On Five: Criterion Collection Blog
- keeproductions
- Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 6:45 pm
- Location: Minneapolis, MN
- Gigi M.
- Joined: Wed Jul 06, 2005 9:09 pm
- Location: Santo Domingo, Dominican Rep
- skuhn8
- Joined: Tue Dec 14, 2004 8:46 pm
- Location: Chico, CA
- Gigi M.
- Joined: Wed Jul 06, 2005 9:09 pm
- Location: Santo Domingo, Dominican Rep
Yeah, look for how much the older version of Playtime is selling for. Sell now.skuhn8 wrote:Sell ASAP obviously. When the new one comes out the old won't be worth squat. Crappy quality DVD to begin with.keeproductions wrote:Paid 40 bucks for mine in 1999, I wonder what's the window to still get 400 for it before the word gets out???
- justeleblanc
- Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 10:05 pm
- Location: Connecticut
I bet you can sell a bootleg for over 60. I did.Gigi M. wrote:Yeah, look for how much the older version of Playtime is selling for. Sell now.skuhn8 wrote:Sell ASAP obviously. When the new one comes out the old won't be worth squat. Crappy quality DVD to begin with.keeproductions wrote:Paid 40 bucks for mine in 1999, I wonder what's the window to still get 400 for it before the word gets out???
- Kristoffer4
- Joined: Mon Nov 15, 2004 10:55 pm
- Location: Aarhus DK
- jbeall
- Joined: Sat Aug 12, 2006 1:22 pm
- Location: Atlanta-ish
I'm with you there! I've been waiting for a re-release of Alphaville, and now that I know they have "around two dozen" films" in need of upgrades, I'm hoping (assuming, really...) that Alphaville will be one of them. All my friends are under strict orders NOT to buy Alphaville for me for Xmas.Kristoffer4 wrote:I am hoping for a rerelease of Alphaville and a release of Vivre sa vie
As for Vivre sa vie, doesn't Fox/Lorber own the rights to that dvd. I watched it and was unimpressed with the overall dvd (although I liked the film). It'd be great if criterion put this one out, but can they get the rights?
- godardslave
- Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 8:44 pm
- Location: Confusing and open ended = high art.
all he said was "we do check the forums". That could refer to any of hundreds of internet dvd or cinema forums. He mentioned none by name.adnankhan wrote:Speaking of which, Jon, (because you said you read us) may be you can quell the clamor by giving us your Salo-like definitive answer on the status of aforementioned mini-masterpieces in your next blog entry. Thank you.Jeff wrote:I hope that none of you punk-ass kids respond to their openness and generosity by flooding their inboxes with odes to Bottle Rocket and The Game.
- Cinephrenic
- Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 6:58 pm
- Location: Paris, Texas
-
ianungstad
- Joined: Thu Mar 17, 2005 1:20 am
-
Napoleon
- Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 10:55 am
It is so far unprecedented for them to re-release a disc that has a decent anamorphic transfer of the fill-length film, so that leaves:
High and Low, Diabolique, Cleo From 9 to 5, Kwaiden, Autumn Sonata, Walkabout, Picnic at Hanging Rock, Seventh Seal (acceptable, but can be improved, and I suspect that this is a big, big film as far the cc are concerned), Rublev, The 2 early Suzukis, Black Narcissus (good at the time but since eclipsed), Nights Of Cabiria, Salo, *Naked Kiss, *Schock Corridor.
If cc gave my the choice of which I'd most like to be given a super-duper re-release I'd go for for Walkabout, Rublev and Cleo (well actually I'd go for Red Shoes, Blimp and Peeping Tom, but I'm not sure that good masters exist for these just yet, so they don't enter the equation).
*Forget this two.
High and Low, Diabolique, Cleo From 9 to 5, Kwaiden, Autumn Sonata, Walkabout, Picnic at Hanging Rock, Seventh Seal (acceptable, but can be improved, and I suspect that this is a big, big film as far the cc are concerned), Rublev, The 2 early Suzukis, Black Narcissus (good at the time but since eclipsed), Nights Of Cabiria, Salo, *Naked Kiss, *Schock Corridor.
If cc gave my the choice of which I'd most like to be given a super-duper re-release I'd go for for Walkabout, Rublev and Cleo (well actually I'd go for Red Shoes, Blimp and Peeping Tom, but I'm not sure that good masters exist for these just yet, so they don't enter the equation).
*Forget this two.
Last edited by Napoleon on Thu Nov 23, 2006 11:30 am, edited 1 time in total.
- Le Samouraï
- Joined: Mon May 08, 2006 10:51 am
- Location: Denmark
- fdm
- Joined: Fri Apr 21, 2006 5:25 pm
My reissue preference would be for the non-anamorphic 2.35:1 (approx) titles to get the treatment first. Quite annoying having to watch one of these in 4:3 mode on a widescreen TV because the subtitles aren't readable otherwise.
So, for me: Andrei Rublev, Branded To Kill, High And Low, Tokyo Drifter
Sanjuro and Yojimbo are about to be saved.
So, for me: Andrei Rublev, Branded To Kill, High And Low, Tokyo Drifter
Sanjuro and Yojimbo are about to be saved.
- mezcla
- Joined: Thu Apr 06, 2006 5:40 pm
agreed. i have a 30" 16:9 tv and having to watch these in 4x3 mode makes me lose a lot of screen space. i have put off watching yojimbo and sanjuro for that very reason.My reissue preference would be for the non-anamorphic 2.35:1 (approx) titles to get the treatment first. Quite annoying having to watch one of these in 4:3 mode on a widescreen TV because the subtitles aren't readable otherwise.
- MichaelB
- Joined: Fri Aug 11, 2006 10:20 pm
- Location: Worthing
- Contact:
Andrei Rublev seems to be the most urgent of these - not least because neither version has had a truly satisfying DVD release yet!
And a definitive edition really needs to include both cuts, as there's no consensus on which is the best version. The 205-minute cut came first, and Tarkovsky made the 185-minute cut under some duress - but it's also undoubtedly true that several sequences in the shorter cut feel tighter and flow more effectively. Put it like this: I'm glad to have had the chance to see the longer version, but if I personally had to choose just one, it would be the later cut.
(The 140-minute cut can be quietly brushed under the carpet - I don't think anyone wants to see that abomination revived!)
And a definitive edition really needs to include both cuts, as there's no consensus on which is the best version. The 205-minute cut came first, and Tarkovsky made the 185-minute cut under some duress - but it's also undoubtedly true that several sequences in the shorter cut feel tighter and flow more effectively. Put it like this: I'm glad to have had the chance to see the longer version, but if I personally had to choose just one, it would be the later cut.
(The 140-minute cut can be quietly brushed under the carpet - I don't think anyone wants to see that abomination revived!)
- Matt
- Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 4:58 pm
Hey, folks. What say we move our random speculation to the... oh, I dunno... random speculation thread?
- Morbii
- Joined: Sat Nov 27, 2004 7:38 am
I found out about these forums from him...godardslave wrote:all he said was "we do check the forums". That could refer to any of hundreds of internet dvd or cinema forums. He mentioned none by name.adnankhan wrote:Speaking of which, Jon, (because you said you read us) may be you can quell the clamor by giving us your Salo-like definitive answer on the status of aforementioned mini-masterpieces in your next blog entry. Thank you.Jeff wrote:I hope that none of you punk-ass kids respond to their openness and generosity by flooding their inboxes with odes to Bottle Rocket and The Game.
- godardslave
- Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 8:44 pm
- Location: Confusing and open ended = high art.
-
Cinesimilitude
- Joined: Tue Jul 09, 2013 4:43 am
This is semi-unrelated, but I googled "criterion forum" and we came up first (with .com a few results after), but one of the other results was interesting...
This thread makes me laugh.
This thread makes me laugh.
- godardslave
- Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 8:44 pm
- Location: Confusing and open ended = high art.
from 1st post:SncDthMnky wrote:This is semi-unrelated, but I googled "criterion forum" and we came up first (with .com a few results after), but one of the other results was interesting...
This thread makes me laugh.
A disturbingly accurate summary of our forum!Pretty interesting & informed, if often a little stuffy, group of people post there on a regular basis
- colinr0380
- Joined: Mon Nov 08, 2004 8:30 pm
- Location: Chapel-en-le-Frith, Derbyshire, UK
godardslave wrote:from 1st post:
A disturbingly accurate summary of our forum!Pretty interesting & informed, if often a little stuffy, group of people post there on a regular basis
I agree with godardslave - they seem to know our characters quite well!The only real problem is when people start being asshats and have to be slapped around a bit.