AidanKing wrote: Wed Apr 07, 2021 9:33 amAlthough I can understand the reasons for wanting to streamline the range, and presumably save money on issues such as design, I can't help feeling that the merging of the Arrow and Academy lines is likely to result in a reduction in the variety of the type of films that Arrow will release in future. I suspect we'll be much less likely to see releases such as the Taviani, Rosi, Godard, Rivette and Rohmer films that Arrow has brought out in the past. However, to be fair, it looks as if Arrow has been releasing fewer of these kinds of films recently in any case, so possibly it won't make much difference in the long run.
Guaranteed at least half of those titles you listed didn't sell well enough for them to consider doing things similar - the Taviani and Godard-Gorin sets are still very much in print and are regularly very cheap (even outside of an Arrow sale) and therefore incredible value for money. That's likely one of the reasons for merging the two labels, as they clearly were making some risky releases from a financial standpoint, and the Academy library was soon being viewed as the 'slow burner' range. Much easier to market and distribute these things if they're all under one banner, and like you say, will probably mean we'll see a little less variety in future but still the odd surprise I'm sure (they're already releasing some dubious stuff under the Arrow Video line, I'm sure some would agree).
I'm hoping this move will be beneficial for Arrow overall as it'll mean solely Arrow Video fans (i.e. cult, horror, exploitation etc) will have everything to consider now, whether it's 'high brow' or 'low brow' or somewhere in-between, and not disregard stuff that was previously under the Arrow Academy title. In other words, even the experimental Japanese box sets will be Arrow Video and would hopefully attract people who had got into, say, Suzuki or Masamura through Arrow Video (but who previously might have disregarded Yoshida or Jissoji as 'arthouse', potentially affecting sales of those sets).
I reckon this was also done to adjust Arrow back into view of rivals like Criterion, Indicator and BFI who tend not to use sub-labels and who release a huge range of genres and styles under one name (Masters of Cinema are obviously an outlier at this point, and due to brand recognition it'd be much harder for them to merge with Eureka Classics, and will likely never happen in fact).