But, it does indicate there are more extras to come. Possibly and hopefully, her shorts.rrenault wrote:But either way, the extras on La Cienaga are rather slight for a 40 dollar MSRP, but I'll buy it anyway probably. Stunning film. What matters is it'll be available in 1080p.
Forthcoming Lists Discussion and Random Speculation Vol. 6
- FrauBlucher
- Joined: Tue Jul 16, 2013 12:28 am
- Location: Greenwich Village
Re: Forthcoming Lists Discussion and Random Speculation Vol.
- hearthesilence
- Joined: Fri Mar 04, 2005 8:22 am
- Location: NYC
Re: Forthcoming Lists Discussion and Random Speculation Vol.
BUT, they need to splice in the scene where Pat Garrett visits his wife. Again, I'm baffled why it was left out, especially when it's explained in the commentary why it should've been re-instated.Bruce wrote:Provided they do the right version, i.e. the 1988 Turner preview version, and not that monstrosity of a 2005 special edition.flyonthewall2983 wrote:Pat Garrett & Billy The Kid would be incredible. One of my favorite Westerns.
The 1988 Turner preview version is really Peckinpah's personal cut and print of the film. Somewhere down the line, Peckinpah cut out the scene where Pat Garrett visits his wife, not to delete it from his print, but because he wanted it shown (either for a particular exhibition or for television, I forgot which). This scene never made it back into his print, he died before that could happen, and it's unfortunate because that print was then taken as the source for the film's re-release in 1988, and no one involved thought (or perhaps knew) to retrieve that scene and put it back in. It was included in the much-maligned 2005 cut, so it's not like it's lost. It would be very, very easy to cut it back into Peckinpah's print where it originated and where it belongs, but no one's done it yet.
-
rrenault
- Joined: Wed Nov 17, 2010 7:49 pm
Re: Forthcoming Lists Discussion and Random Speculation Vol.
Any chance of Deprisa, Deprisa or Scattered Clouds ever getting a physical release?
- ryannichols7
- Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2012 6:26 pm
Re: Forthcoming Lists Discussion and Random Speculation Vol.
yep. I'm sure he'd skip over the ending (totally reasonable) but I would love to hear him talk about the film at length. cast interviews are always welcome too as those are both absent from the current BDs (though Boogie Nights has the cast commentary)flyonthewall2983 wrote:I think PTA said in an interview awhile back he was reconsidering audio commentaries, so maybe he'd do one for Magnolia and it would give Criterion a good chance to jump on it, as it's not a title I'd imagine they'd want to re-release.
but otherwise yeah there's no point for either movie, Hard Eight and Punch Drunk Love are both far more in need.
-
Bruce
- Joined: Wed Dec 30, 2009 10:14 am
Re: Forthcoming Lists Discussion and Random Speculation Vol.
Yes, agreed!hearthesilence wrote:BUT, they need to splice in the scene where Pat Garrett visits his wife. Again, I'm baffled why it was left out, especially when it's explained in the commentary why it should've been re-instated.Bruce wrote:Provided they do the right version, i.e. the 1988 Turner preview version, and not that monstrosity of a 2005 special edition.flyonthewall2983 wrote:Pat Garrett & Billy The Kid would be incredible. One of my favorite Westerns.
The 1988 Turner preview version is really Peckinpah's personal cut and print of the film. Somewhere down the line, Peckinpah cut out the scene where Pat Garrett visits his wife, not to delete it from his print, but because he wanted it shown (either for a particular exhibition or for television, I forgot which). This scene never made it back into his print, he died before that could happen, and it's unfortunate because that print was then taken as the source for the film's re-release in 1988, and no one involved thought (or perhaps knew) to retrieve that scene and put it back in. It was included in the much-maligned 2005 cut, so it's not like it's lost. It would be very, very easy to cut it back into Peckinpah's print where it originated and where it belongs, but no one's done it yet.
- John Hodson
- Joined: Wed Jan 17, 2007 6:25 pm
- Location: Near dark satanic mills...
- Contact:
Re: Forthcoming Lists Discussion and Random Speculation Vol.
Yes, agreed again; I honestly don't get the 2005 cut, particularly coming from such a source. It's filled with bizarre - stupefying - editorial decisions.
- Forrest Taft
- Joined: Fri Mar 16, 2007 12:34 am
- Location: Stavanger, Norway
Re: Forthcoming Lists Discussion and Random Speculation Vol.
Should Criterion release it, I hope they also include the theatrical cut, if only to satisfy my curiosity. Has it Ever been releasen on video?
- aox
- Joined: Fri Jun 20, 2008 4:02 pm
- Location: nYc
Re: Forthcoming Lists Discussion and Random Speculation Vol.
Sorry I am late to the party, but I noticed A Taste of Cherry is up on Hulu. That means we can expect an announcement in the next we months?
- warren oates
- Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2012 4:16 pm
Re: Forthcoming Lists Discussion and Random Speculation Vol.
I don't know. The master that's up doesn't appear to be in HD.
- Toby Dammit
- Joined: Tue Sep 02, 2008 2:03 pm
- Location: Santiago de Chile
Re: Forthcoming Lists Discussion and Random Speculation Vol.
Any chance por any Mauro Bolognini's movie??
Il Bell' Antonio
La Viaccia
L' Ereditá Ferramonti
Il Bell' Antonio

La Viaccia

L' Ereditá Ferramonti

- NABOB OF NOWHERE
- Joined: Thu Sep 01, 2005 4:30 pm
- Location: Brandywine River
Re: Forthcoming Lists Discussion and Random Speculation Vol.
Mosfilm / Baba Yaga restoration playing now at Lumiere Festival LyonDrucker wrote:Last year I believe they mentioned Rublev is still a huge mess. Sounded like a proper restoration wasn't even planned, and it's going to need a lot of work.Gregory wrote:It would've been nice if someone had asked about Andrei Rublev instead of wasting time talking about things like whether Tootsie belongs in the Collection or not.
Excited about Warners, obviously. Hopefully things like Shop Around the Corner could be coming.
http://www.festival-lumiere.org/manifes ... ublev.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
- swo17
- Bloodthirsty Butcher
- Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2008 2:25 pm
- Location: SLC, UT
Re: Forthcoming Lists Discussion and Random Speculation Vol.
That looks like the same shorter cut that's been out on Blu for years now.
- Gregory
- Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 8:07 pm
Re: Forthcoming Lists Discussion and Random Speculation Vol.
Maybe that wasn't the best example, but I could think of quite a few things I would have rather seen them get asked. Another could have been the reasons why some of the box sets have dropped out of print and if they'll be available again in the foreseeable future.
- jwd5275
- Joined: Tue Jun 08, 2010 4:26 pm
- Location: SF, CA
Re: Forthcoming Lists Discussion and Random Speculation Vol.
What we really need to come out of this Warner Bros deal is those few silents that seem too big and influential for Warners to relegate to the Archive, but seem to have no interest in giving a proper release on their own. I am specifically thinking about King Vidor's The Crowd and Sjostrom's films with Lillian Gish, The Wind and The Scarlet Letter. I would think these would be near the top of Criterion's list.
Last edited by jwd5275 on Mon Oct 20, 2014 2:54 pm, edited 2 times in total.
- Drucker
- Your Future our Drucker
- Joined: Wed May 18, 2011 1:37 pm
Re: Forthcoming Lists Discussion and Random Speculation Vol.
Agreed of course! I really wonder how the Big Parade fared sales-wise. They mentioned that the status of the above (and Greed) would depend on how Big Parade sold.
There's also the frame-rate issue on BP, so it would be great if that could get fixed with anything that ends up coming out.
There's also the frame-rate issue on BP, so it would be great if that could get fixed with anything that ends up coming out.
- jwd5275
- Joined: Tue Jun 08, 2010 4:26 pm
- Location: SF, CA
Re: Forthcoming Lists Discussion and Random Speculation Vol.
Completely forgot that Greed is Warners too and therefore would also fall into that category...
I doubt Big Parade sold very well (though I did my best to help the efforts through my purchase), that is why Criterion releases might be the best of both worlds for Warners. They would save face by not dumping them into the archive and allowing them to come out in great editions, while all the long only having to put minimal effort into it.
I doubt Big Parade sold very well (though I did my best to help the efforts through my purchase), that is why Criterion releases might be the best of both worlds for Warners. They would save face by not dumping them into the archive and allowing them to come out in great editions, while all the long only having to put minimal effort into it.
- Drucker
- Your Future our Drucker
- Joined: Wed May 18, 2011 1:37 pm
Re: Forthcoming Lists Discussion and Random Speculation Vol.
Even if they are reluctant to fish it out to a third-party...the blu-ray arm of the Warner Archive seems to be putting out a really excellent product. If that's what it takes to get these films on blu, so be it.
Also, let's not forget The Cameraman which I believe would have to be a high candidate for release. Or I'd like to believe, at least.
Also, let's not forget The Cameraman which I believe would have to be a high candidate for release. Or I'd like to believe, at least.
- captveg
- Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 11:28 pm
Re: Forthcoming Lists Discussion and Random Speculation Vol.
Would be a great way to get Keaton in the collection properly (not counting Chaplin's Limelight).Drucker wrote:Also, let's not forget The Cameraman which I believe would have to be a high candidate for release. Or I'd like to believe, at least.
- swo17
- Bloodthirsty Butcher
- Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2008 2:25 pm
- Location: SLC, UT
Re: Forthcoming Lists Discussion and Random Speculation Vol.
For the record, I'm not counting It's a Mad Mad Mad Mad World either.
- captveg
- Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 11:28 pm
Re: Forthcoming Lists Discussion and Random Speculation Vol.
I do count that for Jimmy Durante, though.
- FrauBlucher
- Joined: Tue Jul 16, 2013 12:28 am
- Location: Greenwich Village
Re: Forthcoming Lists Discussion and Random Speculation Vol.
captveg wrote:Would be a great way to get Keaton in the collection properly (not counting Chaplin's Limelight).Drucker wrote:Also, let's not forget The Cameraman which I believe would have to be a high candidate for release. Or I'd like to believe, at least.
It's a Mad Mad Mad Mad World is in the Collection. Ugh. When did that happen?swo17 wrote:For the record, I'm not counting It's a Mad Mad Mad Mad World either.
-
giovannii84
- Joined: Sat May 12, 2012 8:44 am
- Location: Melbourne, Australia
- Contact:
Re: Forthcoming Lists Discussion and Random Speculation Vol.
A Criterion release of 'Polyester' would be cool. They could include an Odorama card in the box.Raymond Marble wrote:It's my understanding that the only film that the music rights are a real issue with is Mondo Trasho. That said, I've been led to believe that it'll be near-impossible to get the proper music rights for that one again.Drucker wrote:Wouldn't it be really difficult to get the Waters' films on Blu-Ray because of music rights clearance?
- warren oates
- Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2012 4:16 pm
Re: Forthcoming Lists Discussion and Random Speculation Vol.
The New Line releases already do. I've still got mine.giovannii84 wrote:A Criterion release of 'Polyester' would be cool. They could include an Odorama card in the box.
-
Raymond Marble
- Joined: Sun Mar 30, 2014 12:48 am
Re: Forthcoming Lists Discussion and Random Speculation Vol.
The Criterion laserdisc had an Odorama card, too. I have three or so floating around the house now, which seems funny.warren oates wrote:The New Line releases already do. I've still got mine.giovannii84 wrote:A Criterion release of 'Polyester' would be cool. They could include an Odorama card in the box.
-
Numero Trois
- Joined: Sun Sep 20, 2009 9:23 am
- Location: Florida
Re: Forthcoming Lists Discussion and Random Speculation Vol.
I seriously doubt that Warner executives have the same definition of "saving face" that you do. Especially when it comes to films that only a tiny fraction of the population are interested in.jwd5275 wrote:They would save face by not dumping them into the archive and allowing them to come out in great editions