Criterion Cover Art & Packaging Babble-on Vol.2

News on Criterion and Janus Films
Locked
Message
Author
User avatar
Cinephrenic
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 6:58 pm
Location: Paris, Texas

#1226 Post by Cinephrenic »

I knew it!!! :lol:
User avatar
justeleblanc
Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 10:05 pm
Location: Connecticut

#1227 Post by justeleblanc »

I got my Kicking and Screaming today and the packaging is great. They really are emphasizing how quotable this movie is, now they have a crossword puzzle. But even so I enjoy the extra effort.
User avatar
cdnchris
Site Admin
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 6:45 pm
Location: Washington
Contact:

#1228 Post by cdnchris »

The crossword was actually a nice little touch, though I don't see the promised answers on the website. I'm guessing that they're not using the clear keep cases from now on, though. I actually think it looks pretty nice with the clear keepcase.
Cinesimilitude
Joined: Tue Jul 09, 2013 4:43 am

#1229 Post by Cinesimilitude »

clear cases are so R2.
User avatar
arsonfilms
Joined: Wed Nov 02, 2005 4:53 pm
Location: Philadelphia, PA

#1230 Post by arsonfilms »

When I was a disc producer, I think we were the only company other than Palm and Blue Underground (that I can think of) that regularly used clear cases, and I always wondered why they weren't more popular. They're a little more expensive (on top of the additional printing costs for the wraps), but I've always been a big fan of them, both for the design possibilities and the unique look. I'm certainly a supporter of digipaks (although I may be on my own in this crowd), but if Criterion were to continue using clear cases instead of the black amarays, I'd be pretty pleased indeed.
User avatar
Theodore R. Stockton
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 8:55 pm
Location: Where Streams Of Whiskey Are Flowing

#1231 Post by Theodore R. Stockton »

The system they have been using so far is, that if a multi-disc set has an incredibaly thick book that is guled not stapled then they go with digi-packs. Malle gets amary but thick books like Rohmer get digi-packs. Dazed and Confused gets a digi, Equinox gets an Amary.

Also, It seems that the flimsiness of the Rohmer set is a result of it being designed to be two slip cases like the Cassavettes but for some reason only coming with the outter case.
User avatar
Lino
Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 10:18 am
Location: Sitting End
Contact:

#1232 Post by Lino »

That's what I was thinking too. Why didn't they bother to make it a double slipcase? That would have solved it.
User avatar
zedz
Joined: Sun Nov 07, 2004 11:24 pm

#1233 Post by zedz »

I've just got my Rohmer box and I see what you all mean. It's definitely a design stuff-up - unexpectedly sloppy from Criterion. Did they drastically underestimate the page count of one of the books? Did they originally intend to include another big glossy catalogue of the collection to commemorate the new look? Were there some 'Wit and Wisdom of Blaise Pascal' collectors cards they withdrew at the last minute?

I'm glad my copy happened to come from Amazon, with their air-padded packaging, as I dread to think what the more toss-it-in-a-box-and-cross-your-fingers companies would have done to it. Nevertheless, it still arrived a little squashed, and it was the shrinkwrap that was responsible, by pulling the loose sides tight and slightly buckling one of them. You know you've got a problem when the shrinkwrap is too tough for the box!

Regarding other packaging trivia, I'm delighted that the cover of Yi-Yi looks just as elegant in person. One of the company's best designs, in my opinion, and a nice last hurrah for the old cover format.
User avatar
justeleblanc
Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 10:05 pm
Location: Connecticut

#1234 Post by justeleblanc »

It looks to me that they had room for a 7th disc in the Rohmer set.
User avatar
arsonfilms
Joined: Wed Nov 02, 2005 4:53 pm
Location: Philadelphia, PA

#1235 Post by arsonfilms »

Granted there's a little more room in there than there would usually be, but honestly, if there were much less room I'd have a hard time taking the sleeves out. In any case, I'm sure the space came from an estimate on the size of the two books (probably from different publishers).
leefarber
Joined: Thu Aug 31, 2006 6:38 pm
Location: Los Angeles, CA

#1236 Post by leefarber »

Does anyone know if the new 3-disc edition [of Brazil] will feature new packaging, or if it'll literally be the same box as last time, with the new single disc edition replacing disc 1 in the box?

Being a collector, I'd get the revised 3-disc edition if they've revamped the packaging. Otherwise, I'd just pick up the new single disc version.
User avatar
Gigi M.
Joined: Wed Jul 06, 2005 9:09 pm
Location: Santo Domingo, Dominican Rep

#1237 Post by Gigi M. »

Yes, a digipak.
leefarber
Joined: Thu Aug 31, 2006 6:38 pm
Location: Los Angeles, CA

#1238 Post by leefarber »

So the new 3-disc Brazil will be in a digipack. Damn! More money to spend.

Anyone seen any scans of the new 3-disc version? I've only seen scans for the single disc edition.
pmunger
Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 11:48 am
Location: Montreal, Canada

#1239 Post by pmunger »

gigimonagas wrote:
leefarber wrote:Does anyone know if the new 3-disc edition [of Brazil] will feature new packaging, or if it'll literally be the same box as last time, with the new single disc edition replacing disc 1 in the box?

Being a collector, I'd get the revised 3-disc edition if they've revamped the packaging. Otherwise, I'd just pick up the new single disc version.
Yes, a digipak.
Do you mean for disc 1 only or that disc 1, 2 and 3 will feature the new packaging (new logo, digipak...)?
Narshty
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 6:27 pm
Location: London, UK

#1240 Post by Narshty »

gigimonagas wrote:Yes, a digipak.
Those cheap fuckers.
User avatar
justeleblanc
Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 10:05 pm
Location: Connecticut

#1241 Post by justeleblanc »

I prefer that over the bulky original three disc set.
User avatar
Gigi M.
Joined: Wed Jul 06, 2005 9:09 pm
Location: Santo Domingo, Dominican Rep

#1242 Post by Gigi M. »

Narshty wrote:Those cheap fuckers.
No offense Narsh, but for one of the most expensive DVD ever, I expect no less.
Narshty
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 6:27 pm
Location: London, UK

#1243 Post by Narshty »

Than tatty cardboard replacing a lush set of three clear Amarays in a translucent blue box? The old Brazil package was a thing of beauty - now we get some crumpled corner fold-out dreck. Booo, I say! BOOOOOOO!!!
User avatar
cdnchris
Site Admin
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 6:45 pm
Location: Washington
Contact:

#1244 Post by cdnchris »

I have to agree with Narsh. Boo-urns! Boo-urns!
User avatar
kinjitsu
Joined: Sat Feb 12, 2005 5:39 pm
Location: Uffa!

#1245 Post by kinjitsu »

cdnchris wrote:I have to agree with Narsh. Boo-urns! Boo-urns!
Same here. A gorgeous set diminished. Digipaks are not a blessing, in fact, I have had to re-glue a couple of them already.
User avatar
miless
Joined: Sun Apr 02, 2006 1:45 am

#1246 Post by miless »

what are you guys doing with your DVD cases? are you involved with some strange sport that I am yet unaware of?

I dislike amaray cases because of when they rub together the clear plastic gets dirty and clouded... I'd take a digipak any day
User avatar
bjeggert82
Joined: Fri Nov 05, 2004 1:36 am
Location: www.deepfocusreview.com
Contact:

#1247 Post by bjeggert82 »

Good news and bad news (depending on your point of view) for those of you that ordered the new Brazil 3 disc set...

I just received my copy from DVDplanet.com. The outer box of the set is basically the same as the previous release, made out of plastic, except perhaps a little more square around the edges. You certainly won't get smushed corners from shipping.

However, I'm concerned. The only physical difference between this release and the previous one is a sticker on the shrink wrap the reads, "Remastered in High Definition, Now Anamorphic." Otherwise all the print on the box, from what I remember, is identical.

Let me know if this is the same on yours, when you folks get your copies, because I can't really tell a difference. I don't want to open it in case I have to return it.

ALSO: The cover art on the "new" disc is the same. No new logo.
User avatar
godardslave
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 8:44 pm
Location: Confusing and open ended = high art.

#1248 Post by godardslave »

the "love / hate digipak divide" is clearly the most pressing and damging division within society in the modern world, and must be adressed by all our best scholars, scientists, spirtual and political leaders immediately.

I demand action now.
User avatar
tavernier
Joined: Sat Apr 02, 2005 11:18 pm

#1249 Post by tavernier »

bjeggert82 wrote:The cover art on the "new" disc is the same. No new logo.
My "new" disc was all new: new logo, new copyright date on the back, new date of the film on left side of front cover....in other words, the new packaging.
leefarber
Joined: Thu Aug 31, 2006 6:38 pm
Location: Los Angeles, CA

#1250 Post by leefarber »

Okay, confused.

Is the new 3-disc edition the same thing packaging-wise as the old 3-disc edition with Disc 1 replaced with the new version? Or is it an all-new 3-disc digipack?

Can anyone who's received theirs post some pictures?
Locked