
787 Jellyfish Eyes
-
greekboy
- Joined: Sun Mar 27, 2005 3:18 am
- sir_luke
- Joined: Mon Nov 04, 2013 1:55 am
Re: Forthcoming: Discussion and Random Speculation Volume 7
"Must be 21 years of age or older to attend"
Judging by the trailer, that's missing the core demo by about a decade, isn't it?
Judging by the trailer, that's missing the core demo by about a decade, isn't it?
- domino harvey
- Dot Com Dom
- Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 6:42 pm
Re: Forthcoming: Discussion and Random Speculation Volume 7
There could be an open bar. Would probably not want to expose others to this when sober either
- knives
- Joined: Sat Sep 06, 2008 10:49 pm
Re: Forthcoming: Jellyfish Eyes
Given some of the artist's work 21 or older makes a lot of sense.
- gorgeousnothings
- Joined: Fri Mar 20, 2015 4:29 pm
Re: Forthcoming: Jellyfish Eyes
Now available for pre-order on iTunes with an expected release date of July 15th.
I'm curious enough to rent it, but I can't get these damn itunes rentals to work on my computer for the life of me.
I'm curious enough to rent it, but I can't get these damn itunes rentals to work on my computer for the life of me.
-
hollis
- Joined: Wed Jul 09, 2014 6:13 pm
Re: Forthcoming: Jellyfish Eyes
Not that further confirmation is necessary but this opens Gawker's interview with Murakami:
...my 30-minute discussion with Japanese visual artist Takashi Murakami and his translator Yuko Sakata earlier this week at the Criterion offices in New York. Close Criterion associate Janus Film is distributing Murakami’s first movie, Jellyfish Eyes, which Murakami was in town to promote.
-
ianungstad
- Joined: Thu Mar 17, 2005 1:20 am
Re: Forthcoming: Jellyfish Eyes
The reviews are starting to pour in and they are quite negative. The film is currently at 33% on RT and 34% on MC and dropping. I have no idea why Criterion went out of the way to acquire the rights to this. This is going to go down in most people's eyes as the worst title in the collection.
- knives
- Joined: Sat Sep 06, 2008 10:49 pm
Re: Forthcoming: Jellyfish Eyes
They're probably a fan of his work. Also, a bit like Tiny Furniture, I bet it will wind up being a money maker for them.
- danieltiger
- Joined: Wed Apr 16, 2014 12:48 am
- Location: San Francisco, CA
- Contact:
Re: Forthcoming: Jellyfish Eyes
Worth noting that Tiny Furniture is currently at 79% on RT.
- sir_luke
- Joined: Mon Nov 04, 2013 1:55 am
Re: Forthcoming: Jellyfish Eyes
I'm just hoping it's ridiculous enough to sustain a satisfying hate-watch.
- FakeBonanza
- Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2012 2:35 am
Re: Forthcoming: Jellyfish Eyes
Criterion finally revisits contemporary Asian cinema, and this is what we get?
-
giovannii84
- Joined: Sat May 12, 2012 8:44 am
- Location: Melbourne, Australia
- Contact:
Re: Forthcoming: Jellyfish Eyes
Worse than Armageddon?ianungstad wrote:The reviews are starting to pour in and they are quite negative. The film is currently at 33% on RT and 34% on MC and dropping. I have no idea why Criterion went out of the way to acquire the rights to this. This is going to go down in most people's eyes as the worst title in the collection.
- The Narrator Returns
- Joined: Tue Nov 15, 2011 10:35 pm
Re: Forthcoming: Jellyfish Eyes
At least this looks memorably bad. Border Radio is like spending a five-hour car ride through nowhere sitting next to a chronic mumbler.
- cdnchris
- Site Admin
- Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 6:45 pm
- Location: Washington
- Contact:
Re: Forthcoming: Jellyfish Eyes
Sounds like my last drive through the mid section of California with my daughter, who was 2 at the time. That was still more entertaining than Border Radio.
-
ianungstad
- Joined: Thu Mar 17, 2005 1:20 am
Re: Forthcoming: Jellyfish Eyes
Jellyfish Eyes is now sitting at 25% on RT.
- domino harvey
- Dot Com Dom
- Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 6:42 pm
Re: Forthcoming: Jellyfish Eyes
Maybe Criterion will release this sans branding, like the Red Balloon
- Gregory
- Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 8:07 pm
Re: Forthcoming: Jellyfish Eyes
Possibly, but at iTunes it already bears the C that is wacky.
Haven't seen it and probably won't, but having read Murkami's statements about what he was going for, it seems preachy and trite. As he told Blouin Art Info, "after the great earthquake and tsunami disasters in 2011, I realized that people need narrative — a story is something that is necessary for people."
So what is this message that people need to be told so urgently because of disasters? In a different interview (Paper magazine), he said "Masashi's uncle ... doesn't do anything throughout the movie, he just tells children to do stuff and then leaves it to them. ... That's an example, but all the adults in the film are like that. The school teacher can't stop the bullying, the parents are actually hitting their own children, and so I was trying to emphasize that the adults are useless and that they don't have any power. Even so, the message is that the children need to find their own way and they need to go forward."
So that's it? Don't trust anyone over 30, or something like that? There's also the whole narrative about exploiting negative emotions as an energy source? The idea seems to be that negative emotions are bad and that children need things that foster positive emotions? Brilliant.
Haven't seen it and probably won't, but having read Murkami's statements about what he was going for, it seems preachy and trite. As he told Blouin Art Info, "after the great earthquake and tsunami disasters in 2011, I realized that people need narrative — a story is something that is necessary for people."
So what is this message that people need to be told so urgently because of disasters? In a different interview (Paper magazine), he said "Masashi's uncle ... doesn't do anything throughout the movie, he just tells children to do stuff and then leaves it to them. ... That's an example, but all the adults in the film are like that. The school teacher can't stop the bullying, the parents are actually hitting their own children, and so I was trying to emphasize that the adults are useless and that they don't have any power. Even so, the message is that the children need to find their own way and they need to go forward."
So that's it? Don't trust anyone over 30, or something like that? There's also the whole narrative about exploiting negative emotions as an energy source? The idea seems to be that negative emotions are bad and that children need things that foster positive emotions? Brilliant.
-
lefeufollet
- Joined: Thu Nov 01, 2012 1:54 pm
- Location: Philadelphia
Re: Forthcoming: Jellyfish Eyes
The iTunes edition of The Red Balloon is likewise graced with a C.Gregory wrote:Possibly, but at iTunes it already bears the C that is wacky.
- djproject
- Joined: Sat Oct 09, 2010 7:41 pm
- Location: Framingham, MA
- Contact:
Re: Forthcoming: Jellyfish Eyes
This just makes me want to see Kaze no tani no Naushika or Sen to Chihiro no Kamikakushi again.Gregory wrote:Haven't seen it and probably won't, but having read Murkami's statements about what he was going for, it seems preachy and trite. As he told Blouin Art Info, "after the great earthquake and tsunami disasters in 2011, I realized that people need narrative — a story is something that is necessary for people."
So what is this message that people need to be told so urgently because of disasters? In a different interview (Paper magazine), he said "Masashi's uncle ... doesn't do anything throughout the movie, he just tells children to do stuff and then leaves it to them. ... That's an example, but all the adults in the film are like that. The school teacher can't stop the bullying, the parents are actually hitting their own children, and so I was trying to emphasize that the adults are useless and that they don't have any power. Even so, the message is that the children need to find their own way and they need to go forward."
So that's it? Don't trust anyone over 30, or something like that? There's also the whole narrative about exploiting negative emotions as an energy source? The idea seems to be that negative emotions are bad and that children need things that foster positive emotions? Brilliant.
(You all are resourceful enough to figure this out. At least I didn't use kanji or hiragana renderings =D )
- danieltiger
- Joined: Wed Apr 16, 2014 12:48 am
- Location: San Francisco, CA
- Contact:
Re: Forthcoming: Jellyfish Eyes
If Criterion ever got their hands on the Miyazaki movies, I think I'd lose my shit a little bit.
- Michael Kerpan
- Spelling Bee Champeen
- Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 5:20 pm
- Location: New England
- Contact:
Re: Forthcoming: Jellyfish Eyes
If only Criterion would rescue Takahata's Omohide poro poro (Only Yesterday) from Disney -- which clearly never plans to release it itself in the US.
-
Polaroid
- Joined: Sat Dec 07, 2013 9:55 pm
Re: Forthcoming: Jellyfish Eyes
This film is pretty bad, managed to see it and I would say its worse than Armageddon. No idea why Criterion would touch this, I am struggling to see any skill in the film making.
- domino harvey
- Dot Com Dom
- Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 6:42 pm
Re: Forthcoming: Jellyfish Eyes
My God, why hast thou forsaken us?Trailer for Jellyfish Eyes 2