It's listed in the supplements now.Boosmahn wrote: Mon Oct 15, 2018 9:27 pm I'm assuming Criterion forgot to put the "Essay by Nathan Rabin" in the special features list, or...?
957 Mikey and Nicky
- Boosmahn
- Joined: Tue Sep 05, 2017 2:08 am
Re: 957 Mikey and Nicky
- FrauBlucher
- Joined: Tue Jul 16, 2013 12:28 am
- Location: Greenwich Village
- hearthesilence
- Joined: Fri Mar 04, 2005 8:22 am
- Location: NYC
Re: 957 Mikey and Nicky
Looks great and looks like the U.S. DVD holds up well too. Clearly SD, but otherwise no oversharpening and the black levels and color palette are often very close to what's seen on the new BD, with some notable exceptions that can be chalked up to the colorist's choice.
- zedz
- Joined: Sun Nov 07, 2004 11:24 pm
Re: 957 Mikey and Nicky
I found this interesting and enjoyable enough, and I thought the scrappy, lo-fi approach to what could have been a much more conventionally dramatic story worked well, but the thought that kept haunting me throughout is "why is Elaine May making a John Cassavetes film when she could be making an Elaine May film?"
- soundchaser
- Leave Her to Beaver
- Joined: Sun Aug 28, 2016 4:32 am
Re: 957 Mikey and Nicky
I don’t think the subject matter is *that* far removed from, say, Ishtar, in that it’s about two co-dependent ne’er-do-wells, but I agree that I’d rather have seen a comedic take on the material. Falk obviously had the timing for it.zedz wrote: Thu Nov 28, 2019 7:39 pm I found this interesting and enjoyable enough, and I thought the scrappy, lo-fi approach to what could have been a much more conventionally dramatic story worked well, but the thought that kept haunting me throughout is "why is Elaine May making a John Cassavetes film when she could be making an Elaine May film?"
It does baffle me that people consider this May’s masterpiece. I like it pretty well, but definitely not as much as her other three features.