Worst DVD covers... ever!

Discuss North American DVDs, Blu-rays, UHDs, and related topics
Locked
Message
Author
User avatar
The Invunche
Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 6:43 am
Location: Denmark

#776 Post by The Invunche »

manicsounds wrote:Image

Danish DVD of "Racing Stripes"
It's not Danish.
User avatar
dx23
Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 12:52 am
Location: Puerto Rico

#777 Post by dx23 »

Image
User avatar
colinr0380
Joined: Mon Nov 08, 2004 8:30 pm
Location: Chapel-en-le-Frith, Derbyshire, UK

#778 Post by colinr0380 »

Mr_sausage wrote:This is the first time I have ever seen a movie, so desperate for some kind of audience, advertise itself as "in the tradition" of the film it is clearly ripping off.

Amusingly, this movie is too good for the title The Gigantic Scorpian. No, it has to have a fancy Latin title. You have to be highbrow about these subjects.
Is the film an actual Delta Force sequel? I thought they were more concerned with terrorists, not giant scorpions? Surely in an age of international terrorism (where I guess there must be a market for the first films) this is the absolute worst time to move into sci-fi rip-offs? One producer to the other: "I've been thinking. I just don't think terrorism is high on people's list of fears at the moment - you know what would really revitalise the series? A bug - and not just any bug, a giant bug!
Matt wrote:
manicsounds wrote:Danish DVD of "Racing Stripes"
I've never wanted to see that movie more
I've never wanted to see that movie more.
User avatar
manicsounds
Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 2:58 am
Location: Tokyo, Japan

#779 Post by manicsounds »

The Invunche wrote:It's not Danish.
Where is it from? I remember seeing that DVD when I was in Denmark.....
Or was it in Holland.....
User avatar
Pinakotheca
Joined: Mon Oct 23, 2006 6:49 pm

#780 Post by Pinakotheca »

[-(
Last edited by Pinakotheca on Sat Nov 04, 2006 2:38 am, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Ashirg
Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 1:10 pm
Location: Atlanta

#781 Post by Ashirg »

Good thing you don't work there....
User avatar
Pinakotheca
Joined: Mon Oct 23, 2006 6:49 pm

#782 Post by Pinakotheca »

Probably.
User avatar
The Invunche
Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 6:43 am
Location: Denmark

#783 Post by The Invunche »

manicsounds wrote:Where is it from? I remember seeing that DVD when I was in Denmark... Or was it in Holland.
I'm not sure. I'm a bit baffled by the language on the cover. And you probably did see something very similiar to it in Denmark. I think the Danish title is "Fart Striber".
User avatar
Poncho Punch
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 6:07 pm
Location: the emerald empire

#784 Post by Poncho Punch »

Well, since the website hosting the image is DVD Host in Norway, I wouldn't be surprised if it was Norwegian.
User avatar
Ashirg
Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 1:10 pm
Location: Atlanta

#785 Post by Ashirg »

It's from Norway
User avatar
colinr0380
Joined: Mon Nov 08, 2004 8:30 pm
Location: Chapel-en-le-Frith, Derbyshire, UK

#786 Post by colinr0380 »

Those Norwegians and their crazy language!

By the way I clicked on ashirg's link and just seeing this made me want to see the film even less, if that is possible:
Vakker musikk av Sting og Bryan Adams...
It makes me wonder if there are any words in English that sound rude when people who speak other languages hear them.
User avatar
Lemmy Caution
Joined: Wed Mar 29, 2006 7:26 am
Location: East of Shanghai

#787 Post by Lemmy Caution »

colinr0380 wrote:It makes me wonder if there are any words in English that sound rude when people who speak other languages hear them.
When I say, for instance, "motherfucker" it is perceived as rude by Chinese.
Although perhaps that's not what you meant.

Was at the Dvd shops this weekend, picking up The Cardinal, The FBI Story, and 100 Men and a Girl, not to mention a back-up copy of Even Dwarfs Started Small ... and saw a bunch of winners (i.e. losers) for this thread:

Even the title of this is one is awkward: Mimic 3 - Sentinel.
Does the tagline ("Terror Has Been Re-invented") mean that this is a sequel? Or does the 3 in the title mean that this is the sequel to the sequel. In any case the lazy, formulaic horror cover is no doubt fitting.

Image

Here's another generic-looking crappy horror cover. The only thing is that the cover is probably better than both the title and the abysmal tagline.

Image
Last edited by Lemmy Caution on Sun Nov 05, 2006 5:52 am, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Lemmy Caution
Joined: Wed Mar 29, 2006 7:26 am
Location: East of Shanghai

#788 Post by Lemmy Caution »

And still more:

When I was in the store, I thought the title of this was Volcano New York. Goofy and ridiculous, but far-fetched enough to possibly amuse. But now I see that the title is actually Disaster Zone: Volcano in New York. Uh-oh, the (potential) fun has dissipated. Did they actually take this premise seriously? Here the concept is actually more ludicrous than the cover. It looks like the Empire State Building is blasting off.

Image

Well, there was also some Chinese film entitled CONTROL that had a laughably bad cover, but I can't find it on the internet. Probably this unwatched film. [Control Factor and Speed 2: Cruise Control have pretty silly covers, but not quite bad enough to be reproduced here]
User avatar
Kirkinson
Joined: Wed Dec 15, 2004 9:34 am
Location: Portland, OR

#789 Post by Kirkinson »

Disaster Zone: Volcano in New York wrote:THE NEXT POMPEII IS AN ERUPTION AWAY...
Dear lord, the tagline rhymes!
User avatar
colinr0380
Joined: Mon Nov 08, 2004 8:30 pm
Location: Chapel-en-le-Frith, Derbyshire, UK

#790 Post by colinr0380 »

Lemmy Caution wrote:When I say, for instance, "motherfucker" it is perceived as rude by Chinese.
Although perhaps that's not what you meant.
:roll: I just don't understand how something can be reinvented. So it has been invented (twice!) before and now it is being redone?
Kirkinson wrote:Dear lord, the tagline rhymes!
One that should have been used for Pearl Harbor: It makes D-Day only look like an affray!
User avatar
King of Kong
Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 11:32 pm
Location: New Zealand
Contact:

#791 Post by King of Kong »

Image

A classic, basically.
User avatar
HerrSchreck
Joined: Sun Sep 04, 2005 3:46 pm

#792 Post by HerrSchreck »

Put this thread to sleep. About six worthwhile pages out of 33!
User avatar
Mr Sausage
Has Risen from the Grave
Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 1:02 am
Location: Canada

#793 Post by Mr Sausage »

HerrSchreck wrote:Put this thread to sleep. About six worthwhile pages out of 33!
And prevent all the future fun to be hand from this thing? There are tons of awful DVD covers just waiting to be born (aborted?).
User avatar
jon
Joined: Wed Sep 06, 2006 1:03 am

#794 Post by jon »

The ugly covers aren't aborted, they are criminally born and allowed to live, Mr. Sausage. How terribly un-pc does that sound. Actually more distasteful, but meh.

But hey, good news for the future of this thread!
djali999
Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 3:41 pm
Location: Florie-dah

#795 Post by djali999 »

Perhaps we ought to at least lock this thread and start a new one at this point?
User avatar
The Invunche
Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 6:43 am
Location: Denmark

#796 Post by The Invunche »

Why?
Napoleon
Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 10:55 am

#797 Post by Napoleon »

The Invunche wrote:Why?
Because Jon has to read a thread from beginning to end. Even when there are only a couple of new posts and he read the thread yesterday he still has to go all the way through from the beginning.

Its a serious condition.
User avatar
jon
Joined: Wed Sep 06, 2006 1:03 am

#798 Post by jon »

Napoleon wrote:
The Invunche wrote:Why?
Because Jon has to read a thread from beginning to end. Even when there are only a couple of new posts and he read the thread yesterday he still has to go all the way through from the beginning.

Its a serious condition.
Tis true. Go look at the new CC Art thread.

And thank you for understanding my "condition".
User avatar
Ashirg
Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 1:10 pm
Location: Atlanta

#799 Post by Ashirg »

Because it totally misrepresents the film. Not sure who that rancher is supposed to be...

Image
User avatar
Matt
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 4:58 pm

#800 Post by Matt »

Ashirg wrote:Because it totally misrepresents the film. Not sure who that rancher is supposed to be...
Duh. It's clearly Candice Bergen.
Locked