post by flyonthewall2983 »

Would see no reason why it wouldn't be
User avatar
hearthesilence
Joined: Fri Mar 04, 2005 8:22 am
Location: NYC

Re: Prince (1958-2016)

#190 Post by hearthesilence »

For one week in late November, Sign 'O' the Times is returning to theaters for its 30th anniversary in a 2k restoration. (Doesn't say, but one wonders if it's the same restoration used for the import-only Blu-Ray.)
User avatar
bearcuborg
Joined: Fri Sep 14, 2007 6:30 am
Location: Philadelphia via Chicago

Re: Prince (1958-2016)

#191 Post by bearcuborg »

Dig if you will, this picture...Prince to return Sunday as a hologram.

I get that it’s Minnesota-but it’s pretty well known Prince didn’t care for Timberlake...for Christ sake, just do a N’sync reunion or let’s see how Janet is holding up, not this...
User avatar
flyonthewall2983
Joined: Mon Jun 27, 2005 7:31 pm
Location: Indiana
Contact:

Re: Prince (1958-2016)

#192 Post by flyonthewall2983 »

Dude should have just stuck with acting.
User avatar
Big Ben
Joined: Mon Feb 08, 2016 4:54 pm
Location: Great Falls, Montana

Re: Prince (1958-2016)

#193 Post by Big Ben »

If it makes any of you feel any better this is going over as well as a corpse at a wedding banquet on social media. To say people are upset is a bit of an understatement.
User avatar
bearcuborg
Joined: Fri Sep 14, 2007 6:30 am
Location: Philadelphia via Chicago

Re: Prince (1958-2016)

#194 Post by bearcuborg »

Janet just said she won’t be part of the show-there goes the only reason I wouldn’t tune into the Puppy Bowl during halftime...
User avatar
Roger Ryan
Joined: Wed Apr 28, 2010 4:04 pm
Location: A Midland town spread and darkened into a city

Re: Prince (1958-2016)

#195 Post by Roger Ryan »

With the term "hologram" conjuring memories of Tupac at Coachella or Obi-Wan Kenobi, it might straighten ruffled feathers to learn that they simply projected footage of Prince onto a sheet behind Timberlake and incorporated his vocals into the mix so the two could briefly "duet" on "I Would Die 4 U". Nothing too distasteful.
User avatar
tavernier
Joined: Sat Apr 02, 2005 11:18 pm

Re: Prince (1958-2016)

#196 Post by tavernier »

Roger Ryan wrote:With the term "hologram" conjuring memories of Tupac at Coachella or Obi-Wan Kenobi, it might straighten ruffled feathers to learn that they simply projected footage of Prince onto a sheet behind Timberlake and incorporated his vocals into the mix so the two could briefly "duet" on "I Would Die 4 U". Nothing too distasteful.
But pretty pointless anyway in a distinctly unmemorable performance.
User avatar
Roscoe
Joined: Fri Nov 14, 2014 7:40 pm
Location: NYC

Re: Prince (1958-2016)

#197 Post by Roscoe »

Overall it came off like a group of Mark Wahlberg career clips that also included a tribute to Daniel Day-Lewis.
User avatar
Lemmy Caution
Joined: Wed Mar 29, 2006 7:26 am
Location: East of Shanghai

Re: Prince (1958-2016)

#198 Post by Lemmy Caution »

At least they tossed in a Prince tribute.
Which was the only part of that performance I liked.
Timberlake's outfit was ugly.
User avatar
ando
Bringing Out El Duende
Joined: Mon Dec 06, 2004 10:53 pm
Location: New York City

Re: Prince (1958-2016)

#199 Post by ando »

flyonthewall2983 wrote:Dude should have just stuck with acting.
Agreed. Don't get the attraction in general. He can obviously follow choreography but he doesn't come off as a natural dancer. Kudos for the Prince props.
User avatar
hearthesilence
Joined: Fri Mar 04, 2005 8:22 am
Location: NYC

Re: Prince (1958-2016)

#200 Post by hearthesilence »

He had the potential to make groundbreaking dance-pop on the same level as Michael Jackson's Off the Wall, but unfortunately FutureSex/LoveSounds turned out to be a peak rather than a harbinger.
Post Reply