Criterion Cover Art & Packaging Babble-on Vol.2

News on Criterion and Janus Films
Locked
Message
Author
Cinesimilitude
Joined: Tue Jul 09, 2013 4:43 am

#926 Post by Cinesimilitude »

swastika and eyepatch will be no problem... breasts exposed will be a challenge. I'll work on it.

also, should I add a subtitle?

A Canterbury Tale:

or, How I Learned to stop worrying about health
hazards due to pipe tobacco, and love the
gun-wielding kangaroo with the gigantic tube-
socked penis while trying to come to terms
with the fact that I stole alain delon's hat and
subsequently had my hands replaced with a
hook and a chainsaw which this truck driver
named rusty thought was so funny he paid
for my woody woodpecker tattoo and signed
me up for shimmy lessons from a group of
interstellar traveling alien burlesque dancers.


has a nice ring to it, no?
jmj713
Joined: Sun Apr 24, 2005 2:47 am

#927 Post by jmj713 »

arsonfilms wrote:So um... what's everyone think of the new Olivier's Shakespeare artwork?
Image
User avatar
Mr Pixies
Joined: Sun Nov 07, 2004 2:03 am
Location: Fla

#928 Post by Mr Pixies »

So the Olivier set will be without disc two of Richard the III?
User avatar
arsonfilms
Joined: Wed Nov 02, 2005 4:53 pm
Location: Philadelphia, PA

#929 Post by arsonfilms »

I'm sure its a typo. All of the features on that disc are listed, so unless they're authoring a new disc with all the supplements AND the feature, I'd say the thing meant to say 4 discs.

Considering two of these releases are top-tier prices on their own, the $79.99 price point for the set is a bargain and a half. I never would have picked these up seperately, but...
AZAI
Joined: Tue Apr 19, 2005 10:17 am

#930 Post by AZAI »

That is a classy cover IMO....I like the rough cartboard look of it and the combination of just 3 colours...
jcelwin
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 6:09 pm

#931 Post by jcelwin »

Yeah, that is a really nice design. Why can't they get good artists more often.
Anonymous

#932 Post by Anonymous »

It reminds me of the Cassavetes box set. Same designer, perhaps?
User avatar
HerrSchreck
Joined: Sun Sep 04, 2005 3:46 pm

#933 Post by HerrSchreck »

Monterey?
User avatar
Derek Estes
Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 12:00 am
Location: Portland Oregon

#934 Post by Derek Estes »

New Art for Canterbury Is out now. It is somewhat of an inprovement. Though I was getting used to Alain Delon's Hat!
User avatar
justeleblanc
Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 10:05 pm
Location: Connecticut

#935 Post by justeleblanc »

This new cover works better. I like the inclusion of the directors names on the bottom. and now the woman has hands.
User avatar
Gigi M.
Joined: Wed Jul 06, 2005 9:09 pm
Location: Santo Domingo, Dominican Rep

#936 Post by Gigi M. »

Man, this site has to be a major influence over at Criterion.
User avatar
Derek Estes
Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 12:00 am
Location: Portland Oregon

#937 Post by Derek Estes »

Even just fixing the smudge in the sky to look intentional helps. I too prefer the new director credit.
User avatar
godardslave
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 8:44 pm
Location: Confusing and open ended = high art.

#938 Post by godardslave »

at least we know the painter dude can paint hands now.
and thats important!
User avatar
souvenir
Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 4:20 pm

#939 Post by souvenir »

of course they misspelled Michael Powell's first name
User avatar
indiannamednobody
Joined: Fri Apr 14, 2006 4:47 pm
Location: Dub I

#940 Post by indiannamednobody »

meh.

Hopefully they plan on changing the text for the director's credits. At least bold it or do something so it's fairly legible.
User avatar
Lemdog
The Man with no Title
Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 8:43 pm

#941 Post by Lemdog »

I liked the old one, but I agree this version is better.
User avatar
SimonI
Joined: Thu Apr 20, 2006 9:55 am
Location: Aberdeen, Scotland
Contact:

#942 Post by SimonI »

I'm afraid I think it still looks rubbish... it's even more depressing to think that if they've gone to the bother of changing it, that that design is likely to be final :(

If it is, I am seriously considering doing my own, total novice with imaging software that I am... something in black and white based on a still.
User avatar
Ashirg
Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 1:10 pm
Location: Atlanta

#943 Post by Ashirg »

It's like, find 10 differences between new and old covers.

They added an extra ray of sun on the background, the bird is not crossed over, the town has more houses around the church and they added a tank with soldiers. Unfortunately, once a lush - always a lush...
Cinesimilitude
Joined: Tue Jul 09, 2013 4:43 am

#944 Post by Cinesimilitude »

gigimonagas wrote:Man, this site has to be a major influence over at Criterion.
I'd say so. if someone from criterion is reading this, I think it would be super cool of you to let us decide a release's art one of these days. maybe give us a few examples and we'll have a vote...
User avatar
Doctor Sunshine
Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 2:04 am
Location: Brain Jail

#945 Post by Doctor Sunshine »

The cover was not necessarily saved by us. The main difference is that the old version has no detail anywhere but the face. The shading on the dress makes me think that black and white picture was quickly colourized in photoshop to meet a deadline. It's likely that it was draft and revisions were already imminent. Anyway, I would only pat our collective backs tentatively.
User avatar
godardslave
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 8:44 pm
Location: Confusing and open ended = high art.

#946 Post by godardslave »

Doctor Sunshine wrote:Anyway, I would only pat our collective backs tentatively.
hot damn, the fine folks and staff over at Criterion are undoubtely hanging on our every word i say!
Further, I would only pat our collective backs after everyone has had a good, hot shower, with soap.
User avatar
Gregory
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 8:07 pm

#947 Post by Gregory »

I can't believe they didn't tinker with the font at all. To me, it seemed like that was clearly one of the ugliest things about the cover.
User avatar
Fesapo
Joined: Sun Apr 09, 2006 7:39 pm
Location: Shimane, Japan

#948 Post by Fesapo »

souvenir wrote:of course they misspelled Michael Powell's first name
Thankfully, Michael Powell's name has been corrected today. It was bound to happen sooner or later, obviously.
rwaits
Joined: Tue Dec 21, 2004 4:24 pm

#949 Post by rwaits »

I just went to have a look...see maybe if they changed the font. Man I still hate that damn cover.
User avatar
Steven H
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 7:30 pm
Location: NC

#950 Post by Steven H »

I've had four people, who don't know eachother, on seperate occasions, mistake the cover and spine for Late Spring as saying "Hate Spring". One one of them corrected themselves, I had to tell the others. hmm.
Locked