Orson Welles

Discuss individual directors, actors, cinematographers, writers, and more
Post Reply
Message
Author
Stefan Andersson
Joined: Thu Nov 15, 2007 5:02 am

Re: Orson Welles

#376 Post by Stefan Andersson »

Rushes from Orson Welles´ Merchant of Venice, restored in 2025 by the Cinemathèque Francaise:
https://www.cinematheque.fr/henri/film/ ... bzZmGDU0dg

Film materials deposited by Oja Kodar. Text says that Kodar has confided part of her film archive to the CF.
Perhaps more unfinished work has been moved from the Munich Film Museum to the CF?

https://www.wellesnet.com/phpbb2/viewto ... 374#p30374
User avatar
hearthesilence
Joined: Fri Mar 04, 2005 8:22 am
Location: NYC

Re: Orson Welles

#377 Post by hearthesilence »

I hope they do the nearly-completed The Deep and make that available.
albucat
Joined: Wed Jul 20, 2011 4:06 am

Re: Orson Welles

#378 Post by albucat »

Thanks for the head's up. And yes, the big questions are what else do they have, and will any of it also see its way online?
beamish14
Joined: Fri May 18, 2018 7:07 pm

Re: Orson Welles

#379 Post by beamish14 »

hearthesilence wrote: Sat Jan 24, 2026 9:15 pm I hope they do the nearly-completed The Deep and make that available.
I don’t know if The Deep can ever become widely available due to the rights situation with its source novel and Dead Calm (1989). Stefan Drossler of the Munich Filmmuseum has screened a program of Welles rarities that includes chunks of it, though. We have probably reached a point where we can properly color grade it
User avatar
Lowry_Sam
Joined: Mon Jul 05, 2010 7:35 pm
Location: San Francisco, CA

Re: Orson Welles

#380 Post by Lowry_Sam »

beamish14 wrote: Sat Jan 24, 2026 10:30 pm I don’t know if The Deep can ever become widely available due to the rights situation with its source novel and Dead Calm (1989). Stefan Drossler of the Munich Filmmuseum has screened a program of Welles rarities that includes chunks of it, though. We have probably reached a point where we can properly color grade it
From what I remember from the screening I saw at the PFA (my memory is a bit foggy because there were a bunch of unfinished Welles projects presented as part of a Welles retrospective, some of which were only clips), part of what exists was in color and part in b&w. Would they leave it that way or release it all in b&w? (Hopefully they won't be using AI to Ted Turner it). The only thing I can remember from the screening was that it was not as good as Plein soleil and so I assumed it would probably never see the light of day. given the missing sound and b&w/color issues.
beamish14
Joined: Fri May 18, 2018 7:07 pm

Re: Orson Welles

#381 Post by beamish14 »

Lowry_Sam wrote: Sun Jan 25, 2026 6:41 pm
beamish14 wrote: Sat Jan 24, 2026 10:30 pm I don’t know if The Deep can ever become widely available due to the rights situation with its source novel and Dead Calm (1989). Stefan Drossler of the Munich Filmmuseum has screened a program of Welles rarities that includes chunks of it, though. We have probably reached a point where we can properly color grade it
From what I remember from the screening I saw at the PFA (my memory is a bit foggy because there were a bunch of unfinished Welles projects presented as part of a Welles retrospective, some of which were only clips), part of what exists was in color and part in b&w. Would they leave it that way or release it all in b&w? (Hopefully they won't be using AI to Ted Turner it). The only thing I can remember from the screening was that it was not as good as Plein soleil and so I assumed it would probably never see the light of day. given the missing sound and b&w/color issues.
Welles loved monochrome, of course, but I assume it really was intended to be all in color, as he really wanted it to be a very commercial work. The OCN doesn’t exist, sadly
User avatar
hearthesilence
Joined: Fri Mar 04, 2005 8:22 am
Location: NYC

Re: Orson Welles

#382 Post by hearthesilence »

Lawrence French writes about it here but basically two workprints exist: one in color, one in black & white. It's supposed to be in color, BUT there are indeed black & white segments which French describes in detail. I think that's what Lowry_Sam caught (and what I fucking missed thanks to the MTA - I still hold that grudge).
User avatar
JamesF
Label Representative
Joined: Thu Mar 04, 2010 5:36 pm

Re: Orson Welles

#383 Post by JamesF »

News to me, so apologies if it's repeating anything here, but apparently the Cinematheque Francaise are restoring The Stranger from the "négatifs originaux", in collaboration with the Library of Congress and Transperfect Media (the latter of whom also restored F For Fake with the Cinetheque a few years ago).
User avatar
Roger Ryan
Joined: Wed Apr 28, 2010 4:04 pm
Location: A Midland town spread and darkened into a city

Re: Orson Welles

#384 Post by Roger Ryan »

JamesF wrote: Mon Jan 26, 2026 4:18 pm News to me, so apologies if it's repeating anything here, but apparently the Cinematheque Francaise are restoring The Stranger from the "négatifs originaux", in collaboration with the Library of Congress and Transperfect Media (the latter of whom also restored F For Fake with the Cinetheque a few years ago).
I hadn't heard anything about this previously either... and that clip embedded on the Cinematheque Francaise site looks better than any version of this longtime public domain film I've seen.
beamish14
Joined: Fri May 18, 2018 7:07 pm

Re: Orson Welles

#385 Post by beamish14 »

Roger Ryan wrote: Mon Jan 26, 2026 7:31 pm
JamesF wrote: Mon Jan 26, 2026 4:18 pm News to me, so apologies if it's repeating anything here, but apparently the Cinematheque Francaise are restoring The Stranger from the "négatifs originaux", in collaboration with the Library of Congress and Transperfect Media (the latter of whom also restored F For Fake with the Cinetheque a few years ago).
I hadn't heard anything about this previously either... and that clip embedded on the Cinematheque Francaise site looks better than any version of this longtime public domain film I've seen.


This is a fantastic development. I’ve always hoped for a true 4K of it, and maybe Criterion would be willing to license it.

Still crossing my fingers for more It’s All True this year
User avatar
hearthesilence
Joined: Fri Mar 04, 2005 8:22 am
Location: NYC

Re: Orson Welles

#386 Post by hearthesilence »

That restoration of F for Fake is the same exact one I've mentioned in the past, the one shown at MoMA's To Save and Project. This bodes well for The Stranger, but I hope they release it as a UHD or at least a Blu-ray - they've yet to do the same with the new F for Fake restoration.
User avatar
colinr0380
Joined: Mon Nov 08, 2004 8:30 pm
Location: Chapel-en-le-Frith, Derbyshire, UK

Re: Orson Welles

#387 Post by colinr0380 »

This was interesting: the Oddity Archive guy has mentioned in a recent video getting hold of a Cartrivision tape of Orson Welles doings readings of literature, which may be the only format that the material exists in.
Stefan Andersson
Joined: Thu Nov 15, 2007 5:02 am

Re: Orson Welles

#388 Post by Stefan Andersson »

beamish14 wrote: Mon Jan 26, 2026 7:33 pm
Roger Ryan wrote: Mon Jan 26, 2026 7:31 pm
JamesF wrote: Mon Jan 26, 2026 4:18 pm News to me, so apologies if it's repeating anything here, but apparently the Cinematheque Francaise are restoring The Stranger from the "négatifs originaux", in collaboration with the Library of Congress and Transperfect Media (the latter of whom also restored F For Fake with the Cinetheque a few years ago).
I hadn't heard anything about this previously either... and that clip embedded on the Cinematheque Francaise site looks better than any version of this longtime public domain film I've seen.
This is a fantastic development. I’ve always hoped for a true 4K of it, and maybe Criterion would be willing to license it.
The Stranger, 4K, screening in the Cannes Classics 2026 program:
https://www.festival-cannes.com/en/pres ... sics-2026/
Stefan Andersson
Joined: Thu Nov 15, 2007 5:02 am

Re: Orson Welles

#389 Post by Stefan Andersson »

News from Joseph McBride re: an updated third edition of his 1972 Orson Welles book, " incorporating recent developments in /.../ Welles scholarship and my revised thinking on some of his films, /.../ including an ambitious monograph-sized study of The Other Side of the Wind."
https://wellesnet.com/persistence-of-vision/
Stefan
Joined: Wed Apr 09, 2008 5:33 am
Location: Berlin, Germany

Re: Orson Welles

#390 Post by Stefan »

What would we do without Joseph McBride? His work has been tremendous.
User avatar
Walter Kurtz
Joined: Sat Jul 25, 2020 7:03 pm

Re: Orson Welles

#391 Post by Walter Kurtz »

McBride... “What has happened over the last few decades to the art form I loved—in this country it’s been turned largely into moronic fodder for the adolescent male audience...we just know that film as we knew it is over."

Moronic fodder. I like that.
Stefan
Joined: Wed Apr 09, 2008 5:33 am
Location: Berlin, Germany

Re: Orson Welles

#392 Post by Stefan »

@Walter Kurtz
McBride ... YES!. It's interesting that there has never been a similar statement by the pope of remaining critical cinema thinking, David Thomson.
User avatar
hearthesilence
Joined: Fri Mar 04, 2005 8:22 am
Location: NYC

Re: Orson Welles

#393 Post by hearthesilence »

I think this has been a pretty popular stance among quite a few critics (Jonathan Rosenbaum especially) and I think it's what Scorsese was insinuating when he explained why he's never been able to watch Marvel movies beyond what few he has seen. I love how Kevin Smith, a middle-aged man who still dresses like he's in fucking middle school, then accused Scorsese of being "a man of a certain age and stuck in his ways."
User avatar
senseabove
Joined: Wed Dec 02, 2015 7:07 am

Re: Orson Welles

#394 Post by senseabove »

Stefan wrote: Sat May 09, 2026 5:12 pmthe pope of remaining critical cinema thinking, David Thomson.
[many, many citations needed]
User avatar
lazarus
Joined: Sun Jan 15, 2023 7:03 pm

Re: Orson Welles

#395 Post by lazarus »

Speaking of The Other Side of the Wind, still waiting for Criterion (or whoever) to release it on physical media. Certainly Netflix stands to make more money this way? No one is subscribing or renewing with their service just to watch an "unfinished" film from the early 70s.

Unless it goes back to more legal disputes between Oja Kodar and the family or other investors, but since they managed to get the editing done not sure why there's wrangling over a disc release.
beamish14
Joined: Fri May 18, 2018 7:07 pm

Re: Orson Welles

#396 Post by beamish14 »

lazarus wrote: Mon May 11, 2026 3:54 am Speaking of The Other Side of the Wind, still waiting for Criterion (or whoever) to release it on physical media. Certainly Netflix stands to make more money this way? No one is subscribing or renewing with their service just to watch an "unfinished" film from the early 70s.

Unless it goes back to more legal disputes between Oja Kodar and the family or other investors, but since they managed to get the editing done not sure why there's wrangling over a disc release.
It could possibly be issues with the Kickstarter that predated Netflix’s involvement.

There is just SO much material-the short rough cut that Welles made and Gary Graver took to studios after Welles’ death, the Hopper/Welles documentary, Netflix’s TWO documentaries on the film, etc.
User avatar
Maltic
Joined: Sat Oct 10, 2020 5:36 am

Re: Orson Welles

#397 Post by Maltic »

Walter Kurtz wrote: Sat May 09, 2026 4:51 pm McBride... “What has happened over the last few decades to the art form I loved—in this country it’s been turned largely into moronic fodder for the adolescent male audience...we just know that film as we knew it is over."

Moronic fodder. I like that.

It might be that the moronic millennial /gen x adolescent male audience, i.e. the Kevin Smith demographic, is the only one that cares at least a bit about movies these days, so we get Project Hail Mary in the somewhat smarter end of the spectrum, and Marvel in the other....
Post Reply