787 Jellyfish Eyes

Discuss releases by Criterion and the films on them. Threads may contain spoilers!
Message
Author
greekboy
Joined: Sun Mar 27, 2005 3:18 am

Re: Forthcoming: Discussion and Random Speculation Volume 7

#26 Post by greekboy »

Image
User avatar
sir_luke
Joined: Mon Nov 04, 2013 1:55 am

Re: Forthcoming: Discussion and Random Speculation Volume 7

#27 Post by sir_luke »

"Must be 21 years of age or older to attend"

Judging by the trailer, that's missing the core demo by about a decade, isn't it?
User avatar
domino harvey
Dot Com Dom
Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 6:42 pm

Re: Forthcoming: Discussion and Random Speculation Volume 7

#28 Post by domino harvey »

There could be an open bar. Would probably not want to expose others to this when sober either
User avatar
knives
Joined: Sat Sep 06, 2008 10:49 pm

Re: Forthcoming: Jellyfish Eyes

#29 Post by knives »

Given some of the artist's work 21 or older makes a lot of sense.
User avatar
gorgeousnothings
Joined: Fri Mar 20, 2015 4:29 pm

Re: Forthcoming: Jellyfish Eyes

#30 Post by gorgeousnothings »

Now available for pre-order on iTunes with an expected release date of July 15th.

I'm curious enough to rent it, but I can't get these damn itunes rentals to work on my computer for the life of me.
hollis
Joined: Wed Jul 09, 2014 6:13 pm

Re: Forthcoming: Jellyfish Eyes

#31 Post by hollis »

Not that further confirmation is necessary but this opens Gawker's interview with Murakami:
...my 30-minute discussion with Japanese visual artist Takashi Murakami and his translator Yuko Sakata earlier this week at the Criterion offices in New York. Close Criterion associate Janus Film is distributing Murakami’s first movie, Jellyfish Eyes, which Murakami was in town to promote.
ianungstad
Joined: Thu Mar 17, 2005 1:20 am

Re: Forthcoming: Jellyfish Eyes

#32 Post by ianungstad »

The reviews are starting to pour in and they are quite negative. The film is currently at 33% on RT and 34% on MC and dropping. I have no idea why Criterion went out of the way to acquire the rights to this. This is going to go down in most people's eyes as the worst title in the collection.
User avatar
knives
Joined: Sat Sep 06, 2008 10:49 pm

Re: Forthcoming: Jellyfish Eyes

#33 Post by knives »

They're probably a fan of his work. Also, a bit like Tiny Furniture, I bet it will wind up being a money maker for them.
User avatar
danieltiger
Joined: Wed Apr 16, 2014 12:48 am
Location: San Francisco, CA
Contact:

Re: Forthcoming: Jellyfish Eyes

#34 Post by danieltiger »

Worth noting that Tiny Furniture is currently at 79% on RT.
User avatar
sir_luke
Joined: Mon Nov 04, 2013 1:55 am

Re: Forthcoming: Jellyfish Eyes

#35 Post by sir_luke »

I'm just hoping it's ridiculous enough to sustain a satisfying hate-watch.
User avatar
FakeBonanza
Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2012 2:35 am

Re: Forthcoming: Jellyfish Eyes

#36 Post by FakeBonanza »

Criterion finally revisits contemporary Asian cinema, and this is what we get?
giovannii84
Joined: Sat May 12, 2012 8:44 am
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Contact:

Re: Forthcoming: Jellyfish Eyes

#37 Post by giovannii84 »

ianungstad wrote:The reviews are starting to pour in and they are quite negative. The film is currently at 33% on RT and 34% on MC and dropping. I have no idea why Criterion went out of the way to acquire the rights to this. This is going to go down in most people's eyes as the worst title in the collection.
Worse than Armageddon?
User avatar
Newsnayr
Joined: Wed Apr 01, 2015 4:54 am

Re: Forthcoming: Jellyfish Eyes

#38 Post by Newsnayr »

Or Border Radio?
User avatar
The Narrator Returns
Joined: Tue Nov 15, 2011 10:35 pm

Re: Forthcoming: Jellyfish Eyes

#39 Post by The Narrator Returns »

At least this looks memorably bad. Border Radio is like spending a five-hour car ride through nowhere sitting next to a chronic mumbler.
User avatar
cdnchris
Site Admin
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 6:45 pm
Location: Washington
Contact:

Re: Forthcoming: Jellyfish Eyes

#40 Post by cdnchris »

Sounds like my last drive through the mid section of California with my daughter, who was 2 at the time. That was still more entertaining than Border Radio.
ianungstad
Joined: Thu Mar 17, 2005 1:20 am

Re: Forthcoming: Jellyfish Eyes

#41 Post by ianungstad »

Jellyfish Eyes is now sitting at 25% on RT.
User avatar
domino harvey
Dot Com Dom
Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 6:42 pm

Re: Forthcoming: Jellyfish Eyes

#42 Post by domino harvey »

Maybe Criterion will release this sans branding, like the Red Balloon
User avatar
Gregory
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 8:07 pm

Re: Forthcoming: Jellyfish Eyes

#43 Post by Gregory »

Possibly, but at iTunes it already bears the C that is wacky.

Haven't seen it and probably won't, but having read Murkami's statements about what he was going for, it seems preachy and trite. As he told Blouin Art Info, "after the great earthquake and tsunami disasters in 2011, I realized that people need narrative — a story is something that is necessary for people."
So what is this message that people need to be told so urgently because of disasters? In a different interview (Paper magazine), he said "Masashi's uncle ... doesn't do anything throughout the movie, he just tells children to do stuff and then leaves it to them. ... That's an example, but all the adults in the film are like that. The school teacher can't stop the bullying, the parents are actually hitting their own children, and so I was trying to emphasize that the adults are useless and that they don't have any power. Even so, the message is that the children need to find their own way and they need to go forward."
So that's it? Don't trust anyone over 30, or something like that? There's also the whole narrative about exploiting negative emotions as an energy source? The idea seems to be that negative emotions are bad and that children need things that foster positive emotions? Brilliant.
lefeufollet
Joined: Thu Nov 01, 2012 1:54 pm
Location: Philadelphia

Re: Forthcoming: Jellyfish Eyes

#44 Post by lefeufollet »

The iTunes edition of The Red Balloon is likewise graced with a C.
User avatar
djproject
Joined: Sat Oct 09, 2010 7:41 pm
Location: Framingham, MA
Contact:

Re: Forthcoming: Jellyfish Eyes

#45 Post by djproject »

Gregory wrote:Haven't seen it and probably won't, but having read Murkami's statements about what he was going for, it seems preachy and trite. As he told Blouin Art Info, "after the great earthquake and tsunami disasters in 2011, I realized that people need narrative — a story is something that is necessary for people."
So what is this message that people need to be told so urgently because of disasters? In a different interview (Paper magazine), he said "Masashi's uncle ... doesn't do anything throughout the movie, he just tells children to do stuff and then leaves it to them. ... That's an example, but all the adults in the film are like that. The school teacher can't stop the bullying, the parents are actually hitting their own children, and so I was trying to emphasize that the adults are useless and that they don't have any power. Even so, the message is that the children need to find their own way and they need to go forward."
So that's it? Don't trust anyone over 30, or something like that? There's also the whole narrative about exploiting negative emotions as an energy source? The idea seems to be that negative emotions are bad and that children need things that foster positive emotions? Brilliant.
This just makes me want to see Kaze no tani no Naushika or Sen to Chihiro no Kamikakushi again.

(You all are resourceful enough to figure this out. At least I didn't use kanji or hiragana renderings =D )
User avatar
danieltiger
Joined: Wed Apr 16, 2014 12:48 am
Location: San Francisco, CA
Contact:

Re: Forthcoming: Jellyfish Eyes

#46 Post by danieltiger »

If Criterion ever got their hands on the Miyazaki movies, I think I'd lose my shit a little bit.
User avatar
Michael Kerpan
Spelling Bee Champeen
Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 5:20 pm
Location: New England
Contact:

Re: Forthcoming: Jellyfish Eyes

#47 Post by Michael Kerpan »

If only Criterion would rescue Takahata's Omohide poro poro (Only Yesterday) from Disney -- which clearly never plans to release it itself in the US.
Polaroid
Joined: Sat Dec 07, 2013 9:55 pm

Re: Forthcoming: Jellyfish Eyes

#48 Post by Polaroid »

This film is pretty bad, managed to see it and I would say its worse than Armageddon. No idea why Criterion would touch this, I am struggling to see any skill in the film making.
User avatar
domino harvey
Dot Com Dom
Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 6:42 pm

Re: Forthcoming: Jellyfish Eyes

#49 Post by domino harvey »

Trailer for Jellyfish Eyes 2
My God, why hast thou forsaken us?
Self
Joined: Fri Apr 25, 2014 1:36 am

Re: 787 Jellyfish Eyes

#50 Post by Self »

Consolation- its priced at $29.95
Post Reply