Forthcoming Lists Discussion and Random Speculation Vol. 6

News on Criterion and Janus Films
Locked
Message
Author
User avatar
FrauBlucher
Joined: Tue Jul 16, 2013 12:28 am
Location: Greenwich Village

Re: Forthcoming Lists Discussion and Random Speculation Vol.

#1776 Post by FrauBlucher »

rrenault wrote:But either way, the extras on La Cienaga are rather slight for a 40 dollar MSRP, but I'll buy it anyway probably. Stunning film. What matters is it'll be available in 1080p.
But, it does indicate there are more extras to come. Possibly and hopefully, her shorts.
User avatar
hearthesilence
Joined: Fri Mar 04, 2005 8:22 am
Location: NYC

Re: Forthcoming Lists Discussion and Random Speculation Vol.

#1777 Post by hearthesilence »

Bruce wrote:
flyonthewall2983 wrote:Pat Garrett & Billy The Kid would be incredible. One of my favorite Westerns.
Provided they do the right version, i.e. the 1988 Turner preview version, and not that monstrosity of a 2005 special edition.
BUT, they need to splice in the scene where Pat Garrett visits his wife. Again, I'm baffled why it was left out, especially when it's explained in the commentary why it should've been re-instated.

The 1988 Turner preview version is really Peckinpah's personal cut and print of the film. Somewhere down the line, Peckinpah cut out the scene where Pat Garrett visits his wife, not to delete it from his print, but because he wanted it shown (either for a particular exhibition or for television, I forgot which). This scene never made it back into his print, he died before that could happen, and it's unfortunate because that print was then taken as the source for the film's re-release in 1988, and no one involved thought (or perhaps knew) to retrieve that scene and put it back in. It was included in the much-maligned 2005 cut, so it's not like it's lost. It would be very, very easy to cut it back into Peckinpah's print where it originated and where it belongs, but no one's done it yet.
rrenault
Joined: Wed Nov 17, 2010 7:49 pm

Re: Forthcoming Lists Discussion and Random Speculation Vol.

#1778 Post by rrenault »

Any chance of Deprisa, Deprisa or Scattered Clouds ever getting a physical release?
User avatar
ryannichols7
Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2012 6:26 pm

Re: Forthcoming Lists Discussion and Random Speculation Vol.

#1779 Post by ryannichols7 »

flyonthewall2983 wrote:I think PTA said in an interview awhile back he was reconsidering audio commentaries, so maybe he'd do one for Magnolia and it would give Criterion a good chance to jump on it, as it's not a title I'd imagine they'd want to re-release.
yep. I'm sure he'd skip over the ending (totally reasonable) but I would love to hear him talk about the film at length. cast interviews are always welcome too as those are both absent from the current BDs (though Boogie Nights has the cast commentary)

but otherwise yeah there's no point for either movie, Hard Eight and Punch Drunk Love are both far more in need.
Bruce
Joined: Wed Dec 30, 2009 10:14 am

Re: Forthcoming Lists Discussion and Random Speculation Vol.

#1780 Post by Bruce »

hearthesilence wrote:
Bruce wrote:
flyonthewall2983 wrote:Pat Garrett & Billy The Kid would be incredible. One of my favorite Westerns.
Provided they do the right version, i.e. the 1988 Turner preview version, and not that monstrosity of a 2005 special edition.
BUT, they need to splice in the scene where Pat Garrett visits his wife. Again, I'm baffled why it was left out, especially when it's explained in the commentary why it should've been re-instated.

The 1988 Turner preview version is really Peckinpah's personal cut and print of the film. Somewhere down the line, Peckinpah cut out the scene where Pat Garrett visits his wife, not to delete it from his print, but because he wanted it shown (either for a particular exhibition or for television, I forgot which). This scene never made it back into his print, he died before that could happen, and it's unfortunate because that print was then taken as the source for the film's re-release in 1988, and no one involved thought (or perhaps knew) to retrieve that scene and put it back in. It was included in the much-maligned 2005 cut, so it's not like it's lost. It would be very, very easy to cut it back into Peckinpah's print where it originated and where it belongs, but no one's done it yet.
Yes, agreed!
User avatar
John Hodson
Joined: Wed Jan 17, 2007 6:25 pm
Location: Near dark satanic mills...
Contact:

Re: Forthcoming Lists Discussion and Random Speculation Vol.

#1781 Post by John Hodson »

Yes, agreed again; I honestly don't get the 2005 cut, particularly coming from such a source. It's filled with bizarre - stupefying - editorial decisions.
User avatar
Forrest Taft
Joined: Fri Mar 16, 2007 12:34 am
Location: Stavanger, Norway

Re: Forthcoming Lists Discussion and Random Speculation Vol.

#1782 Post by Forrest Taft »

Should Criterion release it, I hope they also include the theatrical cut, if only to satisfy my curiosity. Has it Ever been releasen on video?
User avatar
aox
Joined: Fri Jun 20, 2008 4:02 pm
Location: nYc

Re: Forthcoming Lists Discussion and Random Speculation Vol.

#1783 Post by aox »

Sorry I am late to the party, but I noticed A Taste of Cherry is up on Hulu. That means we can expect an announcement in the next we months?
User avatar
warren oates
Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2012 4:16 pm

Re: Forthcoming Lists Discussion and Random Speculation Vol.

#1784 Post by warren oates »

I don't know. The master that's up doesn't appear to be in HD.
User avatar
Toby Dammit
Joined: Tue Sep 02, 2008 2:03 pm
Location: Santiago de Chile

Re: Forthcoming Lists Discussion and Random Speculation Vol.

#1785 Post by Toby Dammit »

Any chance por any Mauro Bolognini's movie??

Il Bell' Antonio Image

La Viaccia Image

L' Ereditá Ferramonti Image
User avatar
NABOB OF NOWHERE
Joined: Thu Sep 01, 2005 4:30 pm
Location: Brandywine River

Re: Forthcoming Lists Discussion and Random Speculation Vol.

#1786 Post by NABOB OF NOWHERE »

Drucker wrote:
Gregory wrote:It would've been nice if someone had asked about Andrei Rublev instead of wasting time talking about things like whether Tootsie belongs in the Collection or not.
Last year I believe they mentioned Rublev is still a huge mess. Sounded like a proper restoration wasn't even planned, and it's going to need a lot of work.

Excited about Warners, obviously. Hopefully things like Shop Around the Corner could be coming.
Mosfilm / Baba Yaga restoration playing now at Lumiere Festival Lyon
http://www.festival-lumiere.org/manifes ... ublev.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
User avatar
swo17
Bloodthirsty Butcher
Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2008 2:25 pm
Location: SLC, UT

Re: Forthcoming Lists Discussion and Random Speculation Vol.

#1787 Post by swo17 »

That looks like the same shorter cut that's been out on Blu for years now.
User avatar
Gregory
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 8:07 pm

Re: Forthcoming Lists Discussion and Random Speculation Vol.

#1788 Post by Gregory »

Maybe that wasn't the best example, but I could think of quite a few things I would have rather seen them get asked. Another could have been the reasons why some of the box sets have dropped out of print and if they'll be available again in the foreseeable future.
User avatar
jwd5275
Joined: Tue Jun 08, 2010 4:26 pm
Location: SF, CA

Re: Forthcoming Lists Discussion and Random Speculation Vol.

#1789 Post by jwd5275 »

What we really need to come out of this Warner Bros deal is those few silents that seem too big and influential for Warners to relegate to the Archive, but seem to have no interest in giving a proper release on their own. I am specifically thinking about King Vidor's The Crowd and Sjostrom's films with Lillian Gish, The Wind and The Scarlet Letter. I would think these would be near the top of Criterion's list.
Last edited by jwd5275 on Mon Oct 20, 2014 2:54 pm, edited 2 times in total.
User avatar
Drucker
Your Future our Drucker
Joined: Wed May 18, 2011 1:37 pm

Re: Forthcoming Lists Discussion and Random Speculation Vol.

#1790 Post by Drucker »

Agreed of course! I really wonder how the Big Parade fared sales-wise. They mentioned that the status of the above (and Greed) would depend on how Big Parade sold.

There's also the frame-rate issue on BP, so it would be great if that could get fixed with anything that ends up coming out.
User avatar
jwd5275
Joined: Tue Jun 08, 2010 4:26 pm
Location: SF, CA

Re: Forthcoming Lists Discussion and Random Speculation Vol.

#1791 Post by jwd5275 »

Completely forgot that Greed is Warners too and therefore would also fall into that category...

I doubt Big Parade sold very well (though I did my best to help the efforts through my purchase), that is why Criterion releases might be the best of both worlds for Warners. They would save face by not dumping them into the archive and allowing them to come out in great editions, while all the long only having to put minimal effort into it.
User avatar
Drucker
Your Future our Drucker
Joined: Wed May 18, 2011 1:37 pm

Re: Forthcoming Lists Discussion and Random Speculation Vol.

#1792 Post by Drucker »

Even if they are reluctant to fish it out to a third-party...the blu-ray arm of the Warner Archive seems to be putting out a really excellent product. If that's what it takes to get these films on blu, so be it.

Also, let's not forget The Cameraman which I believe would have to be a high candidate for release. Or I'd like to believe, at least.
User avatar
captveg
Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 11:28 pm

Re: Forthcoming Lists Discussion and Random Speculation Vol.

#1793 Post by captveg »

Drucker wrote:Also, let's not forget The Cameraman which I believe would have to be a high candidate for release. Or I'd like to believe, at least.
Would be a great way to get Keaton in the collection properly (not counting Chaplin's Limelight).
User avatar
swo17
Bloodthirsty Butcher
Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2008 2:25 pm
Location: SLC, UT

Re: Forthcoming Lists Discussion and Random Speculation Vol.

#1794 Post by swo17 »

For the record, I'm not counting It's a Mad Mad Mad Mad World either.
User avatar
captveg
Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 11:28 pm

Re: Forthcoming Lists Discussion and Random Speculation Vol.

#1795 Post by captveg »

I do count that for Jimmy Durante, though.
User avatar
FrauBlucher
Joined: Tue Jul 16, 2013 12:28 am
Location: Greenwich Village

Re: Forthcoming Lists Discussion and Random Speculation Vol.

#1796 Post by FrauBlucher »

captveg wrote:
Drucker wrote:Also, let's not forget The Cameraman which I believe would have to be a high candidate for release. Or I'd like to believe, at least.
Would be a great way to get Keaton in the collection properly (not counting Chaplin's Limelight).
swo17 wrote:For the record, I'm not counting It's a Mad Mad Mad Mad World either.
It's a Mad Mad Mad Mad World is in the Collection. Ugh. When did that happen?
giovannii84
Joined: Sat May 12, 2012 8:44 am
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Contact:

Re: Forthcoming Lists Discussion and Random Speculation Vol.

#1797 Post by giovannii84 »

Raymond Marble wrote:
Drucker wrote:Wouldn't it be really difficult to get the Waters' films on Blu-Ray because of music rights clearance?
It's my understanding that the only film that the music rights are a real issue with is Mondo Trasho. That said, I've been led to believe that it'll be near-impossible to get the proper music rights for that one again.
A Criterion release of 'Polyester' would be cool. They could include an Odorama card in the box. :)
User avatar
warren oates
Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2012 4:16 pm

Re: Forthcoming Lists Discussion and Random Speculation Vol.

#1798 Post by warren oates »

giovannii84 wrote:A Criterion release of 'Polyester' would be cool. They could include an Odorama card in the box. :)
The New Line releases already do. I've still got mine.
Raymond Marble
Joined: Sun Mar 30, 2014 12:48 am

Re: Forthcoming Lists Discussion and Random Speculation Vol.

#1799 Post by Raymond Marble »

warren oates wrote:
giovannii84 wrote:A Criterion release of 'Polyester' would be cool. They could include an Odorama card in the box. :)
The New Line releases already do. I've still got mine.
The Criterion laserdisc had an Odorama card, too. I have three or so floating around the house now, which seems funny.
Numero Trois
Joined: Sun Sep 20, 2009 9:23 am
Location: Florida

Re: Forthcoming Lists Discussion and Random Speculation Vol.

#1800 Post by Numero Trois »

jwd5275 wrote:They would save face by not dumping them into the archive and allowing them to come out in great editions
I seriously doubt that Warner executives have the same definition of "saving face" that you do. Especially when it comes to films that only a tiny fraction of the population are interested in.
Locked