Worst DVD covers... ever!

Discuss North American DVDs, Blu-rays, UHDs, and related topics
Locked
Message
Author
User avatar
denti alligator
Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 1:36 am
Location: "born in heaven, raised in hell"

#1001 Post by denti alligator »

alandau wrote:Finally had a real look at it, and not impressed.

Image
"Not impressed" is a far cry from "worst ever."
User avatar
skuhn8
Joined: Tue Dec 14, 2004 8:46 pm
Location: Chico, CA

#1002 Post by skuhn8 »

alandau, you meant to post here obviously.
User avatar
souvenir
Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 4:20 pm

#1003 Post by souvenir »

dx23 wrote:Image
And for the Forest Whitaker wearing glasses in straight-to-DVD trash hopefully he won't be doing now that he has an Oscar combo:

Image
User avatar
cgray
Joined: Wed Aug 10, 2005 6:21 pm
Location: Erie, CO

#1004 Post by cgray »

Image
User avatar
colinr0380
Joined: Mon Nov 08, 2004 8:30 pm
Location: Chapel-en-le-Frith, Derbyshire, UK

#1005 Post by colinr0380 »

cgray wrote:Image
I wonder if this is an attempt to make up for the damage that Boat Trip did?

Is that meant to be a rainbow or effluent streaming out of the back of that ship? Why do so many people on cruise ships seem to come down with food poisoning - at least in films? Perhaps it is an easy way of making a crisis worse..."Captain we are taking on water, there are only two lifeboats and to make things worse half the crew have eaten the shrimp!"

And why does the person singing in the bottom left corner remind me of the Grand Duke from And The Ship Sailed On?

Image
User avatar
dx23
Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 12:52 am
Location: Puerto Rico

#1006 Post by dx23 »

Image
patrick
Joined: Sun Mar 11, 2007 4:15 pm
Location: Philadelphia

#1007 Post by patrick »

maybe not the worst, but completely unnecessary...

Image
User avatar
domino harvey
Dot Com Dom
Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 6:42 pm

#1008 Post by domino harvey »

As someone on the DVD Talk board pointed out, the "squad" apparently consists of one person.
patrick
Joined: Sun Mar 11, 2007 4:15 pm
Location: Philadelphia

#1009 Post by patrick »

Another crappy repackaging, they might as well have labeled it "Fun & Flirty":

Image

What is it with studios and loud primary colors these days?

(By the way, I feel a little embarrassed mentioning how much I like this movie, but the Tom Hanks director's cut makes it feel like it's been dragged out to epic length).
User avatar
colinr0380
Joined: Mon Nov 08, 2004 8:30 pm
Location: Chapel-en-le-Frith, Derbyshire, UK

#1010 Post by colinr0380 »

patrick wrote:(By the way, I feel a little embarrassed mentioning how much I like this movie, but the Tom Hanks director's cut makes it feel like it's been dragged out to epic length).
How much has been added to it? I remember liking it when I saw it on television, and it always helps in these films for the band to have a catchy song they are always having to play!
User avatar
domino harvey
Dot Com Dom
Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 6:42 pm

#1011 Post by domino harvey »

about an hour believe it or not!
User avatar
colinr0380
Joined: Mon Nov 08, 2004 8:30 pm
Location: Chapel-en-le-Frith, Derbyshire, UK

#1012 Post by colinr0380 »

Yikes! I'm not sure if I like the film that much!
User avatar
Fletch F. Fletch
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 7:54 pm
Location: Provo, Utah

#1013 Post by Fletch F. Fletch »

domino harvey wrote:about an hour believe it or not!
39 minutes, I believe. Yeah, the extra scenes actually hurt the film so I'm glad they included the theatrical cut as well.

I too admit that this film is a guilty pleasure. Kind of the whitebread flipside to Dreamgirls?
patrick
Joined: Sun Mar 11, 2007 4:15 pm
Location: Philadelphia

#1014 Post by patrick »

39 minutes doesn't surprise me, it felt even longer. The original cut is snappy and quickly paced, and after watching Hanks' director's cut (which I suppose in this case just meant he added every last bit of footage that was removed back in) I think the pacing of the theatrical version is part of what makes it so likeable. I didn't mind the added musical scenes though.
User avatar
miless
Joined: Sun Apr 02, 2006 1:45 am

#1015 Post by miless »

dx23 wrote:Image
Wha? John Waters? Mel Gibson? Attack Force (Z or 2?)?
I sure hope that Gibson eats a pile of shit.
User avatar
Ashirg
Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 1:10 pm
Location: Atlanta

#1016 Post by Ashirg »

User avatar
jbeall
Joined: Sat Aug 12, 2006 1:22 pm
Location: Atlanta-ish

#1017 Post by jbeall »

This one's pretty awful:

Image

The lettering reminds me of the Harry Potter dvds, and it looks like the movie is intended to be in the children's section, when in fact the movie is about... fascism! Hardly appropriate viewing material for your elementary schoolers...
patrick
Joined: Sun Mar 11, 2007 4:15 pm
Location: Philadelphia

#1018 Post by patrick »

Yeah, it's kind of a shame that the 1-disc gets the nice Optimum-esque art, and the 2-disc is stuck with that really busy cover. Still, I don't think either are, say, "The Fountain" bad.
User avatar
Matt
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 4:58 pm

Re:

#1019 Post by Matt »

Rufus T. Firefly wrote: Sun Sep 17, 2006 11:43 amImage
"Up the Streisand Box"????
I just saw this image again as the thumbnail for the film on Tubi and had a good old LOL
Locked