Page 1 of 2

Shine a Light (Martin Scorsese, 2008)

Posted: Mon Aug 13, 2007 6:04 pm
by foggy eyes

Posted: Tue Aug 14, 2007 12:54 am
by exte
Yet another fantastic interview. Thank you so much for this, honestly...

Posted: Thu Aug 16, 2007 2:15 am
by Jeff

Posted: Thu Aug 16, 2007 3:37 am
by Highway 61
Looks great, especially the B&W. The nerd in me is psyched for the Mick & Marty banter.

Posted: Thu Aug 16, 2007 3:58 am
by Antoine Doinel
As much as I love Scorsese, and as much as I love classic-era Stones (hell, I even played in a damn cover band), it's certainly disheartening to see the likes of this once culturally influential band prancing around on stage with Christina Aguilera with Bill Clinton in the audience. Ugh.

I just wonder if they'll use subtitles whenever Keef speaks ;)

Posted: Thu Aug 16, 2007 4:55 am
by flyonthewall2983
What'd you play?

Posted: Thu Aug 16, 2007 4:58 am
by Antoine Doinel
I played guitar and sang lead. The band only ever got to one show, but as I recall the songs we played included "Jumping Jack Flash", "Happy", "Love In Vain" and "Brown Sugar".

Posted: Thu Aug 16, 2007 6:31 am
by rs98762001
According to that interview, Martin Scorsese likes David Gray. Boy, that's depressing, but maybe an insight into why his narrative films over the last ten years have been so bland. Yes, I think I'll blame David Gray.

Posted: Thu Aug 16, 2007 6:48 am
by Highway 61
Antoine Doinel wrote:it's certainly disheartening to see the likes of this once culturally influential band prancing around on stage with Christina Aguilera with Bill Clinton in the audience. Ugh.

Yes, nothing has tainted this great band's reputation more than 30+ years of Mick's failed attempts to appeal to a young audience with half-assed pop. While I still love the band, I'd almost rather see a documentary about how such a hugely successful musician/businessman--whose top priority is keeping in touch with his audience--has managed to be out of touch for so long. It's amazing, really. Dylan, Springsteen, McCartney, Prince, etc. have all rejuvenated their critical and commercial standing with back-to-basics albums, yet Mick is still in a mid-life crisis.

Posted: Thu Aug 16, 2007 8:36 am
by Jeff
Ugh. It's been pushed to 2008.

Posted: Thu Aug 16, 2007 7:08 pm
by TedW
Highway 61 wrote:
Antoine Doinel wrote:it's certainly disheartening to see the likes of this once culturally influential band prancing around on stage with Christina Aguilera with Bill Clinton in the audience. Ugh.

Yes, nothing has tainted this great band's reputation more than 30+ years of Mick's failed attempts to appeal to a young audience with half-assed pop. While I still love the band, I'd almost rather see a documentary about how such a hugely successful musician/businessman--whose top priority is keeping in touch with his audience--has managed to be out of touch for so long. It's amazing, really. Dylan, Springsteen, McCartney, Prince, etc. have all rejuvenated their critical and commercial standing with back-to-basics albums, yet Mick is still in a mid-life crisis.
I'd say he's kept in touch with his audience pretty good. The Stones are currently winding down the most successful tour in the history of rock and roll, the album for which is pretty back to basics, was well-reviewed, and is actually pretty good. Christina Aguilera I can do without, however.

Posted: Thu Aug 16, 2007 7:31 pm
by Highway 61
That's all very true. But then again, The Stones have been doing all that since Steal Wheels twenty years ago. You could set your watch to it. I just wish they could pull off one last album worthy of their 60s/70s material, not another "well, it's the best since Some Girls" album. But it'll never happen.

Posted: Thu Aug 16, 2007 8:04 pm
by Antoine Doinel
I agree. I actually wish Keith Richards would do some more solo albums, because his solo material is exceptionally strong and blows most post-70s Stones' stuff right out of the water.

Posted: Fri Aug 17, 2007 2:23 am
by TedW
Highway 61 wrote:Looks great, especially the B&W. The nerd in me is psyched for the Mick & Marty banter.
Richardson is the cinematographer; but of note is the fact that his stature, Scorsese's stature, and the Stones' stature got a number of world-class cinematographers to agree to operate cameras for the concert. Stuart Dryburgh, Emmanuel Lubezki, Ellen Kuras, Andrew Lesnie, Robert Elswit and others actually came on for an evening of camerawork, which should be fun to watch.

Posted: Fri Aug 17, 2007 7:48 pm
by BWilson
Will this be released theatrically?

Posted: Fri Aug 17, 2007 7:52 pm
by TedW
Look up five posts.

Posted: Sat Aug 18, 2007 8:09 pm
by Highway 61
TedW wrote:Richardson is the cinematographer; but of note is the fact that his stature, Scorsese's stature, and the Stones' stature got a number of world-class cinematographers to agree to operate cameras for the concert. Stuart Dryburgh, Emmanuel Lubezki, Ellen Kuras, Andrew Lesnie, Robert Elswit and others actually came on for an evening of camerawork, which should be fun to watch.
How did I miss this bit of news? That's fantastic.

Posted: Fri Aug 24, 2007 2:39 am
by Jeff
Trailer again: bigger, better, higher-deffer.

Posted: Fri Aug 24, 2007 7:30 pm
by miless
Highway 61 wrote:
TedW wrote:Richardson is the cinematographer; but of note is the fact that his stature, Scorsese's stature, and the Stones' stature got a number of world-class cinematographers to agree to operate cameras for the concert. Stuart Dryburgh, Emmanuel Lubezki, Ellen Kuras, Andrew Lesnie, Robert Elswit and others actually came on for an evening of camerawork, which should be fun to watch.
How did I miss this bit of news? That's fantastic.
I wonder if Lubezki is responsible for the B&W hand-held stuff (as no-one does hand-held quite like Emmanuel)

Posted: Tue Jan 15, 2008 11:07 pm
by Antoine Doinel
Shine A Light to open 58th Berlinale.

Posted: Fri Mar 07, 2008 2:43 am
by Antoine Doinel
The Stones edited their more provocative lyrics for the film.

Posted: Tue Apr 01, 2008 11:04 pm
by lacritfan
TedW wrote:Richardson is the cinematographer; but of note is the fact that his stature, Scorsese's stature, and the Stones' stature got a number of world-class cinematographers to agree to operate cameras for the concert. Stuart Dryburgh, Emmanuel Lubezki, Ellen Kuras, Andrew Lesnie, Robert Elswit and others actually came on for an evening of camerawork, which should be fun to watch.
Don't forget John Toll.

Posted: Wed Apr 02, 2008 1:09 am
by exte
So is the IMAX version the necessary viewing setting here? I'd really like not to trek out if I don't have to...

Posted: Thu Apr 03, 2008 1:17 am
by Svevan
According to Variety, Albert Maysles shot the "backstage moments." I assume that means he's responsible for the black and white stuff, which looks much more interesting than the actual concert (however beautiful).

Posted: Thu Apr 03, 2008 2:45 am
by Saarijas
Svevan wrote:According to Variety, Albert Maysles shot the "backstage moments." I assume that means he's responsible for the black and white stuff, which looks much more interesting than the actual concert (however beautiful).
I am afraid your very right that the back stage stuff was much more interesting. Now if only the backstage stuff had lasted more then 20 minutes...