Julien Duvivier

Discuss individual directors, actors, cinematographers, writers, and more
Message
Author
User avatar
Matt
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 4:58 pm

Julien Duvivier

#101 Post by Matt »

The Miraculous Life of Teresa of Lisieux (La Vie miraculeuse de Thérèse Martin, 1929): The problem with making a film about the life of a saint lies in making them believably human while maintaining their inspirational saintliness. Duvivier does his best here, but what can you really say about a girl whose only ambition is to become a nun and then, having done so, only wishes to suffer and die (which she takes an extremely long time in achieving, I must add). The performances by the leads playing Thérèse and her father are exceptional and well-directed, but within the limited range of pious but sad to pious but glad. The whole first hour is basically Thérèse as a young girl begging everyone from her parish priest to the Pope to let her become a Carmelite nun like two of her older sisters, but they all tell her she’s too young. Then she just enters the convent when she’s finally old enough. But suddenly, as she is taking her vows, holy shit this guy shows up:

Image

and the movie becomes The Last Temptation of Thérèse! Things are absolutely WILD for a few minutes (some truly inspired filmmaking here), then the film settles back into its overly reverent groove, Thérèse plays the last act of Camille, then we see her in Heaven raining rose petals down on the earth.

I can see why this film was made and why it might have been important. Thérèse was canonized in 1925, just four years before the film, so there’s a strong element of Local Girl Makes Good pride in her story, and she was a hugely popular figure at the time and since. It does a good job of portraying the devotion and sacrifice necessary to become and to be a nun, even if those things don’t necessarily make for gripping cinema. It’s touching to see her father grieve when he loses her to the convent and again just a handful of years later when he beholds her lifeless body.

This is probably my least favorite and the most sedate and restrained of the films so far, but there is still much to admire in it.
User avatar
Finch
Joined: Mon Jul 07, 2008 9:09 pm
Location: United States

Re: Julien Duvivier

#102 Post by Finch »

Thank you for those rundowns, Matt. Between this set and their Argentinian noirs, Flicker Alley have really excelled themselves this year.
User avatar
Matt
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 4:58 pm

Re: Julien Duvivier

#103 Post by Matt »

Mother Hummingbird (Mama Colibri, 1930): Tale as old as time—a bored, aging, insecure socialite wife and mother attends a masked ball and is swept off her feet by a dashing young stranger. She leaves her family and scampers off to Algeria with her beau who has been called up for military service. She swans around on her patio under the North African sun while he rides horses and starts noticing the new blonde neighbor. Trouble ensues.

You might recognize the young man as Francis Lederer from Pandora’s Box (or perhaps from The Return of Dracula. I always thought he looked too much like Liberace to be a credible romantic lead, but he’s perfectly adequate here. The titular role is played very effectively by Maria Jacobini, a major Italian star of the time.

The film is beautiful but languorous. It could easily have been cut by 30-40 minutes without diminishment. The ball scene, as you would expect from Duvivier, is obscenely well done. The shift to Algeria has some nice moments (and some fun John Ford-style horseback action scenes), but is overall far too long, as are the final scenes.

I kept wishing that the film had focused on the sensitive mama’s boy younger son and what it meant for him to have his beloved mother abandon him for a lover (and to be stuck with his rigid, authoritarian father). Not something that would have been a hit play and high-grossing movie, no doubt.

This is fine, but I think you can’t help but feel Duvivier’s lack of interest in the material as the movie only takes flight when he’s got something visually interesting to do (hence the ball scene, the horseback scene).

I’m glad some of you are enjoying these scatter-brained reactions. It’s been a banner year for box sets, and this one (while more modestly scaled than some) is a humdinger.
User avatar
swo17
Bloodthirsty Butcher
Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2008 2:25 pm
Location: SLC, UT

Re: Julien Duvivier

#104 Post by swo17 »

Speaking of, you should do the Milligan box next
User avatar
Matt
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 4:58 pm

Re: Julien Duvivier

#105 Post by Matt »

I imagine treating it like a job is the only thing that would get me through the whole box.
User avatar
Matt
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 4:58 pm

Julien Duvivier

#106 Post by Matt »

Ladies' Paradise (Au bonheur des dames, 1930): What a film to go out on! I have a lot of thoughts about this one, let’s see if I can get them out in any kind of coherent fashion.

Starting with the basis of the film: this is a silent melodrama based on a 19th century realist novel. It’s going to be pitched to the rafters in terms of emotion. I don’t know Zola from Zyrtec, but he seems to be one of those novelists well-regarded and popular in the past (but now mostly unread) who trafficked in social issues wrapped up in literary ribbons and melodramatic bows so as to appeal to the very bourgeois readers they were criticizing. Like Theodore Dreiser. And so it makes sense that this film brings to mind the great adaptation of a Dreiser novel, A Place in the Sun (and, to some extent, Paramount’s flop follow-up, Carrie) in that huge social issues are played out through interpersonal relationships with devastating consequences (for the underclasses at least).

Here we’re talking mass market capitalism vs. small business; the moneyed class vs. the workers; how capitalism has no room for the old, the infirm, the weakly human and no patience for sentiment. We’ve got the old, independent shop owner being crushed by the huge new department store across the street (which is in turn under the heel of its wealthy, amoral financier) and the improbable romance between the shop owner’s niece (fresh from the country) and the sophisticated proprietor of the department store.

I don’t want to talk much about what else happens in the plot because I think the film would be best enjoyed in a state of total ignorance of and openness to what happens. But I will say that the ending had me thinking,
Spoiler
“What? You can’t be serious!” and then Duvivier tops a too-sweet conclusion with caramel, whipped cream, sprinkles, and a candied cherry, and the film launches into the stratosphere of irony and you realize the film has been a dish of poison the whole time. Like, it’s absolutely preposterous and perfectly cynical at the same time. There’s no way Duvivier was not fully aware of what he was doing here, as the whole film builds up to it.

A quote that’s been echoing around in my head during the whole week of watching these films is Oscar Wilde’s withering assessment of the oozing sentimentality of Dickens’ novels: “One must have a heart of stone to read the death of little Nell without laughing.” And that seems to sum up Duvivier at his best, a sort of precursor to (though really a contemporary of) Douglas Sirk, having his melodramatic cake and eating it, too.
This is a perfect bookend to this selection of films as it shows the evolution of Duvivier’s visual style from flashy, experimental camera effects (like the trick mirror shots, the superimpositions) to more sophisticated, narrative-driven innovations like handheld tracking shots, elaborate staging, associative and expressive editing, and complicated camera movements. Yet both this film and Poil de carotte are based on highly emotional yet realist 19th century literature and are both somewhat “coming of age” stories (or, more accurately, “reaching a new stage of clear-eyed emotional maturity” stories). And the full set, even though chronological in order, is sequenced as well as a good album—a great opener, a variety of lesser but interesting tracks in different tempos and styles, and a surprising and explosive finale.

And now for the crass, purely subjective, gut reaction numerical ranking (which is on a scale of “absolutely fucking incredible” to “merely quite good”):

1. (tie) Poil de carotte, Le Bonheur des Dames
3. La Divine Croisière
4. Le Tourbillon de Paris
5. Le Mystère de la tour Eiffel
6. Maman Colibri
7. La Vie miraculeuse de Thérèse Martin
8. L'Agonie de Jérusalem
9. Le mariage de mademoiselle Beulemans
User avatar
hearthesilence
Joined: Fri Mar 04, 2005 8:22 am
Location: NYC

Re: Julien Duvivier

#107 Post by hearthesilence »

Matt wrote: Thu Dec 23, 2021 9:12 pm The Divine Voyage (La Divine Croisière, 1928): This film has everything you’d want in an entertainment: a seaside village, hunky sailors on a dangerous sea voyage, mutiny, a shipwreck, a black-hearted rich man and his golden-hearted daughter, a portly priest who takes in orphans, a vengeful mob storming an elegant dinner party and setting fire to the drapes, art restoration, a divine vision, a hopeless rescue mission, a cheeky stowaway, more arson, quicksand, a comeuppance, a tearful reunion, and a third act Change of Heart.

Long considered a lost film, this is yet another miracle of film restoration with a lovely ensemble score by Antonio Coppola. One could get spoiled by these riches.
I just saw this projected and it is indeed a great restoration, so much that it really irritates me off that I missed The Navigator, which was also Lobster's restoration with a new Antonio Coppola score. (I was planning to go but had to skip it at the very last minute.) As this one was pieced together from various sources, some scenes looking a bit scuffed up but the majority of it looked sparkling good. To be honest, it was a bit corny for my tastes, but Duvivier's direction was really impressive. I got the feeling that putting a camera on a boat pulling away from a small seaside town was the most lyrical thing you could do with a camera - like when you see the priest wave goodbye as if knowing what was to come, or seeing the town wave goodbye to the rescue mission, and just the shots floating by parts of the town as the ship picks up speed (reminds me of Connecticut in some ways). A lot of the static long shots where the cloud-scarred day-time sky dominates the figures below are especially beautiful. But most impressive is when he moves the camera in unexpected ways - particularly the incredible overhead shot that moves over the vengeful mob before it catches and follow the woman with the torch, and also that hurtling close-up of the daughter screaming "Assassin!" Scorsese would envy that last one.
User avatar
Red Screamer
Joined: Tue Jul 16, 2013 4:34 pm
Location: Boston, MA

Re: Julien Duvivier

#108 Post by Red Screamer »

User avatar
Matt
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 4:58 pm

Re: Julien Duvivier

#109 Post by Matt »

Can anyone comment on Duvivier’s Flesh and Fantasy, recently released on Blu by Vinegar Syndrome Labs? Not sure if it’s worth a blind buy as I’m much less fond of his Hollywood work than of his French work.
User avatar
SeizureMilk
Joined: Sun Jan 22, 2023 5:51 pm

Re: Julien Duvivier

#110 Post by SeizureMilk »

Matt wrote: Sun May 28, 2023 12:47 am Can anyone comment on Duvivier’s Flesh and Fantasy, recently released on Blu by Vinegar Syndrome Labs? Not sure if it’s worth a blind buy as I’m much less fond of his Hollywood work than of his French work.
Generally Flesh and Fantasy is a fine film but nothing exceptional.

The first Short is arguably the weakest and really doesn’t have much to do with fate as the others do. It’s still well made though, the dialogue is well written, the story’s (though a bit too much Hollywood at the end) well executed, and it may have the most well done and subtle piece of cinematography in the film when the main woman holds her mask, a bit of light shines onto it but once she takes it off, the face darkens in light.

The second is easily the best as we see how a normal socialite can be driven to the worse of ends by the revelation of their fate. The technical aspects here really shine as we see the double exposure be put to great use. Robinson also, as usual, delivers a grand performance. Of all the segments check this one out.

The last one is not bad but feels like a melodrama with a sense of horror involving visions of a woman not seen before. It’s fine and the circus performances are the best part but outside of that and the acting, it’s nothing great.

Overall though great as a technical and atmospheric piece but story wise, only the 2nd truly shines.
User avatar
Rayon Vert
Green is the Rayest Color
Joined: Thu Jan 09, 2014 2:52 am
Location: Canada
Contact:

Re: Julien Duvivier

#111 Post by Rayon Vert »

Very similar level of appreciation to SeizureMilk on my part, although for me the 3rd (Charles Boyer) episode is the weakest. B minus, which for me nevertheless puts it ahead of the previous year's anthology film Tales of Manhattan.
User avatar
SeizureMilk
Joined: Sun Jan 22, 2023 5:51 pm

Re: Julien Duvivier

#112 Post by SeizureMilk »

Rayon Vert wrote: Tue May 30, 2023 1:48 am Very similar level of appreciation to SeizureMilk on my part, although for me the 3rd (Charles Boyer) episode is the weakest. B minus, which for me nevertheless puts it ahead of the previous year's anthology film Tales of Manhattan.
Upon further consideration, yeah the 3rd’s worst, at least with the 1st one, it attempts to use lightening to convey key details and a sense of atmosphere, but what really was that technically cool about the 3rd part, asides that one shot where the camera descends to show Barbara in the crowd, really nothing is of note, and the similarities between this and the 2nd while narratively make sense, just makes this feel like the same story without the impact of the 2nd’s ending.
User avatar
domino harvey
Dot Com Dom
Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 6:42 pm

Re: Julien Duvivier

#113 Post by domino harvey »

Coincidentally, I recently caught up with Duvivier's adaptation of the Burning Court, La Chambre ardente, and found it pretty creaky, with an ending that tries very hard to be shocking but is mostly unconvincing. Afterwards I looked up the source text and discovered why: the original "Locked Room" mystery ended with a wild twist that Duvivier totally avoids, but he still presumably felt compelled to do something here to shock in its absence. I'll spoiler the the novel's twist below just because it's hilarious
Spoiler
The book presents a seemingly supernatural occurrence involving a revived corpse who may or may not have been poisoned by persons unknown. One of the characters of the novel, completely gone from the film, is a mystery writer who solves the three central mysteries of the film, including how the poisoner was able to walk through the walls like a ghost, using Sherlock Holmes-esque deduction and conjecture. However, in the final chapter, it's revealed that in fact everything was supernatural, the corpse did rise from the dead, and the mystery writer framed two innocents for the crime of murder to hide this because he too is a member of the undead.
I mean, this would be hard for anyone to pull off, especially a director delivering one big "Oof" after another in this period, but why would you even adapt a piece of shit mystery story like this and not bother to include the only interesting part?
User avatar
domino harvey
Dot Com Dom
Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 6:42 pm

Re: Julien Duvivier

#114 Post by domino harvey »

Matt wrote: Sun May 28, 2023 12:47 am Can anyone comment on Duvivier’s Flesh and Fantasy, recently released on Blu by Vinegar Syndrome Labs? Not sure if it’s worth a blind buy as I’m much less fond of his Hollywood work than of his French work.
Caught up with this and while all three entries are handsomely filmed, it’s absurd how much better the Edward G Robinson entry is than the treacly bunk on either side of it. But man, that Wilde adaptation is a hoot from start to finish, and Thomas Mitchell in particular is having the time of his life. Interesting to see Boyer with a producer credit here, but why would he pick such a lame story to star in?
User avatar
Never Cursed
Such is life on board the Redoutable
Joined: Sun Aug 14, 2016 4:22 am

Re: Julien Duvivier

#115 Post by Never Cursed »

Is there any digital copy, either legitimate or on backchannels, of Duvivier's Anna Karenina that is NOT cut by 30 or so minutes?
User avatar
TechnicolorAcid
Joined: Wed Oct 11, 2023 11:43 pm

Re: Julien Duvivier

#116 Post by TechnicolorAcid »

Never Cursed wrote: Sat Feb 01, 2025 12:56 am Is there any digital copy, either legitimate or on backchannels, of Duvivier's Anna Karenina that is NOT cut by 30 or so minutes?
DM me, I have a source.
User avatar
vertigo
Joined: Wed Nov 19, 2025 12:08 am

Re: Julien Duvivier

#117 Post by vertigo »

I have never seen a long, boring and stupid film since I watched those Joan Crawford insult to intelligence -same plot- movies from the 20s and 30s for MGM. I watch this afternoon La femme et le pantin. BB in Sevilla with that body and walking, caused sensation in the city.

BB talked on her memories only bad things about the ugly, deformed (Goya paintings), short size, dark Spaniards, and I agree her words, but, those Spaniards have passed away or are DYING now

we are fewer, but we are better

A certain Ninotchka said that, if she said so, I believe it.

She missed the cliché about us as a hairy people, that was in part all true true until the arrival of laser depilation, even myself, I did it, and I am not afraid of saying so.

By far it is Duvivier's worst film, money can buy even dignity.

In stead, Les Bijoutiers du clair de lune made by her ex husband was quite good, what a surprise, and it was not boring, or long.
Vadim compared with this awful Duvivier's work was like Godard, lol.
Post Reply